Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T05:19:00.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vetupraeca n. gen. and Mucopraeca n. gen. (Cryptodonta, Bivalvia): A reappraisal of Late Devonian bivalves from the Hercynian Facies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Judith Nagel-Myers ,
Michael R. W. Amler  and
R. Thomas Becker
Judith Nagel-Myers
Affiliation:
Paleontological Research Institution, Cornell University, 1259 Trumansburg Rd., Ithaca, New York 14850,
Michael R. W. Amler
Affiliation:
LMU München, Department f. Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Sektion Paläontologie, Richard Wagner-Strasse 10, 80333 München, Germany
R. Thomas Becker
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Geologisch-Paläontologisches Institut Münster, Correns str. 24, 48149 Münster, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bivalves from the Late Devonian pelagic or Hercynian Facies of classical regions such as eastern North America and Europe have not been investigated for almost a century.

A group of small, radially ribbed bivalves frequently occurs in association with ammonoids and conodonts in pelagic cephalopod limestones and shales of the latest Frasnian and early Famennian. These bivalves have traditionally been assigned to the Late Silurian genus Praecardium Barrande, 1881. Re-studying the types of the Late Devonian taxa, Cardium? vetustum Hall, 1843, Cardiola duplicata Münster, 1840, Praecardium clymeniae Beushausen, 1895, Praecardium melletes Clarke, 1904, and Praecardium multicostatum Clarke, 1904 shows that they differ significantly from Praecardium.

As a result, two new genera, Vetupraeca n. gen. and Mucopraeca n. gen, are established. Furthermore, neotypes are designated for Cardiola nehdensis, Kayser, 1873 and Vetupraeca clymeniae (Beushausen, 1895), and lectotypes are chosen for Mucopraeca multicostata (Clarke, 1904) and Vetupraeca duplicata (Münster, 1840). These bivalve taxa were widely distributed in the subtropical to tropical, latest Frasnian/early Famennian outer shelf habitats of Laurussia and Gondwana.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 6 , November 2008 , pp. 1150 - 1160
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amler, M. R. W. 1995. Die Bivalvenfauna des Oberen Famenniums West-Europas. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 29:19–143.Google Scholar
Amler, M. R. W. 1999. Synoptical classification of fossil and recent Bivalvia. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 33:237–248.Google Scholar
Amler, M. R. W. 2004. Late Famennian bivalve, gastropod and bellerophontid molluscs from the Refrath 1 Borhole (Bergisch Gladbach-Paffrath Syncline; Ardennes-Rhenish Massif, Germany). Courier Forschungs Institut Senckenberg, 251:151–173.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1881. Systême Silurien du centre de la Bohême. 1. Recherches Paléontologiques, 6. Classe de Mollusques. Ordre des Acéphalés, Prague and Paris (published by the author). 342 p.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T. 1993. Stratigraphische Gliederung und Ammonoideen-Fauna im Nehdenium (Oberdevon II) von Europa und Nord-Afrika, Courier Forschungs Institut Senckenberg, 155:405.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T., Ashouri, A. R., and Yazdi, M. 2004. The Upper Devonian Annulata Event in the Shotori Range (eastern Iran). Neues Jahrbuch Geologie Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 31(1):119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, R. T. and House, M. R. 1994. Kellwasser Events and goniatite successions in the Devonian of the Montagne Noire with comments on possible causations. Courier Forschungs Institut Senckenberg, 169:45–77.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T. and House, M. R. 2000. Devonian ammonoid zones and their correlation with established series and stage boundaries. Courier Forschungs Institut Senckenberg, 220:113–151.Google Scholar
Beushausen, L. 1895. Die Lamellibranchiaten des rheinischen Devons. Abhandlungen der Preussisch Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neve Folge, 17, 70:514.Google Scholar
Berner, R. A. 1984. Sedimentary pyrite formation: An update. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 48:605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. 1990. Evolutionary significance of shell microstructure in the Palaeotaxodonta, Pteriomorphia and Isofilibranchia (Bivalvia: Mollusca). In Carter, J. (ed.), Skeletal biomineralization: Patterns, processes and evolutionary trends, Volume I, New York (Van Nostrand Reinhold):136–296.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 1904. Naples Fauna in Western New York. New York State Museum Bulletin, Memoir 6, 385 p.Google Scholar
Conrath, P. 1887. Über einige silurische Pelecypoden. Sitzungsberichte kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Classe, Abteilung 1, 66:40–51.Google Scholar
Crampton, J. S. 2004. Shell composition, Cryptic Costae, Complex Composite Molds, and Taphonomic Chicanery in Mytiloides (Inoceramidae, Bivalvia). Journal of Paleontology, 78(6):1091–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denckmann, A. 1896. Zur Stratigraphie des Oberdevon im Kellerwald und in einigen benachbarten Devon-Gebieten. Jahrbuch Preussisch Geologische Landesanstalt 16, (1895)[1896]:8–62.Google Scholar
Erben, H. 1964. Facies Development in the Marine Devonian of the World. Proceedings of the Ussher Society, 1(3):92–118.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1887. Die palaeozoischen Bildungen von Cabrieres. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 39:360–487.Google Scholar
Golonka, J. 2000. Cambrian to Neogen plate tectonic maps. Wydawnictwa Universytetu Jagiellónskiego, Kraków:125 p.Google Scholar
Grimm, M. C. 1998. Systematik und Paläoökologie der Buchiolinae nov. sub-fam. Schweizer. Paläontologische Abhandlungen, 118:135.Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H. 1925. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Oberdevons der Herzkamper Mulde. Jahrbuch des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Elberfeld, 15:48–96.Google Scholar
Gürich, G. 1896. Das Palaeozoicum im polnischen Mittelgebirge. Verhandlungen der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft, St. Petersburg, Ser. 2, 32:539.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1843. Geology of New York, 4. Comprising the survey of the fourth geological district. New York Geological Survey, Albany, United States. 683 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1883. Lamellibranchiata, plates and explanation. Nat. Hist. New York, Palaeontology, 5(1):20.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1885. New York Geological Survey, Palaeontology, 1. Lamellibranchiata II. Descriptions and figures of the Dimyaria of the Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage and Chemung groups. New York Geological Survey, 5:269–5561.Google Scholar
Heller, T. 1925. Die Fauna des obersilurischen Orthocerenkalks von Elbersreuth. Geognostische Jahreshefte, 38:197–278.Google Scholar
Hoernes, R. 1884. Elemente der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). Leipzig (Veit). 549 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzapfel, E. 1882. Die Goniatiten-Kalke von Adorf in Waldeck. Palaeontographica, 8:37.Google Scholar
House, M. R. 1985. Correlation of mid-Palaeozoic ammonoid evolutionary events with global sedimentary perturbations. Nature, 313:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, M. R. 2002. Strength, timing, setting and cause of mid-Palaeozoic extinctions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 181:5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, P. A. and Collom, C. J. 1998. The bivalve heresies—Inoceramidae are Cryptodonta not Pteriomorphia. In Johnston, P. A. and Haggart, J. W. (eds.), Bivalves: An Eon of Evolution. Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D. Newell. University of Calgary Press, p. 347–360.Google Scholar
Jux, U. and Krath, J. 1974. Die Fauna aus dem Mittleren Oberdevon (Nehden-Stufe) des südlichen Bergischen Landes (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). Palaeontographica, A, 147:115–168.Google Scholar
Kaever, M., Oekentorp, K., and Siegfried, P. 1980. Fossilien Westfalens. Münster. Forschungen der Geologie und Paläontologie, 50:1–276.Google Scholar
Kayser, E. 1873. Ueber die Fauna des Nierenkalkes vom Enkeberg und der Schiefer von Nehden bei Brilon, und über die Gliederung des Oberdevon im Rheinischen Schiefergebirge. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 25:602–674.Google Scholar
Korn, D. and Ziegler, W. 2002. The ammonoid and conodont zonation at Enkeberg (Famennian, Late Devonian; Rhenish Mountains), Senckenbergiana lethaea, 82(2):453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Křiž, J. 1979. Silurian Cardiolidae (Bivalvia). Sbornik Geologickych Ved: Palaeontology, 2:157.Google Scholar
Křiž, J. 2004. Latest Frasnian and Earliest Famennian (Late Devonian) Bivalves from the Montagne Noire (France). Senckenbergiana lethaea, 84(1/2):85–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, W. 1929. Zur Kenntnis des Oberdevons am Enkeberg und bei Balve. Abhandlungen der Preussisch Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neve Folge, 119:132.Google Scholar
Levin, L. A. 2003. Oxygen minimum zone benthos: Adaptation and community response to hypoxia. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 41:1–45.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, regnum animale 1, editio 10. Holmiae [Stockholm] (Laurentii Salvii). 824 p.Google Scholar
Matern, H. 1931. Das Oberdevon der Dill-Mulde. Abhandlungen der Preussisch Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neve Folge, 134:139.Google Scholar
McAlester, L. A. 1962a. Upper Devonian pelecypods of the New York Chemung stage. Peabody Museum Bulletin, 16:88.Google Scholar
McAlester, L. A. 1962b. Mode of Preservation in Early Paleozoic Pelecypods and its Morphologic and Ecologic Significance. Journal of Paleontology, 36:69–73.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1877. The American Palaeozoic fossils: A catalogue of the genera and species, with names of authors, dates, places of publication, groups of rocks in which found, and the etymology and signification of the words, and an introduction devoted to the stratigraphical geology of the Palaeozoic rocks. Cincinnati, published by the author. 253 p.Google Scholar
Münster, G. 1840. Die Versteinerungen des Uebergangskalkes mit Clymenien und Orthoceratiten von Oberfranken. Beiträge zur Petrefaktenkunde, 3:33–121.Google Scholar
Münster, G. 1842. Die Versteinerungen des Uebergangskalkes mit Clymenien und Orthoceratiten von Oberfranken. Beiträge zur Petrefaktenkunde, 3:112–128.Google Scholar
Nagel-Myers, J. 2007. Pelagic Bivalves of the Late Devonian. SDS 2007 Annual Meeting and IGCP 499 Devonian Land Sea Interaction Eureka, Nevada.Google Scholar
Nagel-Myers, J. and Amler, M. R. W. 2007. Revision of Late Devonian Lunulacardiids (Bivalvia) from the German Hercynian Facies. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 41:47–79.Google Scholar
Neumayr, M. 1884. Zur Morphologie des Bivalvenschlosses. Kaiserlich Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Classe, Sitzungsberichte, Abteilung 1, 88(1):385–418.Google Scholar
Neumayr, M. 1891. Beiträge zu einer morphologischen Eintheilung der Bivalven. Denckschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematische-naturwissenschaftliche Classe, Wien, 58:701–801.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. American Museum Novitates, 2206:1–25.Google Scholar
Nye, O., Brower, J., and Wilson, S. 1975. Hitchhiking Clams in the Marcellus Sea. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 67:287–298.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D. [1847] 1850. Prodrome de Paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés faisant suite au cours élémentaire de paléontologie et de géologie stratigraphiques. Paris (Masson), 1:349 p.Google Scholar
Oschmann, W. 1994. Adaptive pathways of benthic organisms in marine oxygen-controlled environments. Neues Jahrbuch Geologie Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 191(3):393–444.Google Scholar
Paeckelmann, W. 1913. Oberdevon des Bergischen Landes. Abhandlungen der Preussisch Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neve Folge, 70:356.Google Scholar
Paeckelmann, W. and Kühne, F. 1936a. Erläuterungen zur Geologischen Karte von Preussen und benachbarten deutschen Ländern, Blatt Alme, Nr. 2585. Preussische Geologische Landesanstalt. 61 p.Google Scholar
Paeckelmann, W. and Kühne, F. 1936b. Erläuterungen zur Geologischen Karte von Preussen und benachbarten deutschen Ländern, Blatt Madfeld, Nr. 2586. Preussische Geologische Landesanstalt. 79 p.Google Scholar
Richter, U. 2002. Gewebeansatz-Strukturen auf pyritisierten Steinkernen von Ammonoideen. Geologische Beiträge Hannover, 4:1–113.Google Scholar
Rogalla, N. S. and Amler, M. R. W. 2003. Abrasion an rezenten Bivalvenschalen. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 37:107–148.Google Scholar
Růžička, B. and Prantl, F. 1960. Genotypy Nekterych Barrandovych Rodu Staroprvohornich Mlzu (Pelecypoda). Casopis Narodni Musea/oddil prirodovedny Narodni Museum (Praha), 1:48–55.Google Scholar
Sandberger, G. and Sandberger, F. 1849[1850]–56. Die Versteinerungen des Rheinischen Schiefergebirges in Nassau. Mit einer kurzgefassten Geognosie dieses Gebietes und mit steter Berücksichtigung analoger Schichten anderer Länder. Kreidel und Niedner, Wiesbaden. 564 p. [p. 1–40 (1849), p. 41–72, pl. 6–8, 11–12 (1850), p. 73–104, pl. 9–10, 13 (1851), p. 105–136, pl. 14–18 (1852), p. 137–168, pl. 19–23 (1852), p. 169–200, pl. 24–28 (1854), p. 201–232, pl. 29–33 (1854), p. 233–564, pl. 34–39 (1856)].Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H. 1923. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Paläozoicums in Oberfranken, Ostthüringen und dem Sächsischen Vogtlande. Neues Jahrbuch der Mineralogie, 49:509.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. 1922. Das Oberdevon-Culm-Gebiet von Warstein i.W. und Belecke. Jahrbuch Preussisch Geologische Landesanstalt, 41, (1920)[1922]:255–339.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1990. Aberrations in bivalve evolution related to photo- and chemosymbiosis. Historical Biology, 3:289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolew, D. 1911. L'étage famennien de la chaîne de montagnes de Kielce-Sandomierz. Ezegodnik po geologii i mineralogii Rosii, 13:34–41. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Stanley, M. S. 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geolical Society of America, Memoir 125. 280 p.Google Scholar
Termier, H. and Termier, G. 1951. Stratigraphie et Paléobiologie des Terrains Primaires de Benhamed (Chaouia sud, Maroc). Notes et Memoir de Service Geologique Maroc, 85:48–105.Google Scholar
Tesmer, I. 1967. Upper Devonian stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Southwestern New York State. International Symposium on the Devonian system, II:259–269.Google Scholar
Walliser, O. H. 1985. Devonian series boundaries; results of world-wide studies. Courier Forschungs Institut Senckenberg, 75:401–408.Google Scholar
Walther, K. 1907. Beiträge zur Geologie und Paläontologie des älteren Paläozoicums in Ostthüringen. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Beilagen-Band, 24:221–324.Google Scholar
Wignall, P. B. 1990. Benthic palaeoecology of the late Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay of England. Palaeontogical Association Special Papers in Paleontology. 43:74.Google Scholar
Wurm, A. 1961. Geologie von Bayern, I. Teil: Frankenwald, Münchberger Gneismasse, Fichtelgebirge, Nördlicher Oberpfälzer Wald. Berlin (Borntraeger). 333 p.Google Scholar