Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:15:06.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calcareous microfossils from the Upper Mississippian (Chesterian) Maxville Limestone, southeastern Ohio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

R. D. Hoare  and
Betty Skipp
R. D. Hoare
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
Betty Skipp
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 913, Denver, Colorado 80225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A low-diversity assemblage of smaller calcareous microfossils is present in the Upper Mississippian Maxville Limestone in Muskingum and Perry Counties, southeastern Ohio. Diagnostic faunal elements that suggest an early Chesterian age include the foraminifers Neoarchaediscus maxvillensis n. sp., Paraarchaediscus aff. P. Pachytheca (Petryk), Paraarchaediscus cf. P. koktjubensis (Rauzer-Chernousova), Endothyra excellens (Zeller), Endothyra bowmani Phillips emend. Brady, and attached forms. The presence of these diagnostic faunal elements in the Chesterian of Ohio significantly extends their known geographic range into the eastern Midcontinent region.

Other forms present include the foraminifers Priscella? of the group P. prisca (Rauzer-Chernousova and Reitlinger), Diplosphaerina inaequalis (Derville), Earlandia spp., and the problematic Asphaltinoides macadami (Brenckle and Groves) and Salebra irregularis Bogush and Brenckle. Microfossils are present in both calcareous mudstone and limestone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , July 1995 , pp. 617 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, A. K., and Mamet, B. L. 1977. Carboniferous microfacies, microfossils, and corals, Lisburne Group, Arctic Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 849, 144 p.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. W., and Brenckle, P. L. 1982. Preliminary statement on Mississippian calcareous foraminiferal successions of the Midcontinent (U.S.A.) and their correlation to western Europe. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 11:136–153.Google Scholar
Bogush, O. I. 1976. An Early Carboniferous fossil of uncertain affinity. Paleontological Journal, 10:103–109 [in Russian, English translation available].Google Scholar
Bogush, O. I., and Brenckle, P. L. 1982. Salebridae—a new family of uncertain affinity from the Lower Carboniferous of the Soviet Union and United States, p. 103–118. In Yuferev, O. V. (ed.), Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Devonian and Carboniferous. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Vypusk 483 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Brady, H. B. 1876. A monograph of Carboniferous and Permian Foraminifera (the genus Fusulina excepted). Palaeontographical Society, London, 166 p.Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L. 1973. Smaller Mississippian and Lower Pennsylvanian calcareous foraminifers from Nevada. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 11, 82 p.Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L. 1991. Foraminiferal division of the Lower Carboniferous/Mississippian in North America, p. 65–78. In Brenckle, P. L. and Manger, W. L. (eds.), Intercontinental Division and Correlation of the Carboniferous System. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 130.Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L., and Grelecki, C. J. 1993. Type archaediscacean foraminifers (Carboniferous) from the former Soviet Union and Great Britain, with a description of computer modeling of archaediscean coiling. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 30, 59 p.Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L., and Groves, J. R. 1987. Calcareous foraminifers from the Humbolt Oolite of Iowa: key to early Osagean (Mississippian) correlations between eastern and western North America. Palaios, 1:561–581.Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L., and Marchant, T. R. 1987. Calcareous microfossils, depositional environments and correlation of the Lower Carboniferous Um Bogma Formation at Gebel Nukhul, Sinai, Egypt. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 17:74–91.Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L., Marshall, F. C., Waller, S. F., and Wilhelm, M. H. 1982. Calcareous microfossils from the Mississippian Keokuk Limestone and adjacent formations, upper Mississippi River Valley: their meaning for North American and intercontinental correlation. Geologica et Paleontologica, 15:47–88.Google Scholar
Brenckle, P. L., Ramsbottom, W. H. C., and Marchant, T. R. 1987. Taxonomy and classification of Carboniferous archaediscacean foraminifers, p. 11–24. In Brenckle, P. L., Lane, R. H., and Manger, W. L. (eds.), Selected Studies in Carboniferous Paleontology and Biostratigraphy. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 98.Google Scholar
Browne, R. G., and Pohl, E. R. 1973. Stratigraphy and genera of calcareous Foraminifera of the Fraileys facies (Mississippian) of central Kentucky. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 64:169–243.Google Scholar
Browne, R. G., Baxter, J. W., and Roberts, T. G. 1977. The Archaediscidae of the Fraileys facies (Mississippian) of central Kentucky. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 72:167–228.Google Scholar
Conil, R., and Lys, M. 1964. Matériaux pour l'étude micropaléontologique du Dinantien de la Belgique et de la France (Avesnois); Pt. 1, algues et foraminiferes; Pt. 2, foraminiferes (suite). Mémoires de l'Institut Géologique de l'Université de Louvain, 23, 296 p.Google Scholar
Conil, R., and Pirlet, H. 1970. Le calcaire Carbonifêre du synclinorium de Dinant et le sommet du Famennien. Colloque sur la stratigraphie du Carbonifère. Congrès et Colloques de l'Université de Liège, 55:47–63.Google Scholar
Derville, P. H. 1931. Les marbres du calcaire Carbonifère en Bas-Boulonnais. O. Boehm, Strasbourg, 322 p.Google Scholar
Derville, P. H. 1952. A propos de calcisphères (rectification). Compte Rendu Sommaire des Séances de la Société Géologique de France, p. 236–237.Google Scholar
