Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:57:08.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Campanian ammonites and inoceramids from the Wolfe City Sand in northeastern Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

W. A. Cobban  and
W. J. Kennedy
W. A. Cobban
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Mail Stop 919, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225
W. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The middle Campanian Wolfe City Sand in northeastern Texas yields a distinctive ammonite and inoceramid fauna with Patagiosites sp., Placenticeras sp., Hoplitoplacenticeras (Hoplitoplacenticeras) minor n. sp., Baculites mclearni Landes, 1940, Trachyscaphites spiniger (Schlüter, 1872) porchi (Adkins, 1929), Inoceramus (Cordiceramus) azerbaidjanensis Aliev, 1939, and I. (Endocostea) balticus Boehm, 1907. The last-named four species allow a direct correlation with the Baculites mclearni zone of the Western Interior of the United States. The base of this zone has been dated at 79.9 ± 3.2/79.2 ± 1.6 Ma on the basis of K/Ar determinations on biotite from a bentonite. Inoceramus azerbaidjanensis is also known from the Campanian of the U.S.S.R. in Azerbaidjan (where the species was first described), western Turkemenia, Georgia, the northern Caucasus, the Crimea, and Donbass.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 71 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W. S. 1929. Some Upper Cretaceous Taylor ammonites from Texas. University of Texas Bulletin, 2901:203–211.Google Scholar
Adkins, W. S. 1933. Mesozoic systems in Texas, p. 240–518. In Sellards, E. H., Adkins, W. S., and Plummer, F. G. (eds.), The Geology of Texas, Volume 1, Stratigraphy. University of Texas Bulletin 3232.Google Scholar
Aliev, M. M. 1939. [Inoceramids in Cretaceous deposits in the northeastern part of the Lesser Caucasus.] Akademiia Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR Institut Geologii, Trudy, 12:213–259 (in Russian with English summary).Google Scholar
Aliev, M. M. 1954. [New data on Inoceramus azerbaidjanensis Aliev.] Akademiia Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR Doklady, 10:95–99 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Aliev, M. M. 1979. [Stratigraficheskoye polozheniye rasprostraneniye Inoceramus azerbaidjanensis.] SSR Izvestiya, Geology Series, 1:76–82 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Blaszkiewicz, A. 1980. Campanian and Maastrichtian ammonites of the Middle Vistula Valley, Poland: a stratigraphic–paleontologic study. Prace Instytutu Geologicznego, 92:1–63.Google Scholar
Boehm, J. 1907. Über Haenleinia nov. subgen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 59:317.Google Scholar
Boehm, J. 1909. Über Inoceramis cripsi auctorum, in Schoeder, Henry, and Boehm, Johannes, Geologie und Paläontologie der subhercynen Kreidemulde. Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, n. ser., 56:39–58.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1962. Baculites from the lower part of the Pierre Shale and equivalent rocks in the Western Interior. Journal of Paleontology, 36:704–718.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. In press. Diversity and distribution of Late Cretaceous ammonites, Western Interior, United States. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A., and Scott, G. R. 1964. Multinodose scaphitid cephalopods from the lower part of the Pierre Shale and equivalent rocks in the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 483-E:E1–E13.Google Scholar
Coquand, H. 1859. Synopsis des animaux et des végétaux fossiles observés dans la formation crétacée du Sud-Ouest de la France. Bulletin de la Societé Géologique de France (2), 16:945–1023.Google Scholar
Dane, C. H., and Stephenson, L. W. 1928. Notes on the Taylor and Navarro Formations in east-central Texas. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 12:41–58.Google Scholar
DeKay, J. E. 1828. Report on several fossil multilocular shells from the state of Delaware: with observations on a second specimen of the new fossil genus Eurypterus . Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History, 2:273–279.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1890. Sur la classification des Cératites de la Craie. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 18:275–292.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. G. 1852. Deutschlands Petrefacten. Ein systematisches Verzeichniss aller in Deutschland und der angrenzenden Ländern vorkommenden Petrefacten nebst Angabe der Synonyme und Fundorte. Leipzig, 329–441.Google Scholar
Giers, R. 1964. Die grossfauna der Mukronatenkreide (unteres Obercampan) im ostlichen Münsterland. Fortschritt in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen, 7:213–294.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1871. Arrangement of the families of mollusks. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 227, 49 p.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, A. 1833–1841. Petrefacta Germaniae, II Teil. Arnz & Co., Düsseldorf, 312 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of recent Mollusca, their synonyms and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Grossouvre, A. de. 1894. Recherches sur la craie supérieure, 2, Paléontologie. Les ammonites de la craie supérieure. Mémoires de la Carte Géologique Détaillée de la France, 264 p. [1893 imprint].Google Scholar
Heinz, R. 1932. Aus der neuen Systematik der Inoceramen. Mitteilungen aus dem Mineralogisch-Geologischen Staatsinstitut in Hamburg, 13:1–26.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1889. Genesis of the Arietidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 673, 238 p.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda, p. 502–604. In von Zittel, K. A., Textbook of Palaeontology, translated by Eastman, C.R. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1977. Illustrated guide to biostratigraphically important Cretaceous macrofossils, western interior basin, USA. Mountain Geologist, 14:225–274.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1986. Campanian and Maastrichtian ammonites from northern Aquitaine, France. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 36, 145 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography and biostratigraphy. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 17:1–94.Google Scholar
Kullmann, J., and Wiedmann, J. 1970. Significance of sutures in phylogeny of Ammonoidea. Paleontological Contributions, University of Kansas, 44:1–32.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. B. A. de M. de. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Mémoires de la Sociéte d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, (1799):63–90.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. B. A. de M. de. 1801. Système des Animaux sans vertebrès. The author, Deterville, Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Landes, R. W. 1940. Paleontology of the marine formations of the Montana group. Memoirs of the Canadian Geological Survey, 221:129–223.Google Scholar
Lewy, Z. 1969. Late Campanian heteromorph ammonites from southern Israel. Israel Journal of Earth Sciences, 18:109–135.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. Report of the U.S. Geological Survey of the Territories (Hayden), 9, 629 p.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1830. Synopsis of the organic remains of the ferrignous sand formation of the United States, with geological remarks. American Journal of Science, 1st ser., 18:243–250.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous group of the United States. Illustrated by nineteen plates, to which is added an appendix containing a tabular view of the Tertiary fossils discovered in America. Key and Biddle, Philadelphia, 88 p.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. American Museum Novitates, 2206, 25 p.Google Scholar
Obradovich, J. D., and Cobban, W. A. 1975. A time scale for the Late Cretaceous of the Western Interior of North America. Geological Association of Canada Special Publication, 13:431–454.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S., and Obradovich, J. D. 1982. NDS 106, p. 634–1040. In Odin, G. S. (ed.), Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy, 2. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore.Google Scholar
Paulcke, W. 1907. Die Cephalopoden der oberen Kreide Sudpatagoniens. Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg i Breisgau, 15:167–248.Google Scholar
Schlüter, C. 1867. Beitrag zur Kenntniss der jungsten Ammoneen Norddeutschlands. A. Henry, Bonn, 36 p.Google Scholar
Schlüter, C. 1871–1876. Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide. Palaeontographica, 21:1–24 (1871); 21:25–120 (1872a); 24:1–144 (121–264) + x (1876).Google Scholar
Schlüter, C. 1872b. Verhandlungen des Naturhistoriches Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande und Westfalens, 29. Correspondenzblatt-1:91–92.Google Scholar
Schmid, F., and Ernst, G. 1975. Ammoniten aus dem Campan und lehrter westmulde und ihre stratigraphische Bedeutung. Bericht der Naturhistorischen Gesellschaft zu Hannover, 119:315–359.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1965. Geologic and biostratigraphic map of the Pierre Shale between Jarre Creek and Loveland, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigation Series Map, II-439.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1976. Geologic and biostratigraphic map of the Pierre Shale in the Canon City–Florence basin and the Twelvemile Park area, south-central Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigation Series Map, I-937.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1986a. Geologic and biostratigraphic map of the Pierre Shale in the Colorado Springs–Pueblo area, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigation Series Map, I-1627.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1986b. Geologic, biostratigraphic and structure map of the Pierre Shale between Loveland and Round Butte, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigation Series Map, I-1700.Google Scholar
Seitz, O. 1967. Die Inoceramen des Santon und Unter-Campan von Nordwestdeutschland. III, Teil; Taxonomie und Stratigraphie der Untergattungen Endocostea, Haenleinia, Platyceramus, Cladoceramus, Selenoceramus und Cordiceramus mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Parasitismus bei diesen Untergattungen. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch, 75, 172 p.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J., and Sowerby, J. de C. 1812–1846. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. The author, London, 7 volumes.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1922. On the Senonian ammonite fauna of Pondoland. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 10:113–147.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1953. The Upper Cretaceous cephalopod fauna of Grahamland. Scientific Reports of the British Antarctic Survey, 3:1–60.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1918. A contribution to the geology of northeastern Texas and southern Oklahoma. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 120-H:129–163.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1916. Über Lobus, Suturallobus und Inzision. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie (B), 1916(8):185–195.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1877. Preliminary report on the paleontology of the Black Hills, containing descriptions of new species of fossils from the Potsdam, Jurassic, and Cretaceous formations of the Black Hills of Dakota. U.S. Geographical and Geological Survey of the Rocky Mountain Region (Powell), 49 p.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1963. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Gulf Coast of the United States. University of Texas Bulletin, 6304. 373 p.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1884. Handbuch der Palaeontology, 1, Abt. 2; Lief 3, Cephalopoda, p. 329–522. R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). R.O. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig, 972 p.Google Scholar