Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:55:21.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multielement reconstructions of Palmatolepis and Polygnathus (Upper Devonian, Famennian) from the Canning Basin, Australia, and Bactrian Mountain, Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Ronald A. Metzger
Ronald A. Metzger*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Upper Devonian (Famennian) sequences were sampled at two sections in the Canning Basin, Western Australia, and a section at Bactrian Mountain, Nevada, over an interval ranging from the Upper crepida Zone into the Lower marginifera Zone of the standard conodont zonation for the Famennian. Over 30,000 conodont elements have been identified among 43 species and subspecies within six genera. New complete and partial multielement reconstructions are illustrated for: Palmatolepis falcata, P. glabra prima, P. loba, P. minuta minuta, P. perlobata perlobata, P. perlobata maxima, P. quadrantinodosalobata, P. rhomboidea, P. schindewolfi, P. subgracilis, P. wolskae, Polygnathus cf. P. diversus, P. glaber glaber, P. nodocostatus nodocostatus, P. subnormalis, and P. cf. P. triphyllatus. The reconstructions are based on stratigraphic occurrence, detailed morphologic similarities, and a few exceptional low-diversity faunas. Additionally, Palmatolepis adamantea n. sp. is proposed based on the Pa element.

A more precise understanding of the taxonomic boundaries of Palmatolepis is achieved through knowledge of the entire apparatus, rather than confined to the Pa elements. Reconstructions presented here provide a more comprehensive understanding of the range of morphologic variation that exists in Palmatolepis, and show that a single generalized elemental plan can be demonstrated for all members of the genus. The differences in the non-Pa elements can thus be used to refine taxonomy and increase understanding of phylogenetic relationships at the specific and subspecific level.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , May 1994 , pp. 617 - 647
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, W. I., and Ozias, K. 1968. Intraspecific variation within the conodont Polygnathus brevilamina. Iowa Academy of Science Proceedings, 73:263–269(imprint 1966).Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1925. Classification and stratigraphic use of the conodonts. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 36:218–220.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. 1956. Oberdevonische Conodonten (to I delta) aus dem Rhenischen Schiefergebirge. Notizblatt des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung zu Wiesbaden, 84:115–137.Google Scholar
van den Boogaard, M. 1963. Conodonts of Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous age from southern Portugal. Geologie en Mijnbouw, 42:248–259.Google Scholar
Boogaard, M. van den., and Kuhry, B. 1979. Statistical reconstruction of the Palmatolepis apparatus (Late Devonian conodontophorids) at the generic, subgeneric, and specific level. Scripta Geologica, 49:1–57.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. 1938. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri. Part I. The University of Missouri Studies, 13(3), 208 p.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B., and Mehl, M. G. 1934. Conodonts from the Grassy Creek Shale of Missouri. The University of Missouri Studies, 8:171–259[imprint 1933].Google Scholar
Branson, E. B., and Mehl, M. G. 1938. The conodont genus Icriodus and its stratigraphic distribution. Journal of Paleontology, 12:156–166.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1974. Middle Devonian conodonts from the Harrogate Formation, southeastern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 11:1461–1484.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L., and Ethington, R. L. 1967. Conodonts and zonation of the Upper Devonian in the Great Basin. Geological Society of America, Memoir 103, 94 p.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L., Sweet, W. C., Bergström, S. M., Klapper, G., Austin, R. L., Rhodes, F. H. T., Müller, K. J., Ziegler, W., Lindström, M., Miller, J. F., and Harris, A. G. 1981. Conodonta. In Robison, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part W, Miscellanea, Supplement 2. Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 202 p.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. L. 1931. New conodonts from the Woodford Formation of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 5:230–243.Google Scholar
Dreesen, R. M. J. 1984. Stratigraphic correlation of Famennian oolitic ironstones in the Havelange (Dinant Basin) and Verveirs boreholes (Vesdre Massif) (Upper Devonian, Belgium). Bulletin de la Societe beige de Geologie, 93:197–211.Google Scholar
