No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A dyrosaurid crocodyliform braincase from Mali
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Abstract
A well-preserved crocodyliform specimen from the Maastrichtian or Paleocene of Mali preserves the braincase and posterior dermatocranium. It is referred to Dyrosauridae on the basis of several derived features (a prominent anterior process of the postorbital, discrete occipital processes on the exoccipitals, significant quadratojugal contribution to jaw joint) and tentatively referred to Rhabdognathus on the basis of supratemporal fenestra shape. The lacrymal and prefrontal are relatively short compared with those published for other dyrosaurids. The palatines border the internal choanae anteriorly, and the choanae are divided by a midline septum derived from the pterygoids. The prefrontal pillars are mediolaterally broad and contact the palate ventrally. One stapes is preserved in place. The basicranial pneumatic system is very unusual, in that the anterior and posterior branches of the median eustachian canal are both separate at the palatal surface, and the pterygoids form part of the border for the anterior branch. The lateral eustachian openings lie within fossae on the lateral surface of the braincase and face laterally, with a descending process of the exoccipital nearly intersecting the opening. The braincase and surrounding dermal bones are elongate anteroposteriorly, and the postorbital's posterior ramus extends along the posterodorsal margin of the infratemporal fenestra. The quadrate ramus projects ventrally. These observations clarify character optimizations in previous phylogenetic analyses of Crocodyliformes.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Arambourg, C.
1952. Les vertébrés fossiles des gisements de phosphates (Maroc-Algérie-Tunisie). Service des Mines du Maroc Notes et Mémoires, Number 92, 372 p.Google Scholar
Argollo, J., Buffetaut, Á., Cappetta, H., Fornari, M., Herail, G., Laubacher, G., Sigé, B., and Vizcarra, G.
1987. Découverte de vertébrés aquatiques présumés Paléocènes dans les Andes Septentrionales de Bolivie (Rio Suches, Sinclinorium de Putina). Geobios, 20:123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassot, J. P., Meloux, J., and Traor, H.
1981. Notice explicative de la carte géologique au 1/1.500.000 de la République de Mali. Direction Nationale de la Géologie et des Mines, Bamako et Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Orléans, 1–138, 1 map.Google Scholar
Bellion, Y., Lefranc, J. P., and Michard, J.-G.
1992. Précisions sur l'âge des sédiments méso-cénozoïques à l'ouest de l'Adrar des Iforas. Actes du Congres National des Societés Savantes 115, Section des Sciences, p. 7–27.Google Scholar
Bellion, Y., Saint-Marc, P., and Damotte, R.
1989. Contribution à la connaissance des dépôts marins au passage crétacé-tertiaire dans la vallée Tilemsi (Nord-Est du Mali). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 9:187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, M. J., and Clark, J. M.
1988. Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodylia, p. 295–338. In
Benton, M. J. (ed.), The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. Volume 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bergounioux, F. M.
1955. Les crocodiliens fossiles des dépôts phosphatés du Sud-Tunisien. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris, 240:1917–1918.Google Scholar
Bergounioux, F. M.
1956. Les reptiles fossiles des dépôts phosphates sud Tunisiens. Royaume de Tunis Service des Mines, de l'Industrie et de l'Energie, Annales des Mines et de la Geologie, Number 15, 105 p.Google Scholar
Brochu, C. A.
1997. A review of “Leidyosuchus“ (Crocodyliformes, Eusuchia) from the Cretaceous through Eocene of North America. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17:679–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brochu, C. A.
1999. Phylogeny, systematics, and historical biogeography of Alligatoroidea, p. 8–100. In
Rowe, T., Brochu, C. A., and Kishi, K. (eds.), Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 6: Cranial Morphology of Alligator mississippiensis and Phylogeny of Alligatoroidea. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Chicago.Google Scholar
Buckley, G. A., and Brochu, C. A., 1999. An enigmatic new crocodile from the Upper Cretaceous of Madagascar, p. 149–175. In
Unwin, D. M. (ed.), Special Papers in Palaeontology 60: Cretaceous Fossil Vertebrates. Palaeontological Association, London.Google Scholar
Buffetaut, Á.
1976a. Une nouvelle definition de la famille des Dyrosauridae de Stefano, 1903 (Crocodylia, Mesosuchia) et ses consequences: inclusion des genres Hyposaurus et Sokotosuchus dans les Dyrosauridae. Geobios, 9:333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffetaut, Á.
1976b. Sur la répartition géographique hors d'Afrique des Dyrosauridae, crocodiliens mésosuchiens du Crétacé terminal et du Paléogène. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris, 283:487–490.Google Scholar
Buffetaut, Á.
