Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:34:40.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ammonite fauna from the Wenonah Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of New Jersey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

W. J. Kennedy  and
W. A. Cobban
W. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, United Kingdom
W. A. Cobban
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 919, Box 25046, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Wenonah Formation of New Jersey yields an ammonite fauna comprising Menuites portlocki (Sharpe, 1855), Placenticeras placenta (DeKay, 1828), P. minor n. sp., Nostoceras (Nostoceras) puzosiforme n. sp., Nostoceras (Nostoceras) aff. N. colubriformis Stephenson, 1941, Didymoceras n. sp., Didymoceras spp., Parasolenoceras sp., Baculites cf. B. scotti Cobban, 1958, Baculites sp., and Trachyscaphites pulcherrimus (Roemer, 1841). Although commonly regarded as lower Maastrichtian by micropaleontologists, the presence of M. portlocki and T. pulcherrimus is an indicator of upper, but not uppermost, Campanian in a northwest European sense, and the presence of Baculites cf. B. scotti suggests uppermost middle Campanian in terms of the Western Interior provincial substages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 95 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnaud, H. 1878. Parallelisme de la craie supérieur dans le Norde et celle du Sud-Ouest. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 3d series, 6:205–211.Google Scholar
Aurisano, R. W. 1989. Upper Cretaceous dinoflagellate biostratigraphy of the subsurface Atlantic Coastal Plain of New Jersey and Delaware. Palynology, 13:143–179.Google Scholar
Birkelund, T., Hancock, J. M., Hart, M. B., Rawson, P. F., Remane, J., Robaszynski, F., Schmid, F., and Surlyk, F. 1984. Cretaceous stage boundaries—proposals. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 33:3–20.Google Scholar
Błaszkiewicz, A. 1980. Campanian and Maastrichtian ammonites of the Middle Vistula Valley, Poland: a stratigraphic-paleontologic study. Prace Instytutu Geologicznego, 92:1–63.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, R. 1948. Emanuel Kayser's Abriss der Geologie, Volume 2, Historische Geologie. Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart, 356 p.Google Scholar
Brouwers, E. M., and Hazel, J. E. 1978. Ostracoda and correlation of the Severn Formation (Navarroan: Maastrichtian) of Maryland. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Monograph, 1, 52 p.Google Scholar
Christopher, R. A. 1980. Cretaceous pollen, p. 20–30. In Minard, J. P. (ed.), Geology of the Round Bay quadrangle, Anne Arundel County, Maryland. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1109.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1958. Two new species of Baculites from the Western Interior region. Journal of Paleontology, 32:660–665.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1970. Occurrences of the late Cretaceous ammonites Didymoceras stevensoni (Whitfield) and Exiteloceras jenneyi (Whitfield) in Delaware. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 700-D:71–76.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1973. The Late Cretaceous ammonite Trachyscaphites pulcherrimus (Roemer) in New Jersey and Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Journal of Research, 1:695–700.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. and Scott, G. R. 1964. Multinodose scaphitid cephalopods from the lower part of the Pierre Shale and equivalent rocks in the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 483-E:E1–E13.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1969. Atlas des fossiles caractéristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites). XV (Campanien inférieur). Service Géologique, Tananarive, 216 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1855. Descriptions of eighteen new Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, 7:265–268.Google Scholar
DeKay, J. E. 1828. Report on several multilocular shells from the State of Delaware: with observations on a second specimen of the new fossil genus EURYPTERUS. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York, 2:273.Google Scholar
Diener, C. 1925. Ammonoidea neocretacea, [pt.] 29 in Animalia, [pt.] 1 inDiener, C. (ed.), Fossilium catalogus. W. Junk, Berlin, 244 p.Google Scholar
Dorf, E. 1952. Critical analysis of Cretaceous stratigraphy and paleobotany of Atlantic Coastal Plain. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 36:2161–2184.Google Scholar
Dorf, E. and Fox, S. K. 1957. Cretaceous and Cenozoic of the New Jersey Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America, Guidebook for Field Trips, Field Trip no. 1:1–25.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1890. Sur la classification des Cératites de la Craie. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France (3), 18:275–292.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1846. Report on the fossil Invertebrata from southern India, collected by Mr. Kaye and Mr. Cunliffe. Transactions of the Geological Society of London (2), 7:97–174.Google Scholar
Gallagher, W. B. 1984. Paleoecology of the Delaware Valley region, Part 2, Cretaceous to Quaternary. The Mosasaur, 2:9–43.Google Scholar
Gill, J. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1973. Stratigraphy and geologic history of the Montana Group and equivalent rocks, Montana, Wyoming and North and South Dakota. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 776, 37 p.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1871. Arrangement of the families of mollusks. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 227, 49 p.Google Scholar
Griepenkerl, O. 1889. Die Versteinerungen der senonen Kreide von Königslutter im Herzogthum Braunschweig. Paläontologische Abhandlungen, 4(5):305–419.Google Scholar
