Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:05:02.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cambrian agnostoid trilobites from Mendoza, Argentina: A systematic revision and biostratigraphic implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

M. Franco Tortello  and
Osvaldo L. Bordonaro
M. Franco Tortello
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Miguel Lillo 205, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
Osvaldo L. Bordonaro
Affiliation:
Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Casilla de Correo 131, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Agnostoid trilobites from the Carlos Rusconi collections in the Museum of Natural Sciences of Mendoza, Argentina, are revised. The agnostoids were collected in the southern Precordillera of Mendoza Province, western Argentina. Revised taxa include Agnostus microcephalus (Rusconi), Lotagnostus (Lotagnostus) peladensis? (Rusconi), Lotagnostus (Lotagnostus) lasherensis (Rusconi), Homagnostus pehuenchensis Rusconi, Kormagnostus seclusus (Walcott), Kormagnostus? beltensis (Lochman in Lochman and Duncan), Hypagnostus parvifrons (Linnarsson), Ptychagnostus cuyanus (Rusconi), Ptychagnostus aculeatus (Angelin), Lejopyge laevigata (Dalman), Tomagnostella exsculpta (Angelin), Diplagnostus planicauda (Angelin), Oedorhachis typicalis Resser, Clavagnostus calensis Rusconi and Clavagnostus repandus (Westergård in Holm and Westergård). Some taxa of uncertain affinities are recognized and new specimens assignated to Lotagnostus and Pseudagnostinae are illustrated. Hypagnostus parvifrons, L. laevigata and C. repandus are reported for the first time in South America. Global correlation with previously described agnostoid faunas indicates that the outcrops range from middle Middle Cambrian to latest Late Cambrian in age.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 74 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N. P. 1851. Palaeontologia Suecica. Pars I: Iconographia crustaceorum formationis transitionis. 24 p. Lund, Weigel.Google Scholar
Belt, T. 1867. On some new trilobites from the Upper Cambrian rocks of north Wales. Geological Magazine, 68:26–38.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1860. On some new species of fossils from the limestone near Point Levis opposite Quebec. Proceedings of the Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, 5:301–324.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. L. 1985. El género Lotagnostus (Trilobite, Agnostida) en el Cámbrico Superior de Mendoza. Reunión de Comunicaciones Paleontológicas, Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, San Juan, 17–19.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. L. 1992. El Cámbrico de Sudamérica, p. 69–84. In Gutierrez-Marco, J. C., Saavedra, J. and Rábano, I. (Eds.), Paleozoico Inferior de Ibero-América. Universidad de Extremadura, Madrid.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. L.In press. Cámbrico y Ordovícico de la Precordillera argentina. In Caminos, R. (Ed.), Geología Regional Argentina. Servicio Geológico Nacional, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. L., and Banchig, A. L.In press. Trilobites laurénticos en el Cámbrico de la Precordillera argentina. Actas VI Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía, Trelew.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. L., and Liñan, E. 1994. Some Middle Cambrian agnostoids from the Precordillera argentina. Revista Española de Paleontología, 9:105–114.Google Scholar
Bordonaro, O. L., Beresi, M., and Keller, M. 1993. Reinterpretación estratigráfica del Cámbrico del área de San Isidro, Precordillera de Mendoza. Actas XII Congreso Geológico Argentino y II Congreso de Exploración de Hidrocarburos, Mendoza, 2:12–19.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A., and Desmarest, A. G. 1822. Histoire naturelle des crustacés fossiles, sous les rapports zoologiques et géologiques. Savoir: Les Trilobites. Levrault, Paris. 154 p.Google Scholar
Clark, T. H. 1923. A group of new species of Agnostus from Levis, Quebec. The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 37:121–125.Google Scholar
Daily, B., and Jago, J. B. 1975. The trilobite Lejopyge Hawle and Corda and the Middle-Upper Cambrian boundary. Palaeontology, 18:527–550.Google Scholar
Dalman, J. W. 1828. Årsberättelse om nyare zoologiska arbeten och upptäcker. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 138 p.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J., and Leanza, A. F. 1957. Ordovician trilobites of Argentina. Department of Geology University of Kansas Special Publication, 1, Lawrence, 276 p.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J., Henntngsmoen, G., Howell, B. F., Jaanusson, V., Lochman, C., Moore, R. C., Poulsen, C., Rasetti, F., Richter, E., Richter, R., Schmidt, H., Sdzuy, K., Struve, W., Tripp, R., Weller, J. M., and Whittinoton, H. B. 1959. Systematic Descriptions, p. 0170–0540. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hawle, I., and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodom einer Monographie der bohmischen Trilobiten. Abhandlungen der Konigliche Bohmischen Gessellschaft Wissenschaften, 5:121–292.Google Scholar
Heredia, S. 1990. Geología de la cuchilla del Cerro Pelado, Precordillera de Mendoza, Argentina. Actas XI Congreso Geológico Argentino, San Juan, 2:101–104.Google Scholar
Holm, G., and Westergård, A. H. 1930. A Middle Cambrian fauna from Bennett Island. Zapiski Akademii Nauk soyuza SSR, po Otdeleniyu Fiziko-Matematicheskikh Nauk, 21(8), 25 p.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F. 1935. Some New Brunswick Cambrian agnostians. Bulletin of the Wagner Free Institute of Science, 10:13–16.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F. 1937. Cambrian Centropleura vermontensis fauna of northwestern Vermont. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 48:1147–1210.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1909. Über die Agnostiden. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 61:380–400.Google Scholar
Jago, J. B. 1972. The youngest recorded Tasmanian Cambrian trilobites. Search, 3:173–174.Google Scholar
Jago, J. B., and Daily, B. 1974. The trilobite Clavagnostus Howell from the Cambrian of Tasmania. Palaeontology, 17:95–109.Google Scholar
Jago, J. B., and Webers, G. F. 1992. Middle Cambrian trilobites from Ellsworth Mountains, West Antarctica. Geological Society of America Memoir, 170:101–124.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1939. On the agnostids. Part 1. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section II (Geology, Mineralogy, Geography, Seismology), 5:69–198.Google Scholar
Laurie, J. R. 1988. Revision of some Australian Ptychagnostinae (Agnostida, Cambrian). Alcheringa, 12:169–205.Google Scholar
Laurie, J. R. 1989. Revision of species of Goniagnostus Howell and Lejopyge Corda from Australia (Agnostida, Cambrian). Alcheringa, 13:175–191.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1869. Om Vestergötlands Cambriska och Siluriska aflagringar. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 8(2), 89 p.Google Scholar
Lochman, C., and Duncan, D. 1944. Early Upper Cambrian faunas of Central Montana. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 54, 181 p.Google Scholar
Lochman, C., and Hu, C. L. 1960. Upper Cambrian faunas from the northwest Wind River Mountains, Wyoming: Part I. Journal of Paleontology, 34:793–834.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., Westrop, S. R., and Kindle, C. H. 1989. Sunwaptan (Upper Cambrian) trilobites of the Cow Head Group, Western Newfoundland, Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 6, 175 p.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1849. On the classification of some British fossil Crustacea with notices of some new forms in the University collection at Cambridge. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 2, 4:161–179, 330-335, 392-414.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1961. The geology and palaeontology of the headwaters of the Burke River, Queensland. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, 53, 249 p.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1967. The Mindyallan fauna of north-western Queensland. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, 74 (2 volumes), 104 p., 167 p.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1979. Middle Cambrian agnostids: systematics and biostratigraphy. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, 172 (2 volumes), 188 p., 67 pls.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1954a. An appraisal of the Great Basin Middle Cambrian trilobites described before 1900. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 264D:55–86.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1954b. The faunas of the Riley Formation in Central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 28:709–786.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1955. Upper Cambrian agnostidae of the Eureka district, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 29:86–101.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1968. Cambrian trilobites of east-central Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 559B, 115 p.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C. 1960. Fossils from the late Middle Cambrian Bolaspidella Zone of Mendoza, Argentina. Matematisk-fysiske Meddelelser, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 32(11), 42 p.Google Scholar
Pratt, B. R. 1992. Trilobites of the Marjuman and Steptoean stages (Upper Cambrian), Rabbitkettle Formation, southern Mackenzie Mountains, northwest Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 9, 179 p.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1944. Upper Cambrian trilobites from the Levis Conglomerate. Journal of Paleontology, 18:229–258.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1938. Cambrian System (restricted) of the southern Appalachians. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 15, 140 p.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1964. Late Middle Cambrian faunas from western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 38:510–566.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1976. Middle Cambrian Trilobite Biostratigraphy of the Great Basin. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 23:93–109.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1982. Some Middle Cambrian agnostoid trilobites from western North America. Journal of Paleontology, 56:132–160.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1984. Cambrian Agnostida of North America and Greenland, Part I, Ptychagnostidae. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Number 109, 59 p.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1988. Trilobites of the Holm Dal Formation (late Middle Cambrian), central North Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland, Geoscience, 20:23–103.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1994. Agnostoid trilobites from the Henson Gletscher and Kap Stanton formations (Middle Cambrian), North Greenland. Bulletin Grønlands Geologiska Undersokning, 169:25–77.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1948. Apuntes sobre el Triásico y el Ordovícico de El Challao, Mendoza. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 2:165–198.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1950a. Trilobitas y otros organismos del Cámbrico de Canota. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 4:71–84.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1950b. Nuevos trilobitas y otros organismos del Cambrico de Canota. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 4:85–94.