Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:58:12.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphometrics and paleoecology of Catenipora (Tabulata) from the Xiazhen Formation (Upper Ordovician), Zhuzhai, South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2016

Kun Liang Open the ORCID record for Kun Liang [Opens in a new window] ,
Robert J. Elias ,
Suk-Joo Choh Open the ORCID record for Suk-Joo Choh [Opens in a new window] ,
Dong-Chan Lee  and
Dong-Jin Lee
Kun Liang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Economic Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China 〈[email protected]〉
Robert J. Elias
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada 〈[email protected]〉
Suk-Joo Choh
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 136-701, Korea 〈[email protected]〉
Dong-Chan Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences Education, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 361-763, Korea 〈[email protected]〉
Dong-Jin Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Andong National University, Andong, 760-749, Korea 〈[email protected]〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Catenipora is one of the most common tabulate coral genera occurring in various lithofacies in the Upper Ordovician Xiazhen Formation at Zhuzhai in South China. A combination of traditional multivariate analysis and geometric morphometrics is applied to a large number of specimens to distinguish and identify species. Based on three major principal components extracted from 11 morphological characters, three major groups as determined by the cluster-analysis dendrogram are considered to be morphospecies. Their validity and distinctiveness are confirmed by discriminant analysis, descriptive statistics, and bivariate plots. Tabularium area and common wall thickness are the most meaningful characters to distinguish the three morphospecies. Geometric morphometrics is adopted to compare the morphospecies with types and/or figured specimens of species previously reported from the vicinity of Zhuzhai. Despite discrepancies in corallite size, principal component analysis and discriminant analysis, as well as consideration of overall morphological characteristics, indicate that the morphospecies represent C. zhejiangensis Yu in Yu et al., 1963, C. shiyangensis Lin and Chow, 1977, and C. dianbiancunensis Lin and Chow, 1977.

Catenipora occurs in seven stratigraphic intervals in the Xiazhen Formation at Zhuzhai, representing a variety of heterogeneous environments. The coralla preservation is variable due to differential compaction; coralla preserved in limestones are commonly intact and in growth position, whereas those in shales are mostly crushed or fragmentary. The size and shape of corallites are considered primarily to be species-specific characters, but are also related to the depositional environments. In all species, morphological characters, including corallite size, septal development, and shape and size of lacunae, show high variability in accordance with lithofacies and stratigraphic position. The intraspecific differences in corallite size at various localities in the Zhuzhai area may indicate responses to local environmental factors, but may also reflect genetic differences if there was limited connection among populations.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , November 2016 , pp. 1027 - 1048
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bae, B.-Y., Elias, R.J., and Lee, D.-J., 2006a, Morphometrics of Catenipora (Tabulata; Upper Ordovician; southern Manitoba, Canada): Journal of Paleontology, v. 80, p. 889–901.Google Scholar
Bae, B.-Y., Lee, D.-J., and Elias, R.J., 2006b, Life-history strategies of a species of Catenipora (Tabulata; Upper Ordovician; southern Manitoba, Canada): Lethaia, v. 39, p. 141–156.Google Scholar
Bae, B.-Y., Elias, R.J., and Lee, D.-J., 2008, Morphometrics of Manipora (Tabulata; Upper Ordovician; southern Manitoba, Canada): Journal of Paleontology, v. 82, p. 78–90.Google Scholar
Bae, B.-Y., Elias, R.J., and Lee, D.-J., 2013, Growth characteristics in co-occurring Upper Ordovician species of the tabulate Catenipora from southern Manitoba, Canada: Lethaia, v. 46, p. 98–113.Google Scholar
