Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:09:52.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology and revision of Late Devonian (early Famennian) Cyrtospirifer (Brachiopoda) and related genera from South China and North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Xueping Ma  and
Jed Day
Xueping Ma
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Department of Geology, Peking University, Beijing, China 100871,
Jed Day
Affiliation:
Department of Geography-Geology, Illinois State University, Normal 61790-4400,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Study of abundant well-preserved specimens of cyrtospiriferid brachiopods from early Famennian triangularis Zone shelf deposits from South China shows that none of them can be attributed to the genera Cyrtospirifer Nalivkin in Fredericks, 1924, or Tenticospirifer Tien, 1938, as previously assigned. Some of these forms are reassigned to the new genus Plicapustula, with Spirifer (Sinospirifer) gortanioides Grabau, 1931 serving as the type species. Restudy of the Upper Devonian cyrtospiriferids of North America and South China indicates that genera of the subfamily Cyrtospiriferinae all developed a delthyrial covering usually composed of two or more thin plates referred to as a composite pseudodeltidium. the delthyrial covering of Cyrtiopsis Grabau, 1923 and other genera of the subfamily Cyrtiopsinae is a convex pseudodeltidium. the lack of a pedicle foramen penetrating the pseudodeltidia of Frasnian Cyrtospirifer indicates that most species had an atrophied pedicle. the pseudodeltidia of most early Famennian cyrtospiriferids are perforated by a pedicle tube or a central hypothyrid foramen as in Sinospirifer Grabau, 1931, or a hypothyrid-to-submesothyrid foramen as in Lamarckispirifer Gatinaud, 1949 and Plicapustula n. gen. the orientation and concavity of the interarea, used with other shell characteristics, are useful characters in species-level taxonomy of Famennian cyrtospiriferids.

Four major types of radial micro-ornament characterize Late Devonian species of Cyrtospirifer and other genera of the Cyrtospiriferinae. These are 1) the verneuili type, consisting of microspines arising from the shell surface with spine bases extending into the primary shell layer, with radial capillae; 2) the whitneyi-subextensus type with small pustules both in the grooves and on the plications; 3) the subarchiaci type characterized by pustules only on plications; and 4) the hayasakai type with coarse elongated pustules on plications and capillae in grooves. There is a notable increase in complexity of the medial plication patterns of shells of Late Devonian cyrtospiriferinids. Simple sinal plication patterns characterize shells of Frasnian species of Cyrtospirifer and related genera, whereas most early Famennian cyrtospiriferinids developed complex patterns. We have documented three variations in the structure of the cardinal processes of the Late Devonian cyrtospiriferids. These consist of 1) unsupported; 2) supported by callus (secondary shell material) from below; or 3) supported by a median septum.

In Hunan-South China, cyrtospiriferid diversity was low in the late Frasnian, but a postextinction radiation of cyrtospiriferids in the very early Famennian resulted in the evolution of numerous new genera within the interval of the undifferentiated triangularis Zone shortly after the Frasnian–Famennian (F–F) mass extinction. Cyrtospiriferid brachiopods of the subfamilies Cyrtospiriferinae and Cyrtiopsinae are important elements of the early Famennian post-extinction survivor and recovery faunas that migrated and radiated rapidly to occupy niches vacated by extinct clades of late Frasnian brachiopods.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , March 2007 , pp. 286 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abich, H. 1858. Vergleichende geologische Grundzüge der kaukasischen, armenischen und nordpersischen Gebirge. Prodromus einer Geologie der kaukasischen Länder. Memoir of Imperial Academia of St. Petersburg, 6th series, 7:361–534.Google Scholar
Abramyan, M. S. 1957. Brakhiopody verkhnefamenskikh i etrenskikh otlozhenii yugo-zapadnoi armenii. Izdatelstvo An Armyanskoi SSR, 142 p.Google Scholar
Alekseeva, R. E., Sidyachenko, A. I., and Baranov, V. V. 1996. Atlas of Devonian brachiopods of North-East of Russian (East Jakutia and Magadan district). Nauka, Moscow, 227 p. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Baliński, A. 1975. Secondary changes in micro-ornamentation of some Devonian ambocoeliid brachiopods. Palaeontology, 18:179–189.Google Scholar
