Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:44:17.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unusual crinoids from the Ramp Creek Formation (Mississippian), Indian Creek, Montgomery County, Indiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

N. Gary Lane
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
Robert M. Howell
Affiliation:
RR2, Box 98, Roachdale, Indiana 46172

Abstract

Three new species of inadunate crinoids of Early Mississippian age from the Ramp Creek Formation along Indiana Creek, southern Montgomery County, Indiana, are described. Poteriocrinites amplus n. sp. is the first correctly identified record from North America of this long-ranging Old World genus. Poteriocrinites macropleurus and P. doris from the Burlington Limestone are here reassigned to Springericrinus. Interchange of Mississippian crinoid genera between Europe and North America is rare, many genera being endemic. Springericrinus sacculus n. sp. is the youngest reported species of this North American counterpart of Poteriocrinites. This new species exhibits two advanced features: presence of only one, rather than three, anal plate, and presence of 3 or 4, rather than 1 or 2, primibrachial plates per ray. The third species, Decadocrinus stellatus n. sp., presents an interesting blend of characters usually used as generic discriminators between Decadocrinus and Histocrinus. The specimen could possibly be considered to be an intermediate between these two genera that are currently placed, incorrectly we believe, in two separate superfamilies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassler, R. S. and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic Pelmatozoan Echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 45, 733 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea & other fossils, from the carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Iowa Ecological Survey, Report Investigations, Preliminary Notice, 19 p.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1941. Four new genera of Mississippian Crinoidea Inadunata. Journal of Paleontology, 15:8288.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1946. Corythocrinus, a new inadunate crinoid genus from the lower Mississippian. Journal of Paleontology, 20:269274.Google Scholar
Kryuchkova, G. A. 1977. Hybrid larvae of sand dollars. Biologiya Morya, Vladivostok, 5:7881.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lily-shaped Animals, with Observation on the Genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites . Bryan & Co., Bristol, 150 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., Gary Lane, N., Strimple, H. L., Sprinkle, James and Fay, R. O. 1978. Inadunata, p. T520T759. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2.Google Scholar
Osanai, K. and Kyozuka, K. I. 1979. Cross fertilization in sea urchin eggs treated with egg water. Bulletin Marine Biology Station Asamushi, 16:189198.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1911. Some new American fossil crinoids. Harvard College, Museum Comparative Zoology Memoir, 25:117161.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. Unusual forms of fossil crinoids. United States National Museum Proceedings, 67:1137.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T59T216. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 1.Google Scholar
Van Sant, J. F. and Lane, N. G. 1964. Crawfordsville (Indiana) crinoid studies. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, Article 7, 136 p.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1950. A monograph of the British carboniferous Crinoidea. Palaeontographical Society, Vol. 1, pt. 1, 24 p.Google Scholar