Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-29T20:54:19.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The first documentation of an Ordovician eurypterid (Chelicerata) from China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2023

Han Wang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Simon J. Braddy
Affiliation:
Manorbier, Pembrokeshire, Wales, UK
Joseph Botting
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China Department of Natural Sciences, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3LP, UK
Yuandong Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

An early form of eurypterids (Chelicerata), Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp., is described from the uppermost Ordovician Wenchang Formation of Anji County, Zhejiang Province, South China. It is the earliest record of eurypterids in China and likely the oldest representative of the Adelophthalmidae. The species, represented by a single specimen, is diagnosed by a ventrally preserved prosoma with a parabolic carapace, Hughmilleria-type prosomal appendages, a short vase-shaped metastoma, and a three-segmented type A (female) genital appendage. The specimen is preserved, together with diverse sponges, graptolites and occasional nautiloids, in a 10 m thick shale of marine deep-water setting. This finding extends the stratigraphic range of adelophthalmids from the previously recorded early Silurian into the Late Ordovician (some 10 million years older) and supports an earlier cryptic phase of eurypterid evolution in Gondwana.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/a2d090e5-1a15-40b6-8e2a-dda45b01e94d

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Introduction

The eurypterids are an extinct group of Paleozoic (specifically from Middle Ordovician to late Permian) aquatic predatory chelicerates. Some forms attained giant size (2.5 m long; Lamsdell and Braddy, Reference Lamsdell and Braddy2010), but most were less than 50 cm long. Some 250 eurypterid species have been recovered from marine (often inshore) to freshwater settings. They are rarely preserved as fossils due to their unmineralized cuticle, but they do occur in large numbers in some Siluro-Devonian Konservat-Lagerstätten. Eurypterids attained their maximum diversity during the late Silurian and Early Devonian (Plotnick, Reference Plotnick, Boucot and Lawson1999).

Ordovician eurypterids are extremely rare, so any reported occurrence is of great significance to understanding their early evolutionary history. Many reported species from the Ordovician of New York State are particularly dubious (see Braddy et al., Reference Braddy, Tollerton, Racheboeuf, Schallreuter, Webby, Droser and Paris2004; Tollerton, Reference Tollerton2004), being either misidentified fossils or pseudofossils. Three equivocal specimens from the Upper Ordovician of Shanxi Province (S. Yanbin, personal communication, 2002) were referred to ?Eurypterida indet. (cf. Onychopterella) or possibly nautiloids (Braddy et al., Reference Braddy, Tollerton, Racheboeuf, Schallreuter, Webby, Droser and Paris2004). Unfortunately, these dubious fossils seem to have been lost, while the original report was not accompanied by figures and descriptions, so no restudy and further assignments are possible.

To date, only 12 species of Ordovician eurypterids are known in the world. Most of them are the large predatory forms of the Megalograptidae, including Pentecopterus decorahensis Lamsdell et al., Reference Lamsdell, Briggs, Liu, Witzke and McKay2015, Echinognathus clevelandi Walcott, Reference Walcott1882, Eocarcinosoma batrachophthalmus Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering1964, Megalograptus alveolatus Shuler, Reference Shuler1915, M. welchi Miller, Reference Miller1874, M. ohioensis Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering1955, M. shideleri Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering1964, and M. williamsae Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering1964. The others are smaller forms, including Orcanopterus manitoulinensis Stott et al., Reference Stott, Tetlie, Braddy, Nowlan, Glasser and Devereux2005, Brachyopterus stubblefieldi Størmer, Reference Størmer1951, Onychopterella augusti Braddy, Aldridge, and Theron, Reference Braddy, Aldridge and Theron1995, and Paraeurypterus anatoliensis Lamsdell, Hoşgör, and Selden, Reference Lamsdell, Hoşgör and Selden2013.

The earliest known eurypterid, Pentecopterus decorahensis Lamsdell et al., Reference Lamsdell, Briggs, Liu, Witzke and McKay2015 from the Darriwilian of Iowa, was described as a megalograptid, but it lacks cercal blades, so it is more likely to be an intermediate between the megalograptids and the other Eurypterina. Lamsdell et al. (Reference Lamsdell, Briggs, Liu, Witzke and McKay2015) resolved megalograptids in a more derived position than most workers (e.g., Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007), dragging down the ghost range of all eurypterid lineages into the Early Ordovician. Lamsdell et al. (Reference Lamsdell, Hoşgör and Selden2013) described Paraeurypterus anatoliensis from the Upper Ordovician (Katian) of southeast Turkey and regarded it as an intermediate between the Dolichopteridae and Eurypteridae. They also inferred long ghost ranges, and a “missing” Ordovician fossil record for eurypterids, proposing that they actually originated in Gondwana and radiated to Laurentia and Baltica in the Late Ordovician and early Silurian, a hypothesis adopted to explain their sudden diverse appearance in Europe and North America.

Chinese eurypterids are known primarily from Silurian strata, with the mixopterid Terropterus xiushanensis from the Llandovery of Xiushan County, Chongqing Municipality, and Wuhan, Hubei Province (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Dunlop, Gai, Lei, Jarzembowski and Wang2021). Hughmilleria wangi was recorded by Tetlie et al. (Reference Tetlie, Selden and Ren2007) from the late Llandovery of Hunan Province, to which the specimens figured by Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Geng, Xiao and Zhu1988) from the same horizon in western Hunan Province may also be related. From the Wenlock of Xintan, Hubei Province, Eurypterus loi, E. styliformis, and E. yangi were described by Chang (Reference Chang1957) on the basis of four specimens. It seems likely that these species are at least partly synonymous, but this material seems to have been lost, and they must be considered dubious (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007). A pterygotid, Erettopterus qujingensis, and a slimoniid, Slimonia sp., were recently described by Ma et al. (Reference Ma, Selden, Lamsdell, Zhang, Chen and Zhang2022) from the upper Silurian Yulongsi Formation of Yunnan Province. Malongia mirabilis (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Liu, Xue, Lamsdell and Selden2022), Pterygotus wanggaii (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Zhang, Lamsdell, Chen, Selden and Chen2023), Parahughmilleria fuea (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Zhang, Lamsdell, Chen, Selden and Chen2023), and an indeterminate pterygotid (Wang and Gai, Reference Wang and Gai2014) were also reported from the Lower Devonian Xiaxishancun Formation of Yunnan Province. Adelophthalmus chinensis was reported by Grabau (Reference Grabau1920) from the Early Permian of Hebei Province.

In this paper, we describe a new eurypterid from the latest Ordovician (Hirnantian) Anji Biota of Zhejiang Province, South China (Fig. 1). Although some details are lacking in the single specimen available, there is sufficient information to support an assignment to the Adelophthalmidae, which extends their stratigraphic range back by some 10 million years.

Figure 1. Regional map and stratigraphy. (1) Map of the Fushi Reservoir area (Anji County, Zhejiang Province, South China) showing location of the Tianfucun section where Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp. was recovered. (2) Lithostratigraphy and biozone showing the approximate position of Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp. in black mudstones of the Wenchang Formation.

Geological setting and preservation

The eurypterid was recovered from a 10 m thick sponge-bearing sequence of dark mudstone at locality Tianfucun in Anji County, Zhejiang Province, South China (Botting et al., Reference Botting, Muir, Zhang, Ma, Ma, Wang, Zhang, Song and Fang2017). This interval yielding the Anji Biota is dated by abundant graptolites to an age of the latest Ordovician Metabolograptus persculptus Biozone (Muir et al., Reference Muir, Zhang, Botting and Ma2020, Reference Muir, Zhang, Botting and Ma2021), i.e., right after the Hirnantian mass extinction (444 Ma). In the dark mudstone, sponges are exceptionally abundant and diverse, including remarkable early representatives of modern deep-sea lineages such as rossellids (Botting et al., Reference Botting, Janussen, Zhang and Muir2020) and euplectellid hexactinellids (Botting et al., Reference Botting, Janussen, Muir, Dohrmann, Ma and Zhang2022), associated with abundant graptolites, occasional nautiloids, and rare arthropods. Judging from evidence from previous paleogeographic reconstructions and the tectonic setting, the Anji area represented a localized deep-water basin with an estimated depth of several hundred meters (Botting et al., Reference Botting, Muir, Wang, Qie, Tan, Zhang and Zhang2018).

The preservation of sponges (and, potentially, the eurypterid) in the Anji Biota has been proposed to be through partial silicification of carbonaceous soft tissues, with early pyritization and subsequent pyrite dissolution (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Botting, Zhang, Muir and Ma2022). This was due to burial of the fossils by collapsing anoxic nepheloid layers (Botting et al., Reference Botting, Muir, Wang, Qie, Tan, Zhang and Zhang2018; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Botting, Zhang, Muir and Ma2022) followed by rapid reoxygenation of the surface sediment as the temporary benthic anoxia dispersed. The absence of any burrowing, or of typical benthic fossils such as brachiopods and trilobites, is consistent with a low-oxygen but survivable (for sponges) environment on the seafloor, where oxygenation was too low for animals with higher metabolic requirements. The eurypterid was therefore probably living within the water column and entrained within a collapsing nepheloid layer. This is the only eurypterid specimen recovered among thousands of complete sponges, implying that it was either a very rare member of the community or an accidental immigrant into this environment.

Materials and methods

The eurypterid specimen is preserved in weathered (orange color) carbon in a dark gray, well-laminated mudstone matrix (Fig. 2). Eurypterid cuticle is preserved as orange films, but in places it has a shadowy appearance, and details are comparatively poor. Photographs were taken using a Nikon D810 camera under normal and polarized light, which helped resolve the appendages. Image processing was carried out with Adobe Photoshop CC2019 to adjust contrast and color, and plates and interpretive drawing (Figs. 2, 3) were prepared with CorelDRAW X7. Morphological terminology follows Wills (Reference Wills1964), for the genitalia, and Tollerton (Reference Tollerton1989), with modifications (i.e., carapace and metastoma shapes; see the following), illustrating the problem of “forcing” terminology into “boxes” on the basis of a limited number of geometric measurements.

Figure 2. Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp. (1) Entire specimen, holotype (NIGP 164906). (2) Line drawing of the entire specimen. (3) Close-up of type A genital appendage. (4) Counterpart. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Figure 3. Enhanced image of Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp., the original color of the fossil adjusted to blue to improve contrast. (1) Entire specimen, holotype (NIGP 164906). (2) Close-up of appendage. (3) Close-up of type A genital appendage. (4) Close-up of metastoma (counterpart). (1, 3, 4) Scale bars = 10 mm; (2) scale bar = 2 mm.

Repository and institutional abbreviation

The specimen used in this study is deposited in the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology (NIGP), Nanjing, China, under the repository number NIGP 164906.

Systematic paleontology

Subphylum Chelicerata Heymons, Reference Heymons1901
Order Eurypterida Burmeister, Reference Burmeister1843
Suborder Eurypterina Burmeister, Reference Burmeister1843
Family Adelophthalmidae Tollerton, Reference Tollerton1989
Genus Archopterus new genus

Type and only species

Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp.

Diagnosis

As for the type species by monotype.

Etymology

Genus name from the Latin prefix arch-, meaning “ancient,” and -opterus, a common suffix for eurypterids, meaning “wing.”

Remarks

With a parabolic-shaped carapace and Hughmilleria-type prosomal appendages, Archopterus has an intermediate Adelophthalmid–hughmilleriid affinity. Most characters are consistent with the Adelophthalmidae Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1951, such as the carapace shape, spinosity of the appendages, and metastoma shape. Adelophthalmids were considered to have appeared in Baltica in the Silurian, with basal forms evolving in the Early Devonian of Euramerica (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007). The family includes Adelophthalmus Jordan in Jordan and von Mayer, Reference Jordan and Meyer1854, and the basal forms Bassipterus Kjellesvig-Waering and Leutze, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering and Leutze1966, Eysyslopterus Tetlie and Poschmann, Reference Tetlie and Poschmann2008, Nanahughmilleria Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961, Parahughmilleria Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1961, Pittsfordipterus Kjellesvig-Waering and Leutze, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering and Leutze1966, and Unionopterus Chernyshev, Reference Chernyshev1948 (see Braddy et al., Reference Braddy, Lerner and Lucas2021 for review). Recently, Pruemopterus has also been added to the family (Poschmann, Reference Poschmann2020). With no spurs present on its abdominal segments, Archopterus is easily distinguished from Adelophthalmus (Størmer, Reference Størmer and Moore1955). Among basal forms, Archopterus is similar to Parahughmilleria in bearing a complex three-segmented type A genital appendage, large spatula, and vase-shaped metastoma with an anterior notch, but Parahughmilleria has reduced appendage spinosity, with isolated spines in places and crenulated distal podomeres, larger epimera and genital spatulae, and coarser ornament. Archopterus is distinguished from Nanahughmilleria by the fact that the former has larger spatula, less spinosity on its appendages, and relatively larger size. Bassipterus is a rare basal form, with appendages II–V of Hughmilleria type with paired ventral spines on each podomere and the paddle bearing a serrated outer edge; these features are also similar to Archopterus, but Bassipterus has a more-complex genital appendage, especially in the second and third joints. Bearing a parabolic carapace, Archopterus can also be easily distinguished from other basal forms, such as Eysyslopterus, Unionopterus, and Pruemopterus.

