Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:10:14.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Benthic foraminifera from the Albian shallow-marine limestones in the Geyik Dağı area (Central Taurides), southern Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Cemile Solak Open the ORCID record for Cemile Solak [Opens in a new window] ,
Kemal Taslı  and
Hayati Koç
Cemile Solak*
Affiliation:
Mersin University, Department of Geological Engineering, Çiftlikköy Campus, 33343, Yenişehir, Mersin, Turkey , ,
Kemal Taslı
Affiliation:
Mersin University, Department of Geological Engineering, Çiftlikköy Campus, 33343, Yenişehir, Mersin, Turkey , ,
Hayati Koç
Affiliation:
Mersin University, Department of Geological Engineering, Çiftlikköy Campus, 33343, Yenişehir, Mersin, Turkey , ,
*
*Corresponding author
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cretaceous carbonates in the Geyik Dağı area (Central Taurides, southern Turkey) are represented by two successions with different paleoenvironmental settings: open shelf to slope succession of Cenomanian to Danian age and inner platform succession of Albian to Maastrichtian age, which is interrupted by a post-Cenomanian disconformity. Outcropped lowermost part of the platform-type one is composed of rudistid limestones corresponding to the Urgonian-type carbonates and belongs to the Geyik Dağı Unit (=Anamas-Akseki Carbonate Platform). It contains a rich assemblage of larger benthic foraminifera including orbitolinid, chrysalidinid, cuneolinid, nezzazatid, and miliolid taxa, which has been illustrated and documented here for the first time from the upper Albian of the Tauride Carbonate Platform. The occurrence of such a diversified foraminiferal fauna indicates a prominent high diversity that took place in the Tauride Carbonate Platform during the late Albian time, which corresponds to a major emersion period in some parts of the platform.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 95 , Issue 4 , July 2021 , pp. 673 - 693
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altıner, D., and Decrouez, D., 1982, Etude stratigraphique et micropaléontologique de Crétacé de la région au NW de Pınarbaşı (Taurus Oriental, Turquie): Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 1, p. 53–91.Google Scholar
Altıner, D., Ömer Yılmaz, İ., Özgül, N., Akçar, N., Bayazıtoğlu, M., and Gaziulusoy, Z.E., 1999, High-resolution sequence stratigraphic correlation in the Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)–Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) peritidal carbonate deposits (Western Taurides, Turkey): Geological Journal, v. 34, p. 139–158.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud-Vanneau, A., 1980, Micropaléontologie, paléoécologie, et sédimentologie d'une plate-forme carbonatée de la marge passive de la Téthys: l'Urgonien du Vercors septentrional et de la Chartreuse (Alpes occidentales): Géologie Alpine Memoire 11, v. 1–3, 874 p.Google Scholar
Arnaud-Vanneau, A. (Coordinator, Early Cretaceous), 1998, Chart 5 Larger Benthic foraminifera, in Hardenbol, J., Jacquin, T., Farley, M.B., de Graciansky, P.C., and Vail, P., eds., Cretaceous Biochronostratigraphy: SEPM Special Publication, v. 60.Google Scholar
Arnaud-Vanneau, A., and Chiocchini, M., 1985, Sabaudia minuta (Hofker, 1965), in Schroeder, R., and Neumann, N., eds., Les grands Foraminifères du Crétacé Moyen de la région méditerranénne: Geobios, Mémoire Special 7, p. 29–32.Google Scholar
Arnaud-Vanneau, A., and Premoli Silva, I., 1995, Biostratigraphy and systematic description of benthic foraminifers from mid-Cretaceous shallow-water carbonate platform sediments at Sites 878 and 879 (MIT and Takuyo-Daisan guyots), in Haggerty, J.A.A., Premoli Silva, I., Rack, F.R., and McNutt, M.K., eds., Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results: v. 144, p. 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud-Vanneau, A., and Sliter, W.V., 1995, Early Cretaceous shallow-water benthic foraminifers and fecal pellets from Leg 143 compared with coeval faunas from the Pacific Basin, Central America, and the Tethys, in Winterer, E.L., Sager, W.W., Firth, J.V., and Sinton, J.M., eds., Proceedings Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results: v. 143, p. 537–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, F.T., Simmons, M.D., and Whittaker, J.E., 1991, The Mesozoic Chrysalidinidae (Foraminifera Textulariacea) of the Middle East: the Redmond (Aramco) taxa and their relatives: Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geological Series, v. 47, p. 101–152.Google Scholar
Bonet, F., 1956, Zonificacion microfaunistica de las calizas Cretacicas del este de Mexico: Boletín de la Asociación Mexicana de Geólogos Petroleros, v. 8, p. 3–102.Google Scholar
BouDagher-Fadel, M.K., 2018, Evolution and Geological Significance of Larger Benthic Foraminifera, Second Edition: London, UCL Press, 714 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BouDagher-Fadel, M.K., Hu, X., Price, G.D., Sun, G., Wang, J-G, An, W., 2017, Foraminiferal biostratigraphy and palaeoenvironmental analysis of the mid-Cretaceous limestones in the southern Tibetan plateau: Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 47, p. 188–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brönnimann, P., and Conrad, M.A., 1968, Remarks on the morphology and occurrence of Pseudotextulariella? scarsellai (De Castro) in the Lower Cretaceous of the Geneva region: Geologica Romana, v. 7, p. 95–106.Google Scholar
Brönnimann, P., Zaninetti, L., and Whittaker, J.E., 1983, On the classification of the Trochamminacea (Foraminiferida): Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 13, p. 202–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvez, H., 1988, Pseudonummoloculina aurigerica n. gen., n. sp. et Dobrogelina? angulata n. sp., deux foraminifères nouveaux de l'Albien calcaire des Pyrénées franco-espagnoles: Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 2, p. 391–399.Google Scholar
Charollais, J., and Brönnimann, P., 1965, Première note sur les foraminifères du Crétacé inférieur de la région genèvoise. Sabaudia Charollais et Brönnimann n. gen.: Archives des Sciences, Genève, v. 18, p. 615–624.Google Scholar
Cherchi, A., and Schroeder, R., 1978, Osservazioni sul gen. Orbitolinopsis silvestri (Foraminiferida) e sua presenza nel Barremiano della Sardegna: Bollettino della Società Sarda di Scienze Naturali, Anno XI, v. 17, p. 159–167.Google Scholar
Cherchi, A., Schroeder, R., and Ruberti, D., 2009, Cuneospirella samnitica gen. n., n. sp. (Foraminiferida) from the Santonian of the Matese Mountains (Molise, central Italy): Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, v. 115, p. 59–65.Google Scholar
Chiocchini, M., 1984, Revisione di Textulariella auruncensis Chiocchini & di Napoli, 1966 e descrizione di Sabaudia dinapolii n. sp., foraminiferi bentonici del cretaceo inferiore del Lazio meridionale: Studi Geologici Camerti, v. 9, p. 15–33.Google Scholar
Chiocchini, M., and Di Napoli-Alliata, E., 1966, Sulla presenza di Textulariella minuta Hofker e Textulariella auruncensis n. sp. (Foraminiferida) nel Cretaceo inferiore dei Monti Aurunci (Lazio meridionale): Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana, v. 87, p. 13–27.Google Scholar
Chiocchini, M., Mancinelli, A., and Romano, A., 1984, Stratigraphic distribution of benthic foraminifera in the Aptian, Albian and Cenomanian carbonate sequences of the Aurunci and Ausoni Mountains (Southern Lazio, Italy): Benthos ‘83, 2nd International Symposium on Benthic Foraminifera, Pau, April 1983, p. 167–181.Google Scholar