Bian, L.Z., and Zhou, X.P., 1990, Calcareous algae from the Sanqushan Formation (Upper Ordovician) at the border area between Zhejiang Province and Jiangxi Province: Journal of Nanjing University (Earth Sciences), v. 3, p. 1–23. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Bian, L.Z., Fang, Y.T., and Huang, Z.C., 1996, On the types of Late Ordovician reefs and their characteristics in the neighboring regions of Zhejiang and Jiangxi provinces, South China, in Fan, J.S., ed., The Ancient Organic Reefs of China and their Relation to Oil and Gas: Beijing, Ocean Publication House, p. 54–75. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Bookstein, F.L., 1991, Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology: New York, Cambridge University Press, 435 p.Google Scholar
Budd, A.F., and Klaus, J.S., 2001, The origin and early evolution of the Montastraea “annularis” species complex (Anthozoa: Scleractinia): Journal of Paleontology, v. 75, p. 527–545.Google Scholar
Budd, A.F., and Pandolfi, J.M., 2004, Overlapping species boundaries and hybridization within the Montastraea “annularis” reef coral complex in the Pleistocene of the Bahama Islands: Paleobiology, v. 30, p. 396–425.Google Scholar
Budd, A.F., and Pandolfi, J.M., 2010, Evolutionary novelty is concentrated at the edge of coral species distributions: Science, v. 328, p. 1558–1561.Google Scholar
Budd, A.F., Johnson, K.G., and Potts, D.C., 1994, Recognizing morphospecies in colonial reef corals: I. Landmark-based methods: Paleobiology, v. 20, p. 485–505.Google Scholar
Budd, A.F., Nunes, F.L.D., Weil, E., and Pandolfi, J.M., 2012, Polymorphism in a common Atlantic reef coral (Montastraea cavernosa) and its long-term evolutionary implications: Evolutionary Ecology, v. 26, p. 265–290.Google Scholar
Buehler, E.J., 1955, The morphology and taxonomy of the Halysitidae: Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin, v. 8, 79 p.Google Scholar
Cairns, S.D., 1989, Discriminant analysis of Indo-West Pacific Flabellum , in Jell, P.A., and Pickett, J.W., eds., Fossil Cnidaria 5: Association of Australasian Palaeontologists Memoir, v. 8, p. 61–68.Google Scholar
Cheetham, A.H., 1987, Tempo of evolution in a Neogene bryozoan: are trends in single morphologic characters misleading?: Paleobiology, v. 13, p. 286–296.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Rong, J.Y., Qiu, J.Y., Han, N.R., Li, L.Z., and Li, S.J., 1987, Preliminary stratigraphy, sedimentologic and environmental investigation of Zhuzhai section: Journal of Stratigraphy, v. 11, p. 23–34. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Copper, P., and Jin, J., 2012, Early Silurian (Aeronian) East Point coral patch reefs of Anticosti Island, eastern Canada: first reef recovery from the Ordovician/Silurian mass extinction in eastern Laurentia: Geosciences, v. 2, p. 65–89.Google Scholar
Deng, Z.Q., and Zhang, Y.S., 1984, Paleozoic corals from Hengduan Mountains, southwestern China, in Regional Geological Surveying Team, Sichuan Province & Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, eds., Stratigraphy and Palaeontology in West Sichuan and East Xizang, China Part 4: Chengdu, Sichuan Science and Technology Press, p. 1–102. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Dixon, O.A., 1974, Late Ordovician Propora (Coelenterata: Heliolitidae) from Anticosti Island, Quebec, Canada: Journal of Paleontology, v. 48, p. 568–585.Google Scholar
Dryden, I.L., and Mardia, K.V, 1998, Statistical Shape Analysis: New York, John Wiley & Sons, 376 p.Google Scholar
Elias, R.J., and Lee, D.-J., 1993, Microborings and growth in Late Ordovician halysitids and other corals: Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 922–934.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1834, Beiträge zur physiologischen Kenntniss der Corallenthiere im allgemeinen, und besonders des Rothen Meeres, nebst einem Versuche zur physiologischen Systematik derselben: Akademie der Wissenschaften physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, Abhandlungen, v. 1832, p. 225–380.Google Scholar
Foster, A.B., 1979, Phenotypic plasticity in the reef corals Montastraea annularis (Ellis & Solander) and Siderastrea siderea (Ellis & Solander): Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, v. 22, p. 25–54.Google Scholar
Foster, A.B., 1980, Environmental variation in skeletal morphology within the Caribbean reef corals Montastraea annularis and Siderastrea siderea : Bulletin of Marine Science, v. 30, p. 678–709.Google Scholar
Foster, A.B., 1984, The species concept in fossil hermatypic corals: a statistical approach, in Oliver, W.A. Jr., Sando, W.J., Cairns, S.D., Coates, A.G., Macintyre, I.G., Bayer, F.M., and Sorauf, J.E., eds., Recent Advances in the Paleobiology and Geology of the Cnidaria: Palaeontographica Americana, v. 54, p. 58–69.Google Scholar
Foster, A.B., 1985, Variation within coral colonies and its importance for interpreting fossil species: Journal of Paleontology, v. 59, p. 1359–1381.Google Scholar
