Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:26:22.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogenetic studies of early Cenozoic Coryphodon (Mammalia, Pantodonta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Spencer G. Lucas  and
Robert M. Schoch
Spencer G. Lucas
Affiliation:
New Mexico Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7010, Albuquerque 87194
Robert M. Schoch
Affiliation:
Division of Science, Boston University, 871 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Juvenile specimens of the Paleocene–Eocene pantodont Coryphodon provide more extensive ontogenetic information for this genus than is available for other Paleocene–Eocene mammals. The dental eruption sequence for Coryphodon is: 1) (DC11, DI1–31–3); 2) DP44; 3) DP33; 4) DP22; 5) (M11, I33); 6) DP11, 7) M22; 8) P44; 9) P33; 10) (P22, I11?); 11) C11; 12) (M33, I22) (eruption sequence of tooth positions in parentheses is uncertain). The DP11 of Coryphodon do not have permanent successors. No significant, qualitative morphological variation can be detected in deciduous cheek teeth of Coryphodon, and metric analysis of these teeth failed to detect taxonomically significant differences. The ontogenetically youngest Coryphodon is known from parts of a skeleton of an individual perhaps less than three years old at the time of death. This skeleton and other partial juvenile skeletons suggest that juvenile Coryphodon grew quickly and approached near-adult proportions before the deciduous dentition was lost or the epiphyses of the long bones began to fuse.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 5 , September 1990 , pp. 831 - 841
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bown, T. M. 1979. Geology and mammalian paleontology of the Sand Creek facies, lower Willwood Formation (lower Eocene), Washakie County, Wyoming. Wyoming Geological Survey Memoir, 2:1–151.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1874. Report upon the vertebrate fossils discovered in New Mexico with descriptions of new species. Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers for 1874 (Government Printing Office), Appendix FF:589–596.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1877. Report upon the extinct Vertebrata obtained in New Mexico by parties of the expedition of 1874. Report of the U.S. Geographical Surveys West of the 100th Meridian (Wheeler), 2:1–370.Google Scholar
Dawson, A. B. 1925. The age order of epiphyseal union in the long bones of the albino rat. Anatomical Record, 31:1–17.Google Scholar
Dawson, A. B. 1935. The sequence of epiphyseal fusion in the skeleton of the mouse with special reference to the phenomenon of “lapsed” fusion. Anatomical Record, 63:93–99.Google Scholar
Edinger, T. 1929. Das fossilen Gehirne. Ergebnisse Anatomische Entwicklungsgeschichte, 28:1–249.Google Scholar
Edinger, T. 1956. Objet et resultats de la paleoneurologie. Annals de Paleontologie, 42:95–116.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J. F. 1981. The Mammalian Radiations: An Analysis of Trends in Evolution, Adaptation, and Behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 610 p.Google Scholar
Hare, W. C. D. 1961. The ages at which the centers of ossification appear roentgenographically in the limb bones of the dog. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 22:825–835.Google Scholar
Harris, S. 1978. Age determination in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)—an evaluation of technique efficiency as applied to a sample of suburban foxes. Journal of Zoology, London, 184:91–117.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. E. 1972. Period of gestation and body weight in some placental mammals. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (A), 43:673–679.Google Scholar
Koch, W. 1935. The age order of epiphyseal union in the skeleton of the European bison (Bos bonasus L.). Anatomical Record, 61:371–376.Google Scholar
Lucas, S. G. 1984. Systematics, biostratigraphy and evolution of early Cenozoic Coryphodon (Mammalia, Pantodonta). Unpubl. , , 649 p.Google Scholar
Simons, E. L. 1960. The Paleocene Pantodonta. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 50:1–99.Google Scholar
Stevenson, P. H. 1924. Age order of epiphyseal fusion in man. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 7:53–93.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. C. 1971. A theory of the evolution of therian dental formulas and replacement patterns. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46:226–249.Google Scholar