Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:33:44.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Early Eocene mollusks from the Orocopia Mountains, southern California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Richard L. Squires  and
David M. Advocate
Richard L. Squires
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Northridge 91330
David M. Advocate
Affiliation:
Exxon Company USA, Thousand Oaks, California 91359-5025
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five new species of mollusks are described from the early Eocene Maniobra Formation, northeastern Orocopia Mountains, southern California. The new species are from the basal part of the formation, and the fauna is indicative of the West Coast provincial molluscan early Eocene “Capay Stage.” The mollusks are shallow-marine forms that were transported a short distance into slope/upper submarine-canyon deposits.

Chedevillia saltonensis n. sp. and Eocypraea? maniobraensis n. sp. resemble Eocene species from Paris Basin, France. Phalium (Semicassis) louella n. sp. is the earliest North American species of Semicassis. Volutilithes orocopiaensis n. sp. is the earliest North American species of this genus and resembles V. muricinus from Paris Basin. Glossus (Meiocardia) susukii n. sp. is the earliest reported species of Meiocardia on the West Coast of North and South America.

Galeodea gallica, a species previously only known from lower Eocene strata in the Anglo-Paris Basin, is tentatively identified from the Maniobra Formation. Campanilopa dilloni, previously only known from south-central California, is present in the formation. Supplementary descriptions and illustrations are given for these two species.

The Maniobra species described have a close relationship to species characteristic of the Eurasian Tethyan paleobiogeographic province. The age of the Maniobra mollusks permits greater resolution of the timing of the westward migration of the Eurasian species, indicating that much of it occurred during early Eocene and/or late Paleocene time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , July 1986 , pp. 851 - 864
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, R. T. 1968. The helmet shells of the world (Cassidae). Part 1. Indo-Pacific Mollusca, 2:15–202.Google Scholar
Advocate, D. M. 1983. Depositional environments of the Eocene Maniobra Formation, northeastern Orocopia Mountains, Riverside County, southern California. Unpubl. Master's thesis, California State University, Northridge, 112 p.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V. and Flynn, J. J. In press. Paleogene geochronology and chronostratigraphy. In Snelling, N. J. (ed.), Geochronology and the Geological Record. Geological Society of London, Special Paper.Google Scholar
British Museum Natural History. 1975. British Cenozoic Fossils (Tertiary and Quaternary), ed. 5. British Museum of Natural History, London, Publication 540, 132 p.Google Scholar
Chédeville, P. J. 1904a. Description de fossiles nouveaux du bassin Tertiaire de Paris. Bulletin de la Société d'étude des Sciences Naturelles d'Elbeuf, 4th sér., 22:101–106.Google Scholar
Chédeville, P. J. 1904b. Liste générale et synonymique des fossiles Tertiaires du bassin de Paris. Bulletin de la Société d'étude des Sciences Naturelles d'Elbeuf, 4th sér., supplément, 22:375–438.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. 1942. New middle Eocene gastropods from California. Journal of Paleontology, 16:116–119.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. and Vokes, H. E. 1936. Summary of marine Eocene sequence of western North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 47:851–878.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. and Durham, J. W. 1946. Eocene faunas from the Department of Bolivar, Colombia. Geological Society of America Memoir 16, 126 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1899. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée, 3. Private publication, Paris, 201 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1903. Essias de paléoconchologie comparée, 5. Private publication, Paris, 213 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1904. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée, 6. Private publication, Paris, 148 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1906a. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée, 7. Private publication, Paris, 261 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1906b. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Eocène des environs de Paris. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, Appendice No. 4, 41:186–286.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. and Pissarro, G. 1910-1913. Iconographie completé des coquilles fossiles de l'Eocène des environs de Paris. Société Géologique de France, Vol. 2, 65 pls., Paris.Google Scholar
Crowell, J. C. and Susuki, T. 1959. Eocene stratigraphy and paleontology, Orocopia Mountains, southeastern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 70:581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, D. et al. 1978. A correlation of Tertiary rocks in the British Isles. Geological Society of London Special Report 12, 72 p.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M. 1971. Tertiary Faunas. Vol. 1. The Composition of Tertiary Faunas. Revision by Eames, F. E. American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 571 p.Google Scholar
Davies, A. M. 1975. Tertiary Faunas. Vol. 2. The Sequence of Tertiary Faunas. Revision by Eames, F. E. and Savage, R. J. G. George Allen and Unwin, London, 447 p.Google Scholar
Delpey, G. 1941. Histoire du genre Campanile . Annales de Paléontologie, 29:3–25.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1824-1837. Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris, 2. Private publication, Paris, 780 p.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1866. Description des animaux sans vertébres découverts dans le bassin de Paris. Vol. 3 of text, Vol. 2 of atlas. J. B. Bailliere et Fils, Paris, 667 p. (text), 107 pls. (atlas).Google Scholar
Dickerson, R. E. 1914. Fauna of the Martinez Eocene of California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 8:61–180.Google Scholar
Dickerson, R. E. 1916. Stratigraphy and fauna of the Tejon Eocene of California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 9:363–524.Google Scholar
Dixon, F. 1850. The Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex. Taylor, London, 422 p.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1904. Paleontologie, mollusques fossiles, p. 191–380. In de Morgan, J., Mission scientifique en Perse, Vol. 3, pt. 4. E. Leroux, Paris.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils, p. 55–243. In Meek, F. B. and Gabb, W. M., Palaeontology of California, Geological Survey of California, Vol. 1, Palaeontology. Caxton Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R. 1974. Eocene molluscan biostratigraphy of the Pine Mountain area, Ventura County, California, University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 109:1–107.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R. 1978. An occurrence of the Tethyan genus Volutilithes (Gastropoda: Volutidae) in the Eocene of California. Journal of Paleontology, 52:104–108.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R. and Kennedy, M. P. 1979. Eocene molluscan stages and their correlation, San Diego area, California, p. 81–95. In Abbott, P. L. (ed.), Eocene Depositional Systems, San Diego, California. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Glibert, M. 1963. Les Mesogastropoda fossiles du Cénozoique étranger des collections de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique. Part 2, Fossaridae to Ficidae (included). Brussels. Mémoires Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, sér. 2, Vol. 73, 154 p.Google Scholar
Hanna, G. D. 1924. Rectifications of nomenclature. California Academy of Sciences Proceedings, 4th ser. 13:151–186.Google Scholar
Hanna, G. D. and Hertlein, L. G. 1949. Two new species of gastropods from the middle Eocene of California. Journal of Paleontology, 23:392–394.Google Scholar
Harris, G. D. 1896. The Midway Stage. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 1:1–157.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. M. 1942. Type fossil Cypraeidae of North America. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 27(104):1–32.Google Scholar
Iredale, T. 1917. More molluscan name-changes, generic and specific. Malacological Society of London Proceedings, 12:322–330.Google Scholar
Kanno, S. 1973. Japanese Tertiary cassids (Gastropoda) and their related mollusks from the west coast of North America. Tohoku University Science Reports, ser. 2 (Geology), Special Volume 6 (Hatari Memorial Volume), p. 217–233.Google Scholar
Kappeler, K. A., Squires, R. L. and Fritsche, A. E. 1984. Transgressive marginal-marine deposits of the Avenal Sandstone, Reef Ridge, central California, p. 9–27. In Blueford, J. R. (ed.), Kreyenhagen Formation and Related Rocks. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. and Bentson, H. 1944. Check list of California Tertiary marine Mollusca. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 56:1–280.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. and Casey, R. 1969. Superfamily Glossacea Gray, 1847, p. 657–664. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, (N) Mollusca 6. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1802. Mémoire sur les fossiles des environs de Paris. Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 1:299–312, 383–391, 474–479.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1804. Mémoire sur les fossiles des environs de Paris. Annales de Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 3, 4, 5, variously paged.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1805. Mémoire sur les fossiles des environs de Paris. Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 6:117–126, 214–228.Google Scholar
Lhomme, L. 1904. Coquilles fossiles trouvées en 1903 dans les sables de Saint-Gobrain (Yprésian). Feuille des Jeunes Naturalistes Paris, no. 401, p. 103–106.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. N. 1925. A contribution to the paleontology of the Martinez Eocene of California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 15:397–466.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1967. A comparison of certain Eocene molluscs of the Americas with those of the western Tethys, p. 183–193. In Adams, C. G. and Ager, D. V. (eds.), Aspects of Tethyan Biogeography. Systematics Association Publication, no. 7.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1977. The unpublished vélins of Lamarck (1802–1809) illustrations of fossils of the Paris Basin Eocene. Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York, 67 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. and Brann, D. C. 1965. Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene Mollusca of the southern and eastern United States. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 48(218):1–1057.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. and Olsson, A. A. 1954. Systems of the Volutidae. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 35(152):1–36.Google Scholar
Pomerol, C. 1982. The Cenozoic Era (Tertiary and Quaternary). Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, England, 272 p.Google Scholar
Quoy, J. R. and Gaimard, J. P. 1834. Voyage de la corvette L'Astrolabe. Vol. 3, pt. I. Paris.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1983. Notes on Paleogene turritellas, venericardias, and molluscan stages of the Simi Valley area, California, p. 71–80. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Schenck, H. G. 1926. Cassididae of western America. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 16:69–98.Google Scholar
Schilder, F. A. 1932. Cypraeacea. Fossilium Catalogus I, pt. 55, 276 p.Google Scholar
Schilder, F. A. 1966. The higher taxa of cowries and their allies. The Veliger, 9:31–35.Google Scholar
Schilder, F. A. 1967. The generic classification of cowries. The Veliger, 10:264–273.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1983. New mollusks from the lower middle Eocene Llajas Formation, southern California. Journal of Paleontology, 57:354–362.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1984. Megapaleontology of the Eocene Llajas Formation, Simi Valley, California. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Contributions in Science 350, 76 p.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1927. Gabb's California fossil type gastropods. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Proceedings, 78:287–447.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1935. The genus Velates in the Eocene of California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 23:381–390.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1939. Molluscan faunas of the Domengine and Arroyo Hondo Formations of the California Eocene. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 38:1–246.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1940. Gastropoda: Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia, p. 721–960. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Band 6, Gastropoda, Teil 4. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1941. Gastropoda: Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia, p. 961–1200. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Band 6, Gastropoda, Teil 5. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1943. Gastropoda: Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia, p. 1200–1506. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Band 6, Gastropoda, Teil 6. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wrigley, A. 1934. English Eocene and Oligocene Cassididae, with notes on the nomenclature and morphology of the family. Malacological Society of London Proceedings, 21:108–130.Google Scholar
Wrigley, A. 1940. The English Eocene Campanile . Malacological Society of London Proceedings, 24:97–112.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1974. Paleocene biostratigraphy of the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Riverside, 236 p.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1983. Late Paleocene (“Martinez Provincial Stage”) molluscan fauna from the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California, p. 61–70. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar