Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:44:53.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First basal synapsids (“pelycosaurs”) from the Upper Permian-?Lower Triassic of Uruguay, South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Graciela Piñeiro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias, Iguá 4225, CP 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay,
Mariano Verde
Affiliation:
Departamento de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias, Iguá 4225, CP 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay,
Martín Ubilla
Affiliation:
Departamento de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias, Iguá 4225, CP 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay,
Jorge Ferigolo
Affiliation:
Museu de Ciências Naturais, Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul. Av. Dr. Salvador França 1427, Jardim Botânico, CEP 90690-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil

Extract

In their monograph Review of the Pelycosauria, Romer and Price (1940), proposed that the earliest synapsids (“pelycosaurs”) were cosmopolitan, despite the observation that amniotes appeared to be restricted to the paleotropics during the Late Carboniferous and Early Permian (290–282 Ma). Romer and Price (1940) accounted for the scarcity of terrestrial tetrapods, including “pelycosaurs,” in Lower Permian beds elsewhere to the absence of coeval continental deposits beyond North America and Europe. Indeed, most workers recognized a geographical and temporal gap between Permo-Carboniferous “pelycosaurs” and therapsid synapsids. Recent research has confirmed that varanopid and caseid “pelycosaurs” were components of therapsid-dominated Late Permian faunas preserved in Russia and South-Africa (Tatarinov and Eremina, 1975; Reisz, 1986; Reisz et al., 1998; Reisz and Berman, 2001).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acevedo, S. A., Lavina, E., Barberena, M., Ferrando, L., and Andreis, R. 1985. Evidencias de correlação entre a Formação Yaguari (Uruguai) e as Formações Rio do Rasto e Sanga do Cabral (Rio Grande do Sul-Brasil). Pesquisas, 17:112121.Google Scholar
Andreis, R. R., Bossi, G., and Montardo, D. 1980. O Grupo Rosário do Sul (Triásico) no Rio Grande do Sul. Annales do XXXI Congreso Brasileiro de Geología, 2:659673.Google Scholar
Barberena, M. C., Araújo, D., and Lavina, E. 1985. Late Permian and Triassic tetrapods of Southern Brazil. National Geographic Research, 1:520.Google Scholar
Berman, D., and Reisz, R. 1982. Restudy of Mycterosaurus longiceps (Reptilia, Pelycosauria) from the Lower Permian of Texas. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 51:423453.Google Scholar
Bossi, J., and Navarro, R. 1991. Geología del Uruguay. Departamento de Publicaciones, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, 996 p.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L., and Currie, P. J. 1991. The early radiation of Diapsid reptiles, p. 354424. In Schultze, H. P. and Trueb, L. (eds.), Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods: Controversy and Concensus. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Cisneros, J. C., and Schultz, C. L. In press. Procolophon brasiliensis, n. sp., a new procolophonoid reptile from the Lower Triassic of Southern Brazil. Neues Jahrbuckh für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte.Google Scholar
Currie, P. J. 1981. The vertebrae of Youngina (Reptilia: Eosuchia). Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 18:815818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccini, U. 1989. O Permo-Triássico do Rio Grande do Sul. Uma análise sob o ponto de vista de Sequencias Depositacionais. Unpublished MSc. dissertation. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Brasil, 113 p.Google Scholar
França, A., Milani, E., Schneider, R., López, P., López, M., Suárez, S., Ana, H. Santa, Wiens, F., Ferreiro, O., Rossello, E., Bianucci, H., Flores, R., Vistalli, M., Seveso, F. Fernández, Fuenzalida, R., and Muñoz, N. 1995. Phanerozoic correlation in Southern South America, p. 129161. In Tankard, A. J., Suárez, R., and Welsink, H. (eds.), Petroleum Basins of South America. Memoir 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goso, C., Piñeiro, G., de Santa Ana, H., Rojas, A., Verde, M., and Alves, C. 2001. Caracterización estratigráfica de los depósitos continentales cuspidales neopérmicos (Formaciones Yaguarí y Buena Vista) en el borde oriental de la Cuenca Norte Uruguaya. XI Congreso Latinoamericano de Geología, III Congreso Uruguayo de Geología. (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
Ivachnenko, M. 1974. New data on the Early Triassic procolophonids of the USSR. Paleontological Journal, 8(3):346351.Google Scholar
Laurin, M., and Reisz, R. 1995. A revaluation of early amniote phylogeny. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113:165223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsicano, C., Perea, D., and Ubilla, M. 2000. A new temnospondyl amphibian from the Lower Triassic of South America. Alcheringa, 24:119123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modesto, S. P., Sidor, C. A., Rubidge, B. S., and Welman, J. 2001. A second varanopseid skull from the Upper Permian of South Africa: Implications for Late Permian “pelycosaur” evolution. Lethaia, 34:249259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modesto, S. P., Damiani, R. J., and Sues, H.-D. In press. A reappraisal of Coletta seca, a basal procolophonoid reptile from the Lower Triassic of South Africa. Palaeontology.Google Scholar
Pinto, I. D. 1972. Late Paleozoic insects and crustaceans from Paraná Basin and their bearing on chronology and continental drift. Annales da Académia Brasileira de Ciências, 44:247254.Google Scholar
Pinto, I. D., Piñeiro, G., and Verde, M. 2000. First Permian insects from Uruguay. Pesquisas, 27:8996.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R. 1981. A diapsid reptile from the Pennsylvanian of Kansas. Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas Special Publications, 7:174.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R. 1986. Pelycosauria. In Wellnhofer, P. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläeoherpetologie, Pt. 17A. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, 102 p.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R., and Berman, D. 2001. The skull of Mesenosaurus romeri, a small varanopseid (Synapsida, Eupeycosauria) from the Upper Permian of the Mesen River Basin, northern Russia. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 70:113132.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R., Dilkes, D., and Berman, D. 1998. Anatomy and relationships of Elliotsmithia longiceps Broom, a small synapsid (Eupelycosauria: Varanopseidae) from the Late Permian of South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18:602611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisz, R. R., Wilson, H., and Scott, D. 1997. Varanopseid synapsid skeletal elements from Richards Spur, a Lower Permian fissure fill near Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geology Notes, 57(5):160170.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S., and Price, L. I. 1940. Review of the Pelycosauria. Special Paper Geological Society of America, 28:1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumida, S. S., and Berman, D. S. 1993. The pelycosaurian (Amniota, Synapsida) assemblage from the Late Pennsylvanian Sangre de Cristo Formation of Central Colorado. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 62:293310.Google Scholar
Tatarinov, L. P., and Eremina, I. V. 1975. New data on the morphology of Ennatosaurus (Pelycosauria, Caseomorpha) from the Lower Tatarian deposits on the Pinega river. Paleontological Journal, 9(4):510514.Google Scholar
Zalán, P. V., Wolf, S., Conceição, J. C. J., Marques, A., Astolfi, M. A., Vieira, I. S., Appi, V. T., and Zanotto, A. 1990. Bacia do Paraná, p. 135168. In Gabaglia, G. P. De Raya and Milani, E. J. (eds.), Origem e evolução das Bacias Sedimentares, Rio de Janeiro (Petrobrás).Google Scholar