No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evactinoporidae, a new family of Cystoporata (Bryozoa) from the Mississippian of North America: growth and functional morphology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 August 2019
Abstract
The morphology and growth habits of Evactinopora species of the Evactinoporidae (new family) are documented. This distinctive family of free-living bryozoans has a radial colony form at all growth stages. During a brief attachment phase on a hard substrate, the colony morphology grew as an expanding cone with vertical folds. Following detachment of the nascent colony from this hard substrate, it settled on soft sediment and the free-living expanding colony acquired a star-like form by producing slender outrigger rays. Continued growth produced a radial array of vertical vanes containing feeding autozooecia. The colony maintained a vertical orientation on soft sediment by means of outrigger rays and secretion of solid skeleton on the colony base that provided ballast. The radial growth pattern, outrigger rays, and vertical vanes developed as adaptive characters suitable for free-living life on soft sediment. North American species of Evactinopora are redefined and described taxonomically on the basis of zoarial and zooecial characters and a new species, Evactinopora mangeri, erected. The new family Evactinoporidae is established on the basis of the novel characters of early colony detachment from a hard surface, radial growth pattern through life, generation of outrigger rays, and growth of vertical vanes from the top of rays.
UUID: http://zoobank.org/d2cf3b6d-72d2-49d5-afa0-c08710af7874
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2019, The Paleontological Society
References
Adams, G.I., Purdue, A.H., Burchard, E.F., and Ulrich, E.O., 1904, Zinc and lead deposits of northern Arkansas: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 24, 118 p.Google Scholar
Astrova, G.G., 1964, O novom otryade paleozojskikh mshanok: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 1964, no. 2, p. 22–31.Google Scholar
Bancroft, A.J., 1988, Palaeocorynid-type appendages in Upper Paleozoic fenestellid bryozoan: Palaeontology, v. 31, p. 665–675.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., 1903, On a Fossil Polyzoa, from the Mountain Limestone, Castleton: Transactions of the Manchester Geological and Mining Society, v. 28, p. 243–245.Google Scholar
Borg, F., 1926, Studies on Recent cyclostomatous Bryozoa: Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala, v. 10, p. 181–507.Google Scholar
Bridges, D.L., and Mulvany, P.S., 2018, Composite stratigraphic column for Missouri: Missouri Geological Survey, chart, 1 sheet.Google Scholar
Butts, C., 1922, The Mississippian Series of eastern Kentucky: Kentucky Geological Survey, 188 p.Google Scholar
Campbell, K.S.W., and Engel, B., 1963, The faunas of the Tournaisian Tulcumba Sandstone and its members in the Werrie and Belvue Synclines, New South Wales: Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, v. 10, p. 55–122.Google Scholar
Cook, P.L., and Chimonides, P.J., 1983, Recent and fossil Lunulitidae (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata) 5. Selenaria alata Tension Woods, and related species: Journal of Natural History, v. 19, p. 337–358.Google Scholar
Crockford, J.M., 1947, Bryozoa from the Lower Carboniferous of New South Wales and Queensland: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 72, p. 1–48.Google Scholar
Crockford, J.M., 1957, Permian Bryozoa from the Fitzroy Basin, Western Australia: Bureau of Mineral Resources, Bulletin, v. 34, p. 1–136.Google Scholar
Crook, A.R., 1911, Report on the Progress and Condition of the Illinois State Museum of Natural History for the Years 1909 and 1910: Illinois State Museum, Springfield, Missouri, 497 p.Google Scholar
Duncan, P.M., and Jenkins, H.M., 1869, On Palaeocoryne, a genus of tubularine Hydrozoa from the Carboniferous Formation: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, v. 159, p. 693–699.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1831, Symbolae Physicae, seu Icones et descriptiones Corporum Naturalium novorum aut minus cognitorum, quae ex itineribus per Libyam, Aegyptum, Nubium, Dongalum, Syriam, Arabium et Habessinium studio annis1820–1825 redierunt Pars Zoologica. vol. 4, Animalia Evertebrata exclusis Insectis: Berolini, 10 pl.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., 2005, Lower Carboniferous Bryozoa from some localities in Sauerland, Germany, in Moyano, H., Cancino, J.M., and Wyse Jackson, P.N., eds., Bryozoan Studies 2004, Proceedings of the 13th International Bryozoology Association conference, Concepción/Chile, 11–16 January 2004: London, CRC Press, p. 49–61.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., Wyse Jackson, P.N., and Aretz, M., 2015, Bryozoan fauna from the Mississippian (Visean) of Roque Redonde (Montagne Noire, southern France): Geodiversitas, v. 37, p. 151–213.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J., 1961, Claviradix, a new genus of the family Palaeocorynidae from the Carboniferous rocks of County Durham: Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, v. 33, p. 135–148.Google Scholar
Greb, S.F., and Potter, P.E., 2013, Geology of Kentucky, Stratigraphy of the Fort Payne Formation: Kentucky Geological Survey web site: http://www.uky.edu/KGS/geoky/fieldtrip/fort_payne/stratigraphy/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, E., Key, M.M Jr., and Ernst, A., 2016, Evactinostella & Lyroporella—weird and wonderful bryozoans from Western Australia: 17th Conference of the International Bryozoology Association, Melbourne Museum, Australia, Abstracts, p. 39.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1857, Observations on the genus Archimedes, or Fenestella, with descriptions of species, etc.: Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, v. 10, p. 176–180.Google Scholar
Hudleston, W.H., 1883, Notes on a collection of fossils and rock specimens from West Australia, north of the Gascoyne River: The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, v. 39, p. 582–595.Google Scholar
Kaiser, C.P., 1950, Stratigraphy of Lower Mississippian rocks in southwestern Missouri: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 34, p. 2133–2175.Google Scholar
Keyes, C.R., 1894, Paleontology of Missouri, Part 2: Missouri Geological Survey Reports, v. 5, 266 p.Google Scholar
Kincade, S.C., 2016, Sequence stratigraphy of the St. Joe and Boone formations, Lower Mississippian (Kinderhookian–Osagean), southern Ozarks region: Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, v. 70, p. 122–125.Google Scholar
Knott, W.T., 1885, Report on the geology of Marion County: Kentucky Geological Survey, 43 p.Google Scholar
Lane, H.R., and De Keyser, T.L., 1980, Paleogeography of the late Early Mississippian (Tournaisian 3) in the central and southwestern United States, in Fouch, T.D., and Magathan, E.R., eds., Paleozoic Paleogeography of the west-central United States: Rocky Mountain Section of SEPM, p. 149–162.Google Scholar
Ma, J.-Y., Buttler, C.J., and Taylor, P.D., 2014, Cladistic analysis of the ‘trepostome’ Suborder Esthonioporina and the systematics of Palaeozoic bryozoans, in Rosso, A., Wyse Jackson, P.N., and Porter, J.S., eds., Bryozoan Studies 2013: Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali, v. 94, p. 153–161.Google Scholar
Männil, R.M., 1961, On the morphology of hemispherical Bryozoa of the Order Trepostomata: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Geoloogia Instituudi Uurimused, v. 6, p. 113–140.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., 1977, Functional interpretation of lyre-shaped Bryozoa: Paleobiology, v. 3, p. 90–97.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., and Jackson, J.B.C., 1989, Bryozoan evolution: Boston, Unwin Hyman, 238 p.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., and Taylor, P.D. 2003. Palaeoecology of free-lying domal bryozoan colonies from the Upper Eocene of southeastern USA: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 48, p. 447–462.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., and Wyse Jackson, P.N., 2015, Order Fenestrata: Morphology and Growth; Treatise Online, v. 66, p. 1–93.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., Taylor, P.D., and Zullo, V.A., 1993, Lyre-shaped hornerid bryozoan colonies; homeomorphy in colony form between Paleozoic Fenestrata and Cenozoic Cyclostomata: Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 343–354.Google Scholar
Meek, F.B., and Worthen, A.H., 1865, Descriptions of new Crinoidea, &c., from the Carboniferous rocks of Illinois and some of the adjoining States: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 17, p. 155–166.Google Scholar
Meek, F.B., and Worthen, A.H., 1868, Palaeontology: Geological Survey of Illinois, v. 3, p. 1–574.Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., 1981, Pozdne paleozoĭskie mshanki severo-vostoka SSSR [Late Paleozoic Bryozoa from the northeastern USSR]: Trudy Paleontologischeskogo Instituta, v. 188, p. 1–118.Google Scholar
Mory, A.J., and Haig, D.W., 2011, Permian–Carboniferous geology of the northern Perth and southern Carnarvon Basins, Western Australia—a field guide: Geological Survey of Western Australia, Record, v. 14, 65 p.Google Scholar
Nelson, S.J., and Bolton, T.E., 1980, Macgowanella gen. nov., possible bryozoan holdfast, Mississippian of southern Canadian Rock Mountains, Alberta: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 17, p. 1431–1435.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H.A., and Hinde, G.J., 1890, Notes on the palaeontology of Western Australia: Geological Magazine, Decade 3, v. 7, p. 193–204.Google Scholar
Pachut, J.F., and Fisherkeller, P., 2011, Patterns of early colony development (astogeny) in four genera of trepostome bryozoans from the Upper Ordovician: Journal of Paleontology, v. 85, p. 744–756.Google Scholar
Ross, J.R.P., 1988, New chaetetiform Bryozoa from the Upper Mississippian of the western United States: Palaeontology, v. 31, 551–566.Google Scholar
Shelby, P.R., 1986, Depositional history of the St. Joe and Boone formations in northern Arkansas: Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, v. 40, p. 67–71.Google Scholar
Shimer, H.W., and Shrock, R.R., 1944, Index fossils of North America: Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press, 837 p.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.B., 1895, A handbook of the genera of the North American Palaeozoic Bryozoa, with an introduction upon the structure of living species: Fourteenth Annual Report of the State Geologist, Albany, New York, p. 407–669.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D., and Wilson, M.A., 2002, A new terminology for marine organisms inhabiting hard substrates: Palaios, v. 17, p. 522–525.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1882, American Palaeozoic Bryozoa: The Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, v. 5, p. 121–175.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1884, American Palaeozoic Bryozoa: The Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, v. 7, p. 34–51.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1890, Paleozoic Bryozoa: Report of the Geological Survey of Illinois, v. 8, part 2, p. 283–678.Google Scholar
Unklesbay, A.G., 1955, The common fossils of Missouri: University of Missouri Bulletin, v. 56, 98 p.Google Scholar
Utgaard, J., 1983, Systematic descriptions for the Order Cystoporata, in Robison, R.A., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. G Bryozoa, revised, Volume 1: Introduction, Order Cystoporata, Order Cryptostomata: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. G358–G439.Google Scholar
Waagen, W.H., and Wentzel, J., 1886, Salt Range Fossils; Productus-limestone fossils: Memoir of the Geological Survey of India, series 13, v. 1, pt. 6, p. 833–924.Google Scholar
Warren, P.S., 1927, Banff area, Alberta: Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 153, 79 p.Google Scholar
Wass, R.E., 1967, Permian Polyzoa from the Port Keats district, Northern Territory: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 92, p. 162–170.Google Scholar
Weller, S., 1909, The fauna of the Fern Glen Formation: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 20, p. 291–292.Google Scholar
Wyse Jackson, P.N., and Key, M.M. Jr., 2007, Borings in trepostome bryozoans from the Ordovician of Estonia: two ichnogenera produced by a single maker, a case of host morphology control: Lethaia, v. 40, p. 237–252.Google Scholar