Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:41:08.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A nonmarine pelecypod assemblage in the Pennsylvanian of Arizona and its correlation with a horizon in Pennsylvania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

R. M. C. Eagar  and
H. W. Peirce
H. W. Peirce
Affiliation:
Arizona Geological Survey, 845 North Park Avenue, Tucson 85719
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A nonmarine pelecypod occurrence was reported in 1977 within a zone of gray shaly mudstones yielding carbonized plants at Promontory Butte, Mogollon Rim, east-central Arizona. On paleobotanical evidence, the zone appeared then to be either of Late Carboniferous or Early Permian age. Work on 50 measurable shells indicates that the fauna is of Anthraconaia protracta Eagar and has wide variation. Standard dimensions of the Arizona fauna are identical to those of the type assemblage of A. protracta, which forms a thin band immediately above the Benwood Limestone of the Monongahela Group near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2,700 km to the east. The Arizona shell varieties match 50–60 percent of those from the band in Pennsylvania. Matching falls off rapidly to nil 70 m below this horizon and 100 m above it. Small differences in the trends of variation of the shells from Promontory Butte and Pennsylvania are accompanied by small differences in their respective host sediments, as reflected in their organic carbon and carbonate contents. When these results are compared with earlier conclusions on recurrent, apparently ecophenotypic, changes in the shape of Anthraconaia from other horizons in the Carboniferous and Lower Permian, they provide further evidence that the Arizona and Pennsylvania faunas were approximately contemporary. When the two bands are correlated, the Promontory Butte band is placed in the upper Pennsylvanian and in the upper Virgilian as traditionally accepted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 61 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrell, I. 1949. The shell morphology of some Swedish Unionids affected by ecological conditions. Arkiv för Zoologi, 41A:1–30.Google Scholar
Baars, D. L. 1990. Permian chronostratigraphy in Kansas. Geology, 18:687–690.Google Scholar
Baars, D. L. 1991. Reply on “Permian chronostratigraphy in Kansas.” Geology, 19:665–666.Google Scholar
Baird, G. C., Shabica, C. W., Anderson, J. L., and Richardson, E. S. Jr. 1985a. Biota of a Pennsylvanian muddy coast: habitats within the Mazonian delta complex, northeastern Illinois. Journal of Paleontology, 59:253–281.Google Scholar
Baird, G. C., Sroka, S. D., Shabica, C. W., and Beard, T. L. 1985b. Mazon Creek-type fossil assemblages in the U.S. midcontinent Pennsylvanian: their recurrent character and paleoenvironmental significance. Philosophical Transacations of the Royal Society of London, B311:87–99.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. A. (ed.). 1975. The Age of the Dunkard, p. i–xvii. Proceedings of the First I. C. White Memorial Symposium, September 25–29, 1972. West Virginia Geolgical and Economic Survey.Google Scholar
Beus, S. S., and Brew, D. C. 1978. Paleontology of the Naco Formation Kohl Ranch area, Arizona, p. 131–137. In Burt, D. M. and Pewe, T. L. (eds.), Guidebook to the Geology of Central Arizona. Department of Geology, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Blakey, R. C. 1990. Stratigraphy and geological history of Pennsylvanian and Permian rocks, Mogollon Rim region, central Arizona and vicinity. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 102:1189–1217.Google Scholar
Blazey, E. B. 1971. Fossil flora of the Mogollon Rim. Unpubl. , Arizona State University, Tempe, 169 p.Google Scholar
Blazey, E. B. 1974. Fossil flora of the Mogollon Rim, central Arizona. Palaeontographica, B148, Pt. 1–2:1–20.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1953. Life and death assemblages amongst fossils. American Journal of Science, 251:25–40.Google Scholar
Brew, D. C. 1965. Stratigraphy of the Naco Formation (Pennsylvanian) in central Arizona. Unpubl. , Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 201 p.Google Scholar
Daly, E. 1981. The unarmored dissorophids (Amphibia, Labyrinthodontia) with the description of a new genus from the Pennsylvanian of Kansas. Unpubl. , University of Kansas, Lawrence, 162 p.Google Scholar
Dickson, P. A. 1974. Some studies of certain Bivalvia in the Pennsylvanian of the Mazon Creek area with emphasis on palaeoecology. Unpubl. , University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K., 59 p.Google Scholar
Dickson, P. A. 1977. Permo-Carboniferous non-marine Bivalvia of the Appalachian Basin: their adaptive strategies and stratigraphical utility. Unpubl. , University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 178 p.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1961. A summary of the results of recent work on the palaeoecology of Carboniferous non-marine lamellibranchs. Comptes Rendus Quatrième Congrès pour l'avancement des études de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère, Heerlen, 15–20 Septembre, 1958, 1:137–149.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1970. Preliminary notes on some new Pennsylvanian marine and non-marine faunas in eastern U. S. A. Comptes Rendus Sixième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie Carbonifère, Sheffield 1967, 2:679–694.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1973. Variation in shape of shell in relation to palaeoecological station in some non-marine Bivalvia of the Coal Measures of southeast Kentucky and of Britain. Sonderdruck aus Septième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie Carbonifère, Krefeld 23–28 August 1971, 2:387–416.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1975. Some nonmarine bivalve faunas from the Dunkard Group and underlying measures. Proceedings of the First I. C. White Memorial Symposium, “The Age of the Dunkard,” September 25–29, 1972, West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Morgantown, West Virginia, p. 23–67.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1978. Shape and function of the shell: a comparison of some living and fossil bivalve molluscs. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 53:169–210.