Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:15:43.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The first fossiliferous Pridolian beds from the southern Appalachians in northern Alabama, and the age of the uppermost Red Mountain Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Jean M. Berdan ,
A. J. Boucot  and
Benjamin A. Ferrill
Jean M. Berdan
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Room E-501, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20560
A. J. Boucot
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331
Benjamin A. Ferrill
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Alabama, P.O. Box 1945, Tuscaloosa 35486
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fossiliferous Late Silurian strata have not previously been recognized in the folded Appalachians south of central Virginia (Berry and Boucot, 1970). In this note, we report that the Red Mountain Formation at two localities in northern Alabama (Sparks Gap and Clear Branch Gap in Red Mountain near Birmingham, Figure 1) has yielded fossils like those of the Cobleskill Limestone (Pridolian, latest Late Silurian). The Red Mountain Formation in this area consists of interbedded sandstone, mudstone, claystone and limestone; some beds are hematitic and most are intensely weathered. The critical fossils are the brachiopod Eccentricosta sp. cf. E. jerseyensis (Weller, 1900) and the ostracode Welleriopsis? sp. aff. W.? pustulosa Berdan, 1972. The Eccentricosta beds at Sparks Gap and Clear Branch Gap are assigned to the Red Mountain because they are lithologically similar to lower beds in the formation. Thus the youngest part of the Red Mountain Formation in the Birmingham area is of Late Silurian, Pridolian, age. At Sparks Gap, underlying beds yielded Late Silurian corals that are not assigned to a faunal zone.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 180 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of Paleontology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berdan, J. M. 1972. Brachiopoda and Ostracoda of the Cobleskill Limestone (Upper Silurian) of central New York. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 730, 47 p.Google Scholar
Berry, W. B. N. and Boucot, A. J. 1970. Correlation of the North American Silurian rocks. Geological Society of America Special Paper 102, 289 p.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1975. Evolution and Extinction Rate Controls. Elsevier, New York, 427 p.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. and Harper, C. W. 1968. Silurian to lower Middle Devonian Chonetacea. Journal of Paleontology, 42:143–176.Google Scholar
Hoar, F. G. and Bowen, Z. P. 1967. Brachiopoda and stratigraphy of the Rondout Formation in the Rosendale quadrangle, southeastern New York. Journal of Paleontology, 41:1–36.Google Scholar
Lundin, R. F. and Newton, G. D. 1970. Ostracoda and the Silurian stratigraphy of northwestern Alabama. Geological Survey of Alabama Bulletin 95, 64 p.Google Scholar
McComb, Ronald and Broadhead, T. W. 1981. Silurian–Devonian boundary correlation in eastern United States. Oklahoma Geology Notes, 41(1):39.Google Scholar
Norford, B. S. 1972. Acaste birminghamensis, a new Lower Silurian trilobite from Alabama. Journal of Paleontology, 46:348–352.Google Scholar
Reeside, J. B. 1917. The Helderberg Limestone of central Pennsylvania. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 108-K, p. 185–225.Google Scholar
Swartz, F. M. 1929. The Helderberg Group of parts of West Virginia and Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 158-C, p. 27–75.Google Scholar
Swartz, F. M. and Whitmore, F. C. Jr. 1956. Ostracoda of the Silurian Decker and Manlius limestones in New Jersey and eastern New York. Journal of Paleontology, 30:1029–1091.Google Scholar
Weller, Stuart. 1903. The Paleozoic faunas. Geological Survey of New Jersey Report on Paleontology, 3, 462 p.Google Scholar