Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T03:42:06.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New fusulinids from Lower Permian turbidites at Conglomerate Mesa, southeastern Inyo Mountains, east-central California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Calvin H. Stevens  and
Paul Stone
Calvin H. Stevens
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, California 95192,
Paul Stone
Affiliation:
2U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seven previously unrecognized fusulinid species from Lower Permian (Wolfcampian and Leonardian) turbidites near Conglomerate Mesa in east-central California, four of which are named as new species, are here described and figured. the four new species are Schwagerina merriami, S. wildei, Parafusulina mackevetti, and Skinnerella rossi. These fusulinid species have close affinities to similar taxa in Texas and northeastern Nevada, and they are distinct from some other faunas of slightly different age in the Conglomerate Mesa area that are dominated by endemic species and other species with Eastern Klamath Mountains affinities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 399 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beede, J. W. and Kniker, H. T. 1924. Species of the genus Schwagerina and their stratigraphic significance. University of Texas, Bureau of Economic Geology and Technology Bulletin, 2433:1–96.Google Scholar
Coogan, A. H. 1960. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Permian Nosoni and Dekkas Formations (Bollibokka Group). University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 36(5):243–315.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. and Henbest, L. G. 1930. The fusulinid genera Fusulina, Fusulinella, and Wedekindella. American Journal of Science, series 5, 20:357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. and Skinner, J. W. 1931. New fusulinids from the Permian of west Texas. America Journal of Science, 22:252–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. and Skinner, J. W. 1936. Schwagerina versus Pseudoschwagerina and Paraschwagerina. Journal of Paleontology, 10:83–91.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. and Skinner, J. W. 1937. Permian Fusulinidae of Texas: The Geology of Texas, Pt. 2. University of Texas. Bureau of Economic Geology and Technology Bulletin, 3701(3):517–825.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G. 1842. Der Bergkalk am Onega-See aus Polythalamien bestehend. Konigslike Preussiche Akademie Wissenschaft Berlin, Berichte Verhandlugen, p. 273–275.Google Scholar
Knight, R. L. 1956. Permian fusulines from Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 30(4):773–792.Google Scholar
Magginetti, R. T., Stevens, C. H., and Stone, P. 1988. Early Permian fusulinids from the Owens Valley Group, east-central California. Geological Society of America Special Paper 217, 61 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklukho-Maklai, A. D. 1953. K sistematike semeistva Fusulinidae Moeller. Uchenyye Zapiski LGU (Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta), Seriya Geologicheskaya, 3:159:12–24.Google Scholar
Möller, V. von. 1877. Ueber Fusulinen and ahnliche Foraminiferen-Formen des russischen Kohlenkalks. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Geologie, und Palaeontologie, 1877:139–146.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A. 1959. The Wolfcamp series (Permian) and new species of fusulinids, Glass Mountains, Texas: Washington Academy of Sciences Journal, 49:299–316.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A. 1960. Fusulinids from the Hess Member of the Leonard Formation, Leonard Series (Permian), Glass Mountains, Texas. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 11(4):117–133.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A. 1962. Fusulinids from the Leonard Formation (Permian), western Glass Mountains, Texas: Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 13:1–22.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. W. and Wilde, G. L. 1965. Permian Biostratigraphy and Fusulinid Faunas of the Shasta Lake Area, Northern California. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Protozoa, Article 6, 98 p.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. H. and Stone, P. 2007. The Pennsylvanian–Early Permian Bird Spring Carbonate Shelf, Southeastern California: Fusulinid Biostratigraphy, Paleogeographic Evolution, and Tectonic Implications. Geological Society of America Special Paper 429, 82 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, C. H. and Stone, P. 2009. New Permian fusulinids from Conglomerate Mesa, southeastern Inyo Mountains, east-central California. Journal of Paleontology, 83(1):9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P., Dunne, G. C., Stevens, C. H., and Gulliver, R. M. 1989. Geologic map of Paleozoic and Mesozoic rocks in parts of the Darwin and adjacent quadrangles, Inyo County, California. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series, Map 1-1932, scale 1:31,250.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. L. 1954. American Wolfcampian Fusulinids. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Protozoa, Article 5, 225 p.Google Scholar
White, M. P. 1932. Some Texas Fusulinidae. University of Texas Bull. 3211, 105 p.Google Scholar