Archopterus anjiensis new species
Figures 2, 3

Reference Botting, Muir, Zhang, Ma, Ma, Wang, Zhang, Song and Fang2017

unnamed hughmilleriid; Botting et al., fig. 2a.

Holotype

NIGP 164906, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, CAS, China.

Diagnosis

Adelophthalmid with a parabolic carapace, Hughmilleria-type prosomal appendages, vase-shaped metastoma, and three-segmented type A (female) genital appendage.

Occurrence

Hirnantian (Metabolograptus persculptus Biozone) of the Wenchang Formation of Tianfucun, Anji County, Zhejiang Province, South China.

Description

The carapace is 20 mm long and 28.8 mm wide (length/width ratio 0.69), with a lateral angle of 90° (i.e., “subquadrate” cf. Tollerton, Reference Tollerton1989). The anterior margin is more curved than a typical subquadrate carapace, showing more of a parabolic shape. A narrow (ventral) marginal rim, 1.4 mm wide anteriorly, narrowing to 0.6 mm laterally, surrounds the anterior carapace. The doublure is unknown, although large scales are apparent bordering the marginal rim. A possible robust chelicera, basis square, 1.3 mm wide, fingers 1.3 mm long, occurs near the anterior midline. Partial remains of prosomal appendages II–VI are preserved, mainly on the left side of the specimen. Appendages II and III, of Hughmilleria type, are folded inward on the left side, overlying the posterior appendages, obscuring details. Appendage II is 1.5 mm wide, with the following (*preserved) lengths: II-1 (coxa), 1.9 mm; II-2, 2.4 mm; II-3, 1.1* mm. Appendage III is best preserved (unfolded) on the right side: III-1 (coxa) and III-2 are obscured, III-3 length 2.9 mm, width 1.9 mm, paired distal spines, 1.3–1.6 mm long; III-4 length 2.6 mm, width 1.9 mm, with a tiny anterior spine 0.9 mm long preserved; III-5 length 1.2 mm, width 1.7 mm, with paired tiny spines 0.7 mm long; III-6 length 1.5 mm, width 1.3 mm. Appendage IV is obscured on the left side, but podomeres 3–6 are best preserved on the right side: IV-3 is 1.5 mm long and wide; IV-4 is 2.5 mm long and 1.4 mm wide; IV-5 is 2.5 mm long and 1.3 mm wide; IV-6 is 2.5 mm long and 1.8 mm wide, with a short spur or spine distally. Appendage V is long, projecting posteriorly on the left side: V-1 (coxa) is large, length 7 mm, distal width 4 mm, the anterior gnathobase curved anteriorly; V-2 is 2.7 mm long, 2.8 mm wide; V-3 is 2.8 mm long, width uncertain; V-4 is 2.5 mm long, 2.1 mm wide; V-5 to V-9 uncertain, as disarticulated. Appendage VI may curl over the genital operculum on the left side and projects laterally on the right side, with only disarticulated podomeres.

A slightly displaced metastoma is faintly preserved, its anterior margin with a notch. The shape is classed as “vase shaped” on the basis of Tollerton (Reference Tollerton1989, fig. 5), with a possible flatter posterior margin.

The genital operculum is 8 mm long, each opercular lobe 15 mm wide, preserving large anterior (3 mm long), median, and posterior (4.8 mm long) plates. The genital appendage is interpreted as being a type A (female; Braddy and Dunlop, Reference Braddy and Dunlop1997, but see Kamenz et al., Reference Kamenz, Staude and Dunlop2011); incompletely preserved part is 10 mm long, composed of three segments; deltoid plates are apparent anterior to the genital appendage; large spatulae can be seen. Two paired Blattfüsse are preserved, at least the second unfused, probably also the first (obscured by appendage). Large V-shaped scales are evident in places.