Baliński, A. 1995. Brachiopods and conodont biostratigraphy of the Famennian from the Debnik anticline, southern Poland. Palaeontologia Polonica, 54:1–88.Google Scholar
Brice, D. 1971. Etude paléontologique et stratigraphique du Dévonien de l'Afghanistan. Notes et Mémoires sur le Moyen-Orient, Paris, 11, 364 p.Google Scholar
Brice, D. 1982. Eodmitria, genre nouveau de Brachiopodes Cyrtospiriferidae du Frasnien inférieur et moyen. Geobios (Lyon), 15:575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brice, D. 1988. Brachiopodes du Dévonien de Ferques (Boulonnais-France). In Brice, D. (ed.), Le Dévonien de Ferques. Bas-Boulonnais (n. France). Biostratigraphie du Paléozoïque, 7:323–395.Google Scholar
Brice, D. 1999. New data on systematics of some Famennian spiriferid brachiopods from Afghanistan and Iran. Seckenbergiana Lethaea, 79:281–295.Google Scholar
Buckman, S. S. 1906. Brachiopod nomenclature. Annual Magazine of Natural History, series 7, 18:323–327.Google Scholar
Carter, J. L., Johnson, J. G., Gourvennec, R., and Hou, H. F. 1994. A revised classification of the spiriferid brachiopods. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 63:327–374.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A., and Dutro, J. T. 1982. Devonian brachiopods of New Mexico. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 83 & 84, 215 p.Google Scholar
Crickmay, C. H. 1952a. Discrimination of late Upper Devonian. Journal of Paleontology, 26:585–609.Google Scholar
Crickmay, C. H. 1952b. Nomenclature of certain Devonian brachiopods. Author, Imperial Oil Limited, Calgary, Alberta, 2 p.Google Scholar
Fenton, C. L. 1931. Studies of evolution in the genus Spirifer. Wagner Free Institute of Science, 2, 436 p.Google Scholar
Fredericks, G. 1924/1919. Paleontological étude, 2: On Upper Carboniferous spiriferids from the Urals. Izvestiya Geologicheskogo Komiteta, 38:295–324. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Gatinaud, G. 1949. Contributions à l'étude des Brachiopodes Spiriferidae. I.—Exposé d'une nouvelle méthode d'étude de la morphologie externe des Spiriferidae a sinus plissé. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, série 2, 21(1):153–159; (2):300–307; (3):408–413; (4):487–492.Google Scholar
Glenister, B. F. 1955. Devonian and Carboniferous spiriferids from the North-west Basin, Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 39:46–71.Google Scholar
Gosselet, J. 1894. Étude sur les variations du Spirifer verneuili. Mémoire, Société Géologique de Nord, 4(no.1):1–61.Google Scholar
Gourvennec, R. 1987. Morphologie des épines chez les brachiopodes Delthyrididae. Lethaia, 20:21–31.Google Scholar
Gourvennec, R. 1989. Brachiopodes Spiriferida du Dévonien Inférieur de Massif Amoricain. Systématique-Paléobiologie-Evolution-Biostratigraphie. Biostratigraphie du Paléozoïque, 9:1–281.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1923–1924. Stratigraphy of China, Pt. 1, Palaeozoic and older. China Geological Survey:1–200 (1923), 201–528 (1924).Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1931–1933. Devonian Brachiopoda of China, I: Devonian Brachiopoda from Yunnan and other districts in South China. China Geological Survey, Palaeontologia Sinica, series B, 3, Fascicle 3, 545 p.Google Scholar
Gratsianova, R. T., Talent, J. A., and Yolkin, E. A. 1988. Devonian brachiopod zonal schemes, provinciality and crustal blocks in the Asia-Australia hemisphere. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 14, 3:295–301.Google Scholar
Greiner, H. 1957. “Spirifer disjunctus“: Its evolution and paleoecology in the Catskill delta. Peabody Museum of Natural History (Yale University) Bulletin, 11, 75 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1843. Geology of New York, Pt. IV. Comprising the Geology of the Fourth Geological District, 683 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Report on the Geological Survey of the State of Iowa, 1, Pt. 2, p. 473–724. In Palaeontology of Iowa. C. Van Benthuysen, Des Moines.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1867. Descriptions and figures of the fossil Brachiopoda of the Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, and Chemung groups. New York Geological Survey, Paleontology, 4(1):428 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1894. An introduction to the study of the genera of Palaeozoic Brachiopoda. Natural History of New York, Palaeontology, 8(2), 217 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Whitfield, R. P. 1872. Description of new species of fossils from the vicinity of Louisville, Ky., and the Falls of the Ohio. New York State Museum Report, 24:181–200.Google Scholar
Hou, H. F., Brice, D., and Tan, Z. X. 1996. Revision of Famennian Spiriferid Brachiopoda of Hunan, China. Mémoires de l'Institut Géologique de l'Université de Louvain, 36:153–174.Google Scholar
Krans, T. H. 1965. Etudes morphologiques de quelques spirifères dévoniens de la chaîne cantabrique (Espangne). Leidse Geologische Medelelingen, 33:71–148.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. 1819. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, Pt. 1, Brachiopodes, 6. J. B. Baillière, Paris, 735 p.Google Scholar
Le Hon, H. 1870. Sur quelques espèces nouvelles du dévonien de Belgique. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 27 (2e série, 1869 à 1870):492–499.Google Scholar
Liu, Z. H., Tan, Z. X., and Ding, Y. L. 1982. Brachiopoda, p. 172–216. In Geological Bureau of Hunan (ed.), Paleontological Atlas of Hunan. Geological Publishing House, Beijing.Google Scholar
Lyashenko, A. I. 1957. Novy rod Devonskikh brachiopod Uchtospirifer . [New genus of Devonian brachiopod, Uchtospirifer.] Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 117:885–888.Google Scholar
Lyashenko, A. I. 1959. Atlas of Brachiopods and Stratigraphy of the Devonian Russian Platform. Gostoptechnizat, Moskova, 451 p. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Lyashenko, A. I. 1973. Brachiopody i stratigraphiia nizhnefranskikh tlozhenii Iuzhnogo Timania i Volgo-Ural'skoi neftegazonosnoi rovinstii [Brachiopods and stratigraphy of lower Frasnian deposits of the South Timan and Volga-Ural oil-gas bearing province]. Vsesoiuznyi Nauchno-Issledovatelskii Geologo-Razvedochnyi Neftianoi Istitut (VNIGNI), Trudy, 134:279 P.Google Scholar
Lyashenko, A. I. 1985. Novye Verkhnedevonskie brakhiopody iuzhnogo Timana [New Upper Devonian brachiopods from southern Timan], p. 9–18. In Il'ina, V. D. and Lipatovoi, V. V. (eds.), Stratigraficheskie Isseldonvaniia Prirodnykh Rezervuarov Nefti i Gaza [Stratigraphic Investigations of Natural Reservoirs of Oil and Gas]. Vsesoyuznyi Nauchno-Issledovatelskii Geologorazvedochnyi Neftyanoi Institut, Moscow.Google Scholar
Ma, X. P. 1994. Systematic paleontology, Part 3. Fauna across the F-F boundary, p. 199–205. In Bai, S. L., Bai, Z. Q., Ma, X. P., Wang, D. R., and Sun, Y. L., Devonian Events and Biostratigraphy of South China. Peking University Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Ma, X. P. 1998. Latest Frasnian Atrypida (Brachiopoda) from South China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 43:345–360.Google Scholar
Ma, X. P., and Bai, S. L. 2002. Biological, depositional, microspherule, and geochemical records of the Frasnian/Famennian boundary beds, South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 181:325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X. P., and Day, J. 1999. The Late Devonian brachiopod Cyrtiopsis davidsoni Grabau, 1923, and related forms from central Hunan of South China. Journal of Paleontology, 73:608–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X. P., and Day, J. 2000. Revision of Tenticospirifer Tien, 1938, and morphologically similar spiriferid brachiopod genera from the Late Devonian (Frasnian) of Eurasia, North America, and Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 74:444–463.Google Scholar
Ma, X. P., and Day, J. 2003. Revision of North American and selected Eurasian Late Devonian (Frasnian) species of Cyrtospirifer and Regelia (Brachiopoda). Journal of Paleontology, 77:267–292.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X. P., and Sun, Y. L. 2001. Small-sized cyrtospiriferids from the Upper Devonian (late Frasnian) of central Hunan, China. Journal of the Czech Geological Society, 46(3/4):75–82.Google Scholar
Ma, X. P., Chen, X. Q., Day, J., and Jin, Y. G. 2003. Restudy of the Chinese Upper Devonian Cyrtospiriferid (Brachiopoda): Sinospirifer Grabau, 1931. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 42(3):367–381.Google Scholar
Ma, X. P., Sun, Y. L., Hao, W.-C., and Liao, W.-H. 2002. Rugose corals and brachiopods across the Frasnian–Famennian boundary in central Hunan, South China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 47(2):373–396.Google Scholar
Martelli, A. 1902. Il Devoniano superiore dello Schensi (Cina). Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana Bulletino, 21(2):349–370.Google Scholar
Martynova, M. V. 1961. Stratigrafiya i brakhiopody famenskogo yarusa, zapadnoi chasti tsentral'nogo Kazakhstana. Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, Moscow, 2, 151 p.Google Scholar
Martynova, M. V. 1970. New late Famennian brachiopods of central Kazakstan. Paleontological Journal, 1970(1):58–72.Google Scholar
Merriam, C. W. 1940. Devonian stratigraphy and paleontology of the Roberts Mountains region, Nevada. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 25, 114 p.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1840. Description de quelques unes des coquilles fossiles les plus abondantes dans les couches devoniennes du Bas-Boulonnais. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 11:250–256.Google Scholar
Paeckelmann, W. 1942. Beiträge zur Kenntnis devonischer Spiriferen. Abhandlungen des Reichsamts für Bodenforschung (Berlin), neue folge, Heft 197, 188 p.Google Scholar
Pellizzari, G. 1913. Fossile Palaeozoici antichi dello Schensi (China). Revista Italiana di Paleontologia, 19:33–48.Google Scholar
Pitrat, C. W. 1965. Spiriferidina, p. H667–H728. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise of Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. H. Brachiopoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Pushkin, V. I. 1996. Pripyatispirifer, a new Lower Famennian genus from Belarus. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 66:43–51.Google Scholar
Sartenaer, P. 1982. The presence and significance of Spirifer bisinus, S. malaisi, S. supradisjunctus, and S. seminoi in early Frasnian beds of western Europe, p. 123–196, pls. 1–9. In Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy (ed.), Papers on the Frasnian–Givetian Boundary. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Administration of Mines, and Geological Survey of Belgium, Brussels.Google Scholar
Sartenaer, P. 1994. Tiocyrspis, a new Late Frasnian cyrtiopsid genus from Germany and Belgium. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 169:29–43.Google Scholar
Sidyachenko, A. I. 1962. Spiriferidy i stratigrafiya famenskikh otlozhenii tsentralnogo i yugovostochnogo Karatau. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Akademiya nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenie: 1–152, 26 pls. Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskova. [Spiriferids and stratigraphy of Famennian deposits of central and southeastern Karatau. Trudy Akad. nauk. SSSR, Sib. Otd. Inst. Geol. Geof., Moscow.] Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1840. On the distribution and classification of the older or Paleozoic deposits of the North of Germany and Belgium and their comparison with formations of the same age in the British Isles, p. 50–58. In Sedgwick, A. and Murchison, R. I. (eds.), Organic Remains Engraved and Described by James de Carle Sowerby. Transactions of the Geological Society of London, 2nd ser., 5(3).Google Scholar
Stainbrook, M. A. 1945. Brachiopoda of the Independence Shale of Iowa. Geological Society of America Memoir, 14, 74 p.Google Scholar
Stainbrook, M. A. 1950. Brachiopoda and stratigraphy of the Aplington Formation of northern Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 24:365–385.Google Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G. 1949. Essai sur l'évolution des Spiriféridés. Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique (Rabat), 74:85–112.Google Scholar
Tien, C. C. 1938. Devonian Brachiopoda of Hunan. Palaeontologia Sinica, n.s. B, 4:1–192.Google Scholar
Vandercammen, A. 1959. Essai d'étude statistique des Cyrtospirifer du Frasnian de la Belgue. Mémoires de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, 145:1–175.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. H. 1883. Salt Range fossils, Part 4 (2) Brachiopoda. Palaeontogia Indica, Memoire Series 13, 1(2):391–546.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jin, Y. G., and Fang, D. W. 1964. Brachiopod Fossils of China (two vols.). Science Press, Beijing, 777 p. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Williams, A., Brunton, C. H. C., and Mackinnon, D. I. 1997. Morphology, p. 321–422. In Williams, A., James, M. A., Emig, C. C., Mackay, S., Rhodes, M. C., Cohen, B. L., Gawthrop, A. B., Peck, L. S., Curry, G. B., Ansell, A. D., Cusack, M., Walton, D., Brunton, C. H. C., MacKinnon, D. I., and Richardson, J. R. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. H. Brachiopoda (revised), 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Xian, S. Y., and Jiang, Z. L. 1978. Brachiopoda Dumeril, 1806, p. 251–337. In Guizhou Team of Stratigraphy and Paleontology (ed.), Paleontological Atlas of Southwestern China, Guizhou, 1, Cambrian to Devonian. Geological Publishing House, Beijing.Google Scholar