Groot, J. J., Organist, D. M., and Richards, H. G. 1954. Marine Upper Cretaceous formations of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. Delaware Geological Survey Bulletin 3, 62 p.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1889. Genesis of the Arietidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 26, 239 p.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1894. Phylogeny of an acquired characteristic. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 32:349–647.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda, p. 502–604. In von Zittel, K. A. (ed.), 1896-1900, Textbook of Palaeontology, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1903. Pseudoceratites of the Cretaceous. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 44, 351 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1986. Campanian and Maastrichtian ammonites from northern Aquitaine, France. Palaeontological Association of London Special Papers in Palaeontology, 36, 145 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Cobban, W. A., and Scott, G. R. 1992. Ammonite correlation of the uppermost Campanian of Western Europe, the U.S. Gulf Coast, Atlantic Seaboard and Western Interior, and the numerical age of the base of the Maastrichtian. Geological Magazine, 129:497–500.Google Scholar
Klinger, H. C. 1982. Revision of Ancyloceras bipunctatum Schlüter, 1872 (Cephalopoda, Ammonoidea) and discussion of the validity, phylogeny and limits of the genus Neancyloceras Spath, 1926. Annals of the South African Museum, 90:219–239.Google Scholar
Kullmann, J., and Wiedmann, J. 1970. Significance of sutures in phylogeny of Ammonoidea. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 44:1–3.Google Scholar
de M. de Lamarck, J. P. B. A. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Mémoires de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, 1799:63–90.Google Scholar
de M. de Lamarck, J. P. B. A. 1801. Système des Animaux sans vertebrès. The author; Deterville, Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Martinez, R. 1982. Ammonoideos cretacicos del Prepirineo de la Provincia de Lleida. Publicaciones de Geologia, Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona, 17, 197 p.Google Scholar
Martino, R. L., and Curran, H. A. 1989. Sedimentology, ichnology, and paleoenvironments of the Upper Cretaceous Wenonah and Mt. Laurel Formations, New Jersey. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 60:125–144.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1938. A biostratigraphic study on the Cretaceous deposits of the Naibuchi Valley, South Karahuto. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy of Japan, 14:190–194.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. U.S. Geological Survey of the Territories, Report (Hayden) 9, 629 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Hayden, F. V. 1856. Descriptions of new species of Gasteropoda and Cephalopoda from the Cretaceous formation of Nebraska Territory. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8 (for 1856):70–72.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1830. Synopsis of the organic remains of the ferruginous sand formation of the United States, with geological remarks. American Journal of Science, 17:274–295.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous group of the United States. Illustrated by nineteen plates, to which is added an appendix containing a tabular view of the Tertiary fossils discovered in America. Key and Biddle, Philadelphia, 88 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, R. K. 1964. Late Cretaceous planktonic foraminifera from New Jersey and Delaware. Micropaleontology, 10:157–188.Google Scholar
Olsson, R. K. 1978. Summary of lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of Atlantic Coastal Plain (northern part), p. 941–947. In Benson, W. E., Sheridan, R. E., et al. (eds.), Initial reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 44.Google Scholar
Olsson, R. K. 1987. Cretaceous stratigraphy of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, Atlantic Highlands of New Jersey. Geological Society of America Centennial Field Guide—Northeastern Section:87–90.Google Scholar
Olsson, R. K., and Nyong, E. E. 1984. A paleoslope model for Campanian–lower Maestrichtian foraminifera of New Jersey and Delaware. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 14:50–68.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d'. 1840-42. Céphalopodes–Paléontologie française, terrain Crétacé. Paris, Masson et Cie, 1st series, Volume 1, 662 p.Google Scholar
Owens, J. P., and Minard, J. P. 1970. Rock stratigraphic studies, p. 5–28. In Owens, J. P., Minard, J. P., Sohl, N. F., and Mello, J. F. (eds.), Stratigraphy of the outcropping post-Magothy Upper Cretaceous formations in southern New Jersey and northern Delmarva Peninsula, Delaware and Maryland. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 674.Google Scholar
Petters, S. W. 1976. Upper Cretaceous subsurface stratigraphy of Atlantic coastal plain of New Jersey. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 60:87–107.Google Scholar
Petters, S. W. 1977. Bolivinoides evolution and Upper Cretaceous biostratigraphy of the Atlantic Coastal Plain of New Jersey. Journal of Paleontology, 51:1023–1036.Google Scholar
Reeside, J. B. Jr. 1962. The Cretaceous ammonites of New Jersey. New Jersey Geological Survey Bulletin, 61:113–137.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. 1956. Geology of the Delaware Valley [Del.-N.J.-Pa.]. Mineralogical Society of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 106 p.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. 1962. Table showing distribution by formation of Cretaceous invertebrate fossils of New Jersey, Appendix D. In The Cretaceous fossils of New Jersey, Pt. 2. New Jersey Bureau of Geology and Topography Bulletin 61[Pt. 2]:209–229.Google Scholar
Roemer, A. 1840-1841. Die Versteinerungen des norddeutschen Kreidegebirges. Hahn'schen Hofbuchhandlung, Hannover, 145:1–48, 1840; 49-145, 1841.Google Scholar
Ruhle, J. L. 1962. Environmental studies of the Cretaceous Mount Laurel and Wenonah Sands of New Jersey. Southeastern Geology, 3:175–189.Google Scholar
Schlüter, C. 1871-1872, 1876. Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide. Palaeontographica, 21:1–24(1871); 21:25-120 (1872); 24:121-264 (1876).Google Scholar
Schulz, M. G., Ernst, G., Ernst, H., and Schmid, F. 1984. Coniacian to Maastrichtian stage boundaries in the standard section for the Upper Cretaceous White Chalk of NW Germany (Lägerdorf-Kronsmoor-Hemmoor): definitions and proposals. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 33:203–215.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1965. Geologic and biostratigraphic map of the Pierre Shale between Jarre Creek and Loveland, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigations Series, Map 1-439.Google Scholar
Sharpe, D. 1853-1857. Description of the fossil remains of Mollusca found in the Chalk of England. I, Cephalopoda. Palaeontographical Society Monographs, 68 p., 1-26 (1853); 27-36 (1855); 37-68 (1857).Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F., and Christopher, R. A. 1983. The Black Creek-Peedee formational contact (Upper Cretaceous) in the Cape Fear River region of North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1285, 37 p.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F., Christopher, R. A. and Mello, J. F. 1970. Biostratigraphic analysis. In Owens, J. P., Minard, J. P., Sohl, N. F., and Mello, J. F. (eds.), Stratigraphy of the outcropping post-Magothy Upper Cretaceous formations in southern New Jersey and northern Delmarva Peninsula, Delaware and Maryland, p. 28–55. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 674.Google Scholar
Spangler, W. B., and Peterson, J. J. 1950. Geology of Atlantic Coastal Plain in New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 34:1–99.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1922. On the Senonian ammonite fauna of Pondoland. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 10:113–147.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1926. On new ammonites from the English Chalk. Geological Magazine, 63:77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1923. The Cretaceous formations of North Carolina; Part 1, Invertebrate fossils of the Upper Cretaceous formations. North Carolina Geological and Economic Survey, 5, 604 p.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1928. Correlation of the Upper Cretaceous or Gulf series of the Gulf Coastal Plain. American Journal of Science, 5th series, 16:485–496.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1939. Cretaceous system, p. 532–549. In Stephenson, L. W., Cooke, C. W., and Gardner, J., The Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain, in Krenkel, E. (ed.), Geologie der Erde, North America, Volume 1. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1941. The larger invertebrates of the Navarro Group of Texas (exclusive of corals and crustaceans and exclusive of the fauna of the Escondido Formation). University of Texas Bulletin 4101, 641 p.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W., King, P. B., Monroe, W. H., and Imlay, R. W. 1942. Correlations of the outcropping Cretaceous formations of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain and Trans-Pecos. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 53:435–448.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1916. Über Lobus, Suturallobus und Inzision. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Pälaontologie for 1916:185–195.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1877. Preliminary report on the paleontology of the Black Hills, containing descriptions of new species of fossils from the Potsdam, Jurassic, and Cretaceous formations of the Black Hills of Dakota. U.S. Geographical and Geological Survey of the Rocky Mountain Region, 49 p.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1880. Paleontology of the Black Hills of Dakota, p. 325–468. In Newton, H. and Jenney, W. P. (eds.), Report on the geology and resources of the Black Hills of Dakota. U. S. Geographical and Geological Survey of the Rocky Mountain Region (Powell).Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1892. Gasteropoda and Cephalopoda of the Raritan Clays and Greensand Marls of New Jersey. U. S. Geological Survey Monograph, 18, 402 p.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1966. Stammesgeschichte und System den posttriadischen Ammonoideen; ein Überblick. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, 125:49–79; 127:13-81.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1979. Die Ammoniten der NW-deutschen, Regensburger und Ostalpinen Oberkreide im Vergleich mit den Oberkreidefaunaen des westlichen Mediterrangebiets. Aspekte der Kreide Europas, International Union of Geological Sciences, Series A, 6:335–350.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1976. Stratigraphic distribution of some pollen types from the Campanian and lower Maestrichtian rocks (Upper Cretaceous) of the middle Atlantic states. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 977, 18 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollemann, A. 1902. Die Fauna der Lüneburger Kreide. Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landsanstalt, new series, 37, 129 p.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W., and Wright, E. V. 1951. A survey of the fossil Cephalopoda of the Chalk of Great Britain. Palaeontographical Society [London] Monograph, 40 p.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K. A. 1884. Handbuch der Palaeontology. 1, p. 329–522, Abt. 2, Lief 3, Cephalopoda. R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K. A. 1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig, 972 p.Google Scholar