Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:49:00.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description of Argenthina emilyae, a new genus and species of ocenebrine muricid gastropods from the early Middle Miocene of Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Gregory S. Herbert  and
Claudia Julia del Río
Gregory S. Herbert
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis 95616 New address: Department of Geology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620,
Claudia Julia del Río
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Angel Gallardo 470, 1405 Buenos Aires,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Argenthina emilyae is a new genus and species of extinct muricid gastropods from the early Middle Miocene of southern Argentina. Most of its shell features are consistent with those of the Acanthina-clade of Thais-like ocenebrines, including a broad, rounded body whorl, a large aperture lacking ornamentation, and a short, open siphonal canal, although other characters are consistent with the Ocinebrina-like ocenebrines, such as the differentiation of axials into varices and intervaricals and complex spiral sculpture. This combination of traits is unique in the Ocenebrinae. It is not yet clear whether this new taxon represents an episode of morphological experimentation by a stem group of Thais-like ocenebrines resulting in convergence on the Ocinebrina-like shell form or an evolutionarily intermediate step between Thais-like and Ocinebrina-like ocenebrines. Intermediates are expected from previously published phylogenetic hypotheses for the Ocenebrinae that suggest Ocinebrina-like ocenebrines have evolved multiple times from Thais-like ocenebrines. Until now, however, such intermediates have not been reported from the fossil record.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 5 , September 2005 , pp. 939 - 943
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H., and Adams, A. 1853. The Genera of Recent Mollusa. Van Voorst, London, 484 p.Google Scholar
Amano, K., Vermeij, G. J., and Narita, K. 1993. Early evolution and distribution of the gastropod genus Nucella, with special reference to Miocene species from Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, 171:237–248.Google Scholar
Ameghino, F. 1894. Enumeración sinóptica de las especies de mamíferos fósiles de las formaciones eocenas de Patagonia. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba, 13:259–445.Google Scholar
Barreda, D. V. 1993. Late Oligocene?–Miocene Pollen of the families Compositae, Malvacea and Polygonaceae from the Chenque Formation, Golfo San Jorge Basin, southeastern Argentina. Palynology, 17:169–186.Google Scholar
Barreda, V., and Palamarczuk, S. 2000a. Estudio palinoestratigráfico del Oligoceno tardío–Mioceno en secciones de la costa patagónica y plataforma continental argentina, p. 103–138. In Aceñolaza, F. G. and Herbst, R. (eds.), El Neógeno de Argentina. Serie Correlación Geológica, 14.Google Scholar
Barreda, V., and Palamarczuk, S. 2000b. Palinoestratigrafía de depósitos del Oligoceno tardío–Mioceno en el área sur del Golfo San Jorge, provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 37:103–118.Google Scholar
Bellardi, L. 1872. I molluschi dei terreni terziarii del Piemonte e della Ligura. Pt. 1. Cephalopoda, Pteropoda, Heteropoda, Gastropoda (Muricidae et Tritonidae). Memoire della Reale Accademia delle Science di Torino, 264 p.Google Scholar
Bellosi, E. 1990. Formación Chenque: Registro de la transgresión patagoniana (Terciario medio) de la cuenca de San Jorge, Argentina. Actas 11° Congreso Geológico Argentino, San Juan, 2:57–60.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1970. Sobre el “Piso Patagoniano” y la representación de la época del Oligoceno en Patagonia Austral (República Argentina). Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 25:495–501.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G., and Griffin, M. 1997. The South American-Australasian connection in Oligocene–Neogene Mollusca, p. 154–167. In Nishimura, S., Utomo, E. P., and Tsuchi, R. (eds.), Sixth International Congress on Pacific Neogene Stratigraphy and IGCP-355: Neogene evolution on the Pacific: Biotic, oceanographic and tectonic development. Serpong, West Java, Indonesia. Proceedings of the Kyoto Institute of Natural History, Kyoto.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G., Griffin, M., and Maxwell, P. A. 1997. Opening of Drake Passage gateway and Late Miocene to Pleistocene cooling reflected in Southern Ocean molluscan dispersal: Evidence from New Zealand and Argentina. Tectonophysics, 281:83–97.Google Scholar
Collins, T. M., Frazier, K., Palmer, A. R., Vermeij, G. J., and Brown, W. M. 1996. Evolutionary history of northern hemisphere Nucella Gastropda, Muricidae): Molecular, morphological, ecological, and paleontological evidence. Evolution, 50:2287–2304.Google Scholar
Cooke, A. H. 1918. On the radula of the genus Acanthina G. Fischer. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 13:6–11.Google Scholar
Cookson, I. C. 1947. Plant microfossils from the lignites of the Kerguelen Archipelago. British and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition, 1929–1931. Report Series A, 2:129–142.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1899. Description de quelques coquilles de la formation Santacruzienne en Patagonie. Journal de Conchyliologie, 47:223–242.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1903. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée. Volume 5. Paris, 215 p.Google Scholar
