Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:33:08.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogenetic adaptations in some Pennsylvanian crinoids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Janet Peters  and
N. Gary Lane
Janet Peters
Affiliation:
Harding Lawson Associates, 7655 Redwood Blvd., Novato, California 94948
N. Gary Lane
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three species of Upper Pennsylvanian crinoids, two inadunates and one flexible, exhibit a sufficiently complete growth series to describe and quantify their ontogeny. Apographiocrinus typicalis (Moore and Plummer), Erisocrinus typus (Meek and Worthen), and Euonychocrinus simplex (Strimple and Moore) were collected from the middle shale of the Millersville Limestone Member of the Bond Formation at the Charleston Stone Quarry, Coles County, Illinois. Ten other crinoid species were collected in insufficient numbers for growth studies. Both bivariate and multivariate statistical procedures were used to analyze the growth of these crinoids.

In the inadunate crinoids skeletal growth was highly coordinated in the dorsal cup and cup plates. Arm length increased by addition of secundibrachials. Food groove width increased almost three times from immature to adult stages, thus allowing a larger range of food particles to be consumed by adults. Growth of the cup is isometric in E. typus and slightly anisometric in A. typicalis. Primibrachials in both species develop anisometrically. Immature specimens possess long, slender primibrachials, with the A ray plate being longest. In maturity, the primibrachials become equidimensional and equalized in all rays. The A ray arm is followed by the C and D ray arms, and finally the B and E ray arms, in sharp contrast to arm development in disparid inadunates. Pinnules appear late in the immature stage of growth. Primary emphasis on the expansion of the arms in young inadunates demonstrates a rapid establishment of a filtration-fan mode of feeding. Subsequent development involves widening of the plates for strength and support of the arms and to accommodate wider food grooves that permit a larger array of food particles to be captured.

The flexible crinoid, E. simplex, experienced a less correlated pattern of growth. Cup plates and arms grew isometrically and all arms were added simultaneously. Development suggests that flexibles fed differently than the associated inadunates and the cup may have played a less important role in functioning of the calyx.

The upright, elevated growth pattern of stalked crinoids exposed them to a sequence of competitive interactions with other epifaunal animals that had important adaptational ramifications for their evolution, diversity, and extinction. The fact that most living crinoids, stalked and unstalked, have abandoned a permanently fixed place of growth may have been an advantageous factor in their survival.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , May 1990 , pp. 427 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Yu. A. 1970. Morskie lilii gipokrinidy [Hypocrinid sea lilies]. Akademia Nauk SSSR. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Institut, 128:3–220.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1980. A model for niche differentiation in lower Mississippian crinoid communities. Journal of Paleontology, 54:273–288.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1978. Postlarval ontogeny of fossil crinoids—camerates, p. T244–T263. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2, 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C., and Veinus, J. 1974. The statistical zap versus the shotgun approach. Mathematical Geology, 6:311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J. C., and Veinus, J. 1975. Ontogeny of Hybocrinus punctatus (Miller and Gurley), an Ordovician crinoid. Mathematical Geology 7:129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, N. G., and Sevastopulo, G. D. 1981. Functional morphology of a microcrinoid: Kallimorphocrinus punctatus n.sp. Journal of Paleontology, 55:13–28.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G., and Sevastopulo, G. D. 1982. Microcrinoids from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 56:103–115.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G., and Sevastopulo, G. D. 1985. Redescription of Allagecrinus americanus Rowley, 1895, a late Devonian microcrinoid. Journal of Paleontology, 59:438–459.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B, and Worthen, A. H. 1865. Note in relation to a genus of crinoids (Erisocrinus) from the Coal Measures of Illinois and Nebraska. American Journal of Science, series 2, 39:350.Google Scholar
Messing, C. G., Rose-Smyth, M. C., Mailer, S. R., and Miller, J. E. 1988. Relocation movement in a stalked crinoid (Echinodermata). Bulletin of Marine Science, 42:480–487.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Lane, N. G. 1976. The feeding behavior of some Paleozoic crinoids and Recent basketstars. Journal of Paleontology, 50:472–480.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Plummer, F. B. 1940. Crinoids from the Upper Carboniferous and Permian strata in Texas. University of Texas Bulletin University of Texas Bulletin, 468 p.Google Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Brent, D. 1970. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, 675 p.Google Scholar
Pabian, R. K., and Strimple, H. L. 1974. Fossil crinoid studies, Pt. 4, Biometrical study of the morphology and development of a new species of Terpnocrinus Strimple and Moore, Pennsylvanian, Nebraska. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 73, p. 38–51.Google Scholar
Pabian, R. K., and Strimple, H. L. 1979. Notes of biometrics, paleoecology and biostratigraphy of Cibolocrinus conicus Strimple from Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska. Journal of Paleontology, 53:421–437.Google Scholar
Pabian, R. K., and Strimple, H. L. 1985. Classification, paleoecology, and biostratigraphy of crinoids from the Stull Shale (Late Pennsylvanian) of Nebraska, Kansas, and Iowa. University of Nebraska State Museum Bulletin, 11:1–81.Google Scholar
Peters, J. 1985. Ontogeny and taxonomy of some Pennsylvanian crinoids from the Millersville Limestone Member (Bond Formation), Missourian, in Coles County, Illinois. Unpubl. , , 103 p.Google Scholar
Rutman, J., and Fishelson, L. 1969. Food composition and behavior of shallow-water crinoids at Eilat (Red Sea). Marine Biology, 3:46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1969. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 776 p.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1920. The Crinoidea Flexibilia. Smithsonian Institution Publication Smithsonian Institution Publication, 486 p.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1939. A group of Pennsylvanian crinoids from the vicinity of Bartlesville, Oklahoma. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 24(87):1–27.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1949. Crinoid studies, Parts III-VII. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 32(133):1–42.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1950. Emendation of Erisocrinus tumidus (Strimple). Journal of Paleontology, 24:112–113.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1951. Some new species of Carboniferous crinoids. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 33:1–40.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1959. Crinoids from the Missourian near Bartlesville, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geology Notes, 19:115–127.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1977. A youthful specimen of Stenopecrinus ornatus (Crinoidea: Inadunata). Journal of Paleontology, 51:423–424.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L., and Moore, R. C. 1971. Crinoids of the LaSalle Limestone (Pennsylvanian) of Illinois. University of Kansas Paleontological Contribution, Article University of Kansas Paleontological Contribution, Article, 48 p.Google Scholar