Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:31:07.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kalana Lagerstätte crinoids: Early Silurian (Llandovery) of central Estonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

William I. Ausich ,
Mark A. Wilson  and
Oive Tinn
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, 125 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Mark A. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691
Oive Tinn
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14 A, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Kalana Lagerstätte of early Aeronian (Llandovery, Silurian) age in central Estonia preserves a diverse shallow marine biota dominated by non-calcified algae. This soft-tissue flora and decalcified and calcified crinoids are preserved in situ, in a lens of microlaminated, dolomitized micrite interbedded in a sequence of dolomitized packstones and wackestones. Although the Lagerstätte is dominated by non-calcified algae, crinoids (together with brachiopods and gastropods) are among the most common organisms that were originally comprised of a carbonate skeleton. Two new crinoids are described from this unit, Kalanacrinus mastikae n. gen. n. sp. (large camerate) and Tartucrinus kalanaensis n. gen. n. sp. (small disparid). Interestingly, these two crinoids display contrasting preservation, with the more common large camerate preserved primarily as a decalcified organic residue, whereas the smaller disparid is preserved primarily in calcite. Preservation was assessed using elemental mapping of C, Ca, S, and Si. Columns have the highest portion of Ca, once living soft tissue is indicated by C, S was dispersed as pyrite or associated with organics, and Si is probably associated with clay minerals in the matrix. This new fauna increases our understanding of the crinoid radiation on Baltica following Late Ordovician extinctions.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/fb1f98c4-d35a-43f4-aa0d-75e4f8154a13

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 131 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © 2019, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsaar, L., Tinn, O., Männik, P., and Meidla, T., 2014, Stop B1: Kalana quarry, in Bauert, H., Hints, O., Meidla, T., and Männik, P., eds., 4th Annual Meeting of IGCP 591, The Early to Middle Paleozoic Revolution: Estonia, 10–19 June 2014, Abstracts and Field Guide, Tartu, p. 174–177.Google Scholar
Ahmed, E., and Holmström, S.J.M., 2015, Microbe-mineral interactions: the impact of surface attachment on mineral weathering and element selectivity by microorganisms: Chemical Biology, v. 403, p. 13–23.Google Scholar
Angelin, N.P., 1878, Iconographia Crinoideorum in stratis Sueciae Siluricis fossilium: Holmiae, Samson and Wallin, 62 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1984a, Calceocrinids from the Early Silurian (Llandoverian) Brassfield Formation of southwestern Ohio: Journal of Paleontology, v. 58, p. 1167–1185.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1984b, The genus Clidochirus from the Early Silurian of Ohio (Crinoidea, Llandoverian: Journal of Paleontology, v. 58, p. 1341–1346.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1985, New crinoids and revision of the superfamily Glyptocrinacea (Early Silurian, Ohio): Journal of Paleontology, v. 59, p. 793–808.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1986a, Early Silurian rhodocrinitacean crinoids (Brassfield Formation, Ohio): Journal of Paleontology, v. 60, p. 84–06.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1986b, Early Silurian inadunate crinoids (Brassfield Formation, Ohio): Journal of Paleontology, v. 60, p. 719–735.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1986c, New camerate crinoids of the Suborder Glyptocrinina from the Lower Silurian Brassfield Formation (southwestern Ohio): Journal of Paleontology, v. 60, p. 887–897.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1987, Brassfield Compsocrinina (Lower Silurian crinoids) from Ohio: Journal of Paleontology, v. 61, p. 552–562.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1998, Phylogeny of Arenig to Caradoc crinoids (Phylum Echinodermata) and suprageneric classification of the Crinoidea: The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, New Series, no. 9, 36 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 2018, Morphological paradox of disparid crinoids (Echinodermata): phylogenetic analysis of a Paleozoic clade: Swiss Journal of Paleontology, v. 137, p. 159–176.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Copper, P., 2010, The Crinoidea of Anticosti Island, Québec (Late Ordovician to Early Silurian): Palaeontographica Canadiana, no. 29, 157 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Deline, B., 2012, Macroevolutionary transitions in crinoids following the Late Ordovician extinction event (Ordovician to Early Silurian): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 361–362, p. 38–48.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Wilson, M.A., 2016, Llandovery (early Silurian) crinoids from Hiiumaa Island, western Estonia: Journal of Paleontology, v. 90, p. 1139–1147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2016.120Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., and Baumiller, T.K., 1994. Demise of the middle Paleozoic crinoid fauna. a single extinction event or rapid faunal turnover?: Paleobiology, v. 20, no. 3, p. 345–361.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., Hess, H., and Simms, M.J., 1999, Crinoid form and function, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.J., Fossil Crinoids: Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, p. 3–30.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Wilson, M.A., and Vinn, O., 2012, Crinoids from the Silurian of western Estonia (Phylum Echinodermata): Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 57, no. 3, p. 613–631.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Wilson, M.A., and Vinn, O., 2015, Wenlock and Pridoli (Silurian) crinoids from Saaremaa, western Estonia (Phylum Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 72–81.Google Scholar
Bather, F.A., 1893, The Crinoidea of Gotland. Pt. 1, The Crinoidea Inadunata: Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, v. 25, no. 2, 200 p.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T.K., 1994, Patterns of dominance and extinction in the record of Paleozoic crinoids, in David, B., Guille, A., Féral, J. P., and Roux, M., eds., Echinoderms through Time (Echinoderms Dijon): Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema, p. 193–198.Google Scholar
Bogolepova, O.K., Donovan, S.K., Harper, D.A.T., Suyarkova, A.A., Yakupov, R., and Gubanov, A.P., 2018, New records of brachiopods and crinoids from the Silurian (Wenlock) of the southern Urals, Russia: GFF, v. 140, p. 323–331.Google Scholar
Briggs, D.E.G., and McMahon, S., 2016, The role of experiments in investigating the taphonomy of exceptional preservation: Palaeontology, v. 59, p. 1–11.Google Scholar
Cole, S.R., 2017, Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Ordovician Camerata (Class Crinoidea, Phylum Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 815–828.Google Scholar
Dong, H., 2010, Mineral-microbe interactions: a review: Frontiers of Earth Science, v. 4, p. 127–147.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 1989, Pelmatozoan columnals from the Ordovician of the British Isles, Part 2: Palaeontographical Society Monograph, v. 142, no. 580, p. 69–114.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 1993, A Rhuddanian (Silurian Llandovery) pelmatozoan fauna from south-west Wales: Geological Journal, v. 28, p. 1–19.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 1994, The Late Ordovician extinction of the crinoids in Britain: National Geographic Research and Exploration, v. 10, p. 72–79.Google Scholar
Eckert, J.D., 1984, Early Llandovery crinoids and stelleroids from the Cataract Group (Lower Silurian), southern Ontario, Canada: Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences, Contributions, no. 137, 83 p.Google Scholar
Eckert, J.D., 1988, Late Ordovician extinction of North American and British crinoids: Lethaia, v. 21, p. 147–167.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, B.-D., and Prezbindowski, D.R., 1974, Niagaran (Middle Silurian) interreef fossil burial environments in Indiana: Neues Jarhbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, v. 144, p. 342–372.Google Scholar
Fearnhead, F.E., and Donovan, S.K., 2007, A cladid crinoid (Echinodermata) from the Llandovery (Lower Silurian) of the Girvan district, SW Scotland: Scottish Journal of Geology, v. 43, p. 74–82.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1923, Notes on Medinan, Niagaran, and Chester fossils: Denison University Bulletin, v. 20, p. 37–210.Google Scholar
Franzén, C., 1982, A Silurian crinoid thanatotope from Gotland: Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, v. 103, p. 469–490.Google Scholar
Franzén, C., 1983, Ecology and taxonomy of Silurian crinoids from Gotland: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Abstracts of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science, no. 665, 31 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1866, Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils from the Lower Silurian strata of the age of the Hudson-River Group and Trenton Limestone: Albany, New York, privately published preprint, 17 p.Google Scholar
Kammer, T.W., and Ausich, W.I., 2007, Soft-tissue preservation of the hind gut in a new genus of cladid crinoid from the Mississippian (Visean, Asbian) at St Andrews, Scotland: Palaeontology, v. 50, p. 951–955.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1918, Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 3, p. 1–128.Google Scholar
Kluesssendorf, J., 1994, Predictability of Silurian Fossil-Konservat-Lagerstätten in North America: Lethaia, v. 27, p. 337–344.Google Scholar
Lane, N.G., and Ausich, W.I., 1995, Interreef crinoid fauna from the Mississinewa Shale Member of the Wabash Formation (northern Indiana; Silurian; Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 69, p. 1090–1106.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-P, Ausich, W.I., Baliński, A., Bergström, S.M., and Sun, Y., 2018, The oldest iocrinid crinoids from the Early/Middle Ordovician of China: possible paleogeographic implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 151, p. 324–333.Google Scholar