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1984. Late Carboniferous–early Permian nonmarine bivalve faunas of northern Europe and eastern North America. Compte Rendu Neuvième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie de Carbonifère, Washington and Champaign-Urbana, May 17–26, 1979, 2:559–576.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1985. The nonmarine bivalves of the succession of Stephanian B age in the Ciñera-Matallana Coalfield, p. 5–14. In Lemos de Sousa, M.J. and Wagner, R.H. (eds.), Papers on the Carboniferous of the Iberian Peninsula (Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, Palaeontology, Tectonics and Geochronology). Anais da Faculdade de Ciências, Universide do Porto. Supplement to Volume 64 (1963), Porto.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1987. The shape of the Upper Carboniferous non-marine bivalve Anthraconaia in relation to the organic carbon content of the host sediment. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Earth Sciences, 78:177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C. 1989. Repeated changes in shape of shell in shallow burrowing non-marine bivalves of the Carboniferous and early Permian Periods, p. 15–32. In Aldrich, J. C. (ed.), Phenotypic Responses and Individuality in Aquatic Ectotherms. Japaga Press, Ashford, Co. Wicklow, Ireland.Google Scholar
Groves, A. W. 1951. Silicate Analysis, 2nd edition. Allen and Unwin, London, 366. p.Google Scholar
Haas, F. 1969. Superfamily Unionacea Fleming, 1828, p. N411–467. In Moore, R. C., (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, 1, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Huddle, J., and Dubrovolny, E. 1945. Late Paleozoic stratigraphy of central and northeastern Arizona. Oil and Gas Investigations Preliminary Chart 10, U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. G., and Richardson, E. S. Jr. 1966. A remarkable Pennsylvanian fauna from the Mazon Creek area, Illinois. Journal of Geology, 74:626–631.Google Scholar
Maples, C. G., and Mapes, R. H. 1988. A preliminary note on Anthraconaia sp. from the Hamilton quarries (Pennsylvanian: Virgilian), Kansas, p. 89–93. In Mapes, G. and Mapes, R. H. (eds.), Regional Geology and Paleontology of Upper Paleozoic Hamilton Quarry Area in Southeastern Kansas. Guidebook Series 6, Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Maples, C. G., and Schultze, H.-P. 1988. Preliminary comparison of the Pennsylvanian assemblage of Hamilton, Kansas, with marine and non-marine contemporaneous asemblages, p. 253–273. In Mapes, G. and Mapes, R. H. (eds.), Regional Geology and Paleontology of Upper Paleozoic Hamilton Quarry Area in Southeastern Kansas. Guidebook Series 6, Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence.Google Scholar
McGoon, D. C. 1962. Occurrences of Paleozoic carbonaceous deposits in the Mogollon Rim region. Guidebook for the 13th Field Conference, New Mexico Geological Society, p. 89–91.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1987. The Westphalian tetrapod fauna; some aspects of its geography and ecology. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 144:495–508.Google Scholar
Morningstar, H. 1922. Pottsville fauna of Ohio. Bulletin of Ohio Geological Survey, 25:1–312.Google Scholar
Mozley, A. 1936. The fresh-water and terrestial Mollusca of northern Asia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 58:605–695.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1940. Paleozoic pelecypods Myalina and Naiadites . American Journal of Science, 238:286–295.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1942. Late Paleozoic pelecypods: Mytilacea. Report of the State Geological Survey of Kansas, No. 10, Pt. 2, p. 1–115.Google Scholar
Peirce, H. W. 1981. The Mississippian and Pennsylvanian (Carboniferous) Systems in the United States–Arizona. State of Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, Geological Survey Branch, Circular 21:Z1–Z20.Google Scholar
Peirce, H. W. 1989. Correlation problems of Pennsylvanian–Permian strata of the Colorado Plateau of Arizona p. 349–368. In Jenney, J.P. and Reynolds, S.J. (eds.), Geologic Evolution of Arizona. Arizona Geological Society Digest, 17.Google Scholar
Peirce, H. W., Jones, N., and Rogers, R. 1977. A survey of uranium favorability in Paleozoic rocks in the Mogollon Rim and Slope region, east-central Arizona. State of Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, Geological Survey Branch, Circular 19, 59 p.Google Scholar
Rascoe, B., and Baars, D. L. 1972. Permian System p. 305–352. In Mallory, W. W. (ed.), Geological Atlas of the Rocky Mountain Region. Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Remy, W. 1975. The floral change at the Carboniferous–Permian boundary in Europe and North America. Proceedings of the First I. C. White Memorial Symposium, “The Age of the Dunkard,” September 25–29, 1972, West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Morgantown, West Virginia, p. 305–352.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. J. 1965. A revision of the species of non-marine Bivalvia from the Upper Carboniferous of eastern North America. Journal of Paleontology, 39:683–686.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W., and Summerson, C. H. 1943. Non-marine Ostracoda from the Lower Pennsylvanian in the southern Appalachians, and their bearing on international correlation. American Journal of Science, 241:653–675.Google Scholar
Sohn, I. G. 1975. Dunkard Ostracoda—an evaluation. Proceedings of the First I. C. White Memorial Symposium, “The Age of the Dunkard,” September 25–29, 1972, West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Morgantown, West Virginia, p. 23–67.Google Scholar
Trueman, A. E. 1942. Supposed commensalism of Carboniferous spirorbids and certain non-marine lamellibranchs. Geological Magazine, 79:312–320.Google Scholar
Trueman, A. E. 1946. Stratigraphical problems in the Coal Measures of Europe and North America. Anniversary Address of the President. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 102:li–xciii.Google Scholar
Weir, J. 1966. A monograph of British Carboniferous non-marine lamellibranchia. Part XI. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, 120, Part XI (1966), p. 321–372.Google Scholar