Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:26:45.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decaying of Artemia salina in clay colloids: 14-month experimental formation of subfossils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Elena B. Naimark
Affiliation:
A.A. Borissyak Paleontological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Profsouznaya, 123, 117647Russia, 〈[email protected]
Maria A. Kalinina
Affiliation:
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Leninsky prosp. 31, 119071Russia, 〈[email protected]
Alexander V. Shokurov
Affiliation:
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Leninsky prosp. 31, 119071Russia, 〈[email protected]
Alexander V. Markov
Affiliation:
A.A. Borissyak Paleontological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Profsouznaya, 123, 117647Russia, 〈[email protected] Lomonosov Moscow State University, Biological Department, Vorobievy Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia, 〈[email protected]
Natalia M. Boeva
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetny per. 35, Moscow, 119017Russia, 〈[email protected]

Abstract

The mechanism that guides the formation of exceptionally preserved fossils with soft tissues variously displayed is a paramount challenge to paleontology. The key question for exceptional preservation is the nature of the slowdown of decay and acceleration of soft tissue mineralization. Here we report the experimental formation of subfossils of the brine shrimp Artemia salina (Crustacea, Branchiopoda), which were produced during 14 months of aging in a kaolinite clay sediment. EDS/SEM elemental analyses showed that the subfossils were preserved as thin clay-organic replicas that displayed fine anatomical details. Decomposition in the clay-colloidal solution established highly heterogeneous acidic conditions, with the lowest pH typically found in the vicinity of the buried organisms, and visually manifested in patchy coloration of the sediment. Elevated acidity is likely what ultimately slowed the decay. An acidic environment increases the rate of clay destruction and, consequently, the diffusion rate decline. As a result, the acidic products quickly accumulate around a buried body; this in turn inhibits bacterial proliferation, accelerates the acidic hydrolysis of clay and, accordingly, the release of tanning and mineralizing agents. The subfossils remained stable under experimental high pressure and temperature. These model subfossils exhibit features that are typical of some Lagerstätten fossils preserved in fine-grained sediments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, P. A., 1988, The role of anoxia in the decay and mineralization of proteinaceous macro-fossils: Paleobiology, v. 14, p. 139154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. A., and Briggs, D. E. G., 1993, Exceptional fossil record: distribution of soft-tissue preservation through the Phanerozoic: Geology, v. 21, p. 527530.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. A., Maeda, H., Tuzino, T., and Maeda, Y., 2008, Exceptional preservation within Pleistocene lacustrine sediments of Shiobara, Japan: Palaios, v. 23, p. 260266.Google Scholar
Birger, K., 1993, Measurement of plankton O2 respiration in gas-tight plastic bags: Marine Ecology Progress Series, v. 94, p. 155163.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., 1995, Experimental taphonomy: Palaios, v. 10, p. 539550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., 2003, The role of decay and mineralization in the preservation of soft-bodied fossils: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 31, p. 275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., and Kear, A. J., 1994, Decay and mineralization of shrimps: Palaios, v. 9, p. 431456.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J., 1990, Organic preservation of non-mineralizing organisms and the taphonomy of the Burgess Shale: Paleobiology, v. 16, p. 272286.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J., 1994, Burgess Shale-type fossils from a lower Cambrian shallow-shelf sequence in northwestern Canada: Nature, v. 369, p. 477479.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J., 1995, Secular distribution of Burgess Shale-type preservation: Lethaia, v. 28, p. 113.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J., 2003, Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian explosion: Integrative and Comparative Biology, v. 43, p. 166177.Google Scholar
Butterfield, N. J., Baltasar, U., and Wilson, L. A, 2007, Fossil diagenesis in the Burgess Shale: Palaeontology, v. 50, p. 537543.Google Scholar
Cai, Y., Schiffbauer, J. D., Hua, H., and Xiao, S., 2012, Preservational modes in the Ediacaran Gaojiashan Lagerstätte: pyritization, aluminosilicification, and carbonaceous compression: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 326–328, p. 109117.Google Scholar
Cama, J., Metz, V., and Ganor, J., 2002, The effect of pH and temperature on kaolinite dissolution rate under acidic conditions: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 66, p. 39133926.Google Scholar
Chin, P. K. F., and Mills, G. L., 1991, Kinetics and mechanisms of kaolinite dissolution: effects of organic ligands: Chemical Geology, v. 90, p. 307317.Google Scholar
Covington, D., 1997, Modern tanning chemistry: Chemical Society Reviews, v. 26, p. 111126.Google Scholar
Covington, D., and Sykes, R. L., 1984, The use of aluminum salts in tanning: Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, v. 79, p. 7293.Google Scholar
Drever, J. I., and Vance, G. F., 1994, Role of soil organic acids in mineral weathering processes, in Pittman, E. D., and Lewan, M. D., eds., Organic Acids in Geological Processes, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, p. 138161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzik, J., Zhu, M-Y., and Zhoa, Y-L., 1997, Mode of life of the Middle Cambrian eldonioid lophophorate Rotadiscus : Paleontology, v. 40, p. 385396.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, H., Rigby, J. K., Botting, J. P., Tsurkan, M., Werner, C., Schwille, P., Petrasek, Z., Pisera, A., Simon, P., Sivkov, V., Vyalikh, D., Molodtsov, S. L., Kurek, D., Kammer, M., Hunoldt, S., Born, R., Stawski, D., Steinhof, A., and Geisler-Wierwille, T., 2013, Discovery of 505 – million-year old chitin in the basal demosponge Vauxia gracilenta : Nature Scientific Reports, v. 3, p. 3497, doi: 10.1038/SREP03497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, D. C., Tikhonov, A. N., Kosintsev, P. A., Rountrey, A. N., Buigues, B., and van der Plicht, J., 2012, Anatomy, death, and preservation of a woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) calf, Yamal peninsula, northwest Siberia: Quaternary International, v. 255, p. 94105.Google Scholar
Forchielli, A., Steiner, M., Kasbohm, J., Hu, S., and Keupp, H., 2014, Taphonomic traits of clay-hosted early Cambrian Burgess Shale-type fossil Lagerstätten in south China: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 398, p. 5985.Google Scholar
Gabbott, S. E., 1998, Taphonomy of the Ordovician Soom Shale Lagerstätte: an example of soft tissue preservation in clay minerals: Palaeontology, v. 41, p. 631667.Google Scholar
Gabbott, S. E., Zalasiewicz, J., and Collins, D., 2008, Sedimentation of the phyllopod bed within the Cambrian Burgess Shale formation of British Columbia: Journal of the Geological Society of London, v. 165, p. 307318.Google Scholar
Gabbott, S. E., Beecroft, T. I. E., Murdock, D. J. E., and Purnell, M. A., 2014, From lab to Lagerstätten: does sediment type bias the preservation of anatomical characters?: 4th International Palaeontological Congress, Mendoza, Argentina, Abstracts, v. 1, p. 301.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. R., Kennedy, M. J., and Droser, M. L., 2005, A new hypothesis for organic preservation of Burgess Bhale taxa in the middle Cambrian Wheeler Formation, House Range, Utah: Palaeoecology, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, v. 220, p. 193205.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. R., Hammarlund, E. U., Hou, X., Qi, C., Gabbott, S. E., Zhao, Y., and Peng, J., 2012, Mechanism for Burgess Shale-Type preservation: PNAS, v. 109, p. 51805184.Google Scholar
Gamez Vintaned, J. A., Liňán, E., and Zhuravlev, A. Yu., 2011, A new Early Cambrian lobopod-bearing animal (Murero, Spain) and the problem of the Ecdysozoan early diversification, in Pontarotti, P., ed., Evolutionary Biology—Concepts, Biodiversity, Macroevolution and Genome Evolution: Springer-Verlag Press Berlin-Heidelberg, p. 193219.Google Scholar
Gostling, N. J., Dong, X., and Donoghue, P. C. J., 2009, Ontogeny and taphonomy: an experimental taphonomy study of the development of the brine shrimp Artemia salina : Paleontology, v. 52, p. 169186.Google Scholar