Lo Duca, S.T., 1990, Medusagraptus mirabilis Ruedemann as a noncalcified dasyclad alga: Journal of Paleontology, v. 64: p. 469–474.Google Scholar
Lo Duca, S.T., and Brett, C.E., 1997, The Medusaegraptus epibole and lower Ludlow Konservat-Lagerstätten of eastern North America, in Brett, C.E., and Baird, G.C., eds., Paleontological Events Stratigraphic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications: New York, Columbia University Press, p. 369–406.Google Scholar
Männik, P., Tinn, O., Loydell, D.K., and Ainsaar, L., 2016, Age of the Kalana Lagerstätte, early Silurian, Estonia: Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 65, p. 105–114.Google Scholar
Mastik, V., and Tinn, O., 2015, New dasycladalean algal species from the Kalana Lagerstätte (Silurian, Estonia): Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 262–268.Google Scholar
Mastik, V., and Tinn, O., 2017, Leveilleites hartnageli Foerste, 1923 (Rhodophyta?) from the Ordovician of Laurentia and Silurian of Baltica: redescription and designation of a neotype: Palaeoworld, v. 26, p. 602–611.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1821, A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lily-shaped Animals, with Observations on the Genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites: Bristol, Bryan and Co., 150 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1943, Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids: Geological Society of America Special Paper 46, 153 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Teichert, K., eds., 1978, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2, Crinoidea: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America, and University of Kansas, 1027 p.Google Scholar
Peters, S., and Ausich, W.I., 2008, A sampling-adjusted macroevolutionary history for Ordovician–Early Silurian crinoids: Paleobiology, v. 34, p. 104–116Google Scholar
Phillips, J., 1839, Chapter 48. Encrinites and zoophytes of the Silurian System, in Murchison, R.I., The Silurian System: London, John Murray, p. 670–675.Google Scholar
Rozhnov, S.V., 1997, New generic name Schaldichocrinus Rozhnov, nom. nov.: Pa leontological Journal, v. 31, p. 437.Google Scholar
Saunders, K.M., Bates, D.E.B., Kluessendorf, J., Loydell, D.K., and Mikulic, D.G., 2009, Desmograptus micromenatodes, a Silurian dendroid graptolite, and its ultrastructure: Palaeontology, v. 52, p. 541–559.Google Scholar
Tinn, O., and Märss, T., 2018, The earliest osteostracan Kalanaspis delectabilis gen. et sp. nov. from the mid-Aeronian (mid-Llandovery, lower Silurian) of Estonia: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 38, e1425212. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2017.1425212Google Scholar
Tinn, O., Meidla, T., Ainsaar, L., and Pani, I., 2009, Thallophytic algal flora from a new Silurian Lagerstätte: Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 58, p. 38–42.Google Scholar
Tinn, O., Mastik, V., Ainsaar, L., Meidla, T., 2015, Kalania pusilla, an exceptionally preserved non-calcified alga from the lower Silurian (Aeronian, Llandovery) of Estonia: Palaeoworld, v. 24, p. 207–214.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978, General morphology, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, K., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, v. 2, p. T58–T216.Google Scholar
Uroz, S., Calvaruzo, C., Turpault, M-P., and Frey-Klett, P., 2009, Mineral weathering by bacteria: ecology, actors and mechanisms: Trends in Microbiology, v. 17, p. 378–387.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1880–1886, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea. Pt. I. The families Ichthyocrinidae and Cyathocrinidae (1880), p. 226–378, (separate repaginated p. 1–153). Pt. II. Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881), p. 177–411, (separate repaginated, p. 1–237). Pt. III, Sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1885), p. 225–364, (separate repaginated, p. 1–138). Pt. III, Sec. 2. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1886), p. 64–226 (separate repaginated, p. 139–302): Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., and Webster, D.W., 2013, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, coronoids, and hemistreptocrinids, 1758–2012. http://crinoids.azurewebsites.net/ (accessed 12 October, 2018).Google Scholar
Wright, D.F., 2017, Bayesian estimation of fossil phylogenies and the evolution of early to middle Paleozoic crinoids (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 799–814.Google Scholar
Wright, D.F., Ausich, W.I., Cole, S.R., Peter, M.E., and Rhenberg, E.C., 2017. Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea (Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 829–846. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2016.142; published online 02-22-17.Google Scholar
Zamora, S., Rahman, I.A., and Ausich, W.I., 2015, A new iocrinid (Disparida) from the Ordovician (Darriwilian) of Morocco: PeerJ, 3:e1450, 10 p. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1450.Google Scholar
Zittel, K.A. von, 1876–1880. Handbuch der Palaeontologie, v. 1, Palaeozoologie: München, , Leipzig, R. Oldenbourg, (1879), no. 1, 765 p.Google Scholar