Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:29:15.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Algae, proalgae, and eualgae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Leigh M. Van Valen*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E. 57 St., Chicago, Illinois 60637

Extract

As Torres (1991) and others have noted, the term “algae” no longer refers to a taxonomically useful group. It does, though, refer to an easily recognized adaptive facies. This adaptive facies contains both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, as do various others (e.g., nanoplankton or decomposers). The blue-green algae are thus indeed algae in this useful sense. More than terminology is involved, because a concept like that of adaptive facies can be forgotten if we focus solely on taxa. The terms “proalgae” and “eualgae” can be used transparently when we want to distinguish prokaryotic from eukaryotic algae. “Proalgae” has in fact been proposed as a formal taxon (Van Valen, 1986); the terms come from Van Valen and Maiorana (1980). Similarly, one can refer to the nonhomologous kinds of flagellae as proflagellae and euflagellae while retaining a general term.

Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Torres, A. M. 1991. Using the term alga. Journal of Paleontology, 65:882883.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. M. 1986. Proalgae and the significance of adaptive facies. Evolutionary Theory, 8:2931.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. M., and Maiorana, V. C. 1980. The Archaebacteria and eukaryotic origins. Nature, 287:248250.Google Scholar