Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:05:05.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New species of protocetid archaeocete whale, Eocetus wardii (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the middle Eocene of North Carolina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

M. D. Uhen
M. D. Uhen*
Affiliation:
Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48303-0801,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new species of protocetid archaeocete, Eocetus wardii n. sp., is named based on material from the late Lutetian (middle Eocene, 43-44 Ma) Comfort Member of the Castle Hayne Formation, North Carolina. This material includes portions of the skull, thoracic, lumbar and caudal vertebrae, ribs, and the right innominate. The innominate (pelvis exclusive of the sacral vertebrae) has some characters in common with the innominata of other protocetids, including sufficient size to support a weight-bearing hind limb. This suggests that Eocetus wardii was capable of both terrestrial and aquatic locomotion. The innominate also includes some features in common with basilosaurid archaeocetes including a shift in the relative positions of the pubis and obturator foramen. In addition, the bone histology of Eocetus is found to be very different from that of other archaeocetes and sirenians (sea cows and dugongs). The ribs and vertebrae are composed of a central area of trabecular bone enveloped by layers of dense cortical bone. Eocetus has previously only been known from a few specimens from Gebel Mokattam near Cairo, Egypt. This identification makes Eocetus the only protocetid archaeocete genus known from both sides of the Atlantic Ocean.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , May 1999 , pp. 512 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, L. B. 1996. A protocetid cetacean from the Eocene of South Carolina. Journal of Paleontology, 70(3):519–522.Google Scholar
Andrews, C. W. 1920. A description of new species of zeuglodont and of leathery turtle from the Eocene of southern Nigeria. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1919(3-4):309–319.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G., and Mitchell, E. 1978. Cetacea, p. 582–602. In Maglio, V. J., and Cooke, H. B. S. (eds.), The Evolution of African Mammals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brisson, A. D. 1762. Regnum Animates in IX Classes.Google Scholar
Buffrénil, V. de, de Rlcqles, A., Ray, C. E., and Domning, D. P. 1990. Bone histology of the ribs of the archaeocetes (Mammalia: Cetacea). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 10(4):455–466.Google Scholar
Domning, D. P., and Buffr, V. D.énil. 1991. Hydrostasis in the Sirenia: Quantitative data and functional interpretations. Marine Mammal Science, 7(4):331–368.Google Scholar
Élouard, P. 1966. Découverte d'un archéocète dans les environs de Kaolack. Notes Africaines, 109:8–10.Google Scholar
Fawcett, D. W. 1942. The amedullary bones of the Florida manatee (Trichechus latirostris). American Journal of Anatomy, 71(2):271–308.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Bice, K. L., Hopkins, C. S., Salva, E. W., and Pickford, K. 1998. Decapod crustaceans from the Eocene Castle Hayne Limestone, North Carolina: Paleoceanographic implications. Journal of Paleontology, The Paleontological Society Memoir, 48:1–28.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. C. 1992. Stratigraphic Parsimony, p. 124–129. In Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R.MacClade 3.0 Manual. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Flower, W. H. 1883. On the arrangement of the orders and families of existing Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1883:178–186.Google Scholar
Fraas, E. 1904a. Neue Zeuglodonten aus dem unteren Mittelecocän vom Mokattam bei Cairo. Geologische und Palæontologische Abhandlungen, Jena, Neue Folge, 6(3):199–220.Google Scholar
Fraas, E. 1904b. Neue Zeuglodonten aus dem unteren Mitteleozän von Mokattam bei Cairo. Geologisches Centralblatt, 5(1048):374.Google Scholar
Geisler, J., and Sanders, A. E. 1996. A new protocetid cetacean from the Eocene of South Carolina, U.S.A.; phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Sixth North American Paleontological Convention Abstracts of Papers. The Paleontological Society Special Publication, 8:139.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1992. Marine mammals (Cetacea and Sirenia) from the Eocene of Gebel Mokattam and Fayum, Egypt: stratigraphy, age and paleoenvironments. University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology Papers on Paleontology, 30:1–84.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D., Arif, M., and Clyde, W. C. 1995. New archaeocetes (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the middle Eocene Domanda Formation of the Sulaiman Range, Punjab (Pakistan). Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 29(11):291–330.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D., Smith, B. H., and Simons, E. L. 1990. Hind limbs of Eocene Basilosaurus: Evidence of feet in whales. Science, 229:154–157.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D., Arif, M., Bhatti, M. A., Raza, H. A., and Raza, S. M. 1995. Protosiren and Babiacetus (Mammalia, Sirenia and Cetacea) from the middle Eocene Drazinda Formation, Sulaiman Range, Punjab (Pakistan). Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 29(12):331–357.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D., Raza, S. M., Arif, M., Anwar, M., and Zhou, X. 1993. Partial skeletons of Indocetus ramani (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the lower middle Eocene Domanda Shale in the Sulaiman range of Punjab (Pakistan). Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 28(16):393–416.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D., Raza, S. M., Arif, M., Anwar, M., and Zhou, X. 1994. New whale from the Eocene of Pakistan and the origin of cetacean swimming. Nature, 368:844–847.Google Scholar
Halstead, L. B., and Middleton, J. A. 1974. New material of the archaeocete whale, Pappocetus lugardi Andrews, from the middle Eocene of Nigeria. Journal of Mining and Geology, 8(1 & 2):81–85.Google Scholar
Harris, W. B., and Laws, R. A. 1997. Paleogene stratigraphy and sea-level history of the North Carolina Coastal Plain: global coastal onlap and tectonics. Sedimentary Geology, 108:91–120.Google Scholar
Harris, W. B., and Zullo, V. A. 1991. Eocene and Oligocene stratigraphy of the outer Coastal Plain, p. 251–262. In Horton, J. W. J., and Zullo, V. A. (eds.), The Geology of the Carolinas. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Hazel, J. E., Bybell, L. M., Edwards, L. E., Jones, G. D., and Ward, L. W. 1984. Age of the Comfort Member of the Castle Hayne Formation, North Carolina. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 95:1040–1044.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C., and Petkewich, R. M. 1991. Innominate of a middle Eocene (Lutetian) protocetid whale from Georgia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11(3):36A.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C., Petkewich, R. M.Bishop, G. A., Bukry, D., and Aleshire, D. P. 1998. A new middle Eocene protocetid whale (Mammalia: Cetacea: Archaeoceti) and associated biota from Georgia. Journal of Paleontology, 72(5):905–925.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. 1936. A Review of the Archaeoceti. Carnegie Institute of Washington, 482:1–366 p.Google Scholar
Köhler, R., and Fordyce, R. E. 1997. An archaeocete whale (Cetacea: Archaeoceti) from the Eocene Waihao Greensand, New Zealand. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17(3):574–583.Google Scholar
Krstic, R. V. 1985. General Histology of the Mammals, p. 404. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kumar, K., and Sahni, A. 1986. Remingtonocetus harudiensis, new combination, a Middle Eocene archaeocete (Mammalia, Cetacea) from western Kutch, India. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 6(4):326–349.Google Scholar
Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution Version 3. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. A., and Barnes, L. G. 1990. Archaeocete cetaceans from the Atlantic Coastal Plain of the United States, including a new protocetid. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 9(3):35A.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. A., and Barnes, L. G. 1996. The systematic position of Pappocetus lugardi and a new taxon from North America (Archaeoceti: Protocetidae). Sixth North American Paleontological Convention Abstracts of Papers. The Paleontological Society Special Publication, 8:270.Google Scholar
Sahni, A., and Mishra, V. P. 1975. Lower Tertiary vertebrates from western India. Monograph of the Palaeontological Society of India, 3:1–48.Google Scholar
Stromer, E. 1903. Zeuglodon-reste aus dem Oberen Mitteleocän des Fajum. Beiträge zur Paläontologie und Geologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, 15:65–100.Google Scholar
Stromer, E. 1908. Die Urwale (Archaeoceti). Anatomischer Anzeiger, 33(4 & 5):81–88.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1991. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
Thewissen, J. G. M., Madar, S. I., and Hussain, S. T. 1996. Ambulocetus natans, an Eocene cetacean (Mammalia) from Pakistan. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 191:1–86.Google Scholar
Trivedy, A. N., and Satsangi, P. P. 1984. A new archaeocete (whale) from the Eocene of India. Abstract. of the 27th International Geological Congress, Moscow, 1:322–323.Google Scholar
Uhen, M. D. 1996. New protocetid archaeocete (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the late middle Eocene Cook Mountain Formation of Louisiana. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16(3):70A.Google Scholar
Uhen, M. D. 1998a. New protocetid (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the late middle Eocene Cook Mountain Formation of Louisiana. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18(3):664–668.Google Scholar
Uhen, M. D. 1998b. Middle to Late Eocene Basilosaurines and Dorudontines, p. 29–61. In Thewissen, J. G. M. (ed.), The Emergence of Whales. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
van Beneden, P. J., and Gervais, P. 1880. Ostéographie des Cétacés Vivants et Fossiles, 634 p. Arthus Bertrand, Paris.Google Scholar