Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T13:40:44.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New data on the genus Diadeloplax Hoare and Mapes, 1995

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

R. D. Hoare  and
R. H. Mapes
R. D. Hoare
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
R. H. Mapes
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Ohio University, Athens 45701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Calyptraea antiqua Howse (1848, 1858), based upon a plate from the Permian of England, was included in the Polyplacophora. King (1850) questioned this assignment since Calyptraea is a gastropod. Kirkby (1859) placed C. antiquus (Howse) in the genus Chitonellus Lamarck, 1819 and described two new species from the Permian of England, C. hancockianus and C. distortus. Kirkby and Young (1867) described another taxon, C. subantiquus, from the Carboniferous of Scotland. Branson (1948) questioned the assignment of these species to the Polyplacophora. Smith and Hoare (1987) rejected them from the class. Kirkby also included other specimens in Chitonellus; these are now assigned to the polyplacophoran Glyptochiton deKoninck, 1883. Geinitz (1861) followed the assignment of Kirkby and recognized three species using Kirkby's (1859) illustrations.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 74 , Issue 5 , September 2000 , pp. 976 - 978
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Branson, C. C. 1948. Bibliographic Index of Permian Invertebrates. Geological Society of America, Memoir 26, 1049 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geinitz, H. B. 1861. Dyas oder die Zechsteinformation und das Rothiliegende. Vol. 1, p. 53–56. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1888. Trilobites and other Crustacea of the Oriskany, Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, Chemung and Catskill Groups. New York Geological Survey, Paleontology 7, 236 p.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Mapes, R. H. 1995. Relationship of the Devonian Strobilepis and related Pennsylvanian problematica. Acta Palaeontologica Polanica, 40:111–128.Google Scholar
Howse, R. 1848. A catalogue of the fossils of the Permian System of the counties of Northumberland and Durham, drawn up at the request of the Tyneside Naturalist's Field Club. Transactions of the Tyneside Naturalist's Field Club, 1:219–264.Google Scholar
Howse, R. 1858. Notes on the Permian System of Northumberland and Durham, being a supplement to the catalogue of fossils of the Permian System of these counties. Transactions of the Tyneside Naturalist's Field Club, 3:235–285.Google Scholar
King, W. 1850. A Monograph of the Permian Fossils of England. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 3, 258 p.Google Scholar
Kirkby, J. W. 1859. On the Permian Chitonidae. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 15:607–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, J. W., and Young, J. 1867. Notes on some remains of Chiton and Chitonellus from the Carboniferous strata of Yorkshire and the west of Scotland. Geological Magazine, 4:340–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koninck, L. G. DE. 1883. Faune du calcaire carbonifère de la Belgique, Pt. 4, Gastéropodes. Annales Musée Royale d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, séries Paléontology, Vol. 8, 240 p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. D. M. DE. 1819. Histoire naturelledes animaux sans vertèbres. Vol. 6, pt. 1, 343 p. Lamarck, Paris.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., and Hoare, R. D. 1987. Paleozoic Polyplacophora: a checklist and bibliography. California Academy of Sciences, Occasional Papers 146, 71 p.Google Scholar