No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
New Permian polyplacophora (Mollusca) from Malaysia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Abstract
Extraordinarily large, thick shelled polyplacophorans occur in the Permian limestone in the province of Perak, Malaysia. Three new genera and species are proposed: Hadrochiton pileus, Pyknochiton lunatus, and Kraterochiton magnificus. The occurrence of K. magnificus extends the range of the family Acutichitonidae into the Middle Permian.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society 2000
References
Batten, R. L.
1972. Permian gastropods and chitons from Perak, Malaysia, Pt. 1, Chitons, bellerophontids, euomphalids and pleurotomarians. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 147(1):1–44.Google Scholar
Bergenhayn, J. R. M.
1955. Die Fossilen Schwedischen Loricaten nebst einer vorlufigen Revision des Systems der ganzen Klasse Loricata. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, n.f. Avd. 2, 51(8); Kungliga Fysiografiska Sällskapets, Handlingar, n.f., Avd. 2,66(8):1-41.Google Scholar
Brady, L. F.
1955. Possible nautiloid mandibles from the Permian of Arizona. Journal of Paleontology, 29(1):102–104.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H. B.
1861. Dyas oder die Zechsteinformation und das rothliegende, Pt. 1, die animalischen ueberreste der Dyas. p. 53–56, Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H.
1908. The Guadalupian Fauna. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper, 58, 651 p.Google Scholar
Gobbott, D. J., and Hutchison, C. S.
1973. Geology of the Malay Peninsula. Wiley & Sons, New York, 438 p.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Mapes, R. H.
1985. New Mississippian and Pennsylvanian Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from North America. Journal of Paleontology, 59(4):875–881.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Mapes, R. H. and Atwater, D. E.
1983. Pennsylvanian Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from Oklahoma and Texas. Journal of Paleontology
57(5):992–1000.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., Mapes, R. H. and Smith, A. G.
1984. Permian Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from West Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 58(1):82–103.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Sturgeon, M. T.
1976.
Arcochiton raymondi n. gen., n. sp. of polyplacophoran from the Pennsylvanian of Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 50(5):841–845.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., Sturgeon, M. T. and Hoare, T. B.
1972. Middle Pennsylvanian (Allegheny Group) Polyplacophora from Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 46(5):675–680.Google Scholar
Iredale, T., and Hull, A. F. B.
1926. A monograph of the Australian Loricates, VIII, Apendix B, Paleoloricata. Australian Zoology, 4(5):324–328.Google Scholar
King, W.
1846. On a Magnesian-limestone species of Chiton. Charlesworth's London Journal of Geology, 1:10–12.Google Scholar
King, W.
1850. A Monograph on the Permian Fossils of England. Palaeontographical Society. 258 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, J. W.
1858. On some Permian fossils from Dunham. Transactions of the Tynesdale Naturalist's Field Club, 3:286–295.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. D. de.
1883. Faune du calcaire carbonifere de la Belgique, Pt. 4, Gastéropodes. Annales Musée Royale de'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique. séries Paléontologie, 8(4):198–213.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A.
1892. Monograph of the Polyplacophora. Manual of Conchology, Volume 14, 352 p.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E.
1910. A preliminary list of the fauna of the Allegheny and Conemaugh Series in western Pennsylvania. Annales of the Carnegie Museum, 7(1):144–158.Google Scholar
Risso, J. A.
1826. Histoire naturelle des principales production de l'Europe méridionale. Volume 4, F. G. Levrault, Paris. 439 p.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G.
1976. Two new Permian chitons from West Texas (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). The Veliger, 18(3):281–288.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. P.
1858. Descriptions of new Carboniferous fossils from the Appalachian, Illinois, and Michigan coalfields. American Journal of Science, 25(74):258–265.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L.
1971. The Permian nautiloid mandible Rhynchoteuthis kaibabensis reinterpreted as a polyplacophoran. Journal of Paleontology, 45(1):130–133.Google Scholar