Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T11:05:00.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confocal microscopy: Potential applications in micropaleontology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Harry Birkmann  and
Robert F. Lundin
Harry Birkmann
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287
Robert F. Lundin
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preliminary experiments with a confocal microscope (Sarastro 2000®) demonstrate its value in micropaleontology for photography and three-dimensional morphometric studies. High-quality images of objects in the size range of 100 to 2,000 μm can be obtained without application of nonremovable coating. Images can easily be electronically converted to stereopairs or displayed as single images. Images are in focus throughout and are superior to light photographs. Numerical data (x, y, and z coordinates) in almost any desired amount can be extracted from enough points on the visible surface to provide for the construction of a detailed topographic map of the surface. All of this can be done without manipulating the specimen once it has been mounted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 6 , November 1996 , pp. 1084 - 1087
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bookstein, F. L. 1978. The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 191 p.Google Scholar
Clark, M. W. 1981. Quantitative shape analysis: a review. Mathematical Geology, 13:85–92.Google Scholar
Evans, D. G., Schweitzer, P. N., and Hanna, M. S. 1985. Parametric cubic splines and geologic shape descriptions. Mathematical Geology, 17:611–624.Google Scholar
Fico, C. 1980. Development of ARTHUR II—a fast microprocessor controlled particle shape analyzer. University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina(unpublished).Google Scholar
Fink, W. 1990. Data acquisition in systematic biology, p. 9–20. In Rohlf, F. J., and Bookstein, F. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.Google Scholar
Foster, B., Williams, E., Witmer, R. J., and Piel, K. M. 1990. Confocal microscopy: a new technique for imaging micro-organisms and morphology in three-dimensions. Palynology (Abstracts), 14:212.Google Scholar
Foster, D. W., and Kaesler, R. L. 1988. Shape analysis ideas from the Ostracoda, p. 53–69. In McKenney, M. L. (ed.), Heterochrony in Evolution, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1976. Planning photography of microfossils. Museum of Paleontology, Papers on Paleontology, 16, 52 p.Google Scholar
Lazarus, D. 1986. Tempo and mode of morphologic evolution near the origin of the radiolarian lineage Pterocanium prismaticum. Paleobiology, 12:175–189.Google Scholar
Lohmann, G. P. 1983. Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: a general morphometric procedure for describing changes in shape. Mathematical Geology, 15:659–672.Google Scholar
Lohmann, G. P., and Schweitzer, P. N. 1990. On Eigenshape analysis, p. 147–166. In Rohlf, F. J., and Bookstein, F. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.Google Scholar
MacLeod, N. 1990. Digital images and automated image analysis systems, p. 21–36. In Rohlf, F. J., and Bookstein, F. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.Google Scholar
$DGynamics®, Molecular. 1992. User's Documentation. Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, California.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. 1990. An overview of image processing and analysis techniques for morphometrics, p. 37–60. In Rohlf, F. J., and Bookstein, F. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H. 1975. An automated coordinate recorder for biometry. Lethaia, 8:49–51.Google Scholar