The first opisthosomal segment is reduced, approximately half the length of the others. The metasoma and telson are unknown. The eurypterid is estimated to have had a total body length of 15 cm.

Etymology

The species is named after Anji County, where the type specimen was discovered.

Remarks

Some obvious characters, such as the specific spatula size, can distinguish A. anjiensis from its most similar relatives, such as Parahughmilleria hefteri (Størmer, Reference Størmer1973) and Nanahughmilleria norvegica (Kiær, Reference Kiaer1911).

Discussion

A. anjiensis represents the oldest adelophthalmid and extends the stratigraphic range of this family to Late Ordovician (by about ten million years), making Adelophthalmidae the longest-living eurypterid family (Ordovician to Permian). The new fossil also represents the first unequivocal Ordovician and the oldest eurypterid recorded in China, adding new knowledge to early evolution of eurypterids in Gondwana.

Associated with diverse sponges, Archopterus anjiensis was found in a deep-water environment of several hundred meters deep. This occurrence, along with some Ordovician eurypterids—e.g., Megalograptus from a normal marine environment (Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering1964)—may indicate that some early eurypterids favored a relatively deeper-water environment than their post-Ordovician relatives, although it is possible that this was a single vagrant individual washed out from more typical shallow-water environments. In addition, this occurrence indicates that adelophthalmids have been found in the widest range of habitats of all eurypterid groups.

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Dunlop and two anonymous reviewers for suggesting improvements to the manuscript. This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB26000000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42125201).