Fukami, H., Budd, A.F., Levitan, D.R., Jara, J., Kersanach, R., and Knowlton, N., 2004, Geographic differences in species boundaries among members of the Montastraea annularis complex based on molecular and morphological markers: Evolution, v. 58, p. 324–337.Google Scholar
Goodall, C.R., 1991, Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, v. 53, p. 285–339.Google Scholar
Hamada, T., 1957, On the classification of the Halysitidae, I: University of Tokyo: Journal of the Faculty of Science, Section 2, v. 10, no. 3, p. 393–405.Google Scholar
Hill, D., 1981, Part F, Coelenterata; Supplement 1, Rugosa and Tabulata; vol. 2, in Teichert, C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology: Boulder and Lawrence, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, p. F379–F762.Google Scholar
Hubmann, B., 1991, Silurian Catenipora Lamarck–a guide to ancient latitudinal and faunal relationships: Anzeiger der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, mathematische-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, v. 128, p. 113–120.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.E., 1991, A User’s Guide to Principal Components: New York, Wiley, 575 p.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.B.C., and Cheetham, A.H., 1990, Evolutionary significance of morphospecies: a test with cheilostome Bryozoa: Science, v. 248, p. 579–583.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, I.T., 2002, Principal Component Analysis: Springer Series in Statistics, 2nd ed.: New York, Springer, 487 p.Google Scholar
Klaamann, E., 1966, Inkommunikatnye tabulyaty Estonii (The Incommunicate Tabulata of Estonia): Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Geoloogia Instituut, 96 p. [in Russian with English summary]Google Scholar
Klaus, J.S., and Budd, A.F., 2003, Comparison of Caribbean coral reef communities before and after the Plio-Pleistocene faunal turnover: analyses of two Dominican Republic reef sequences: Palaios, v. 18, p. 3–21.Google Scholar
Kwon, S.-W., Park, J., Choh, S.-J., Lee, D.-C., and Lee, D.-J., 2012, Tetradiid–siliceous sponge patch reefs from the Xiazhen Formation (late Katian), southeast China: a new Late Ordovician reef association: Sedimentary Geology, v. 267–268, p. 15–24.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B.P.A. de M. de, 1816, Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres, vol. 2: Paris, the author, 568 p. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/47698#page/9/mode/1up.Google Scholar
Laub, R.S., 1979, The corals of the Brassfield Formation (mid-Llandovery; lower Silurian) in the Cincinnati Arch region: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 75, p. 1–457.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-C., 2013, Late Ordovician trilobites from the Xiazhen Formation in Zhuzhai, Jiangxi Province, China: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 58, p. 855–882.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-C., Park, J., Woo, J., Kwon, Y.K., Lee, J.-G., Guan, L., Sun, N., Lee, S.-B., Liang, K., Liu, L., Rhee, C.-W., Choh, S.-J., Kim, B.-S., and Lee, D.-J., 2012, Revised stratigraphy of the Xiazhen Formation (Upper Ordovician) at Zhuzhai, South China, based on palaeontological and lithological data: Alcheringa, v. 36, p. 393–412.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-J., and Elias, R.J., 1991, Mode of growth and life-history strategies of a Late Ordovician halysitid coral: Journal of Paleontology, v. 65, p. 191–199.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-J., and Noble, J.P.A., 1990, Colony development and formation in halysitid corals: Lethaia, v. 23, p. 179–193.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Kershaw, S., and Mu, X.N., 2004, Ordovician reef systems and settings in South China before the Late Ordovician mass extinction: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 205, p. 235–254.Google Scholar
Lin, B.Y., and Chow, X.H., 1977, Tabulata and Heliolitida of the Upper Ordovician in Zhejiang and Jiangxi provinces: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Professional Paper of Stratigraphy and Paleontology, v. 3, p. 108–208. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H., and Haime, J., 1849, Mémoire sur les polypiers appartenant aux groupes naturels des Zoanthaires perforés et des Zoanthaires tabulés: Académie des Sciences de Paris, Comptes Rendus, v. 29, p. 257–263.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H., and Haime, J., 1850, A Monograph of the British Fossil Corals: First Part, Introduction: London, Palaeontographical Society, v. 3, no. 7, p. i–lxxxv.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J., 2005, http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ee/rohlf/software.html (accessed June 2016).Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J., and Marcus, L.F., 1993, A revolution in morphometrics: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, v. 8, p. 129–132.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J., and Slice, D.E., 1990, Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks: Systematic Zoology, v. 39, p. 40–59.Google Scholar