Dreesen, R. M. J., and Dusar, M. 1974. Refinement of conodont biozonation in the Famennian type area. International Symposium on Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Visean, Namur, Belgium Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Visean, Namur, Belgium Geological Survey Publication 13, 36 p.Google Scholar
Druce, E. C. 1976. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Upper Devonian reef complexes of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Bulletin, 158, 303 p.Google Scholar
Dusar, M., and Dreesen, R. M. J. 1985. Stratigraphy of the Upper Frasnian and Famennian deposits in the region of Hamoir-sur-Ourthe (Dinant Synclinorium, Belgium). Belgian Geological Survey Professional Paper 209, 55 p.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1976. Remarks on the evolution of Ordovician conodonts. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 21:395–455.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1991. Evolution of oral apparatuses in the conodont chordates. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 36:265–323.Google Scholar
Fåhraeus, L. E. 1982. Palmatolepis conodont apparatuses—empirically derived composition and structure (Conodontophorida, Upper Devonian). Geologica et Palaeontologica, 16:111–118.Google Scholar
Glenister, B. F., and Klapper, G. 1966. Upper Devonian conodonts from the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 40:777–842.Google Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1959. Conodonts from the Chappel Limestone of Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 294J:365–400.Google Scholar
Helms, J. 1959. Conodonten aus dem Saalfelder Oberdevon (Thüringen). Geologie, 8:634–677.Google Scholar
Helms, J. 1961. Die “nodocostata-Gruppe” der Gattung Polygnathus, Oberdevonische Conodonten. Geologie, 10:674–711.Google Scholar
Helms, J. 1963. Zur “Phylogenese” und Taxionomie von Palmatolepis (Conodontida, Oberdevon), Geologie, 12:449–485.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1879. On conodonts from the Chazy and Cincinnati Group of the Cambro-Silurian, and from the Hamilton and Genesee-Shale divisions of the Devonian, in Canada and the United States. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 35:351–369.Google Scholar
Irwin, S. E. B., and Orchard, M. J. 1991. Upper Devonian–Lower Carboniferous conodont biostratigraphy of the Earn Group and overlying units, northern Canadian Cordillera, p. 185–213. In Orchard, M. J. and McCracken, A. D. (eds.), Ordovician to Triassic Conodont Paleontology of the Canadian Cordillera. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 417.Google Scholar
Johnston, D. I., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1991. Famennian conodont biostratigraphy of the Palliser Formation, Rocky Mountains, Alberta and British Columbia, Canada, p. 163–183. In Orchard, M. J. and McCracken, A. D. (eds.), Ordovician to Triassic Conodont Paleontology of the Canadian Cordillera. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 417.Google Scholar
Khalymbadzha, V. G., and Chernysheva, N. G. 1978. Konodonty verkhnedevonskikh otlozheniy tsentral'noy chasti Volgo-Ural'skoy oblasti i ikh stratigraficheskoe znachenie, p. 3–42. In Stratigrafiya i Paleontologiya Paleozoya vostoka Russkoy Platformy. Izdatel'stvo Kazanskogo Universiteta, Kazan'.Google Scholar
Klapper, G. 1991. Multielement species-level taxonomy of Palmatolepis (Late Devonian, Frasnian) (Abstract). Canadian Paleontology Conference I, Vancouver, Canada, p. 43.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Foster, C. T. Jr. 1986. Quantification of outlines in Frasnian (Upper Devonian) platform conodonts. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 23:1214–1222.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Lane, H. R. 1985. Upper Devonian (Frasnian) conodonts of the Polygnathus biofacies, N.W.T., Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 59:904–951.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Philip, G. M. 1971. Devonian conodont apparatuses and their vicarious skeletal elements. Lethaia, 4:429–452.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Philip, G. M. 1972. Familial classification of reconstructed Devonian conodont apparatuses. Geologica et Palaeontologica, SB1:97–114.Google Scholar
Kuzmin, A. V. 1990. Asimmetricheskiye pary platformennykh u nektoykh predstaviteley roda Polygnathus (konodonty). Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1990(4):66–74.Google Scholar
Lange, F.–G. 1968. Conodonten-Gruppenfunde aus Kalken des tieferen Oberdevon. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 2:37–57.Google Scholar
Matyja, H. 1987. Conodont biofacies of the Famennian Stage of Pomerania, northwestern Poland, p. 363–381. In Austin, R. L. (ed.), Conodonts: Investigative Techniques and Applications, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar
Mehl, M. G., and Ziegler, W. 1963. A neotype for Palmatolepis gracilis Branson and Mehl 1934. Denison University, Scientific Laboratories, Journal, 45:197–206[imprint 1962].Google Scholar
Merrill, G. K., von Bitter, P. H., and Grayson, R. C. Jr. 1990. The generic concept in conodont paleontology—growth, changes and developments in the last two decades. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 118:397–408.Google Scholar
Metzger, R. A. 1989. Upper Devonian (Frasnian–Famennian) conodont biostratigraphy in the subsurface of north-central Iowa and southeastern Nebraska. Journal of Paleontology, 63:503–524.Google Scholar
Metzger, R. A. 1991. Multielement reconstructions of Palmatolepis (Upper Devonian, Famennian) from the Canning Basin, Western Australia and their taxonomic implications. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 23(5):279.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1956. Zur Kenntnis der Conodonten-Fauna des europäischen Devons, I. Die Gattung Palmatolepis. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 494, 70 p.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Müller, E. M. 1957. Early Upper Devonian (Independence) conodonts from Iowa, Part I. Journal of Paleontology, 31:1069–1108.Google Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1980. The multielement genus Apatognathus from the Late Devonian of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Alcheringa, 4:133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, R. S. 1985. Multielement composition of the conodont species Polygnathus xylus xylus Stauffer, 1940 and Ozarkodina brevis (Bischoff & Ziegler, 1957) from the Upper Devonian of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. BMR Journal of Geology & Geophysics, 9:133–147.Google Scholar
Orchard, M. J. 1989. Conodonts from the Frasnian–Famennian boundary interval in Western Canada, p. 35–52. In McMillan, N. J., Embry, A. F., and Glass, D. J. (eds.), Devonian of the World. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14, Volume III [imprint 1988].Google Scholar
Over, D. J. 1992. Conodonts and the Devonian–Carboniferous Boundary in the Upper Woodford Shale, Arbuckle Mountains, south-central Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 66:293–311.Google Scholar
Ovnatanova, N. S. 1969. Novye verkhnedevonskie konodonty tsentral'nykh rayonov Russkoy Platformy i Timana. Vsesoyuzyy Nauchno-Issledovatel'skiy Geologorazvedochnyy Neftyanoy Institut, Trudy, Vypusk, 93:139–141.Google Scholar
Ovnatanova, N. S. 1976. Novye pozdnedevonskiye konodonty Russkoy platformy. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1976:106–115.Google Scholar
Ovnatanova, N. S. 1979. Frasnian–Famennian conodonts of the Volga-Ural region. Belgian Geological Survey Professional Paper 161:62–70.Google Scholar
Pander, C. H. 1856. Monographie der fossilen Fische des Silurischen Systems der Russich-Baltischen Gouvernements. Akademie der Wissenschaften, St. Petersburg, 91 p.Google Scholar
Pavlicek, M. I. 1986. Upper Devonian conodont biostratigraphy in the subsurface of south-central and southeastern Iowa. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 142 p.Google Scholar
Perri, M. C., and Spalletta, C. 1990. Famennian conodonts from Clymenid pelagic limestone, Carnic Alps, Italy. Palaeontographia Italica, 77:55–83.Google Scholar
Puchkov, V. N., Klapper, G., and Mashkova, T. V. 1982. Natural assemblages of Palmatolepis from the Upper Devonian of the northern Urals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 26:281–298.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A. 1976. Conodont biofacies of the Late Devonian Polygnathus styriacus Zone in Western United States. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 15:171–186.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., and Dreesen, R. 1984. Late Devonian icriodontid biofacies models and alternate shallow-water conodont zonation, p. 143–178. In Clark, D. L. (ed.), Conodont Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 196.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., and Ziegler, W. 1973. Refinement of standard Upper Devonian conodont zonation based on sections in Nevada and West Germany. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 7:97–122.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., and Ziegler, W. 1979. Taxonomy and biofacies of important conodonts of Late Devonian styriacus-Zone, United States and Germany. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 13:173–212.Google Scholar