1977. Donnees nouvelles sur les crocodiliens paléogènes du Pakistan et de Birmanie. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris, 285:869–872.Google Scholar
Buffetaut, Á.
1978. Les Dyrosauridae (Crocodylia, Mesosuchia) des phosphates de l'Eocene inférieur de Tunisie: Dyrosaurus, Rhabdognathus, Phosphatosaurus.
Géologie Mediterranéene, 5:237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffetaut, Á.
1979.
Sokotosuchus ianwilsoni and the evolution of the dyrosaurid crocodiles. Nigerian Field Monograph, 1:31–41.Google Scholar
Buffetaut, Á.
1980. Les crocodiliens paléogenes du Tilemsi (Mali), un aperçu systematique, p. 15–35. In
Palaeovertebrata, Mémoire Jubilaire Rene Lavocat, Laboratoire de Paléontologie des Vertébrés de l'Ecole Practique des Hautes Etudes, Montpelier.Google Scholar
Buffetaut, Á.
1982. Radiation évolutive, paléoécologie et biogéographie des crocodiliens mesosuchiens. Memoires de la Societé Geologique de France, Number 60, 88 p.Google Scholar
Buffetaut, Á., Bussert, R., and Brinkmann, W.
1990. A new nonmarine vertebrate fauna in the Upper Cretaceous of northern Sudan. Berliner Geowissenschaftlische Abhandlungen, 120:183–202.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M.
1994. Patterns of evolution in Mesozoic Crocodyliformes, p. 84–97. In
Fraser, N. C. and Sues, H.-D. (eds.), In the Shadow of the Dinosaurs. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Colbert, E. H.
1946. The eustachian tubes in the Crocodilia. Copeia, 1946:11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, R. K., Dobie, J. L., and Parris, D. C.
1997. The marine crocodilian Hyposaurus in North America, p. 375–397. In
Callaway, J. M. and Nicholls, E. L. (eds.), Ancient Marine Reptiles. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Stefano, G.
1903. Nuovi rettili degli strati a fosfato della Tunisia. Bolletino della Societa Geologia Italiana, 22:51–80.Google Scholar
Eudes-Deslongchamps, M.
1863. Mémoires sur les Téléosauriens de l'époque Jurassique du Département du Calvados. Chez A. Hardel, Caen, 138 p.Google Scholar
Gasparini, Z.
1996. Biogeographic evolution of the South American crocodilians. Münchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 30:159–84.Google Scholar
Gasparini, Z., and Spalletti, L. A.
1990. Un nuevo cocodrilo en los depósitos mareales Maastrichtianos de la Patagonia noroccidental. Ameghiniana, 27:141–150.Google Scholar
Halstead, L. B.
1975.
Sokotosuchus ianwilsoni n.g., n.sp., a new teleosaur crocodile from the Upper Cretaceous of Nigeria. Journal of the Nigerian Mining, Geological, and Metallurgical Society, 11:101–103.Google Scholar
Kälin, J. A.
1933. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Osteologie des Crocodilidenschädels. Zoologisches Jahrbucher, 57:535–714.Google Scholar
K?Ken, E.
1887. Die Dinosaurier, Crocodiliden und Sauropterygier des norddeutschen Wealden. Palaeontologische Abhandlungen, 3:309–419.Google Scholar
Langston, W. L.
1973. The crocodilian skull in historical perspective, p. 263–284. In
Gans, C. and Parsons, T. (eds.), Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 4. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Langston, W. L.
1995. Dyrosaurs (Crocodilia, Mesosuchia) from the Paleocene Umm Himar Formation, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 2093-F:F1–F36.Google Scholar
Larsson, H. C. E.
2000. Ontogeny and phylogeny of the archosauriform skeleton. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, 483 p.Google Scholar
Lavocat, R.
1955. Observations anatomiques nouvelles sur le genre de crocodilien Dyrosaurus Pomel. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris, 240:2549–2551.Google Scholar
Maddison, W. P.
1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree?
Evolution, 44:539–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddison, W. P.
2000. Testing character correlations using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 202:195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markwick, P. J.
1998. Crocodilian diversity in space and time: the role of climate in paleoecology and its implication for understanding K/T extinctions. Paleobiology, 24:470–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, T.
1939. Notes géologiques sur les confins sahariens du Soudan français. Revue de Géographie Physique et Géologie Dynamique, 12:461–478.Google Scholar
Mook, C. C.
1921. Individual and age variations in the skulls of recent Crocodilia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 44:51–66.Google Scholar
Norell, M. A., and Clark, J. M.
1990. A reanalysis of Bernissartia fagesii, with comments on its phylogenetic position and its bearing on the origin and diagnosis of the Eusuchia. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 60:115–128.Google Scholar
Owen, R.
1850. On the communications between the cavity of the tympanum and the palate in the Crocodilia (gavials, alligator and crocodiles). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 27:521–527.Google Scholar
Pagel, M. D.
1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 255:37–45.Google Scholar
Parris, D. C.
1986. Biostratigraphy of the fossil crocodile Hyposaurus Owen from New Jersey. New Jersey State Museum Investigation, Number 4, 16 p.Google Scholar
Pérébaskine, V.
1932. Contribution à l'étude géologique du Soudan oriental. Thèse Strasbourg. Agence Gén. Colonies, Paris, 124 p.Google Scholar
Piveteau, J.
1935. Le Dyrosaurus: Un crocodilien de l'éocène inférieur de l'Afrique du Nord. Annales de Paléontologie, 24:51–71.Google Scholar
Radier, H.
1959. Contribution à l'étude géologique du Soudan oriental (A. O. F.). I. Le Précambrian saharien du Sud de l'Adrar des Iforas. II. Le bassin crétacé et tertiaire de Gao. Bulletin du Service de Géologie et de Prospection Minière, 26:1–550.Google Scholar
Sereno, P., Larsson, H. C. E., Sidor, C. A., and Gado, B.
2001. The giant crocodyliform Sarcosuchus from the Cretaceous of Africa. Science, 294:1516–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storrs, G. W.
1986. A dyrosaurid crocodile (Crocodylia: Mesosuchia) from the Paleocene of Pakistan. Postilla, Number 197, 16 p.Google Scholar
Swinton, W. E.
1930. On fossil Reptilia from Sokoto Province. Geological Survey of Nigeria Bulletin, 13:9–61.Google Scholar
Swinton, W. E.
1950. On Congosaurus bequaerti Dolio. Annales du Musee du Congo Belge (Ser. 8), 4:9–34.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L.
2001. PAUP∗ (Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods), Version 4.0b7. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Telles Antunes, M.
1967. Um mesosuquiano do Liásico de Tomar (Portugal). Serviços Geológicos de Portugal Memoria (N.S.), Number 13, 66 p.Google Scholar
Thevenin, A.
1911. Le Dyrosaurus des phosphates de Tunisie. Annales de Paléontologie, 6:95–108.Google Scholar
Troxell, E. L.
1925.
Hyposaurus, a marine crocodilian. American Journal of Science, 8:489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasse, D., and Hua, S.
1998. Diversité des crocodiliens du Crétacé Supérieur et du Paléogène. Influneces et limites de la crise Maastrichtien-Paléocène et des “Terminal Eocene Events.”
Oryctos, 1:65–77.Google Scholar
Vignaud, P., Lange-Badre, B., Hantzpergue, P., Dutrieux, M., and Maury, G.
1993. Découverte d'un crâne de Teleosauridae dans la Zone à Eudoxus du Kimméridgien supérieur quercynois (France). Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris, 317:1509–1514.Google Scholar
Walker, A. D.
1990. A revision of Sphenosuchus acutus Haughton, a crocodylomorph reptile from the Elliot Formation (Late Triassic or Early Jurassic) of South Africa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 330:1–120.Google Scholar
Wenz, S.
1968. Contribution a l'étude du genre Metriorhynchus: Crâne et moulage endocranien de Metriorhynchus superciliosus.
Annales de Paléontologie (Vertébrés), 54:149–183.Google Scholar
Westphal, F.
1962. Die Krokodilier des deutschen und englischen oberen Lias. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 118:23–118.Google Scholar
Whetstone, K. N., and Wybrow, P. J.
1983. A “cursorial” crocodilian from the Triassic of Lesotho (Basutoland), southern Africa. Occasional Papers of the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Number 106, 37 p.Google Scholar
Wu, X.-C., Brinkman, D. B., and Russell, A. P.
1996.
Sunosuchus junggarensis sp. nov. (Archosauria: Crocodyliformes) from the Upper Jurassic of Xinjiang, People's Republic of China. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33:606–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X.-C., Sues, H.-D., and Dong, Z.-M.
1997.
Sichuanosuchus shuhanensis, a new ?Early Cretaceous protosuchian (Archosauria: Crocodyliformes) from Sichuan (China), and the monophyly of Protosuchia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17:89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X.-C., Russell, A. P., and Cumbaa, S. L.
2001.
Terminonaris (Archosauria: Crocodyliformes): new material from Saskatchewan, Canada, and comments on its phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 21:492–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar