Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:49:49.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bryozoan fauna of the Lake Valley Formation (Mississippian), New Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2018

Andrej Ernst
Affiliation:
Institut für Geologie, Universität Hamburg, Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany 〈[email protected]
Karl Krainer
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology, Innsbruck University, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria 〈[email protected]
Spencer G. Lucas
Affiliation:
New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road NW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104, USA 〈[email protected]

Abstract

Ten bryozoan species are described from the Andrecito and Tierra Blanca members of the Lake Valley Formation (Mississippian) of Sierra County, New Mexico, USA. One genus, with one species, is new—a cystoporate, Cystomeson sierraensis n. gen. n. sp. The bryozoans indicate quieter and deeper conditions in the Andrecito Member and more agitated and shallower conditions in the Tierra Blanca Member. The species identified in this study are endemic to North America, whereas at the generic level, the composition is rather cosmopolitan.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/fc354A60-1fbc-4e41-8b9b-bbfd65e59a71

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astrova, G.G., 1964, [A new order of the Paleozoic Bryozoa]: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, no. 2, p. 2231.Google Scholar
Astrova, G.G., and Morozova, I.P., 1956, [On systematics of the bryozoans of the order Cryptostomata]: Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 110, no. 4, p. 661664.Google Scholar
Balakin, G.V., 1975, [Bryozoa], in Mikhno N. M., and Balakin G. V., eds., [Lower Carboniferous Foraminifers and Bryozoans of the Chatkal Mountains]: Tashkent, Uzbekistan, Ministerstvo Geologii Uzbekskoy SSR, p. 55114.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1911, The Early Paleozoic Bryozoa of the Baltic Provinces: Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum, v. 77, p. 1382.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1929, The Permian Bryozoa of Timor: Paläontologie von Timor, v. 16, p. 3790.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1952, Taxonomic notes on genera of fossil and Recent Bryozoa: Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, v. 42, p. 381385.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, B., 1994, Permian climatic cooling in the Canadian Arctic, in Klein, G.D., ed., Pangea: Paleoclimate, Tectonics and Sedimentation during Accretion, Zenith and Break-up of a Super-Continent: Geological Society of America Special Paper 288, p. 229246.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, B., and Desrochers, A., 1997, Permian warm- to very cold carbonates and cherts in northwest Pangea, in James, N.P., and Clarke, J., eds., Cool Water Carbonates: SEPM Special Publication 56, p. 327347.Google Scholar
Borg, F., 1926, Studies on Recent cyclostomatous Bryozoa: Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala, v. 10, p. 181507.Google Scholar
Burckle, L.H., 1960, Some Mississippian fenestrate Bryozoa from central Utah. Journal of Paleontology, v. 34, p. 10771098.Google Scholar
Chronic, B.J., 1949, Invertebrate paleontology (excepting fusulinids and corals), in Newell, N.D., Chronic, J., and Roberts, J., eds., Upper Paleozoic of Peru: New York, Columbia University, University Service Bureau, p. 46173.Google Scholar
Condra, G.E., 1902, New Bryozoa from the Coal Measures of Nebraska: The American Geologist, v. 30, no. 6, p. 337358.Google Scholar
Crockford, J., 1944, Bryozoa from Wandagee and Nooncanbah series of Western Australia: Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, v. 28, p. 165185.Google Scholar
Darton, N.H., 1928, ‘Red Beds’ and associated formations in New Mexico, with an outline of the geology of the state: United States Geological Survey Bulletin 794, p. 1356.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1831, Symbolae Physicae, seu Icones et descptiones Corporum Naturalium novorum aut minus cognitorum, quae ex itineribus per Libyam, Aegiptum, Nubiam, Dongalaam, Syriam, Arabiam et Habessiniam, studia annis 1820–25, redirent, Pars Zoologica, 4, Animalia Evertebrata exclusis Insectis: Berolini, 10 pls.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., Wyse Jackson, P.N., and Aretz, M., 2015, Bryozoan fauna from the Mississippian (Viséan) of Roque Redonde (Montagne Noire, southern France): Geodiversitas, v. 37, no. 2, p. 151213. doi: 10.5252/g2015n2a2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, M K., and Condra, G.E., 1957, Fenestella from the Permian of west Texas: Geological Society of America Memoir, v. 70, p. 1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, E.H., and McColloch, M.E., 1995, Fenestrida and Rhabdomesida (Bryozoa) of the Otter Formation (Visean), central Montana: Journal of Paleontology, v. 69, p. 813830.Google Scholar
Gorjunova, R.V., 1975, [Permian Bryozoa of Pamir]: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 148, p. 1125.Google Scholar
Gorjunova, R.V., 1985, [Morphology, system und phylogeny of Bryozoa (order Rhabdomesida)]: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 208, p. 1152.Google Scholar
Gorjunova, R.V., 1988, New Carboniferous bryozoans of the Gobi Altai, in Rozanov, A.Y., ed., New Species of Fossil Invertebrates of Mongolia: Trudy—Sovmestnaya Sovetsko-Mongol’skaya Paleontologicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, v. 33, p. 1023.Google Scholar
Hageman, S.J., 1991, Approaches to systematic and evolutionary studies of perplexing groups: An example using fenestrate Bryozoa: Journal of Paleontology, v. 65, p. 630647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hageman, S.J., 1993, Effects of nonnormality on studies of the morphological variation of a rhabdomesine bryozoan, Streblotrypa (Streblascopora) prisca (Gabb and Horn): The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, v. 4, p. 113.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1852, Natural History of NewYork, Part 6, Palaeontology 2, Containing descriptions of the lower Middle Division of the New York System: Albany, New York, C. Van Benthuysen, viii + 362 pp.Google Scholar
Harlton, B.H., 1933, Micropalaeontology of the Pennsylvanian Johns Valley Shale of the Ouachita Mountains, Oklahoma, and its relationship to the Mississippian Caney Shale: Journal of Paleontology, v. 7, p. 329.Google Scholar
King, W., 1849, On some families and genera of corals: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 2, p. 388390.Google Scholar
Krainer, K., and Lucas, S.G., 2012, Sedimentary petrography and depositional environments of the type section of the Mississippian Lake Valley Formation, Sierra County, New Mexico, in Lucas, S.G., McLemore, V.T., Lueth, V.W., Spielmann, J.A., and Krainer, K., eds., 63rd Fall Field Conference Guidebook, Geology of the Warm Springs Region: Socorro, New Mexico Geological Society, p. 293–304.Google Scholar
Kues, B.S., 1986, Paleontology of the Caballero and Lake Valley formations (lower Mississippian) west of the Rio Grande, south-central New Mexico, in Clemons, R.E., King, W.E., Mack, G.H., and Zidek, J., eds., Truth or Consequences Region, 37th Fall Field Conference Guidebook: Socorro, New Mexico Geological Society, p. 203–214.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, W., 1839, Corals, in Murchison, R.I., ed., The Silurian System, Part 2, Organic Remains: London, John Murray, p. 675694.Google Scholar
Lucas, S.G., 2012, The discovery of the Mississippian system in New Mexico: E.D. Cope and Lake Valley, 1881–1882, in Lucas, S.G., McLemore, V.T., Lueth, V.W., Spielmann, J.A., and Krainer, K., eds., 63rd Fall Field Conference Guidebook, Geology of the Warm Springs Region: Socorro, New Mexico Geological Society, p. 27–28.Google Scholar
Ma, J.-Y., Buttler, C.J., and Taylor, P.D., 2014, Cladistic analysis of the ‘trepostome’ suborder Esthonioporina and the systematics of Palaeozoic bryozoans, in Rosso, A., Wyse Jackson, P.N., and Porter, J.S., eds., Bryozoan Studies 2013: Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali, v. 94, p. 153161.Google Scholar
M’Coy, F., 1849, On some new genera and species of Paleozoic corals and Foraminifera: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 3, p. 119136.Google Scholar
McKee, E.D., and Gutschick, R.C., 1969, History of the Redwall Limestone of northern Arizona: Geological Society of America Memoir 114, p. 1726.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1881, Subcarboniferous fossils from the Lake Valley mining district of New Mexico, with descriptions of new species: Cincinnati Society of Natural History Journal, v. 4, p. 306315.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1889, North American Geology and Paleontology for the Use of Amateurs, Students and Scientists: Cincinnati, Ohio, Western Methodist Book Concern, 664 p.Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., 1960, [Devonian Bryozoa of the Minusinsk and Kuznetsk depressions]: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 86, p. 1206.Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., 1974, [Revision of the genus Fenestella]: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, no. 2, p. 5467.Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., 2001, [Bryozoans of the order Fenestellida (morphology, systematics, historical development)]: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, v. 277, p. 1177.Google Scholar
Nekhoroshev, V.P., 1948, [Carboniferous Bryozoa from the northeast Balkhash Lake region]: Alma-Ata, Izdatelstvo AN Kazakhskoi SSR, p. 170.Google Scholar
Nekhoroshev, V.P., 1953, [Lower Carboniferous Bryozoa of Kazakhstan]: Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Instituta (VSEGEI), v. 9, p. 1183.Google Scholar
Nekhoroshev, V.P., 1956, [Lower Carboniferous Bryozoa of the Altai and Siberia]: Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Geologicheskogo Instituta (VSEGEI), new ser., v. 13, p. 1419.Google Scholar
Nikiforova, A.I., 1948, [Lower Carboniferous Bryozoa of Karatau]: Alma-ata, AN KazSSR, p. 153.Google Scholar
OrbignyA.D., d’ A.D., d’, 1849, Prodrome de Paléontologie Stratigraphique Universelle des Animaux Mollusques Rayonnés, Faisant Suite ou Cours Élémentaire de Paléontologie et Géologie Stratigraphique, Volume 1: Paris, Masson, p. 1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D.E., 1973, Carboniferous Bryozoa from County Tyron: Geological Journal, v. 8, no. 1, p. 297306.Google Scholar
Phillips, J., 1836, Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire, Part 2, The Mountain Limestone District: London, John Murray, 253 p., 22 pls.Google Scholar
Sakagami, S., 1962, Lower Carboniferous Bryozoa from the Hikoroichi Series, Japan: Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, new ser., v. 46, p. 227242.Google Scholar
Schopf, T.J.M., Collier, K.O., and Bach, B.O., 1980, Relation of the morphology of stick-like bryozoans at Friday Harbour, Washington, to bottom currents, suspended matter and depth: Paleobiology, v. 6, p. 466476.Google Scholar
Schulga-Nesterenko, M.I., 1951, [Carboniferous Fenestellida of the Russian Platform]: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 32, p. 1157.Google Scholar
Schulga-Nesterenko, M.I., 1955, [Carboniferous Bryozoa of the Russian Platform]: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 57, p. 1207.Google Scholar
Snyder, E.M., 1991, Revised taxonomic procedures and paleoecological applications for some North American Mississippian Fenestellidae and Polyporidae (Bryozoa): Palaeontographica Americana, v. 57, p. 1272.Google Scholar
Spjeldnaes, N., 1984, Upper Ordovician bryozoans from Ojl Myr, Gotland, Sweden: Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, new ser., v. 10, p. 166.Google Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G., 1971, Bryozoaires du Paléozoïque supérieur de l’Afghanistan: Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de Lyon, v. 47, p. 152.Google Scholar
Thomsen, E., 1977, Phenetic variability and functional morphology of erect cheilostome bryozoans from the Danian (Paleocene) of Denmark: Paleobiology, v. 3, p. 360376.Google Scholar
Trizna, V.B., 1958, [Early Carboniferous bryozoans of the Kuznetz depression]: Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Neftanogo Nauchno-Issledovatel’skogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta, v. 122, p. 1436.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1882, American Paleozoic Bryozoa: The Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, v. 5, p. 121175, 233–257.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1884, American Palaeozoic Bryozoa: The Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, v. 8, p. 2451.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1886, Descriptions of new Silurian and Devonian fossils: Bryozoa: Contributions to American Palaeontology, v. 1, p. 833.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1888, A list of the Bryozoa of the Waverly Group in Ohio, with descriptions of new species: Denison University, Bulletin of Scientific Laboratories, v. 4, p. 6296.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1890, Palaeozoic Bryozoa, III: Report of the Geological Survey of Illinois, v. 8, p. 283688.Google Scholar
Vine, G.R., 1884, Fourth report of the Committee consisting of Dr. H. R. Sorby and Mr. G. R. Vine, appointed for the purpose of reporting on fossil Polyzoa, in Reports of the 53rd Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement in Sciences, p. 161–209.Google Scholar
Winchell, A., 1864, Descriptions of fossils from the Yellow Sandstones lying beneath the ‘Burlington Limestone,’ at Burlington, Iowa: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, ser. 2, v. 15, no. 7, p. 225.Google Scholar
Young, J., and Young, J., 1874, On a new genus of Carboniferous Polyzoa: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 4, v. 13, p. 335339.Google Scholar