Devera, J. A. 1987. Asphaltinoides incertae sedis, a new genus from the Devonian of Illinois. Journal of Paleontology, 61:1274–1278.Google Scholar
Groves, J. R. 1983. Calcareous foraminifers and algae from the type Morrowan (Lower Pennsylvanian) region of northeastern Oklahoma and northwestern Arkansas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 133, 65 p.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D. 1993. Ostracodes from the Maxville Limestone (Mississippian, Chesterian) from Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 67:571–585.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., Hansen, M. C., Merrill, G. K., and Hook, R. W. 1988. Preserved color patterns of Pectinacea (Bivalvia, Mississippian) from Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 62:653–654.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. S. 1969. Some Chester correlations in the Appalachian region. Abstracts for 1968, Geological Society of America Special Paper, 121:662.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr., and Tappan, H. 1987. Foraminiferal Genera and Their Classification. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 2 volumes, 970 p.Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L. 1974. Taxonomic note on Carboniferous Endothyracea. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 4:200–204.Google Scholar
Miklukho-Maklai, A. D. 1956. Semeistvo (Family) Archaediscidae N. Tchernysheva, 1948, p. 9–15. In Kiparisova, L. D., Markovsky, B. P., Radchenko, G. P. (eds.), Materials for Paleontology, New Families and Genera. Vsesoyuznyi Nauchno-Issledovatel'skii Geologicheskii Institut (VSEGEI), Novoya Seriya, Paleontologiya, 12 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Miklukho-Maklai, A. D. 1957. New data on the systematics and phylogeny of the Archaediscidae. Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, Seriya Geologiya i Geofizika, 24:34–46 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Morse, W. C. 1910. The Maxville Limestone. Geological Survey of Ohio, Bulletin 13, 128 p.Google Scholar
Morse, W. C. 1911. The fauna of the Maxville Limestone. Proceedings of the Ohio State Academy of Science, Special Paper 17:351–420.Google Scholar
Orlova, I. N. 1955. A new genus of the family Archaediscidae E. Tchern. Doklady Academii Nauk SSSR, 102:621–622 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Petryk, A. A. 1971. A new Lower Carboniferous Archaediscus (Foraminifera) from southwestern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 17:249–252.Google Scholar
Petryk, A. A., and Mamet, B. L. 1972. Lower Carboniferous algal microflora, southwestern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, 9:767–802.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1846. On the remains of microscopic animals in the rocks of Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Geological Society of the West Riding of Yorkshire, Leeds, 2:274–285.Google Scholar
Plummer, H. J. 1930. Calcareous Foraminifera in the Brownwood Shale near Bridgeport, Texas. University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology and Technology Bulletin, 3019:5–21.Google Scholar
Rauzer-Chernousova, D. M. 1948a. Materials on the foraminiferal fauna of the Carboniferous deposits of central Kazakhstan. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Geologicheskaya Seriya, 66:1–25 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Rauzer-Chernousova, D. M. 1948b. Some new species of foraminifers from Lower Carboniferous deposits of the Moscow Basin. Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 62:227–238 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Reitlinger, E. A. 1950. Foraminifers from Middle Carboniferous deposits in the central part of the Russian Platform (exclusive of the family Fusulinidae). Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Geologicheskaya Seriya 47, Vol. 126, 127 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Rich, M. 1980. Carboniferous calcareous foraminifera from northeastern Alabama, south-central Tennessee, and northwestern Georgia. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 18, 62 p.Google Scholar
Rich, M. 1982. Foraminiferal zonation of the Floyd Formation (Mississippian) in the type area near Rome, Floyd County, Georgia. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 12:242–260.Google Scholar
Rich, M. 1986. Foraminifera, stratigraphy and regional interpretation of the Bangor Limestone in northwestern Georgia. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 16:110–134.Google Scholar
Scatterday, J. W. 1963. Stratigraphy and conodont faunas of the Maxville Group (Middle and Upper Mississippian) of Ohio. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 162 p.Google Scholar
Suleimanov, I. S. 1948. On some Lower Carboniferous Foraminifera from the Sterlitamak region, p. 244–245. In Rauzer-Chernousova, D. M. et al. (eds.), Stratigraphy and Foraminifera of the Lower Carboniferous of the Russian Platform and the Cis-Ural region. Trudy, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Institut Geologicheskii Nauk, Moscow, Geologiya Series, no. 19, 62 p. Google Scholar
Vachard, D. 1977. Etude stratigraphique et micropaléontologique (Algues et foraminifères) du Viséen de la Montagne Noire (Hérault, France). Mémoires de l'Institut Géologique de l'Université de Louvain, 8, 309 p.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1882. Descriptions of new species of fossils from Ohio, with remarks on some of the geological formations in which they occur. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 2:193–244.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1891. Contributions to invertebrate paleontology. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 5:505–620.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1893. Contributions to invertebrate paleontology. Ohio Geological Survey, 7:407–494.Google Scholar
Zeller, D. E. N. 1953. Endothyroid Foraminifera and ancestral fusulinids from the type Chesteran (Upper Mississippian). Journal of Paleontology, 27:183–199.Google Scholar