Grogan, E.D., and Lund, R., 2002, The geological and biological environment of the Bear Gulch Limestone (Mississippian of Montana, USA) and a model for its deposition: Geodiversitas, v. 24, p. 295315.Google Scholar
Guggenberger, G., and Kaiser, K., 2003, Dissolved organic matter in soil: challenging the paradigm of sorptive preservation: Geoderma, v. 113, p. 293310.Google Scholar
Harvey, T. H. P., Vélez, M. I., and Butterfield, N. J., 2012, Exceptionally preserved crustaceans from western Canada reveal a cryptic Cambrian radiation: PNAS, v. 109, p. 15891594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huldtgren, T., Cunningham, J. A., Yin, C., Stampanoni, M., Marone, F., Donoghue, P. C., and Bengtson, S., 2011, Fossilized nuclei and germination structures identify Ediacaran “animal embryos” as encysting protists: Science, v. 334, p. 16961699.Google Scholar
Ivantsov, A. Yu., Zhuravlev, A. Yu., Krassilov, V. A., Leguta, A. V., Melnikova, L. M., Urbanek, A., Ushatinskaya, G. T., and Malakhovskaya, Y., 2005, Unique Sinsk Localities of Early Cambrian Organisms (Siberian Platform) (Palaeontological Institute. V. 284). Nauka, Moscow, 143 p.Google Scholar
Kaiser, K., and Guggenberger, G., 2000, The role of DOM sorption to mineral surfaces in the preservation of organic matter in soils: Organic Geochemistry, v. 31, p. 711725.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M., Droser, M., Mayer, L., Pevear, D., and Mrofka, D., 2006, Late Precambrian Oxygenation: Inception of the clay Mineral Factory: Science, v. 311, p. 14461449.Google Scholar
Lombardi, D., Russe, J. D., and Keller, W. D., 1987, Compositional and structural variation in the size fractions of a sedimentary and a hydrothermal kaolinite: Clays and Clay Minerals, v. 35, p. 321335.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-P., Zhao, Y.-L., Rahman, I. A., Xiao, S., and Wang, Y., 2010, Bioturbation in Burgess Shale-type Lagerstätten — Case study of trace fossil-body fossil association from the Kaili Biota (Cambrian Series 3), Guizhou, China: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 292, p. 245256.Google Scholar
Ma, X., Hou, X., Edgecombe, G.D., and Strausfeld, N.J., 2012, Complex brain and optic lobes in anearly Cambrian arthropod: Nature, v. 490, p. 258261.Google Scholar
Martin, D., Briggs, D. E. G., and Parkes, R. J., 2004, Experimental attachment of sediment particles to invertebrate eggs and the preservation of soft-bodied fossils: Journal of the Geological Society, London, v. 161, p. 735738.Google Scholar
Mellman, I., Fuchs, R., and Helenius, A., 1986, Acidification of the endocytic and exocytic pathways: Annual Review Biochemistry, v. 55, p. 663700.Google Scholar
Midgley, D., and Torrens, K., 1978, Potentiometric Water Analysis, New York, Wiley, 120 p.Google Scholar
Murdock, D. J. E., Gabbott, S. E., and Purnell, M. A., 2014, Beyond the bucket: testing the effect of experimental design on rate and sequence of decay: 4th International Palaeontological Congress, Mendoza, Abstracts, v. 1, p. 306.Google Scholar
O′Brien, L. J., and Caron, J-B., 2012, A new stalked filter-feeder from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, British Columbia, Canada: PLoS ONE, v. 7, p. e29233.Google Scholar
Orr, P. J., Briggs, D. E. G, and Kearns, S. L., 1998, Cambrian Burgess Shale animals replicated in clay minerals: Science, v. 281, p. 11731175.Google Scholar
Orr, P. J., Kearns, S. L., and Briggs, D. E. G., 2009, Elemental mapping of exceptionally preserved ‘carbonaceous compression’ fossils: Palaeogeography, Palaeoecology, Palaeoclimatology, v. 277, p. 18.Google Scholar
Page, A., Gabbott, S. E., Wilby, P. R., and Zalasiewicz, J. A., 2008, Ubiquitous Burgess Shale-style “clay templates” in low-grade metamorphic mudrocks: Geology, v. 36, p. 855858.Google Scholar
Painter, T., 1991, Lindow man, tollund man and other peat-bog bodies: the preservative and antimicrobial action of sphagnan, a reactive glycuronoglycan with tanning and sequestering properties: Carbohydrate Polymers, v. 15, no. 2, p. 123142.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., Sha, J., and Fürsich, F. T., 2014, A model for organic fossilization of the Early Cretaceous Jehol Lagerstätte based on the taphonomy of “Ephemeropsis trisetalis: Palaios, v. 29, p. 363377.Google Scholar
Petrovich, R., 2001, Mechanisms of fossilization of the soft-bodied and lightly armored faunas of the Burgess Shale and of some other classical localities: American Journal of Science, v. 301, p. 683726.Google Scholar
Peverill, K. I., Sparrow, L. A., and Reuter, D. J., 1999, Soil analysis: an Interpretation Manual: Melbourne, CSIRO Publishing, 388 p.Google Scholar
Pushie, M. J., Pratt, B. R., Macdonald, T. C., George, G. N., and Pickering, I. J., 2014, Evidence for biogeneick copper (hemocyanin) in the Middle Cambrian arthropod Marella from Burgess Shale: Palaios, v. 29, p. 512524.Google Scholar
Ragland, J. L., and Coleman, N. T., 1960, The hydrolysis of aluminum salts in clay and soil systems: Soil Science Society of America, v. 24, p. 457460.Google Scholar
Sagemann, J., Bale, S. J., Briggs, D. E. G., and Parkes, R. J., 1999, Controls on the formation of authigenic minerals in association with decaying organic matter: an experimental approach: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 63, p. 10831095.Google Scholar
Sansom, R. S., Gabbott, S. E., and Purnell, M. A., 2010, Non-random decay of chordate characters causes bias in fossil interpretation: Nature, v. 463, p. 797800.Google Scholar
Sansom, R. S., Gabbott, S. E., and Purnell, M. A., 2013, Atlas of vertebrate decay: a visual and taphonomic guide to fossil interpretation: Palaeontology, v. 56, p. 457474.Google Scholar
Savrda, C. E., Bingham, P. S., Knight, T. K., and Lewis, R. D., 2009, The prospect of compact estuarine Lagerstätten: Sedimentary Record, v. 7, p. 48.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K., and Taylor, A. W., 1954, The measurement of soil pH: Soil Science Society of America, v. 19, p. 164167.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, H. E., Mclean, E. O., and Pratt, P. F., 1961, Buffer methods for determination of lime requirement of soils with appreciable amount of exchangeable aluminum: Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, v. 25, p. 274277.Google Scholar
Siveter, Da. J., Siveter, De. J., Sutton, M. D., and Briggs, D. E. G., 2007, Brood care in a Silurian ostracod: Proceedings of the Royal Society B, v. 274, p. 465469.Google Scholar
Tan, K. H., 1980, The release of silicon, aluminum, and potassium during decomposition of soil minerals by humic acid: Soil Science, v. 129, p. 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. W., 1982, Exchangeable cations, in Page, A.L., ed., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Mineralogical Properties, Madison: Wisconsin, American Society of Agronomy, p. 159165.Google Scholar
Tikhonov, V. N., 1971, Analytical chemistry of Aluminum: Nauka, Moscow, 266 p.Google Scholar
Towe, K. M., 1996, Fossil preservation in the Burgess Shale: Lethaia, v. 29, p. 107108.Google Scholar
Vannier, J., 2012, Gut contents as direct indicators for trophic relationships in the Cambrian Marine Ecosystem: PLoS ONE, v. 7, p. e52200.Google Scholar
Vinther, J., Stein, M., Longrich, N. R., and Harper, D. A. T., 2014, A suspension-feeding anomalocarid from the Early Cambrian: Nature, v. 507, p. 496499.Google Scholar
Webster, M., Gaines, R. R., and Hughes, N. C., 2008, Microstratigraphy, trilobite biostratinomy, and depositional environment of the “Lower Cambrian” Ruin Wash Lagerstätte, Pioche Formation, Nevada: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 264, p. 100122.Google Scholar
Whittle, R. J., Gabbott, S. E., Aldridge, R. J., and Theron, J. N., 2007, Taphonomy and palaeoecology of a Late Ordovician caryocaridid from the Soom Shale Lagerstätte, South Africa: Palaeoecology Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology, v. 251, p. 383397.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. A., and Butterfield, N. J., 2014, Sediment effects on the preservation of Burgess shale-type compression fossils: Palaios, v. 29, p. 145153.Google Scholar
Yuan, T. L., 1963, Some relationships among hydrogen, aluminum, and pH in solution and soil systems: Soil Science, v. 95, p. 155163.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., and Briggs, D. E. G., 2007, The nature and significance of the appendages of Opabinia from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale: Lethaia, v. 40, p. 161173.Google Scholar
Zhu, M., Zhang, J. M., and Li, G. X., 2001, Sedimentary environments of the Early Cambrian Chengjiang Biota: Sedimentology of the Yu′anshan Formation in Chengjiang County, Eastern Yunnan: Acta Paleontologica Sinica, v. 40, p. 80105.Google Scholar