da Costa, E. M. 1776. Elements of Conchology, or An Introduction to the Knowledge of Shells. B. White, London, 318 p.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1846. Geological Observations on the Volcanic Islands and Parts of South America Visited During the Voyage of H. M. S. Beagle. Appleton, London, 648 p.Google Scholar
DeVries, T. J., and Vermeij, G. J. 1997. Herminespina: New genus of Neogene muricid gastropod from Peru and Chile. Journal of Paleontology, 71:610–615.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1842. Voyage dans l'Amerique méridionale. 3(4) (Paléolontogie). Pitois-Levrault, Paris, 187 p.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1807. Catalogue systématique et raisonné des curiosités de la nature et de l'art. Volume 3. Végétaux et animaux. Muséum Démidoff, Moscou, 339 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Habib, D. 1972. Dinoflagellate Stratigraphy Leg 11, Deep Sea Drilling Project, p. 367–425. In Hollister, C. D. et al. (ed.), Deep Sea Drilling Project, Washington, Initial Reports, 11.Google Scholar
Hatcher, J. B. 1900. Sedimentary rocks of southern Patagonia. American Journal of Science, 4:85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herm, D. 1969. Marines Pliozän und Pleistozän in Nord-und Mittel-Chile unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung der Mollusken-Faunen. Zitteliana, 2, 159 p.Google Scholar
Iredale, T. 1915. Marine molluscs from Lord Howe Island, Norfolk Island, Australia and New Caledonia. Australian Zoologist, 9:429–443.Google Scholar
Jousseaume, F. P. 1880. Division méthodique de la famille des Purpur-idae. Le Naturaliste, Journal des Échanges et des Nouvelles, 2:335–336.Google Scholar
Kool, S. P. 1987. Significance of radular characters in reconstruction of thaidid phylogeny. The Nautilus, 101:117–132.Google Scholar
Kool, S. P. 1993a. The systematic position of the genus Nucella (Prosobranchia: Muricidae: Ocenebrinae). Nautilus, 107:43–57.Google Scholar
Kool, S. P. 1993b. Phylogenetic analysis of the Rapaninae (Neogastropoda: Muricidae). Malacologia, 35:155–259.Google Scholar
Marko, P. B., and Vermeij, G. J. 1999. Molecular phylogenetics and the evolution of labral spines among eastern Pacific ocenebrine gastropods. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 13:275–288.Google Scholar
Montfort, P. D. De. 1810. Conchyliologie systématique et classification méthodique des coquilles; offrant leurs figures, leurs arrangement générique, leurs descriptions charactéristiques, leurs noms; ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs langues. Coquilles univalves, non cloisonnées. F. Schoell, Paris, 676 p.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A. E. 1900. Synopsis of the collections of invertebrate fossils made by the Princeton Expedition to South Patagonia. American Journal of Science, 160:368–381.Google Scholar
Pallas, P. S. 1774. Spicilegia Zoologica. Volume 1, Pt. 10. Lange, Berlin.Google Scholar
Parodiz, J. J. 1996. The taxa of fossil Mollusca introduced by Hermann Von Ihering. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 65:183–296.Google Scholar
Radwin, G. E., and D'attilio, A. 1976. Murex Shells of the World; An Illustrated Guide to the Muricidae. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 284 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature, ou tableau de l'univers et des corps organisees. Author, Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Röding, J. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianus sive Catalogus cimeliorum e tribus regnis naturae quae olim collegerat. Johan Christi Trappii, Hamburg, 199 p.Google Scholar
Stimpson, W. 1865. On certain genera of zoophagous gateropods. American Journal of Conchology, 1:55–64.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A Treatise on Malacology; or the Natural Classification of Shells and Shellfish. Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London, 416 p.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1993. Spinucella, a new genus of Miocene to Pleistocene muricid gastropods from the eastern Atlantic. Contributions to Tertiary and Quarternary Geology, 30:19–27.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1998. New genera of Cenozoic muricid gastropods, with comments on the mode of formation of the labral tooth. Journal of Paleontology, 72:855–864.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 2001. Innovation and evolution at the edge: Origins and fates of gastropods with a labral tooth. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72:461–508.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Signor, P. W. 1992. The geographic, taxonomic and temporal distribution of determinate growth in marine gastropods. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 47:233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Vokes, E. H. 1997. Cenozoic Muricidae of the western Atlantic region. Part XII—The subfamily Ocenebrinae (in part). Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 29:69–118.Google Scholar
von Ihering, H. 1897. Os Molluscos dos terrenos terciarios da Patagonia. Revista del Museo Paulista, 21:217–382.Google Scholar
von Ihering, H. 1899. Die Conchylien der Patagonisches Formation. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Paläontologie, 2:1–46.Google Scholar
von Ihering, H. 1907. Les mollusques fossiles du Tertiaire et du Crétacé Supérieur de l'Argentine. Anales del Museo Nacional, Buenos Aires (serie 3, 7), 14:1–611.Google Scholar
Wenz, W., 1938. Gastropoda. Teil 1. Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia, p. 1–240. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Palaozoologie. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar