Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:19:37.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isotelus (Trilobita) “hunting burrow” from Upper Ordovician strata, Ohio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Danita S. Brandt ,
David L. Meyer  and
Peter B. Lask
Danita S. Brandt
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824
David L. Meyer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
Peter B. Lask
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recurring associations of the trilobite ichnogenus Rusophycus with various “worm” burrows suggest an interaction between the two tracemakers, specifically, capture of the worm by the trilobite. An exceptional ichnofossil from the Upper Ordovician of southwestern Ohio shows characters consistent with previously described “trilobite hunting burrows” from Cambrian and Silurian strata. Preserved in convex hyporelief is R. carleyi, attributable to the trilobite Isotelus, on which is superimposed the case of a worm burrow of the ichnogenus Palaeophycus. The cast of the worm burrow appears to have been truncated by the digging activities of the trilobite, suggesting its predation of the worm. The exquisite preservation of ventral axial morphology of the trilobite distinguishes this Rusophycus from simpler bilobate forms attributable to filter-feeding behavior. Congruency in the preservation of worm and trilobite trace supports the conclusion that both were created at the same time, as the trilobite exited the intrastratal burrow. This is the first report of a trilobite hunting burrow from the Ordovician, and the first evidence for predatory behavior for the trilobite genus Isotelus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 1995 , pp. 1079 - 1083
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergström, J. 1969. Remarks on the appendages of trilobites. Lethaia, 2:395–414.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. 1973. Organization, life and systematics of trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 2:1–69.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, K., and Bruton, D. 1971. Some trilobite resting and crawling traces. Lethaia, 4:303–319.Google Scholar
Goldring, R. 1985. The formation of the trace fossil Cruziana . Geological Magazine, 122:65–72.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1852. Palaeontology. Natural History of New York, Volume 2. C. Van Benthuysen, Albany, 362 p.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1975. Preservation of trace fossils, p. 55–63. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. 1990. Predation by early Cambrian trilobites on infaunal worms—evidence from the Swedish Mickwitzia Sandstone. Lethaia, 23:29–42.Google Scholar
Martinsson, A. 1965. Aspects of a middle Cambrian thanatotope on Oland. Geologiska Foreningens i Stockholm Forhandlingar, 87:181–230.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1975. Structure and function of trilobite terrace lines. Fossils and Strata, 4:155–438.Google Scholar
Osgood, R. G. 1970. Trace fossils of the Cincinnati area. Palaeontographica Americana, 6:281–444.Google Scholar
Osgood, R. G., and Drennen, W. T. 1975. Trilobite trace fossils from the Clinton Group (Silurian) of east-central New York State. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 67:300–348.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1985. Trilobite paleobiology and substrate relationships. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 76:231–237.Google Scholar
Stürmer, W., and Bergström, J. 1973. New discoveries on trilobites by X-ray. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 47:104–141.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1975. Trilobites with appendages from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Fossils and Strata, 4:97–136.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1980. Exoskeleton, moult stage, appendage morphology and habits of the Middle Cambrian trilobite Olenoides serratus . Palaeontology, 23:171–204.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1992. Trilobites. Fossils Illustrated, Volume 2. Boydell Press, Woodbridge, Suffolk, 280 p.Google Scholar