Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:30:20.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trilobite associations from the Chouteau Formation (Kinderhookian) of central Missouri

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

David K. Brezinski
David K. Brezinski*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Planetary Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
*
1Present address: The Maryland Geological Survey, 711 W. 40th St., Baltimore, MD 21211.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three distinct trilobite associations can be recognized in the Chouteau Formation (Tournaisian, Early Carboniferous) of central Missouri. These associations appear to be lithologically and environmentally sensitive. Association A, the stratigraphically lowest association, contains six genera and is among the most diverse Carboniferous trilobite associations known in North America. This association is dominated numerically by Proetides colemani and exhibits a restricted geographic and stratigraphic distribution. The association is found only in the basal 20 cm of the Chouteau Formation at one locality, in strata representing transgressive subtidal deposits. Association B is found within subtidal and open shelf lithologies and is dominated by two trilobite species, Breviphillipsia sampsoni and Breviphillipsia? swallowi. Breviphillipsia sampsoni, an apparently eurytopic species, is found in both shaly and carbonate strata but is predominately recovered from the shaly partings and interbeds. Breviphillipsia? swallowi, a more stenotopic species, occurs primarily in the more carbonate-rich intervals. In addition, five trilobite species, subordinate in numbers, are only locally common in Association B. The sparse trilobite fauna of Association C is dominated numerically by Namuropyge? armata, and is contained within open shelf sediments that interfinger with mud biostrome lithologies.

Early Carboniferous adaptive radiation of trilobites resulted from the creation of new ecospace by transgression. This allowed initially eurytopic trilobites to move into and occupy certain niches that may have been unavailable to them prior to the Frasnian extinctions. With continued deepening, niche-specialized associations developed in more offshore settings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , July 1986 , pp. 870 - 881
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E. J. 1971. Environmental models for Paleozoic communities. Lethaia, 4:287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apollonov, M. K. 1975. Ordovician trilobite assemblages of Kazakhstan. Fossils and Strata, 4: 375–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beus, S. S. 1984. Fossil associations in the High Tor Limestone (Lower Carboniferous) of South Wales. Journal of Paleontology, 58:651–667.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1983. Does evolution take place in an ecological vacuum? II. Journal of Paleontology, 56:1–30.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B. and Andrews, D. 1938. Trilobita of the Chouteau Limestone, p. 122–133. In Branson, E. B. et al., Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, Part 1. University of Missouri Studies, 13.Google Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. 1969. Evolution of Paleozoic benthic marine invertebrate communities. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, 6:45–59.Google Scholar
Brezinski, D. K. 1984. Paleoecology of the Upper Mississippian trilobite Paladin chesterensis in southwestern Pennsylvania. The Compass (of Sigma Gamma Epsilon), 61:2–7.Google Scholar
Brezinski, D. K. and Stitt, J. H. 1982. Ditomopyge scitula (Meek and Worthen) from the Lower Pennsylvanian of central Missouri and central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 56:1242–1250.Google Scholar
Bucurel, H. G. and Chamberlain, C. K. 1977. Status and redescription of the Lower Pennsylvanian trilobite Ditomopyge ornata (Vogdes). Journal of Paleontology, 51:405–410.Google Scholar
Canis, W. F. 1968. Conodonts and biostratigraphy of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 42:525–555.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K. 1972. Evolution of the Permian trilobite Anisopyge . Journal of Paleontology, 46:503–508.Google Scholar
Cisne, J. L. 1971. Paleoecology of trilobites of the Kaibab Limestone (Permian) in Arizona, Utah, and Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 45:525–533.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. 1979. Invertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, 322 p.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1975. Early Ordovician trilobite communities. Fossils and Strata, 4:331–352.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. and Owens, R. T. 1975. Proetida—a new order of trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 4:227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, G., Hahn, R. and Brauckmann, C. 1980. Uber Namuropyge (Trilobita; Unter-Karbon). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 60:353–371.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. 1962. The Lower Mississippian genus Proetides (Trilobita). Journal of Paleontology, 36:811–816.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. 1963. Lower Mississippian trilobites of the family Proetidae in the United States Part I. Journal of Paleontology, 37:543–562.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. 1965. Lower Mississippian trilobites of the family Proetidae in the United States Part II. Journal of Paleontology, 39:248–264.Google Scholar
King, D. T. 1980. Genetic stratigraphy of the Mississippian System in central Missouri. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 121 p.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. 1981. Kinderhookian sedimentary facies and the Kinderhook-Osagian boundary in central Missouri. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 13:487.Google Scholar
Levinton, J. S. 1970. The paleoecological significance of opportunistic species. Lethaia, 3:69–78.Google Scholar
McNamara, K. J. and Fordham, B. G. 1981. Mid-Cautleyan (Ashgill Series) trilobites and facies in the English Lake District. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, 34:137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulic, D. G. and Watkins, R. 1981. Trilobite ecology in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderlands, p. 101–117. In Gray, J. and Boucot, A. J. (eds.), Communities of the Past. Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1973. Coignouina decora sp. nov. and Carbonocoryphe hahnorum sp. nov. (Trilobita) from a Visean fissure deposit near Clitheroe, Lancaster. Geological Magazine, 110:113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. L. 1968. Benthic marine diversity and the stability-time hypothesis, p. 71–80. In Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems. Brookhaven Symposium in Biology, 22.Google Scholar
Schmalfuss, H. 1981. Structure, patterns and function of cuticular terraces in trilobites. Lethaia, 14:331–341.Google Scholar
Sloss, L. L. 1963. Sequences in the cratonic interior of North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 74:93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution Pattern and Processes. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 322 p.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. H. 1971. Distribution and diversity of Pennsylvanian marine faunas relative to water depth and distance from shore. Lethaia, 4:403–412.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. 1977. Late Cambrian of western North America; trilobite biofacies, environmental significance and biostratigraphic implications, p. 397–425. In Kauffman, E. G. and Hazel, J. E. (eds.), Concepts and Methods of Biostratigraphy. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Tilsley, J. W. 1977. Trilobites (Proetacea) from Visean reef limestones at Treak Cliff, Castleton, Derbyshire. Mercian Geology, 6:155–170.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1972. Conceptual models of ecosystem evolution, p. 192–215. In Schopf, T. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R. 1983. The life habits of the Ordovician illaenine trilobite Bumastoides . Lethaia, 16:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar