Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:14:54.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new species of the clypeasteroid echinoid Astrodapsis from the Miocene Isidro Formation, Baja California Sur, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Richard L. Squires
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Northridge 91330
Robert A. Demetrion
Affiliation:
8839 Katherine Avenue, Panorama City, California 91402

Abstract

The clypeasteroid echinoid Astrodapsis bajasurensis n. sp. is described from upper middle Miocene beds of the Isidro Formation near the mouth of Arroyo Mezquital on the Pacific coast of north-central Baja California Sur, Mexico. The new species is the first occurrence of Astrodapsis outside of California and extends the southern limit of the genus by 1,100 km.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addicott, W. O. 1972. Provincial middle and late Tertiary molluscan stages, Temblor Range, California, p. 122. In Stinemeyer, E. H. and Church, C. C. (eds.), The Pacific Coast Miocene Biostratigraphic Symposium, Proceedings. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Agassiz, A. 1872–1874. Revision of the Echini. Illustrated Catalogue of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, No. VII. University Press, Cambridge, 761 p.Google Scholar
Argamakova, V. F. 1934. On some Neogene Echinoidea of Sakhalin. Transactions of the Oil Geology Institute (Leningrad), Series A, Fascicle 41:144.Google Scholar
Armentrout, J. M., Echols, R. J., and Ingle, J. C. 1984. Neogene biostratigraphic-chronostratigraphic scale for the northeastern Pacific margin, p. 171177. In Ikebe, N. and Tsuchi, R. (eds.), Pacific Neogene Datum Planes, Contributions to Biostratigraphy and Chronology. University of Tokyo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. 1906. The Tertiary and Quaternary pectens of California. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 47, 264 p.Google Scholar
Beadle, S. C. 1989. Ontogenetic regulatory mechanisms, heterochrony, and eccentricity in dendrasterid sand dollars. Paleobiology, 15:205222.Google Scholar
Beal, C. H. 1948. Reconnaissance of the geology and oil possibilities of Baja California, Mexico. Geological Society of America Memoir 31, 138 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1856. Description of three new genera, twenty-three new species middle Tertiary fossils from California and one from Texas. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8:312316.Google Scholar
Darton, N. H. 1921. Geologic reconnaissance in Baja California. Journal of Geology, 29:720748.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1952. Not Astrodapsis in Japan. Journal of Paleontology, 26:844846.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1953. New name for Nipponaster Durham, 1952. Journal of Paleontology, 27:756.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1955. Classification of clypeasteroid echinoids. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 31:73198.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1966. Clypeasteroids, p. U450U491. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. U, Vol. 2, Echinodermata 3. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. E., Grant, U. S., and Allen, H. B. 1941. Miocene of Caliente Range and environs, California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 25:193262.Google Scholar
Grant, U. S. IV, and Hertlein, L. G. 1938. The west American Cenozoic Echinoidea. Publications of the University of California at Los Angeles in Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 2:1225.Google Scholar
Hall, C. A. Jr. 1962. Evolution of the echinoid genus Astrodapsis . University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 40:47180.Google Scholar
Heim, A. 1922. Notes on the Tertiary of southern Lower California (Mexico). Geological Magazine, 59:529547.Google Scholar
Hertlein, L. G. 1925. Pectens from the Tertiary of Lower California. California Academy of Sciences, 4th series, 14:135.Google Scholar
Hertlein, L. G. 1933. Additions to the Pliocene fauna of Turtle Bay, Lower California, with a note on the Miocene diatomite. Journal of Paleontology, 7:440.Google Scholar
Hertlein, L. G. 1934. New oysters and a new Pecten from the Tertiary of California. Southern California Academy of Sciences Bulletin, 33(Pt. 1):15.Google Scholar