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

Botting, J.P., Muir, L.A., Zhang, Y.-D., Ma, X., Ma, J.-Y., Wang, L.-W., Zhang, J.-F., Song, Y.-Y., and Fang, X., 2017, Flourishing sponge-based ecosystems after the end-Ordovician mass extinction: Current Biology, v. 27, p. 556562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botting, J.P., Muir, L.A., Wang, W.-H., Qie, W.-K., Tan, J.-Q., Zhang, L.-N., and Zhang, Y.-D., 2018, Sponge-dominated offshore benthic ecosystems across South China in the aftermath of the end-Ordovician mass extinction: Gondwana Research, v. 61, p. 150171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botting, J.P., Janussen, D., Zhang, Y.-D., and Muir, L. A., 2020, Exceptional preservation of two new early rossellid sponges: the dominant species in the Hirnantian (Late Ordovician) Anji Biota of China: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 177, p. 10251038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botting, J.P., Janussen, D., Muir, L.A., Dohrmann, M., Ma, J.-Y., and Zhang, Y.-D., 2022, Extraordinarily early Venus’ flower basket sponges (Hexactinellida, Euplectellidae) from the uppermost Ordovician Anji Biota, China: Palaeontology, v. 65, n. e12592, https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddy, S.J., and Dunlop, J.A., 1997, The functional morphology of mating in the Silurian eurypterid, Baltoeurypterus tetragonophthalmus (Fischer, 1839): The Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 121, p. 435461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddy, S.J., Aldridge, R.J., and Theron, J.N., 1995, A new eurypterid from the Late Ordovician Table Mountain Group, South Africa: Palaeontology, v. 38, p. 563581.Google Scholar
Braddy, S.J., Tollerton, V.P. Jr., Racheboeuf, P.P., and Schallreuter, R., 2004, Eurypterids, phyllocarids and ostracodes, in Webby, B.D., Droser, M.L., and Paris, F., eds., The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event: New York, Columbia University Press, p. 255265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddy, S.J., Lerner, A.J., and Lucas, S.G., 2021, A new specimen of Adelophthalmus luceroensis (Eurypterida: Chelicerata) from the late Carboniferous (middle Missourian; Kasimovian) Kinney Quarry Lagerstätte of New Mexico: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, v. 302, p. 105115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burmeister, H., 1843, Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt; nebst systematische Uebersicht aller Seitherbeschriebenen Arten: Berlin, Georg Reimer, 147 p.Google Scholar
Caster, K.E., and Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N., 1955, Marsupipterus, an unusual eurypterid from the Downtonian of England: Journal of Paleontology, v. 29, p. 10401041.Google Scholar
Caster, K.E., and Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N., 1964, Upper Ordovician eurypterids of Ohio: Palaeontographica Americana, v. 4, p. 301358.Google Scholar
Chang, A.-C., 1957, On the discovery of the Wenlockian Eurypterus-fauna from south China: Acta Paleontologica Sinica, v. 5, p. 446450. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Chernyshev, B.I., 1948, New representative of Merostomata from the lower Carboniferous: State of Kiev, Geological Collections, v. 2, p. 119130.Google Scholar
Grabau, A.W., 1920, A new species of Eurypterus from the Permian of China: Bulletin of the Geological Survey of China, v. 2, p. 6167.Google Scholar
Heymons, R., 1901, Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender: Zoologica, v. 13, p. 244.Google Scholar
Jordan, H., and Meyer, H., 1854, Ueber die Crustaceen der Steinkohlenformation von Saarbrücken: Palaeontographica, v. 4, p. 115.Google Scholar
Kamenz, C., Staude, A., and Dunlop, J.A., 2011, Sperm carriers in Silurian sea scorpions: Naturwissenschaften, v. 98, p. 889896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiaer, J., 1911, A new Downtonian fauna in the sandstone series of the Kristiania area: a preliminary report: Vidensk.-selsk. Skrifter,Kristiania, v. 1911, no. 7, p. 122.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N., 1951, Downtonian (Silurian) Eurypterida from Perton, near Stoke Edith, Herefordshire: Geological Magazine, v. 88, p. 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N., 1961, The Silurian Eurypterida of the Welsh Borderland: Journal of Paleontology, v. 35, p. 251256.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N., and Leutze, W.P., 1966, Eurypterida from the Silurian of West Virginia: Journal of Paleontology, v. 40, p. 11091122.Google Scholar
Lamsdell, J.C., and Braddy, S.J., 2010, Cope's Rule and Romer's theory: patterns of diversity and gigantism in eurypterids and Palaeozoic vertebrates: Biology Letters, v. 6, p. 265269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamsdell, J.C., Hoşgör, I., and Selden, P.A., 2013, A new Ordovician eurypterid (Arthropoda: Chelicerata) from southeast Turkey: evidence for a cryptic Ordovician record of Eurypterida: Gondwana Research, v. 23, p. 354366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamsdell, J.C., Briggs, D.E.G., Liu, H.-P., Witzke, B.J., and McKay, R.M., 2015, The oldest described eurypterid: a giant Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian) megalograptid from the Winneshiek Lagerstätte of Iowa: BMC Evolutionary Biology, v. 15, n. 169, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0443-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Z.-H., Selden, P.A., Lamsdell, J.C., Zhang, T.-S., Chen, J.-W., and Zhang, X., 2022, Two new eurypterids (Arthropoda, Chelicerata) from the upper Silurian Yulongsi Formation of south-west China: Journal of Paleontology, v. 96, p. 10781086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Z.-H., Zhang, T.-S., Lamsdell, J.C., Chen, J.-W., Selden, P.A., and Chen, L.-X., 2023, Early Devonian (Lochkovian) eurypterids from the Yunnan province of southwest China: Geological Magazine, v. 160, p. 172179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1874, Notes and descriptions of Cincinnatian Group fossils: Cincinnati Quarterly Journal of Science, v. 1, p. 343351.Google Scholar