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1951a. Trilobitas cámbricos del Cerro Pelado (Mendoza). Boletin Paleontológico de Buenos Aires, 24, 4 p.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1951b. Mas trilobitas cámbricos de San Isidro, Cerro Pelado y Canota. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 5:3–30.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1952a. Varias especies de trilobitas del Cámbrico de Canota. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 6:5–17.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1952b. Fosiles cámbricos del Cerro Aspero, Mendoza. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 6:63–122.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1953a. Nuevos trilobites cámbricos de la Quebrada de La Cruz. Boletín Paleontológico de Buenos Aires, 27, 8 p.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1953b. Lista de agnóstidos e hiolites del Cámbrico de Mendoza. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina, 156:3–9.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1954a. Trilobitas cámbricos de la Quebradita Oblicua, Sud del Cerro Aspero. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 7:3–59.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1954b. Las piezas “tipos” del Museo de Mendoza. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 7:82–155.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1955a. Más fósiles cámbricos y ordovicicos de San Isidro, Mendoza. Boletín Paleontológico de Buenos Aires, 31, 4 p.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1955b. Nota previa sobre organismos ordovícicos y cámbricos de San Isidro, Mendoza. Boletín Paleontológico de Buenos Aires, 32, 4 p.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1955c. Fosiles cámbricos y ordovícicos al Oeste de San Isidro, Mendoza. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 8:3–64.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1955d. Formaciones y horizontes geológicos fundados por Carlos Rusconi. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 8:65–84.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1956a. Fósiles ordovícicos de la quebrada de Los Bueyes (Mendoza). Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 9:3–15.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1956b. Lista de los géneros y especies fundadas por Carlos Rusconi. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 9:121–156.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1958. Nuevos trilobitas de la Quebrada Oblicua. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 11:81–93.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1962. Correlación de organismos cambro-ordovicicos de varias localidades de Mendoza. Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Mendoza, 14:85–96.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. A monograph of the British trilobites from the Cambrian, Silurian and Devonian formations. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, 80 p.Google Scholar
Samson, S., Palmer, A. R., Robison, R. A., and Secor, D. T. Jr. 1990. Biogeographical significance of Cambrian trilobites from the Carolina slate belt. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 102:1459–1470.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H. 1975. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilobites from the Burke River Structural Belt, Western Queensland, Australia. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, 153 (2 volumes), 251 p.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H. 1977. Classification of the trilobite Pseudagnostus. Palaeontology, 20:69–100.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H., Laurie, J. R., and Sun, X. 1990. Classification and review of the trilobite Order Agnostida Salter, 1864: an Australian perspective. Report of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, 296, 93 p.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H., Bordonaro, O. L., and Liñan, E. 1995. Late Cambrian agnostoid trilobites from Argentina. Palaeontology, 38:241–257.Google Scholar
Sun, X. W. 1989. Cambrian agnostids from the North China Platform. Palaeontologia Cathayana, 4:53–129.Google Scholar
Tortello, M. F. 1995. El Orden Agnostida (Trilobita, Cámbrico-Ordovícico) en la República Argentina. Unpublished thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, 259 p.Google Scholar
Wahlenberg, G. 1818. Petrificata Telluris Svecanae. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiatum Upsaliensis, 8:1–116.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884. The paleontology of the Eureka district, Nevada. United States Geological Survey Monograph, 8, 298 p.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1936. Paradoxides oelandicus beds of Oland. Sveriges Geologiska Undersokning, Series C, 394, 66 p.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1946. Agnostidea of the Middle Cambrian of Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Undersokning, Series C, 477, 141 p.Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R., Ludvigsen, R., and Kindle, C. H. 1996. Marjuman (Cambrian) agnostoid trilobites of the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology, 70:804–829.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F. W. 1936. The Cambrian faunas of northeastern Australia. Parts 1 and 2. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 11:59–112.Google Scholar
Yang, J. L. 1978. Middle and Upper Cambrian Trilobites of Western Hunan and Eastern Ghizhou. Professional Papers of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, Geological Publishing House, Peking, 4:1–82. (In Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yang, J. L., Hu, C. L., and Jiang, X. 1984. On new trilobite zones of the early Late Cambrian Wuham Laochatian Formation. Earth Science, Journal of Wuhan College of Geology, 2(25):23–31. (In Chinese).Google Scholar