Rong, J.Y., and Chen, X., 1987, Faunal differentiation, biofacies and lithofacies patterns of the Late Ordovician (Ashgillian) in South China: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 26, p. 507–535. [in Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
Rong, J.Y., Zhan, R.B., Xu, H.G., Huang, B., and Yu, G.H., 2010, Expansion of the Cathaysian Oldland through the Ordovician-Silurian transition: emerging evidence and possible dynamics: Science China, Earth Science, v. 53, p. 1–17.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F., 1858, Untersuchungen über die Silurische Formation von Ehstland, Nord-Livland und Oesel: Archiv für die Naturkunde Liv-, Ehst- und Kurlands, v. 2, p. 1–248.Google Scholar
Sokolov, B.S., 1947, Novye syringoporidy Taymyra (New syringoporids from the Taymyr): Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody, Byulletin (Geologiia), v. 22, no. 6, p. 19–28. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Stasinska, A., 1967, Tabulata from Norway, Sweden and from the erratic boulders of Poland: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 18, p. 1–112.Google Scholar
Tchernychev, B.B., 1937, Verkhnesiluriyskie i devonskie Tabulata Novoy Zemli, Severnoy Zemli, i Taymyra (Upper Silurian and Devonian Tabulata of Novaya Zemlaya, Severnaya Zemlya, and Taymyr): Vsesoiuznoe Arktiki Institut, Trudy, v. 91, p. 67–134. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Wang, G.X., and Deng, Z.Q., 2010, Application of cluster analysis to classification of cateniporids: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 49, p. 478–486. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Watkins, R., 2000, Corallite size and spacing as an aspect of niche-partitioning in tabulate corals of Silurian reefs, Racine Formation, North America: Lethaia, v. 33, p. 55–63.Google Scholar
Webby, B.D., 2002, Patterns of Ordovician reef development, in Kiessling, W., Flugel, E., and Golonka, J., eds., Phanerozoic Reef Patterns: SEPM Special Publication, v. 72, p. 129–179.Google Scholar
Wu, H., 2003, Tectonopalaeogeographic analysis of the geologic problems related to ophiolitic belt in northeastern Jiangxi Province: Journal of Palaeogeography, v. 5, p. 328–342. [in Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Yan, D., Chen, D., Wang, Q., Wang, J., and Wang, Z., 2009, Carbon and sulfur isotopic anomalies across the Ordovician–Silurian boundary on the Yangtze Platform, South China: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 274, p. 32–39.Google Scholar
Yu, C.M., 1960, Late Ordovician corals of China: Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, v. 8, p. 65–132. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Yu, C.M., 1963, Catenipora (Catenipora?) zhejiangensis C.M. Yu (nom. nov.), in Yu, C.M., Wu, W.S., Zhao, J.M., and Zhang, Z.C., Chinese Coral Fossils: Beijing, Science Press, p. 291. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Yu, C.M., Wu, W.S., Zhao, J.M., and Zhang, Z.C., 1963, Chinese Coral Fossils: Beijing, Science Press, 390 p. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Yu, J.H., Bian, L.Z., Huang, Z.C., Chen, M.J., Fang, Y.T., Zhou, X.P., and Shi, G.J., 1992, A preliminary study on the Late Ordovician buildup at the border area between Zhejiang and Jiangxi provinces: Journal of Nanjing University (Earth Science), v. 4, p. 1–13. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Zhan, R.B., and Jin, J.S., 2007, Ordovician–Llandovery (Silurian) Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China: Beijing, Science Press, 169 p.Google Scholar
Zhan, R.B., Zhang, Y.D., and Yuan, W.W., 2008, The great Ordovician radiation of marine life: examples from South China: Progress in Natural Science, v. 18, p. 1–12.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.D., Chen, X., Yu, G.H., Goldman, D., and Liu, X., 2007, Ordovician and Silurian Rocks of Northwest Zhejiang and Northeast Jiangxi Provinces, SE China, Hefei, University of Science and Technology of China Press, 189 p. [in Chinese]Google Scholar