Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T22:36:50.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late Devonian ammonoids from Ohio and adjacent states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

M. R. House
Affiliation:
University of Hull, England
Mackenzie Gordon Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20560
W. J. Hlavin
Affiliation:
Appalachian Exploration Inc., Canton, Ohio 44709

Abstract

Three late Devonian ammonoid-bearing levels are described from the area of Cleveland, Ohio. These appear to represent the German Platyclymenia, Clymenia and Wocklumeria Stufen, clear evidence for which has been lacking previously in eastern North America. The lowest level, around the base of the Cleveland Shale, yields Sporadoceras, Cyrtoclymenia, Platyclymenia and a new species, Pleuroclymenia (?) ohioense. The middle level, near the top of the Cleveland Shale, bears Cymaclymenia, Sporadoceras and Prionoceras. The highest level, just above the base of the Bedford Shale, has Prionoceras quadripartitum. This species, and a fauna of the basal Bedford, have been located also in the area of Columbus, Ohio. An Epiwocklumeria (?) sp. is recorded from Indiana. Attention is drawn to the international importance of the late Famennian and Lower Carboniferous ammonoid sequence which can now be recognized in Ohio.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of Paleontology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogoslovski, B. I. 1971. Devonskii ammonoidei, II, Goniatity. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, Akademya Nauk SSSR, 127:228 p.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. 1911. Notes on the Ohio shales and their faunas. University of Missouri, Science Series, Bulletin, 2(3):2331.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. and Caster, K. E. 1935. The cephalopod fauna of the Conewango Series in New York and Pennsylvania. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 22:174.Google Scholar
Foord, A. H. and Crick, G. C. 1897. Catalogue of the Fossil Cephalopoda in the British Museum (Natural History). London, xxxiii + 303 p.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1913. Ammoneae Devonicae (Clymeniidae, Aphyllitidae, Gephyroceratidae, Cheiloceratidae). Fossilium Catalogus, 1, Animalia, 1. Berlin, 42 p.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1912. Geologic age of the Bedford Shale of Ohio. New York Academy of Sciences, Annals, 22:295319.Google Scholar
Gümbel, C. W. 1862. Revision der Goniatiten des Fichtelgebirges. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 1862:284326.Google Scholar
Herrick, C. L. 1891. The Cuyahoga shale and the problem of the Ohio Waverly. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2:3148.Google Scholar
Herrick, C. L. 1894. Observations upon the so-called Waverly Group of Ohio. Geological Survey of Ohio, Reports, 7:195515.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1962. Observations on the ammonoid successions of the North American Devonian. Journal of Paleontology, 36:247284.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1965. A study in the Tornoceratidae: the succession of Tornoceras and related genera in the North American Devonian. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 250:79130.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1968. Devonian ammonoid zonation and correlations between North America and Europe, p. 10611068. In Oswald, D. H. (ed.), International Symposium on the Devonian System, Calgary, 1967, 1. Alberta Society of Petroleum Geologists.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1978. Devonian ammonoids from the Appalachians and their bearing on international zonation and correlation. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 21, 70 p.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1979. Biostratigraphy of the early Ammonoidea, p. 263280. In House, M. R., Scrutton, C. T. and Bassett, M. G. (eds.), The Devonian System. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 23.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1984. Devonian eustatic events. Proceedings of the Ussher Society, 5:396405.Google Scholar
House, M. R., Richardson, J. B., Chaloner, W. G., Allen, J. R. L., Holland, C. H. and Westoll, T. S. 1978. A correlation of the Devonian rocks of the British Isles. Geological Society of London, Special Reports, 7, 110 p.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. E. 1953. The Mississippian formations of central and southern Ohio. Geological Survey of Ohio, Bulletin 51, 355 p.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. B. H. 1968. Famennian ammonoids from New South Wales. Palaeontology, 11:535548.Google Scholar
Lange, W. 1929. Zur Kenntnis der Oberdevon am Enkeberg und bei Balve (Sauerland). Abhandlungen der Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, n.f., 119:1132.Google Scholar
Manger, W. L. 1971. The Mississippian ammonoids Karagandoceras and Kazachstania from Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 45:3339.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K. 1938. Devonian ammonoids of America. Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 14:xiii + 262.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K. and Flower, R. H. 1936. A Sporadoceras from America. Journal of Paleontology, 44:751757.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1956. Cephalopodenfauna und Stratigraphie des Oberdevons von Schleiz und Zeulenroda in Thüringen. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch, 20:193.Google Scholar
Münster, G. 1832. Über die Planuliten und Goniatiten im Übergangs-Kalk des Fichtelgebirges. Bayreuth, 38 p.Google Scholar
Münster, G. 1839–1843. Beiträge zur Petrefaktenkunde, 1–6. Bayreuth, 727 p.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. S. 1975. The Upper Devonian (Famennian) ammonoids from the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 49, Memoir 8, 55 p.Google Scholar
Petter, G. 1959. Goniatites Dévoniennes du Sahara. Service de la Carte Géologique de l'Algérie, Publications, n.s., Paléontologie Mémoires, 2, 313 p.Google Scholar
Price, J. D. and House, M. R. 1984. Ammonoids near the Devonian/Carboniferous boundary. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg (in press).Google Scholar
Prosser, C. S. 1912. The Devonian and Mississippian formations of northeastern Ohio. Geological Survey of Ohio, Bulletin 15 (4th series):323882, 896–908.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1909. The fauna of the Upper Devonian in Montana. Part 1, The fossils of the red shales. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 5:141158.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H. 1923. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Paläozoicums in Oberfranken, Ostthüringen und dem Sächsischen Vogtlands. 1, Stratigraphie und Ammoneenfauna des Oberdevon von Hof a. S. Neues Jarhbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 49:250358, 393–509.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H. 1934. Über eine Oberdevonische Ammoneen-Fauna aus den Rocky Mountains. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abteilung B, 72:331350.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H. 1952. Über das Oberdevon und Unterkarbon von Saalfeld in Ostthüringen. Senckenbergiana, 32:281306.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H. 1955. Zur Taxonomie und Nomenklatur der Clymenien. Ein Epilog. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 10:417429.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H. 1959. Adolescent cephalopods from the Exshaw Formation of Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 33:971976.Google Scholar
Sobolew, D. 1914a. Skizzen zur Phylogenenie der Goniatiten. Mitteilungen Warschauer polytechnische Institut, 1192.Google Scholar
Sobolew, D. 1914b. Uber Clymenien und Goniatiten. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 1:248378.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1908. Die Cephalopodenfauna des höheren Oberdevon am Enkeberge. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 26:565635.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1914. Monographie der Clymenien des Rheinischen Gebirges. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, n.f., 10(1):173.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1917 (1918). Genera der Palaoammonoidea (Goniatiten). Palaontographica, 62:85184.Google Scholar
White, I. C. 1881. The geology of Erie and Crawford counties. Pennsylvania Geological Survey, Reports, 2, 355 p.Google Scholar
Wilmarth, M. G. 1938. Lexicon of geologic names of the United States (including Alaska). United States Geological Survey, Bulletin 896, 2,396 p.Google Scholar