Muir, L.A., Zhang, Y.-D., Botting, J.P., and Ma, X., 2020, Avitograptus species (Graptolithina) from the Hirnantian (uppermost Ordovician) Anji Biota of South China and the evolution of Akidograptus and Parakidograptus: Journal of Paleontology, v. 94, p. 955965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, L.A., Zhang, Y.-D., Botting, J.P., and Ma, X., 2021, Convergent evolution in planktic graptolites: independent origin of the dicranograptid morphology in the Hirnantian (latest Ordovician): Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, v. 45, p. 395400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotnick, R.E., 1999, Habitat of Llandoverian–Lochkovian eurypterids, in Boucot, A. J., and Lawson, J.D., eds., Paleocommunities: A Case Study from the Silurian and Lower Devonian, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 106131.Google Scholar
Poschmann, M., 2020, A new sea scorpion (Arthropoda, Eurypterida) from the Early Devonian of Willwerath (Rhineland–Palatinate, SW Germany): Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 95, p. 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuler, E.W., 1915, A new Ordovician eurypterid: American Journal of Science, ser. 4, v. 39, p. 551554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L., 1951, A new eurypterid from the Ordovician of Montgomeryshire, Wales: Geological Magazine, v. 88, p. 409422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L., 1955, Merostomata, in Moore, R.C., ed, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part P, Arthropoda 2, Chelicerata: Lawrence, Kansas, University of Kansas Press, p. 441.Google Scholar
Størmer, L., 1973, Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany. Part 3: Eurypterida, Hughmilleridae: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 54, p. 119205.Google Scholar
Stott, C.A., Tetlie, O.E., Braddy, S.J., Nowlan, G.S., Glasser, P.M., and Devereux, M.G., 2005, A new eurypterid (Chelicerata) from the uppermost Ordovician of Manitoulin Island, Ontario, Canada: Journal of Paleontology, v. 79, p. 11661174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlie, O.E., 2007, Distribution and dispersal history of Eurypterida (Chelicerata): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 252, p. 557574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlie, O.E., and Poschmann, M., 2008, Phylogeny and palaeoecology of the Adelophthalmoidea (Arthropoda; Chelicerata; Eurypterida): Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 6, p. 237249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlie, O.E., Selden, P.A., and Ren, D., 2007, A new Silurian eurypterid (Arthropoda: Chelicerata) from China: Palaeontology, v. 50, p. 619625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollerton, V.P. Jr., 1989, Morphology, taxonomy, and classification of the order Eurypterida Burmeister, 1843: Journal of Paleontology, v. 63, p. 642657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollerton, V.P. Jr., 2004, Summary of a revision of New York State Ordovician eurypterids: implications for eurypterid palaeoecology, diversity and evolution: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, v. 94, p. 235242.Google Scholar
Walcott, C.D., 1882, Description of a new genus of the order Eurypterida from the Utica Slate: American Journal of Science, ser. 3, v. 23, p. 213216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B., and Gai, Z.-K., 2014, A sea scorpion claw from the Lower Devonian of China (Chelicerata: Eurypterida): Alcheringa, v. 38, p. 296300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G.-X., Geng, L.-Y., Xiao, Y.-H., and Zhu, Z.-B, 1988, Geological age and depositional feature of the upper Xiushan Formation and Xiaoxiyu Formation of west Hunan: Journal of Stratigraphy, v. 12, p. 216225. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Wang, H., Dunlop, J., Gai, Z.-K., Lei, X.-J., Jarzembowski, E.A., and Wang, B., 2021, First mixopterid eurypterids (Arthropoda: Chelicerata) from the lower Silurian of south China: Science Bulletin, v. 66, p. 22772280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J.-S., Liu, L., Xue, J.-Z., Lamsdell, J.C., and Selden, P.A., 2022, A new genus and species of eurypterid (Chelicerata, Eurypterida) from the Lower Devonian Xiaxishancun Formation of Yunnan, southwestern China: Geobios, v. 75, p. 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, L.J., 1964, The ventral anatomy of the upper Carboniferous eurypterid Anthraconectes Meek and Worthen: Palaeontology, v. 7, p. 474507.Google Scholar
Wu, X.-J., Botting, J.P., Zhang, Y.-D., Muir, L.A., and Ma, J.-Y., 2022, Taphonomy of exceptional sponge preservation in the Hirnantian Anji Biota, China: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 179, n. jgs2021–112, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Regional map and stratigraphy. (1) Map of the Fushi Reservoir area (Anji County, Zhejiang Province, South China) showing location of the Tianfucun section where Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp. was recovered. (2) Lithostratigraphy and biozone showing the approximate position of Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp. in black mudstones of the Wenchang Formation.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp. (1) Entire specimen, holotype (NIGP 164906). (2) Line drawing of the entire specimen. (3) Close-up of type A genital appendage. (4) Counterpart. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Enhanced image of Archopterus anjiensis n. gen. n. sp., the original color of the fossil adjusted to blue to improve contrast. (1) Entire specimen, holotype (NIGP 164906). (2) Close-up of appendage. (3) Close-up of type A genital appendage. (4) Close-up of metastoma (counterpart). (1, 3, 4) Scale bars = 10 mm; (2) scale bar = 2 mm.