Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:26:36.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predation on the Pennsylvanian ammonoid Gonioloboceras and its implications for allochthonous vs. autochthonous accumulations of goniatites and other ammonoids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

R. H. Mapes ,
M. S. Sims  and
D. R. Boardman II
R. H. Mapes
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens 45701
M. S. Sims
Affiliation:
922 Laurel Avenue, Zanesville, OH 43701
D. R. Boardman II
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Damage displayed by 18 of 954 relatively mature (> 35 mm diameter) specimens of Gonioloboceras goniolobum (Meek) from North American Midcontinent Upper Carboniferous sediments is interpreted to be bite marks caused by condrichthyans and other fish, particularly the symmoriid shark Symmorium reniforme. It is likely that these and other predators regularly preyed on Gonioloboceras goniolobum because all of the analyzed specimens of Gonioloboceras exhibit some evidence of unrepaired damage, including broached camerae and missing body chambers. Two new characteristics utilized with caution to detect predatory events on ammonoids are raised oval or circular pedestals on internal molds and the breakage and termination of septa in conjunction with a broken external shell. When sufficient damage to the Gonioloboceras conchs occurred during predatory attacks, the broached camerae flooded, the conch became negatively buoyant, and it sank in the vicinity of the attack. When preserved, these conchs form a variable component of an autochthonous fossil accumulation that can include numerous other cephalopod taxa, which also were probably subjected to predatory attacks. Other, but not all, ammonoid accumulations in the fossil record form similar autochthonous deposits, or even autochthonous portions of mixed deposits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , May 1995 , pp. 441 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. R. 1981. Predation scars preserved in Chesterian brachiopods: probable culprits and evolutionary consequences for the articulates. Journal of Paleontology, 55:192–203.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. R. 1986. Resistance to and repair of shell breakage induced by durophages in Late Ordovician brachiopods. Journal of Paleontology, 60:273–285.Google Scholar
Boardman, D. R. II, Mapes, R. H., Yancey, T. E., and Malinky, J. M. 1984. A new model for the depth-related allogenic community succession within North American Pennsylvanian cyclothems and implications on the black shale problem, p. 141–182. In Hyner, N. J. (ed.), Limestones of the Mid-Continent. Tulsa Geological Society Special Publication 2.Google Scholar
Boardman, D. R. II, Work, D. M., Mapes, R. H., and Barrick, J. E. 1994. Biostratigraphy of Middle and Late Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian-Virgilian) ammonoids. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 232:121.Google Scholar
Bond, P. N. 1984. Sublethal predation of Upper Mississippian (Chesterian) ammonoids. Unpubl. , Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 80 p.Google Scholar
Bond, P. N., and Bukowski, F. 1990. A predator attacks Sphenodiscus . The Mosasaur, 4:69–74.Google Scholar
Bond, P. N., and Saunders, W. B. 1989. Sublethal injury and shell repair in Upper Mississippian ammonoids. Paleobiology, 15:414–428.Google Scholar
Boston, W. B., Sims, M. S., and Mapes, R. H. 1987. Predation on cephalopods from the Finis Shale (Pennsylvanian–Virgilian) of Texas. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 19:6.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A., Ward, P. D., and Weaver, J. S. 1981. Postmortem ascent of Nautilus shells: implications for cephalopod paleobiogeography. Paleobiology, 7:494–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, M. K. 1938. Revision of Gonioloboceras from late Paleozoic rocks of the Midcontinent Region. Journal of Paleontology, 12:91–100.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. C., and Mapes, R. H. 1990. A predator-prey relationship between sharks and cephalopods in the late Paleozoic, p. 182–192. In Boucot, A. (ed.), Evolutionary Paleobiology of Behavior and Co-evolution. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1977a. Origin of phosphatic black shale facies in Pennsylvanian cyclothems of Midcontinent North America. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 61:1045–1068.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1977b. Thin widespread Pennsylvanian black shales of Mid-continent North America: a record of a cyclic succession of widespread pycnoclines in a fluctuating epiric sea, p. 259–273. In Tyson, R. V. and Pearson, T. H. (eds.), Modern and Ancient Continental Shelf Anoxia. Geological Society Special Publication 58.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1990. Evidence for global (glacial-eustatic) control over Upper Carbonitorous (Pennsylvanian) cyclothems in midcontinent North America. In Hardman, R. F. P. and Brooks, J. (eds.), Tectonic Events Responsible for Britains Oil and Gas Reserves. Geological Society Special Publication, number 55.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G., and Kesling, R. 1960. An Upper Cretaceous ammonite bitten by a mosasaur. University of Michigan Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, 15:193–248.Google Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 1993. Evolution of the naicid gastropod predator-prey system: an evaluation of the hypothesis of escalation. Palaios, 8:358–375.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography, and biostratigraphy. Paleontological Association Special Papers in Paleontology, 17:94.Google Scholar
Kidder, D. L. 1985. Petrology and origin of phosphate nodules from the midcontinent Pennsylvanian epicontinental sea. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 55:809–816.Google Scholar
Kloc, G. T. 1987. Coprolites containing ammonoids from the Devonian of New York. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 19:23.Google Scholar
Lehmann, U. 1981. The Ammonites, Their Life and Their World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 246 p.Google Scholar
Mapes, R. H., and Hansen, M. C. 1984. Pennsylvanian shark–cephalopod predation: a case study. Lethaia, 17:175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapes, R. H., Hansen, M. C., and Boardman, D. R. II. 1987. Evidence of predation in Midcontinent upper Paleozoic anoxic and dysaerobic marine environments. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 19:28.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K., and Downs, H. R. 1950. Ammonoids of the Pennsylvanian Finis Shale of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 24:185–218.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., and Miles, R. S. 1971. Paleozoic Fishes. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 259 p.Google Scholar
Reedside, J. B., and Cobban, W. A. 1960. Studies of the Mowry Shale (Cretaceous) and contemporary formations in the United States and Canada. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 355:126.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B., Spinosa, C., and Davis, L. E. 1987. Predation on Nautilus , p. 201–212. In Saunders, W. B. and Landman, N. H. (eds.), Nautilus: The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York and London.Google Scholar
Sayre, A. N. 1930. The fauna of the Drum Limestone of Kansas and western Missouri. University of Kansas Bulletin 17, 31:73–160.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W. 1972. Ecology and Paleoecology of Marine Environments. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 568 p.Google Scholar
Sims, M. S. 1987. The systematics, paleoecology, and paleobiogeography of Gonioloboceras (Ammonoidea) from the middle and upper Pennsylvanian of North America. Unpubl. , Ohio University, Athens, 107 p.Google Scholar
Sims, M. S., Boston, W. B., and Mapes, R. H. 1987. Predation on an Upper Carboniferous ammonoid Gonioloboceras . Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 19:57–58.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. Mesozoic marine revolutions. Paleobiology, 3:245–258.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and Adaptation Patterns of Marine Life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London, 352 p.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1983. Traces and trends of predation with special reference to bivalve animals. Journal of Paleontology, 26:455–465.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and Escalation: An Ecological History of Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 527 p.Google Scholar
Ward, P. E. 1987. The Natural History of Nautilus . Allen and Unwin, Boston, 267 p.Google Scholar
Willey, A. 1902. Contributions to the Natural History of the Pearly Nautilus: Zoological Results Based on Material from New Britain, New Guinea, Loyality Islands and Elsewhere, Pt. 6:691–830, University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R. 1981. Chondrichthyes I, Paleozoic Elasmobrachii, 1–155. In Schultze, H. P. (ed.), Handbook of Paleoichthyology 3A. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, New York.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., and Richardson, E. S. 1963. The paleoecological history of two Pennsylvanian black shales. Fieldiana, Geology Memoir 4, 352 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar