No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Taxonomy, distribution, and characters of Pre-Oligocene members of the Cantharus group of Pisaniinae (Neogastropoda: Buccinoidea)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 July 2015
Abstract
This paper presents a review of Cretaceous to Eocene genera and species of the Cantharus group of the buccinoidean neogastropod subfamily Pisaniinae, the description of two new genera and one new species, and a nonphylogenetic discussion of character evolution in this group. The new genus Ickarus is introduced for Tritonidea ickei Martin, 1914, from the Nanggulan beds (middle Eocene) of Java, Indonesia. Editharus (type species: Fusus polygonus Lamarck, 1803, middle Eocene of the Paris Basin, France) is a new genus with seven to nine species ranging from the early to late Eocene of Europe. Editharus is unusual in having a labral tooth formed at the angular junction between the adapical and abapical sectors of the outer lip. Editharus angulilabris from the Marinesian (early late Eocene) is a new species from the Paris Basin closely related to E. polygonus. The incidence and expression of several characters has sharply increased in the Cantharus group from the Paleogene to the Neogene. These characters include the presence of lirae (spiral ridges) on the inner side of the outer lip, the presence of a parietal tooth at the adapical end of the inner lip, and determinate growth (as inferred from a unique adult varix). These trends are also exhibited by other Cenozoic gastropod clades.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society 2001
References
Abbass, H. L.
1967. A monograph on the Egyptian Paleocene and Eocene gastropods. Egyptian General Organization of Mining and Geological Research, Geological Survey, Geological Museum, Palaeontological Series Monograph, 4:1–154.Google Scholar
Adegoke, O. S.
1977. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Ewekoro Formation (Paleocene) of southwestern Nigeria. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 71(295):1–379.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H.
1895. New or little known Tertiary Mollusca from Alabama and Texas. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 1(2):53–82.Google Scholar
Bayan, F.
1870. Etudes Faites dans la Collection de l'École des Mines sur des Fossiles Nouveaux ou Malconnus. Premier Fascicule: Mollusques Tertiaires. Savy, Paris, 81 p., 10 pl.Google Scholar
Bayan, F.
1873. Études Faites dans la Collection de l'École des Mines sur des Fossiles Nouveaux ou Malconnus. Deuxième fascicule. 2: Notes sur Quelques Fossiles Tertiaires. Savy, Paris, p. 91–136, pl. 13-15.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G., and Maxwell., P. A.
1987. A revision of the fossil and living gastropods related to Plesiotriton Fischer, 1884 (family Cancellariidae, subfamily Plesiotritoninae n. subfam.), with an appendix: genera of Buccinidae Pisaniinae related to Colubraria Schumacher, 1817. New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin, 54:1–140.Google Scholar
Bivona-Bernardi, A.
1832. Caratteri d'un nuovo genere di conchiglie della famiglia delle Columellarie del Signor de Lamarck. Effemeridi Scientifiche e Letterarie per la Sicilia, 2:8–13.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. de.
1832. Disposition méthodique des espèces Recentes et fossiles des genres pourpre, ricinule, licorne et concholepas de M. de Lamarck et déscription des espèces nouvelles ou peu connues faisant partie de la collection du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, 1:189–263.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P.
1988. Two new species of Metula (Gastropoda: Buccinidae) with a description of the radula of the genus. Nautilus, 102:149–153.Google Scholar
Boussac, J.
1910. Palaeontologia universalis. Centuria 2. Paris, Fiches 170-170a, 171-171a, 183-183a.Google Scholar
Briart, A., and Cornet., F. L.
1877. Déscription des fossiles du Calcaire Grossier de Mons. Gastéropodes. Mémoire de l'Académie des Sciences, les Beaux-Arts, de Belgique, Pt. III, Volume 43.Google Scholar
Brocchi, G.
1814. Conchiologia fossile subapenina con osservazioni geologiche sugli Apenini e sul suolo adiacente, Volume 2, 241–712, pl. 1-16.Google Scholar
Broderip, W. J.
1832. Characters of new species of Mollusca and Conchifera, collected by Mr. Cuming. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London for 1832:173–179.Google Scholar
Broderip, W. J., and Sowerby., G. B.
1829. Observations on new or interesting Mollusca contained, for the most part, in the museum of the Royal Society. Zoological Journal, London, 4:359–379, pl. 9.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A.
1823. Mémoire sur les Terrains de Sédiment Supérieurs Calcareo-Trappéens du Vicentin, et sur Quelques Terrains d'Italie, de France, de l'Allemagne, etc., qui Peuvent se Rapporter à la Mème Époque. F. G. Levrault, Paris, 86 p.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. P.
1866. On the Pleistocene fossils collected by Col. E. Jewett at Sta. Barbara (California); with descriptions of new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History including Zoology, Botany, and Geology, 17(3rd series):274–278.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R.
1951. Observations on the penetration of tightly closing bivalves by Busycon and other predators. Ecology, 32:73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cernohorsky, W. O.
1966. A new genus and species of Buccinidae from the Fiji Islands (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Veliger, 9:229–232.Google Scholar
Cernohorsky, W. O.
1971. Indo-Pacific Pisaniinae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) and related buccinid genera. Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum, 8:137–167.Google Scholar
Cernohorsky, W. O.
1975. Supplementary notes on the taxonomy of buccinid species of the subfamily Pisaniinae (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum, 12:175–211.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L.
1938. Fauna from the Markley Formation (Upper Eocene) on Pleasant Creek, California. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 47:683–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. L., and Durham., J. W.
1946. Eocene faunas from the Department of Bolivar, Colombia. Geological Society of America Memoir, 16:1–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, T. A.
1846. Descriptions of new species of fossil and Recent shells and corals. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 3:19–27.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1889. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Éocène des environs de Paris. Quatrième fascicule. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, 24:3–385, pl. 1-12.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1897. Mollusques Éocèniques de la Loire Inférieure. Troisième fascicule. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France, 7:297–358.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1902a. Mollusques Éocèniques de la Loire-Inférieure. Gastropodes suite et fin. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France (Série 2) 2 (Fascicule 2):5–157.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1902b. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Éocène des environs de Paris. Appendice 3. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, 36:9–110, pl. 1-6.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1903. Observations sur quelques coquilles Crétaciques recueillies en France. 5e Article. Association Française pour l'Avancement des Sciences Funsionnée avec l'Association scientifique de France. Compte rendu de la 31me Session, Montaubon 1902. Secrétariat de l'Association, Paris, p. 539–557.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1913. Iconographie Complete des Coquilles Fossiles de l'Éocène des Environs de Paris. Tome II. Hermann, Paris, pl. 46-65.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1913. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Éocène des environs de Paris. Appendice 5. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, 49:19–238, pl. 7.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1919. Supplément aux mollusques Éocèniques de la Loire-Inférieure. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France (troisième série), 5:53–141.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M.
1923. Déscription des mollusques. In
O'Gorman, G., Le gisement Cuisien de Gan (Basses-Pyrénées). Cossmann et O'Gorman, Pau, 188 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M., and Pissarro., G.
1901. Faune Éocènique du Cotentin (mollusques), Deuxième article. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de Normandie, 20:11–90.Google Scholar
Curry, D.
1981. Bartonian, p. 23–36. In
Pomerol, C. (ed.), Stratotypes of Paleogene Stages. Bulletin d'Information des Géologues du Bassin de Paris (serie 2), Mémoire. Paris.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H.
1890. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida, with especial reference to the Miocene Silex-beds of Tampa and the Pliocene beds of the Caloosahatchee River. Pt. I. Pulmonate, opisthobranchiate and orthodont gastropods. Transactions of the Wagner Free Institute of Science, Philadelphia, 3:1–200.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H.
1904. An historical and systematic review of the frogshells and tritons. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 47:114–144.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H.
1924. Notes on molluscan nomenclature. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 37:87–90.Google Scholar
De Gregorio, A.
1885. Studi su talune conchiglie mediterranee viventi e fossili con una rivista del gen. Vulsella
. Bullettino della Società Malacologica Italiana, 10:36–288.Google Scholar
De Gregorio, A.
1894. Déscription des faunes Tertiaires de la Vénétie: fossiles des environs de Bassano, surtout l'horizon à Conus diversiformis Desh. et Serpula spirulaea Lamk. Annales de Géologie et de Paléontologie (Palerme), 13:1–40.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P.
1834. Déscription des Coquilles Fossiles des Environs de Paris. Atlas II. Levrault, Paris, pl. 72-78.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P.
1835. Déscription des Coquilles Fossiles des Environs de Paris. Tome II. Levrault, Paris, p. 495–789.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P.
1864. Déscriptions des Animaux sans Vertébres Decouverts dans le Bassin de Paris pour Servir du Supplément à la Déscription des Coquilles Fossiles des Environs de Paris Comprenant une Revue Générale des Toutes les Espèces Actuellement Connues. Atlas Il. J.-B. Baillière et Fils, Paris, pl. 63-85.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G.-P.
1865. Déscriptions des Animaux sans Vertébres Decouverts dans le Bassin de Paris pour Servir du Supplément à la Déscription des Coquilles Fossiles des Environs de Paris Comprenant une Revue Générale des Toutes les Espèces Actuellement Connues. Tome III. J.-B. Baillière et Fils, Paris, p. 201–668.Google Scholar
Dietl, G. P., and Alexander., R. R.
1998. Shell repair frequencies in whelks and moon snails from Delaware and southern New Jersey. Malacologia, 39:151–165.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. III.
1998. Molluscan faunas across the Paleocene/Eocene series boundary in the North American Gulf Coastal Plain, p. 296–322. In
Aubry, M.-P., Lucas, S., and Berggren, W. A. (eds.), Late Paleocene-Early Eocene Climatic and Biotic Events in the Marine and Terrestrial Records. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dolin, C., Dolin, L., and Le Renard., J.
1980. Inventaire systématique des mollusques de l'Auversien à “Faciès Charrié” de Baron (Oise), et remarques paléontologiques. Bulletin d'Informations des Géologues du Bassin de Paris, 17:26–48.Google Scholar
Doncieux, L.
1908. Catalogue descriptif des fossiles nummulitiques de l'Aude et de l'Herault. Deuxième partie (fascicule I). Corbières septentrionales. Annales de l'Université de Lyon, Nouvelle Série I, 22:1–178.Google Scholar
Emerson, W. K., and Moffitt., R. B.
1988. A new genus and species of prosobranch gastropod (?Fasciolariidae) from the Mariana Islands. Veliger, 31:43–45.Google Scholar
Fabiani, R.
1915. Monografia sui terreni Terziari del Veneto. II Paleogene del Veneto. Memorie del Instituto Geologico della Università de Padova, 3:1–332.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. J.
1927. A further commentary on New Zealand molluscan systematics. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 57:320–485.Google Scholar
Galante, M. A.
1974. Muricidi e buccinidi (gasteropodi) del Paleogene Veneto e loro prospective filogenetiche. Atti e Memorie dell'Accademia Patavina di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti Già Accademia dei Ricovrati, 86(1):57–77.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.
1944. The molluscan fauna of the Alum Bluff Group of Florida. Pt. VII. Stenoglossa (in part). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 142-G:437–491.Google Scholar
Gistel, J.
1848. Naturgeschichte des Tierreichs für höhere Schulen. Mit einem Atlas von 32 Tafeln (Darstellend 617 Illuminierte Figuren) und Mehreren dem Texte Ausgedruckten Xylographien. Hoffman'sche Verlags-Buchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R., and Garvie., C. L.
1994.
Strepsidura ficus (Gabb) of Harris (1895), Eocene of Texas: a volutid gastropod species distinct from Whitneya ficus (Gabb, 1864), Eocene of California. Journal of Paleontology, 68:274–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glibert, M.
1963. Les Muricacea et Buccinacea fossiles du Cénozoïque étranger des collections de l'Institut Royale des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique. Mémoire de l'Institut Royale des Science Naturelles de Belgique (série 2), 74:1–179.Google Scholar
Glibert, M.
1973. Révision des Gastropoda du Danien et du Montien de la Belgique. I. Les Gastropoda du Calcaire de Mons. Mémoire de l'Institut Royale des Sciences Naturelle de Belgique, 173:1–116.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F.
1791. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Editio decima tertia. Lipsiae (Leipzig), p. 3021–3910.Google Scholar
Gougerot, L., and Le Renard., J.
1983. Clefs de détermination des petites espèces de gastéropodes de l'Éocene du Bassin Parisien. XXII—Les genres Coptochetus et Suessionia Cossmann. Cahiers des Naturalistes Bulletin des Naturalistes Parisiens n.s., 39:1–10.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.
1839. Molluscous animals and their shells, p. 103–155. In
Beechey, F. W., The Zoology of Captain Beechey's Voyage; Compiled from the Collections and Notes Made by Captain Beechey, the Officers and Naturalist of the Expedition, during a Voyage to the Pacific and Behring's Straits performed in His Majesty's Ship Blossom, under the Command of Captain F. W. Beechey, R.N., F.R.S., etc., etc., in the Years 1825, 26, 27, and 28. Henry G. Bohn, London.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.
1857. Guide to the Systematic Distribution of Mollusca in the British Museum Part I. British Museum, London, 230.Google Scholar
Griffith, E., and Pidgeon., E.
1834. The Mollusca and Radiata. Arranged by the Baron Cuvier, with Supplementary Additions to Each Order. Whittaker and Company, London, 601 p.Google Scholar
Hedley, C.
1915. Studies on Australian Mollusca. Pt. XII. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales for 1914, 39:695–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertlein, L. G., and Strong., A. M.
1951. Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. XLIII. Mollusks from the west coast of Mexico and Central America. Pt. X. Zoologica (New York), 36:67–120.Google Scholar
Hinds, R. B.
1844. The Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Sulphur, under the command of Captain Sir Edward Belcher, R.N., C.B., B.R.G.S., etc. during the years 1836-1842. Volume II. Mollusca. Smith, Elder and Company, London, p. 1–48, pl. 1-14.Google Scholar
Hörnes, R., and Auinger., M.
1884. Die Gasteropoden der Meeres-Ablagerungen der Ersten und Zweiten Miocän Mediterran-Stufe in der Österreichisch-Ungarischen Monarchie. Abhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichs-Anstalt
12:153–192, pl. 17-22.Google Scholar
Iredale, T.
1912. New generic names and new species of marine Mollusca. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 10:217–228.Google Scholar
Iredale, T.
1929. Strange molluscs in Sydney Harbour. Australian Zoologist, 5:337–352.Google Scholar
Iredale, T.
1940. Marine molluscs from Lord Howe Island, Norfolk Island, Australia and New Caledonia. Australian Zoologist, 9:429–443.Google Scholar
Johnson, S., Johnson, J., and Jazwinski., S.
1995. Parasitism of sleeping fish by gastropod mollusks in the Colubrariidae and Marginellidae at Kwajalein, Marshall Islands. Festivus, 27:121–125.Google Scholar
Kent, B. W.
1983a. Patterns of coexistence in busyconine whelks. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 66:257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, B. W.
1983b. Natural history observations on the busyconine whelks Busycon contrarium (Conrad) and Busycotypus spiratum (Lamarck). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 49:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiener, L. C.
1835. Spécies Général et Iconographie des Coquilles Vivantes Comprenant la Collection du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, la Collection de Lamarck, celle de Massena (Appartenant Maintenant M. le Baron B. Delessert), et les Découvertes Recentes des Voyageurs. Genre Buccinum
. Rousseau Libraire, Paris, p. 1–51, 46 pl.Google Scholar
Kilburn, R. N.
1981. Revision of the genus Ancilla Lamarck, 1799 (Mollusca: Olividae: Ancillinae). Annals of the Natal Museum, 24:349–463.Google Scholar
Kollman, H. A.
1976. Gastropoden aus den Losensteiner Schichten der Umgebung von Losenstein (Oberösterreich). I: Euthyneura und Prosobranchia (1 Neogastropoda). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 80:163–206.Google Scholar
Kollman, H. A.
1982. Gastropoden-Faunen aus der höheren Unterkreide nordwestdeutschlands. Geologische Jahrbücher, (A)
65:517–551.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de Monet de.
1803. Mémoires sur les fossiles des environs de Paris, comprenant la détermination des espèces qui appartiennent aux animaux marins sans vertébres, et dont la plupart sont figurées dans les collections des vélins du muséum. Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 2:315–321.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de Monet de.
1822. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertébres. Lamarck, Paris, 711 p.Google Scholar
Laubrière, L. de, and Carez., L.
1880. Sur les Sables de Brasles (Aisne). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France (3-ème série), 8:391–413.Google Scholar
Lea, I.
1833. Contributions to Geology. Carey, Lea and Blanchard, Philadelphia, 227 p., 6 pl.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C.
1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classis, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio 10, reformata. L. Salvii, Holmiae.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., and Pacaud., J.-M.
1995. Révision des mollusques Paléogènes du Bassin de Paris II—Liste des reférences primaires et des espèces. Cossmanniana, 3:65–132.Google Scholar
Lowry, J. W.
1866. Chart of the characteristic British Tertiary fossils stratigraphically arranged. (Containing upwards of 800 figures.) J. Tennant and E. Stanford, London.Google Scholar
Martin, K.
1899. Die Fossilien von Java auf Grund einer Sammlung von Dr. R. D. M. Verbeek. Sammlungen des Geologischen Reichs-Museums in Leiden (n.s.), 1(6):133–280.Google Scholar
Martin, K.
1914. Die Fauna des Obereocäns von Nanggulan, auf Java. A. Gastropoda. Sammlungen des Geologischen Reichs-Museums in Leiden, Neue Folge, 2(4):107–178.Google Scholar
Martin, K.
1921. Die Mollusken der Njalindungschichten. Sammlungen des Geologischen Reichs-Museums in Leiden, Neue Folge, 1(2):446–496.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B.
1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. U.S. Geological Survey of the Territories. Government Printing House, Washington, 629 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Hayden., S. V.
1857. Descriptions of new species and genera of fossils, collected by Dr. F. V. Hayden in Nebraska Territory, under the direction of Lieut. F. K. Warren, U.S. topological engineer; with some remarks on the Tertiary and Cretaceous formations of the North-West, and the parallelism of the latter with those of other protions of the United States and territories. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 9:117–148.Google Scholar
Monterosato, A.
1917. Molluschi viventi e Quaternari raccolti lungo de coste della Tripolitania. Bollettino delia Società Zoologica Italiana (ser. 3), 3 (fascicule 12):1–25.Google Scholar
Montfort, P. D. de.
1810. Conchyliologie Systématique et Classification Méthodique des Coquilles (…) 2. Schoell, Paris, 676.Google Scholar
Newton, R. B.
1891. Systematic List of the Frederick E. Edwards collection of British Oligocene and Eocene Mollusca in the British Museum (Natural History), with References to the Type-Specimens from Similar Horizons Contained in Other Collections Belonging to the Geological Department of the Museum. British Museum, London, 365 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A.
1930. Contributions to the Tertiary paleontology of northern Peru: part 3, Eocene Mollusca. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 17(62):1–96.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A.
1931. Contributions to the Tertiary paleontology of northern Peru: part IV, The Peruvian Oligocene. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 17(63):97–264.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A.
1932. Contributions to the Tertiary paleontology of northern Peru: part 5, the Peruvian Miocene. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 19(68):1–272.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A.
1971. Biological results of the University of Miami deepsea expeditions. 77. Mollusks from the Gulf of Panama collected by R/V John Elliott Pilsbry, 1967. Bulletin of Marine Science, 21:35–92.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A., and Harbison., A.
1953. Pliocene Mollusca of southern Florida with special reference to those from North Saint Petersburg. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Monograph, 8:1–457.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P.
1896. Das Alttertiär der Coli Berici in Venetien, die Stellung der Schichten von Priabona und die Oligocäne Transgression im Alpinen Europa. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft
48:27–152.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P.
1901. Die Priabona Schichten und ihre Fauna im Zusammenhänge mit gleichalterigen und analogen Ablagerungen. Palaeontographica, 47:1–348.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A.
1843. Paléontologie française. Description zoologique et géologique de tous les animaux mollusques et rayonnés fossiles de France. Terrains crétacés (Gastropoda). Volume 2. Paris:456 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A.
1850. Prodrome de Paléontologie Stratigraphique Universelle des Animaux Mollusques & Rayonnés, Faisant Suite au Cours Elémentaire de Paléontologie et de Géologie Stratigraphiques. Deuxième Volume. Victor Masson, Paris, 427.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T.
1962. Morphological diversification in sympatric gastropods of the genus Busycon
. Evolution, 16:515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W.
1937. The Claibornian Scaphopoda, Gastropoda and dibranchiate Cephalopoda of the southern United States. Bulletins of Aemrican Paleontology, 7:1–548.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. H., and Black., R.
1995. Drilling by the buccinid gastropods of the genus Cominella in Australia. Veliger, 38:37–42.Google Scholar
Pezant, A.
1908. Mollusques fossiles de Monneville (Oise) (suite). La Feuille des Jeunes Naturalistes, Revue Mensuelle d'Histoire Naturelle (IV), 38(453):173–178.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A.
1844. Testaceorum novorum centuria (continuatio). Zeitschrift für Malakozoologie, 5(2):17–27.Google Scholar
Pomerol, C.
1981. Auversian, p. 11–22. In
Pomerol, C. (ed.), Stratotypes of Paleogene Stages. Bulletin d'Informations des Géologues du Bassin de Paris (Série 2), Mémoire.Google Scholar
Pomerol, C., Damotte, R., Ginburg, L., Montenat, C., Lorenz, J., and Toutin., N.
1965. Étude paléontologique et sédimentologique du Baronien inférieur (Auversien) dans la localité-type du Guépelle (Seineet-Oise). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 7e Série, 7:257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponder, W. F.
1968. Anatomical notes on two species of the Colubrariidae (Mollusca, Prosobranchia). Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, Zoology, 10:217–223.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F.
1972. Some Australian species and genera of the family Buccinidae (Neogastropoda). Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia, 2:249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravn, J. P. G.
1939. Études sur les mollusques du Paléocene de Copenhague. Kongelige Danske Videnskabemes Selskab, Biologiske Skrifter, 1:1–106.Google Scholar
Risso, A.
1826. Histoire Naturelle des Principales Productions de l'Europe Méridionale et Particulièrement de Celles des Environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes. Volume 4, Mollusca. Paris. 439 p. 12 pl.Google Scholar
Röding, P. F.
1798. Museum Boltenianum: Catalogus Cimeliorum e Tribus Regnis Naturae Quae Olim Colegerat Joa. Frid Bolten, M.D.pd. Pars Secunda. J. Christi, Trappii, Hamburg, 199 p.Google Scholar
Rovereto, G.
1899. Prime ricerche sinonimiche sui generi dei gasteropodi. Atti della Societa Ligustica di Scienze Naturali e Geografiche, 10:101–110.Google Scholar
Schauroth, F. Freiherrn von.
1865. Verzeichnis der Versteinerungen im Herzogl. Naturaliencabinet zu Coburg (no. 1-4328): mit Angabe der Synonymen und Beschreibung Vieler Neuen Arten, Sowie der Letzteren Abbildung auf 30 Tafeln. Dietz'sche Hofbuchdruckerei, Coburg, 327 p.Google Scholar
Schumacher, C. F.
1817. Essai d'un nouveau système des habitations des vers testacés avec XXII planches. Schultz, Copenhague, 287 p.Google Scholar
Shuto, T.
1969. Neogene gastropods from Panay Island, The Philippines. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D Geology, 19:1–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.
1944. Panamic Marine Shells: Synonymy, Nomenclature, Range and Illustrations. Tropical Photographic Laboratory, Winter Park, FL, 127 p.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F.
1964. Gastropods from the Coffee Sand (Upper Cretaceous) of Mississippi. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 331-C:345–394.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B.
1834. The Genera of Recent and Fossil Shells for the Use of Students in Conchology and Geology. Volume 2. London pl 127-262 and text.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J.
1813. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of Those Remains of Testaceous animals or Shells, Which Have Been Preserved at Various Times and Depths in the Earth. Volume I(3-8). London, pl. 10-44.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C.
1823. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of Those Remains of Testaceous animals or Shells, Which Have Been Preserved at Various Times and Depths in the Earth. Volume V. London.Google Scholar
Suter, H.
1917. Descriptions of new Tertiary Mollusca occurring in New Zealand, accompanied by a few notes on necessary changes in nomenclature. Pt. I. New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin, 5:1–93.Google Scholar
Swainson, W.
1840. A treatise on malacology; or the natural classification of shells and shellfish. Longman, Orme, Green, and Longmans, London, 419 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szõts, E.
1953. Mollusques Éocènes de l'Hongarie I. Les Mollusques Éocènes des environs de Gànt. Geologica Hungarica Ser. Paleontologica fasc., 22:137–238.Google Scholar
Tenison-Woods, T.
1879. On some new Tasmanian marine shells. Papers and Proceedings and Report of the Royal Society of Tasmania for
1878:32–48.Google Scholar
Thiele, J.
1929. Handbuch der Systematische Weichtierkunde Volume 1 (1) (Loricata; Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Gustav Fischer, Jena, 376.Google Scholar
Tracey, S.
1992. A review of the early Eocene molluscs of Bognor Regis (Hampshire Basin), England. Tertiary Research, 13:155–175.Google Scholar
Tracey, S., Todd, J. A., Le Renard, J., King, A., and Goodchild., M.
1996. Distribution of Mollusca in Unit S1 to S9 of the Selsey Formation (Middle Lutetian) Peninsula, west Sussex. Tertiary Research
16:97–139.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J.
1993. A Natural History of Shells. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 207.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J.
1998a. Decline and extinction: the history of the relictual gastropod family Pseudolividae. Géobios, 30:997–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J.
1998b. The systematic position of Tritonidea dentata Schepman, 1911 (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia: Buccinidae). Basteria
62:25–34.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J.
1999.
Denticulabrum, a new genus of buccinid gastropods (Gastropoda: Buccinidae) from the Neogene of Indonesia. Basteria, 63:185–191.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Bouchet., P.
1998. New Pisaniinae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Buccinidae) from New Caledonia, with remarks on Cantharus and related genera. Zoosysterna, 20:471–485.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., and Signor., P. W.
1992. The geographic, taxonomic and temporal distribution of determinate growth in marine gastropods. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 47:233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vokes, E. H.
1971. Catalogue of the genus Murex Linné (Mollusca: Gastropoda); Muricinae, Ocenebrinae. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 61:1–141.Google Scholar
Waiters, G. T.
1983. A new species of Caducifer (Monostiolum) from the western Atlantic (Buccinidae). Nautilus, 97:125–128.Google Scholar
Waiters, G. T., and Finlay., C. J.
1989. A revision of the western Atlantic Recent species of the genus Monostiolum Dall, 1904, and Bailya (Parabailya) new subgenus (Gastropoda: Buccinidae). Veliger, 32:47–59.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E.
1942. Paleontology of the marine Tertiary formations of Oregon and Washington. University of Washington Publications in Geology, 5:1–790.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. E., and Palmer., K. V. W.
1922. Fauna of the Eocene of Washington. University of Washington Publications in Geology, 1(3):1–56.Google Scholar
Wells, H. W.
1958. Predation of pelecypods and gastropods by Fasciolaria hunteria (Perry). Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 8:52–166.Google Scholar
Wollemann, A.
1900. Die Bivalven und Gastropoden des Deutschen und Holländischen Neocoms. Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, neue folge, 31:1–180.Google Scholar
Wollemann, A.
1907. Fauna des Mittleren Gaults von Algermissen. Jahrbuch der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt zu Berlin, 24:22–42.Google Scholar
Wrigley, A. G.
1925. Notes on English Eocene and Oligocene Mollusca, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 16:232–248.Google Scholar
Zekeli, F.
1852. Die Gasteropden der Gosaugebilde. Abhandlungen der K. K. Geologischen Reichsanstalt, Band 1, Abteilung
11:1–124.Google Scholar