Hertlein, L. G., and Grant, U. S. IV. 1960. The geology and paleontology of the marine Pliocene of San Diego, California (Paleontology: Coelenterata, Bryozoa, Brachiopoda, Echinodermata). Memoirs of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 2(Pt. 2a):73133.Google Scholar
Hertlein, L. G., and Jordan, E. K. 1927. Paleontology of the Miocene of Lower California. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 4th series, 16:605647.Google Scholar
Hoots, H. W. 1931. Geology of the eastern part of the Santa Monica Mountains, Los Angeles County, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 165-C:83134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. K., and Hertlein, L. G. 1926. Contributions to the geology and paleontology of the Tertiary of Cedros Island and adjacent parts of Lower California. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 4th series, 15:409464.Google Scholar
Kew, W. S. W. 1915. Tertiary echinoids from the San Pablo Group of middle California. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geology, 8:365376.Google Scholar
Kew, W. S. W. 1920. Cretaceous and Cenozoic Echinoidea of the Pacific coast of North America. University of California Publication, Bulletin of the Department of Geology, 12:23236.Google Scholar
Khomenko, J. 1931. Materials on the stratigraphy of the Tertiary beds of the eastern Sakhalin oilfield. Transactions of the Geological and Prospecting Service of U.S.S.R., Fascicle 79:1126.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. 1914. P. 241320. In Lambert, J. and Thiéry, P., Essai de Nomenclature Raisonneé des Échinides, Fascicule IV. Libraire L. Fernère, Chaumont.Google Scholar
McLean, H., Hausback, B. P., and Knapp, J. H. 1985. Reconnaissance geologic map of part of the San Isidro quadrangle, Baja California Sur, Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies, Map MF-1799.Google Scholar
McLean, H., Hausback, B. P., and Knapp, J. H. 1987. The geology of west-central Baja California Sur, Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1579, 15 p.Google Scholar
Mina, F. 1957. Bosquejo geológico del Territorio Sur de la Baja California. Asociacíon Mexicana de Geólogos Petroleros Boletín, 9:139269.Google Scholar
Minch, J. C., Gastil, G., Fink, W., Robinson, J., and James, A. H. 1976. Geology of the Vizcaino Peninsula, p. 136195. In Howell, D. G. (ed.), Aspects of the Geologic History of the California Continental Borderland. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Pacific Section, Miscellaneous Publications 24.Google Scholar
Nisiyama, S. 1948. Astrodapsis in Japan. Journal of Paleontology, 22:601605.Google Scholar
Perri, M. L., and Fritsche, A. E. 1988. Stratigraphy and depositional environments of the Miocene Branch Canyon Formation in the Sierra Madre, Caliente Range, and Sespe Creek areas, California, p. 8798. In Bazeley, W. J. M. (ed.), Tertiary Tectonics and Sedimentation in the Cuyama Basin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura Counties, California. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Book 59, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Poore, R. Z., Barron, J. A., and Addicott, W. O. 1984. Biochronology of the northern Pacific Miocene, p. 165169. In Ikebe, N. and Tsuchi, R. (eds.), Pacific Neogene Datum Planes, Contributions to Biostratigraphy and Chronology. University of Tokyo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Richards, G. L. Jr. 1936. Astrodapsis faunal zones of California upper Miocene and lower Pliocene formations. Geological Society of America Proceedings for 1935, p. 412413.Google Scholar
Smith, J. T. 1984. Miocene and Pliocene marine mollusks and preliminary correlations. Vizcaino Peninsula to Arroyo La Purisima, northwestern Baja California Sur, Mexico, p. 197217. In Frizzell, V. A. Jr. (ed.), Geology of the Baja California Peninsula. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Smith, J. T. 1986. Middle Tertiary rocky substrate mollusks from Baja California Sur, Mexico. American Malacological Bulletin, 4:112.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L., and Demetrion, R. 1990. New Eocene marine bivalves from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 64:382391.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L., and Demetrion, R. 1992. Paleontology of the Eocene Bateque Formation, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 430, 55 p.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E., and the Western Cenozoic Subcommittee. 1944. Correlation of the marine Cenozoic formations of western North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 55:569598.Google Scholar