Chiocchini, M., Farinacci, A., Mancinelli, A., Molinari, V., and Potetti, M., 1994, Biostratigrafia a foraminiferi, dasicladali e calpionelle delle successioni carbonatiche Mesozoiche dell'Appennino Centrale (Italia), in Mancinelli, A., ed., Biostratigrafia dell'Italia Centrale: Studi Geologici Camerti, v. speciale, p. 9–128.Google Scholar
Chiocchini, M., Pampaloni, M. L., and Pichezzi, R.M., 2012, Microfacies e microfossili delle successioni carbonatiche Mesozoiche del Lazio et dell'Abruzzo (Italia centrale) Cretacico: Memorie per Servire alla Descrizione della Carta Geologica d'Italia, ISPRA, Servizio Geologico d'Italia—Dipartimento Difesa del Suolo-Roma, v. 17, 269 p.Google Scholar
Conkin, J.E., and Conkin, B.M., 1958, Revision of the genus Nummoloculina and emendation of Nummoloculina heimi Bonet: Micropaleontology, v. 4, p. 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1937, A monograph of the foraminiferal Family Valvulinidae: Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication, v. 8, 210 p.Google Scholar
Cvetko Tešović, B., Glumac, B., and Bucković, D., 2011, Integrated biostratigraphy and carbon isotope stratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous (Barremian to Albian) Adriatic–Dinaridic carbonate platform deposits in Istria, Croatia: Cretaceous Research, v. 32, p. 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmoian, S.A., 1976, Nezzazatinella adhami a new genus and species of imperforate Foraminifera from the pre-Coniacian of southeastern Iraq: First International Symposium on Benthonic Foraminifera of Continental Margins. Maritime Sediments Special Publication No. 1, p. 523–528.Google Scholar
De Castro, P., 1963, Cuneolina scarsellai n. sp. nel Cretacico dell'Appennino Meridionale: Bollettino della Società dei Naturalisti in Napoli, v. 72, p. 71–76.Google Scholar
De Castro, P., 1981, Osservazioni su Chrysalidina gradata D'Orbigny 1839 (Foraminiferida) dell'lle Madame (Francia): Atti dell'Accademia Pontaniana Nuova Serie, v. 30, p. 1–25.Google Scholar
De Castro, P., 1985, Chrysalidina gradata D'Orbigny, 1839, in Schroeder, R., and Neumann, N., eds., Les Grands Foraminifères du Crétace Moyen de la Région Méditerranénne: Geobios, Mémoire Special 7, p. 23–26.Google Scholar
De Castro, P., 1987, On some foraminifera and algae in Apennine Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene: Memorie della Societa Geologica Italiana, v. 40, p. 109–124.Google Scholar
Decrouez, D., and Moullade, M., 1974, Orbitolinidés nouveaux de I'Albo-Cénomanien de Grèce: Archives des Sciences, Genève, v. 27, p. 75–92.Google Scholar
Delage, Y., and Hérouard, E., 1896, Traité de Zoologie Concréte, La Cellule et les Protozoaires: Paris, Schleicher Fréres, v. 1, 584 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A., 1826, Tableau méthodique de la classe des Céphalopodes: Annales des Sciences Naturelles, v. 7, p. 245–314.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A., 1839, Foraminifères des îles Canaries: Histoire Naturelle des Iles Canaries, v. 2, p. 120–146.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A., 1846, Foraminifères Fossiles du Bassin Tertiaire de Vienne: Paris, Gide et Comp., 312 p.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1839, Über die Bildung der Kreidefelsen und des Kreidemergels durch unsichtbare organismen: Physikalische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, p. 59–147.Google Scholar
Farinacci, A., and Köylüoğlu, M., 1982, Evolution of the Jurassic–Cretaceous Taurus shelf (Southern Turkey): Estratto dal Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, v. 21, p. 267–276.Google Scholar
Fursenko, A.V., 1958, Osnovnye etapy razvitiya faun foraminifer v geologicheskom proshlom: Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Akademiia Nauk Belorusskoi SSR, Minsk, v. 1, p. 10–29.Google Scholar
Ghigi, A., 1909, Raccolte planctoniche fatte dalla R. Nave “Liguria” nel viaggio di circonnavigazione del 1903–1905. I. Ctenofori: Pubblicazioni del R. Instituto di Studi Superiori Practici e di Perfeziona - mento in Firenze Sezione di Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, v. 2, p. 1–24.Google Scholar
Görür, N., and Tüysüz, O., 2001, Cretaceous to Miocene Palaeogeographic evolution of Turkey: implications for hydrocarbon potential: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 24, p. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granier, B., Clavel, B., Moullade, M., Busnardo, R., Charollais, J., Tronchetti, G., and Desjacques, P., 2013, L'Estellon (Baronnies, France), a “Rosetta Stone” for the Urgonian biostratigraphy: Carnets de Géologie [Notebooks on Geology], Brest, Article 2013/04 (CG2013_A04), p. 163–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamaoui, M., 1963, Reissella ramonensis gen. nov., sp. nov. (Foraminifera) from the Cenomanian of Israel: Israel Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 12, p. 58–64.Google Scholar
Hamaoui, M., and Saint-Marc, P., 1970, Microfaunes et microfaciès du Cénomanien du Proche-Orient: Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf Aquitaine, v. 4, p. 257–352.Google Scholar
Henson, F.R.S., 1948, New Trochamminidæ and Verneuilinidae from the Middle East: Journal of Natural History Series 11, v. 14, p. 605–630.Google Scholar
Hofker, J., 1965, Some foraminifera from the Aptian-Albian passage of northern Spain: Leidse Geologische Mendelingen, v. 33, p. 183–189.Google Scholar
Hottinger, L., 2006, Illustrated Glossary of Terms Used in Foraminiferal Research: Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology Memoir (2006/02), 125 p. doi:/10.4267/2042/5832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hottinger, L., Drobne, K., and Caus, E., 1989, Late Cretaceous, larger, complex miliolids (Foraminifera) endemic in the Pyrenean faunal province: Facies, v. 21, p. 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husinec, A., and Sokač, B., 2006, Early Cretaceous benthic associations (foraminifera and calcareous algae) of shallow tropical-water platform environment (Mljet Island, southern Croatia): Cretaceous Research, v. 27, p. 418–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husinec, A., Velić, I., and Sokač, B., 2009, Diversity patterns in mid-Cretaceous benthic foraminifers and Dasycladalean algae of the southern part of the Mesozoic Adriatic platform, Croatia: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Special Publication, v. 93, p. 153–170.Google Scholar
Kaminski, M.A., 2004, The year 2000 classification of the agglutinated foraminifera, in Bubík, M., and Kaminski, M.A., eds., Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera: Grzybowski Foundation Special Publication, v. 8, p. 237–255.Google Scholar
Kaminski, M.A., 2014, The year 2010 classification of the agglutinated foraminifera: Micropaleontology, v. 60, 89–108.Google Scholar
Koçyiğit, A., 1981, Isparta büklümünde (Batı Toroslar) Toroslar karbonat platformunun jeolojik evrimi (Geologic evolution of the Taurides Carbonate Platform in the Isparta Angle (Western Taurides): Geological Society of Turkey Bulletin, v. 24, p. 15–23.Google Scholar
Lankester, E.R., 1885, Protozoa, in Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 19, 9th ed., p. 830–866.Google Scholar
Laug, B., Peybernès, B., and Rey, J., 1980, Mayncina bulgarica n. sp. Lituolidé nouveau du Crétacé inférieur mésogéen (Bulgarie, Portugal, Pyrénées, Tunisie): Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, v. 116, p. 68–76.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, R., 1967, Un nouvel élément dans la géologie du Taurus Lycien: les nappes d'Antalya (Turquie): Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, v. 265, p. 1365–1368.Google Scholar