Sannemann, D. 1955a. Beitrag zur Untergliederung des Oberdevons nach Conodonten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 100:324–331.Google Scholar
Sannemann, D. 1955b. Oberdevonische Conodonten (to II alpha). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 36:123–156.Google Scholar
Sparling, D. 1981. Middle Devonian conodont apparatuses with seven type of elements. Journal of Paleontology, 55:295–316.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1988. The Conodonta: morphology, taxonomy, paleoecology, and evolutionary history of a long-extinct animal phylum. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, 10, 212 p.Google Scholar
Szulczewski, M. 1971. Upper Devonian conodonts, stratigraphy and facial development in the Holy Cross Mts. Acta Geologica Polonica, 21:1–129.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Bassler, R. S. 1926. A classification of the toothlike fossils, conodonts, with descriptions of American Devonian and Mississippian species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 68(12), 63 p.Google Scholar
Vorontzova, T. N., and Kuzmin, A. V. 1984. New species of conodonts of Polygnathus genus from Famennian sediments of Central Kazakhstan. Izvesitya Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Seriya Geologiya, 1984, 10:58–64.Google Scholar
Wang, C.-Y., and Ziegler, W. 1983. Devonian conodont biostratigraphy of Guangxi, South China, and the correlation with Europe. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 17:75–107.Google Scholar
Wang, K., and Bai, S. 1989. Faunal changes and events near the Frasnian–Famennian boundary of South China, p. 71–78. In McMillan, N. J., Embry, A. F., and Glass, D. J. (eds.), Devonian of the World. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14, Volume III [imprint 1988].Google Scholar
Weddige, K. 1984. Zur Stratigraphie und Palaogeographie des Devons und Karbons von NE-Iran. Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 65:179–223.Google Scholar
Wolska, Z. 1967. Upper Devonian conodonts from the south-west region of the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 12:363–456.Google Scholar
Youngquist, W. L. 1945. Upper Devonian conodonts from the Independence Shale (?) of Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 19:355–367.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1958. Conodontenfeinstratigraphische Untersuchungen an der Grenze Mitteldevon/Oberdevon und in der Adorfstufe. Notizblatt des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 87:7–77.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1962a. Taxionomie und Phylogenie Oberdevonischer Conodonten und ihre stratigraphische Bedeutung. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 38, 166 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1962b. Die Conodonten aus den Gerollen des Zechsteinkonglomerates von Rossenray (südwestlich Rheinberg/Niederrhein). Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen, 6:1–15[preprint 1960].Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1972. Uber devonische Conodonten-Apparate. Geologica et Palaeontologica, SB 1:91–96.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. (ed.) 1973. Catalogue of Conodonts, I. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 504 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. (ed). 1975. Catalogue of Conodonts, II. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 404 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. (ed.). 1977. Catalogue of Conodonts, III. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 574 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. (ed.). 1979. Givetian and Upper Devonian conondont zonation, p. 199–224. In Klapper, G. and Ziegler, W., Devonian conodont biostratigraphy. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 23.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., and Huddle, J. W. 1969. Die Palmatolepis glabra-Gruppe (Conodonta) nach der Revision der Typen von Ulrich & Bassler durch J.W. Huddle. Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen, 16:377–386.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., and Sandberg, C. A. 1984. Palmatolepis-based revision of upper part of standard Late Devonian conodont zonation, p. 179–194. In Clark, D. L. (ed.), Conodont Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 196.Google Scholar
Zvereva, Y. V. 1986. Discovery of a conodont apparatus from the Devonian of the Priurals. Scripta Publishing Co., Paleontological Journal translation from Russian Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 16, 1:127–129.Google Scholar