Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:19:43.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nacre in late Cretaceous Sensuitrochus ferreri—implications for the taxonomic affinities of the Cirridae (Gastropoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Steffen Kiel  and
Jiří Frýda
Steffen Kiel
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin, Fachrichtung Paläontologie, Institut für Geologische Wissenschaften, Malteserstraße 74-100, Haus D, 12249, Germany,
Jiří Frýda
Affiliation:
Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, 118 21 Praha 1, Czech Republic,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gastropods belonging to the extinct family Cirridae Cossmann, 1916 are relatively rare elements of Mesozoic marine communities. The unusual change in shell coiling from dextral to sinistral during their ontogeny represents a character which makes their recognition in the fossil record easy. This shell feature is also known from members of the Paleozoic family Porcelliidae Koken in Zittel, 1895, uniting the planispirally coiled Porcelliinae with the sinistrally coiled Agnesiinae Knight, 1956. This heterostrophy is not homologous with that of the Heterobranchia (Frýda and Blodgett, 2001). Shells of Porcelliinae and Agnesiinae bear an apertural slit, in contrast to the Mesozoic Cirridae. According to Bandel (1993a), slit-bearing members of the Porcelliidae evolved into the Cirridae without slit during the Triassic. Therefore Bandel (1993a) united both families into one natural group, the Cirroidea. That name has now been changed into Porcellioidea, according to the older family name (see discussion in Bandel and Frýda, in press). The oldest representatives of the Porcelliidae were reported from Silurian strata (Frýda, 1997). The youngest Cirridae are known from Late Cretaceous strata (Kiel and Bandel, 2002). Frýda and Blodgett (1998) described an Emsian (Early Devonian) porcellioid—Alaskacirrus bandeli—without slit as in the Mesozoic Cirridea, and pointed out that phylogenetic relationships of the Paleozoic Porcelliidae and Mesozoic Cirridae are still uncertain. The placement of the Porcellioidea within the Archaeogastropoda is based on the discovery of an archaeogastropod-type protoconch in the Paleozoic Porcelliidae (Yoo, 1994) as well as in the Mesozoic Cirridae (Bandel, 1993a). In addition, Bandel (1993a) mentioned the presence of a nacreous inner layer in a Mesozoic cirrid. This observation was from an unpublished master's thesis (Hänsel, 1992) supervised by him. Hänsel (1992) demonstrated that nacre is present in shells of the Late Cretaceous cirrid Sensuitrochus ferreri Quintero and Revilla, 1966 (Fig. 1.1), using peels of polished and etched shells to determine the shell structure. Although this observation is important for the interpretation of the higher taxonomic position of the Cirridae, it was never published. The aim of the present study is to document the presence of nacreous shell in the Mesozoic cirrid Sensuitrochus ferreri, using scanning electron microscopy.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , July 2004 , pp. 795 - 797
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandel, K. 1982. Morphologie und Bildung der frühontogenetischen Gehäuse bei conchiferen Mollusken. Fazies, 7:1–198.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1991. Schlitzbandschnecken mit perlmutteriger Schale aus den triassischen St. Cassian-Schichten der Dolomiten. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien (A), 92:1–53.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1993a. Evolutionary history of sinistral archaeogastropods with and without slit (Cirroidea, Vetigastropoda). Freiberger Forschungshefte, C450:41–81.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1993b. Trochomorpha (Archaeogastropoda) aus den Cassian Schichten (Dolomiten, Mittlere Trias). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien (A), 95:1–99.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., and Frýda, J.In press. Sasakiela, a new Early Carboniferous porcelliid genus (Porcellioidea, Gastropoda) with an unusual shell ontogeny. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., and Geldmacher, W. 1996. The structure of the shell of Patella crenata connected with suggestions to the classification and evolution of the Archaeogastropoda. Freiberger Forschungshefte, C464:1–71.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., Nützel, A., and Yancey, T. E. 2002. Larval shells and shell microstructures of especially well-preserved Late Carboniferous gastropods from the Buckhorn Asphalt deposit (Oklahoma, USA). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 82:639–689.Google Scholar
Batten, R. L. 1972. The ultrastructure of five common Pennsylvanian pleurotomarian gastropod species of Eastern United States. American Museum Novitates, 2501:1–34.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1916. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée 10. Privately published, Paris, 292 p.Google Scholar
Erben, H. K., and Krampiz, G. 1972. Ultrastruktur und Aminosäuren-Verhältnisse in den Schalen der rezenten Pleurotomariidae (Gastropoda). Biomineralisation, 6:12–31.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1822. The Philosophy of Zoology; or a General View of the Structure, Functions, and Classification of Animals. A. Constable, Edinburgh, 618 p.Google Scholar
Frýda, J. 1997. Oldest representatives of the superfamily Cirroidea (Vetigastropoda) with notes on early phylogeny. Journal of Paleontology, 71:839–847.Google Scholar
Frýda, J. 2001. Discovery of a larval shell in Middle Paleozoic subulitoidean gastropods with description of two new species from the Early Devonian of Bohemia. Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey, 76:29–37.Google Scholar
Frýda, J., and Blodgett, R. B. 1998. Two new cirroidean genera (Vetigastropoda, Archaeogastropoda) from the Emsian (late Early Devonian) of Alaska with notes on the early phylogeny of Cirroidea. Journal of Paleontology, 72:265–273.Google Scholar
Frýda, J., and Blodgett, R. B. 2001. The oldest known heterobranch gastropod, Kuskokwimia gen. nov., from the Early Devonian of west-central Alaska, with notes on the early phylogeny of higher gastropods. Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey, 76:39–53.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonymy and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Record of London, 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Hänsel, K. N. 1992. Geologische Kartierung und Untersuchung der Gastropodenfauna aus dem Campan südwestlich von Pobla de Segur. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hamburg, 163 p.Google Scholar
Hedegaard, K. 1990. Shell structure of the recent Archaeogastropoda. Thesis for the candidate of sciences degree, University of Aahus, Denmark, 154 p.Google Scholar
Hedegaard, K., Lindberg, D. R., and Bandel, K. 1997. Shell microstructure of a Triassic patellogastropod limpet. Lethaia, 30:331–335.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. S. 1988. Archaeogastropod evolution, phylogeny and systematics: a re-evaluation. Malacological Review (supplement), 4:17–34.Google Scholar
Kiel, S., and Bandel, K. 2001. Trochidae (Archaeogastropoda) from the Campanian of Torallola in northern Spain. Acta Geologica Polonica, 51:137–154.Google Scholar
Kiel, S., and Bandel, K. 2002. Further Archaeogastropoda from the Campanian of Torallola, northern Spain. Acta Geologica Polonica, 52:239–249.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B. 1956. New families of Gastropoda. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 46:41–42.Google Scholar
MacClintock, C. 1967. The shell structure of patelloid and bellerophontoid gastropods (Mollusca). Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University Bulletin, 22:1–140.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F., and Lindberg, D. R. 1997. Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: an analysis using morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 119:83–256.Google Scholar
Quintero, I., and Revilla, J. 1966. Algunas especies nuevas y otras poco conocidas. Notas y comunicaciones del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, 82:27–86.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou Tableau de l'univers et des corps organisées. Barraveccia, Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Simó, A. 1986. Carbonate platform depositional sequences, Upper Cretaceous, south-central Pyrenees (Spain). Tectonophysics, 129:205–231.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A Treatise on Malacology; or the Natural Classification of Shells and Shell-fish. Longman, London, 419 p.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1884. Second catalogue of Mollusca recently added to the fauna of the New England coast and the adjacent part of the Atlantic, consisting mostly of deepsea species, with notes on others previously recorded. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 6:139–194.Google Scholar
Wise, S. W. 1970. Microarchitecture and mode of formation of Nacre (Mother-of-Pearl) in Pelecypods, Gastropods, and Cephalopods. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 63:775–797.Google Scholar
Yoo, E. K. 1994. Early Carboniferous Gastropoda from the Tamworth Belt, New South Wales, Australia. Records of the Australian Museum, 46:63–120.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1895. Grundzüge der Paläontologie (Paläozoologie), Abt. I, Invertebrata. Oldenburg, München, 971 p.Google Scholar