Leymerie, A., 1878, 1881, Description géologique et paléontologique des Pyrénées de la Haute-Garonne: Toulouse, Édouard Privat, 2 v. (text, 1878; atlas, 1881), 1010 p.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A.R. Jr., and Tappan, H., 1946, New Washita Foraminifera: Journal of Paleontology, v. 20, p. 238–258.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A.R. Jr., and Tappan, H., 1988, Foraminiferal genera and their classification: New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 2 vol., 970 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozo, F.E., 1944, Biostratigraphic relations of some north Texas Trinity and Fredericksburg (Comanchean) foraminifera: American Midland Naturalist, v. 31, p. 513–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luperto-Sinni, E., 1979a, Praechrysalidina infrocretacea n. gen. n. sp. (Foraminiferida) del Cretaceo Inferiore delle Murge Baresi, Studi Geologici e Morfologici sulla Regione Pugliese V, Istituto di Geologia e Paleontologia. Bari: Studi Geologici e Morfologici sulla Regione Pugliese, v. 5, p. 3–16.Google Scholar
Luperto-Sinni, E., 1979b, Cretacicladus minervini n. gen. n. sp., nuova alga (Chlorophyta) del Cenomaniano della Murge: Studi Geologici e Morfologici sulla Regione Pugliese, v. 8, p. 3–30.Google Scholar
Luperto-Sinni, E., 1999, Protochrysalidina elongata n. gen. n. sp. del Cretaceo inferiore delle murge (Puglia, Italia Meridionale): Geologica Romana, v. 35, p. 249–259.Google Scholar
Mancinelli, A., and Chiocchini, M., 2006, Cretaceous benthic foraminifers and calcareous algae from Monte Cairo (southern Latium, Italy): Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, v. 45, p. 91–113.Google Scholar
Marie, P., 1941, Les Foraminifères de la craie à Belemnitella mucronata du Bassin de Paris: Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, n. sér., v. 12, p. 1–296.Google Scholar
Martin, K., 1890, Untersuchungen über den Bau von Orbitolina (Patellina auct.) von Borneo: Sammlungen des Geologischen Reichs-Museums Leiden, ser. 1, v. 4, p. 209–231.Google Scholar
Martin, C., 1969, Akseki kuzeyindeki bir kısım Toroslar’ın stratigrafik ve tektonik incelemesi (Stratigraphic and tectonic investigation of a part of the Taurides in north of Akseki): Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Bulletin, v. 72, p. 110–129. [in Turkish]Google Scholar
Maync, W., 1955, Coskinolina sunnilandensis, n. sp., a Lower Cretaceous (Urgo-Albian) species: Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, v. 6, p. 105–111.Google Scholar
McPhee, P.J., van Hinsbergen, D.J.J., Maffione, M., and Altıner, D., 2018, Palinspastic reconstruction versus cross-section balancing: how complete is the central Taurides fold-thrust belt (Turkey)?: Tectonics, v. 37, p. 4285–4310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megza, A., Cvetko Tešović, B., Bajraktarević, Z., and Bucković, D., 2007, A new dinosaur tracksite in the late Albian of Istria, Croatia: Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, v. 113, p. 139–148.Google Scholar
Mikhalevich, V., 2004, On the new understanding of the Order Lituolida Lankester, 1885 (Foraminifera): Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, v. 4, p. 247–267.Google Scholar
Monod, O., 1977, Recherches Géologiques dans le Taurus Occidental au Sud de Beyşehir (Turquie) [Ph.D. dissertation]: Paris, Université de Paris-Sud Orsay, 442 p.Google Scholar
Moullade, M., 1965, Contribution au probléme de la classification des Orbitolinidae (Foraminiferida, Lituolacea): Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, v. 260, p. 4031–4034.Google Scholar
Moullade, M., Peybernès, B., Rey, J., and Saint-Marc, P., 1985, Biostratigraphic interest and paleobiogeographic distribution of Early and mid-Cretaceous Mesogean Orbitolinids (Foraminiferida): Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 15, p. 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munier-Chalmas, E., 1887, Sur la Cyclolina et trois nouveaux genres de foraminifères des couches à rudistes: Cyclopsina, Dicyclina et Spirocyclina: Compte Rendu des Séances de la Société Géologique de France, v. 4, p. 30–31.Google Scholar
Neagu, T., 1968, Andersenia rumana, n. gen, n. sp., and some taxonomic observations on the Subfamily Valvulininae: Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, v. 19, p. 120–122.Google Scholar
Neagu, T., 1979, Données nouvelles concernant les représentants de la famille des Pfenderinidae de l'Eocrétacé de la Dobrogea méridionale (Roumanie): Revista Española de Micropaleontología, v. 11, p. 479–504.Google Scholar
Neumann, M, 1967, Manuel de micropaléontologie des Foraminifères, (Systematique-Stratigraphie): Paris, Gauthier-Villars, v. 1, 297 p.Google Scholar
Omara, S., 1956, New foraminifera from the Cenomanian of Sinai, Egypt: Journal of Paleontology, v. 30, p. 883–890.Google Scholar
Özdikmen, H., 2009, Substitute names for some unicellular animal taxa (Protozoa): Munis Entomology & Zoology, v. 4, p. 233–256.Google Scholar
Özer, S., and Kahrıman, H.H., 2019, Cenomanian canaliculate rudists (Bivalvia) from the Geyik Dağı-Hadim area (Central Taurides, S Turkey): systematic paleontology, stratigraphic importance and depositional environment: Cretaceous Research, v. 103, 104161. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2019.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgül, N., 1976, Torosların bazı temel jeolojik özellikleri (Some main geological properties of the Taurides): Geological Society of Turkey Bulletin, v. 19, 65–78. [in Turkish]Google Scholar
Özgül, N., 1984, Stratigraphy and tectonic evolution of the Central Taurides, in Tekeli, O., and Göncüoğlu, M.C., eds., Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Geology of the Taurus Belt 1983: Ankara, MTA, Geological Society of Turkey, p. 77–90.Google Scholar
Özgül, N., 1997, Bozkır-Hadim-Taşkent (Orta Toroslar'ın kuzey kesimi) dolayında yer alan tektono-stratigrafik birliklerin stratigrafisi: Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Bulletin, v. 119, p. 113–174. [in Turkish]Google Scholar
Pawlowski, J., Holzmann, M., and Tyszka, J., 2013, New supraordinal classification of foraminifera: molecules meet morphology: Marine Micropaleontology, v. 100, p. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peybernès, B., 1984, Foraminifères benthiques nouveaux de l'Albien supérieur du Massif du Turbôn (Pyrénées espagnole), in Oertli, H.J., ed., Benthos '83: Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf Aquitaine, Memoir, v. 6, p. 491–499.Google Scholar
Piuz, A., and Vicedo, V., 2020, New Cenomanian “nummoloculinas” of the Natih Formation of Oman: Cretaceous Research, v. 107, 104224. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2019.104224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praturlon, A., 1964, Calcareous algae from Jurassic–Cretaceous limestone of Central Appennines (Southern Latium-Abruzzi): Geologica Romana, v. 3, p. 171–202.Google Scholar
Ricou, L.E., Argyriadis, , and Marcoux, J., 1975, L'Axe calcaire du Taurus, un alignement de fenêtres arabo-africaines sous des nappes radiolaritiques, ophiolitiques et métamorphiques: Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, v. 7, p. 1024–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A.H.F., and Woodcock, N.H., 1984, The SW segment of the Antalya Complex, Turkey as a Mesozoic–Tertiary Tethyan continental margin, in Dixon, J.E., and Robertson, A.H.F., eds., The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean: Geological Society, London, Special Publications 17, p. 251–272.Google Scholar
Roemer, F., 1849, Texas, mit besonderer Rüchsicht auf deutsche Auswanderung und die physichen Verhaltnisse des Landes: Bonn, A. Marcus, 464 p.Google Scholar
Roemer, F., 1852, Die Kreidebildungen von Texas und ihre organischen Einschlüsse: Bonn, A. Marcus, 700 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidova, K.M., 1981, On an up-to-date System of Supraspecific Taxonomy of Cenozoic Benthonic Foraminifera: Moscow, Institut Okeanologii P.P.Shirshova, Akademiya Nauk, SSSR, 73 p. [in Russian]Google Scholar
Saint-Marc, P., 1974, Étude stratigraphique et micropaléontologique de l'Albien, du Cénomanien et du Turonien du Liban: Notes et Mémoires sur le Moyen-Orient, v. 13, p. 1–342.Google Scholar
Sartoni, S., and Crescenti, U., 1962, Ricerche biostratigrafiche nel Mesozoico dell´Appennino meridionale: Giornale di Geologia, ser. 2, v. 29, p. 161–302.Google Scholar
Schlagintweit, F., 2020, Cribellopsis moulladei (Saint-Marc, 1974) nov. comb. (Foraminiferida, Orbitolinidae): an Albian marker taxon of the southern Neotethysian margin: Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, v. 16, p. 37–41.Google Scholar
Schlagintweit, F., and Gawlick, H.J., 2005, Vercorsella halleinensis n. sp.—a new cuneoliniform foraminifera from the late Tithonian to early Berriasian (Barmstein Limestones, Plassen Carbonate Platform) of the Northern Calcareous Alps (Austria): Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, v. 145, p. 159–169.Google Scholar
Schlagintweit, F., Kolodziej, B., and Qorri, A., 2015, Foraminiferan-calcimicrobial benthic communities from Upper Cretaceous shallow-water carbonates of Albania (Kruja Zone): Cretaceous Research, v. 56, p. 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlagintweit, F., Rosales, I., and Najarro, M., 2016, Glomospirella cantabrica n. sp., and other benthic foraminifera from Lower Cretaceous Urgonian-type carbonates of Cantabria, Spain: biostratigraphic implications: Geologica Acta, v. 14, p. 113–138.Google Scholar
Schroeder, R., 1962, Orbitolinen des Cenomans Südwesteuropas: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 36, p. 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, R., 1964, Orbitoliniden-Biostratigraphie des Urgons nordöstlich von Teruel (Spanien): Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, v. 1964, p. 462–474.Google Scholar
Schroeder, R., 1985, Orbitolina (M.) texana (Roemer, 1849), in Schroeder, R., and Neumann, N., eds., Les grands Foraminifères du Crétacé Moyen de la région méditerranénne: Geobios, Mémoire Special 7, p. 77–80.Google Scholar
Schroeder, R., Clavel, M.B., and Charollais, J., 1990, Praedictyorbitolina carthusiana n. gen. n. sp., Orbitolinidé (Foraminiferida) de la limite Hauterivian-Barrémian des Alpes occidentales: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 64, p. 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, R., Buchem, F.S.P. van, Cherchi, A., Baghbani, D., Vincent, B., Immenhauser, A., and Granier, B., 2010, Revised orbitolinid biostratigraphic zonation for the Barremian–Aptian of the eastern Arabian Plate and implications for regional stratigraphic correlations, in van Buchem, F.S.P., Al-Husseini, M.I., Maurer, F., and Droste, H.J., eds., Barremian–Aptian Stratigraphy and Hydrocarbon Habitat of the Eastern Arabian Plate: GeoArabia Special Publication, v. 1, p. 49–96.Google Scholar
Schwager, C., 1876, Saggio di una classificazione dei foraminiferi avuto riguardo alle loro famiglie naturali: Bolletino R. Comitato Geologico d'Italia, v. 7, p. 475–485.Google Scholar
Simmons, M.D., Whittaker, J.E., and Jones, R.W., 2000, Orbitolinids from Cretaceous sediments of the Middle East—a revision of the F.R.S. Henson and associated collection, in Hart, M.B., and Smart, C.W., eds., Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera: Gybrowski Foundation Special Publication, v. 7, p. 411–437.Google Scholar
Smout, A.H., 1956, Three new Cretaceous genera of foraminifera related to the Ceratobuliminidae: Micropaleontology, v. 2, p. 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solak, C., 2019, Anamas-Akseki ve Bey Dağları Karbonat Platformları ile Bornova Fliş Zonu'nun güneybatı kesimindeki Üst Kretase istiflerinin stratigrafisi, paleo-ortamsal analizi ve bentik foraminifer mikropaleontolojisi (Stratigraphy, Paleoenvironmental Analysis and Benthic Foraminiferal Micropaleontology of the Upper Cretaceous Successions in the Anamas-Akseki and Bey Dağları Carbonate Platforms and SW part of the Bornova Flysch Zone) [Ph.D. dissertation]: Mersin, Turkey, Mersin University, 305 p. [in Turkish]Google Scholar
Solak, C., and Taslı, K., 2020, Phenacophragma oezeri n. sp., a benthic foraminifera from Albian shallow marine carbonates of the Geyik Dağı area (Southern Turkey): Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 50, p. 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solak, C., Taslı, K., and Koç, H., 2017, Biostratigraphy and facies analysis of the Upper Cretaceous–Danian? platform carbonate succession in the Kuyucak area, western Central Taurides, S Turkey: Cretaceous Research, v. 79, p. 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solak, C., Taslı, K., Özer, S., and Koç, H., 2019, The Madenli (Central Taurides) Upper Cretaceous platform carbonate succession: benthic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and platform evolution: Geobios, v. 52, p. 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solak, C., Taslı, K., and Koç, H., 2020, An Albian–Turonian shallow-marine carbonate succession of the Bey Dağları (Western Taurides, Turkey): biostratigraphy and a new benthic foraminifera Fleuryana gediki sp. nov.: Cretaceous Research, v. 108, 104321. doi:0.1016/j.cretres.2019.104321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmann, G., 1881, Die Foraminiferengattung Nummoloculina n.g.: Neuest Jahrbuch Mineralogie Geologie Paläontologie, Stuttgart, v. 1, p. 31–43.Google Scholar
Şengör, A.M.C., and Yılmaz, Y. 1981, Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach: Tectonophysics, v. 75, p. 181–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taslı, K., and Solak, C., 2019., New findings on an Orbitolinid foraminifer Coskinolinella bariensis (Luperto-Sinni & Reina, 1992) from the Albian shallow-water carbonate sequence of the Bey Dağları (S Turkey): Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 49, p. 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velić, I., 2007, Stratigraphy and palaeobiogeography of Mesozoic benthic foraminifera of the Karst Dinarides (SE Europe): Geologica Croatica, v. 60, p. 1–113.Google Scholar
Velić, I., and Gušić, I., 1973, Cuneolina tenuis n. sp. from the Neocomian of Mt. Velika Kapela (Central Croatia): Geološki Vjesnik, v. 25, p. 155–161.Google Scholar
Vlahović, I., Tišljarb, J., Velić, I., and Matičec, D., 2005, Evolution of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform: palaeogeography, main events and depositional dynamics: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 220, p. 333–360.Google Scholar
Walker, J.D., Geissman, J.W., Bowring, S.A., and Babcock, L.E., compilers, 2018, Geologic Time Scale v. 5.0: Geological Society of America, https://doi.org/10.1130/2018.CTS005R3C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaninetti, L., 1978, Un organisme incertae sedis nouveau dans le Permien supérieur du Sud- Zagros, Iran: Notes du Laboratoire de Paléontologie de l' Université de Genéve, v. 3, p. 17–19.Google Scholar