Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:06:18.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomy and phylogeny of the Triassic bivalve families Mysidiellidae Cox, 1964 and Healeyidae new family

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

M. Hautmann
M. Hautmann*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Department of Earth Sciences, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mysidiellidae are morphologically isolated among Triassic bivalves but share important characters with Late Paleozoic Ambonychioidea. Apart from a great similarity in the general shape of the shell, the most primitive mysidiellid genus Promysidiella resembles ambonychioids in the presence of a duplivincular-opisthodetic ligament system. Within the Mysidiellidae, this ligament type evolved into the transitional ligament system that characterizes Late Triassic Mysidiella. The phyletic polarity indicates that this evolution probably took place by paedomorphosis. New examinations of the shell microstructure of Mysidiella demonstrate the presence of simple prismatic and possibly foliated structures in the calcitic outer shell layer, which further supports an ambonychioid affinity. Therefore, the Mysidiellidae are removed from the Mytiloidea and assigned to the Ambonychioidea. The poorly known genus Protopis, which was originally included in the Mysidiellidae, probably had a parivincular ligament system and was hence a member of the Heteroconchia. Joannina, which was previously considered a junior synonym of Protopis, is re-established. The hinge margin of Joannina carries a well developed nymph but lacks teeth. These characters as well as its modioliform shape, anterior shell lobe, and pronounced diagonal carina link Joannina with the Late Triassic genus Healeya (Modiomorphoidea). Both taxa are herein placed in the new family Healeyidae, which differs from the morphologically similar Kalenteridae in the absence of elaborated hinge teeth. Protopis, as well as the recently described genera Leidapoconcha, Waijiaoella, and Qingyaniola, are tentatively assigned to the Healeyidae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 555 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beurlen, K. 1944. Beiträge zur Stammesgeschichte der Muscheln. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1-2:133–145.Google Scholar
Beyrich, H. E. von. 1864. Über eine Kohlenkalk-Fauna von Timor. Abhandlungen der Königlich-Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin, 1864:61–98.Google Scholar
Bittner, A. 1891. Triaspetrefakten von Balia in Kleinasien. Jahrbuch der k. k. Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 41:97–116.Google Scholar
Bittner, A. 1892. Neue Arten aus der Trias von Balia in Kleinasien. Jahrbuch der k. k. Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 42:77–89.Google Scholar
Bittner, A. 1895. Lamellibranchiaten der alpinen Trias. I. Theil: Revision der Lamellibranchiaten von Sct. Cassian. Abhandlungen der k. k. Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 18:1–235.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G. 1990a. Evolutionary significance of shell microstructure in the Palaeotaxodonta, Pteriomorphia and Isofilibranchia (Bivalvia: Mollusca), p. 135–296. In Carter, J. G. (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralisation: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends. Volume I. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G. 1990b. Shell microstructural data for the Bivalvia, Pt. III, Orders Praecardioida, Arcoida, Pterioida and Limoida, p. 321–345. In Carter, J. G. (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralisation: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends. Volume I. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G., Lutz, R. A., and Tevesz, M. J. S. 1990. Shell microstructural data for the Bivalvia, Pt. VI, Orders Modiomorphoida and Mytiloida, p. 391–411. In Carter, J. G. (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralisation: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends. Volume I. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1863. Descriptions of new genera, subgenera and species of Tertiary and Recent shells. Proceedings of the Acadamy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1862:284–291.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1932. Further notes on the trans-Jordanian Trias. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 10, 10:93–113.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1960. Thoughts on the classification of the Bivalvia. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 34:60–88.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1964. Notes concerning the taxonomy and nomenclature of fossil Bivalvia. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 36:39–48.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1969a. Family Mysidiellidae Cox, 1964, p. N280–N281. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6. Bivalvia 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1969b. Family Hippopodiidae Cox, new family, p. N582–N583. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Crame, J. A. 1995. Occurrence of the bivalve genus Manticula in the Early Cretaceous of Antarctica. Palaeontology, 38:299–312.Google Scholar
Damborenea, S. 2004. Early Jurassic Kalentera (Bivalvia) from Argentina and its palaeobiogeographical significance. Ameghiana, 41:185–198.Google Scholar
Zhong-jie, Fang and Morris, N. J. 1997. The genus Pseudosanguinolites and some modioliform bivalves (mainly Palaeozoic). Palaeoworld, 7:49–69.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1880-1887. Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologie ou histoire naturelle des mollusques vivants et fossiles. S. Savy, Paris, 1,369 p.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1891. Die devonischen Aviculiden Deutschlands, ein Beitrag zur Systematik und Stammesgeschichte der Zweischaler. Abhandlungen zur Geologischen Spezialkarte von Preußen und den Thüringischen Staaten, 9: 1–253.Google Scholar
Golebiowski, R. 1991. Becken und Riffe der alpinen Obertrias. Lithostratigraphie und Biofazies der Kössener Formation, p. 80–119. In Nagel, D. & Rabeder, G. (eds.), Exkursionen im Jungpaläozoikum und Mesozoikum Österreichs. Österreichische Paläontologische Gesellschaft, Wien.Google Scholar
Grobben, K. 1894. Zur Kenntnis der Morphologie, der Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse und des Systems der Mollusken. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Wien, 103:61–86.Google Scholar
Zhiwei, Gu, Huang, Baoyu, Chen, Chuzhen, Wen, Shixuan, Ma, Qihong, Lan, Xiu, Xu, Juntao, Liu, Lu, Wang, Deyou, Qui, Ranzhong, Huang, Zhaoqi, Zhang, Zuoming, Chen, Jinhua, and Wu, Peili. 1976. Fossil Lamellibranchiata of China. Science Press, Beijing, 522 p., 150 pls. [In Chinese].Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Palaeontology. Geological Survey of New York, Albany, 338 p., 87 pls.Google Scholar
Hautmann, M. 2001. Die Muschelfauna der Nayband-Formation (Obertrias, Nor-Rhät) des östlichen Zentraliran. Beringeria, 29:1–181.Google Scholar
Healey, M. 1908. The fauna of the Napeng-beds or the Rhaetic beds of upper Burma. Palaeontologia Indica, New Series II (4): 1–88.Google Scholar
Hertwig, C. W. T. R. 1895. Lehrbuch der Zoologie (3rd edition), xii + 599 p., Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Kittl, E. 1904. Geologie der Umgebung von Sarajevo. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 53:707–738[for 1903].Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. de 1841-1844. Description des animaux fossiles qui se trouvent dans le terrain carbonifère de Belgique. Dessain, Liège, 650 p.Google Scholar
Körner, K. 1937. Marine (Cassianer-Raibler) Trias am Nevado de Acrotambo (Nordperu). Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 86:145–237.Google Scholar
Krumbeck, L. 1924. Die Brachiopoden, Lamellibranchiaten und Gastropoden der Trias von Timor II. Paläontologischer Teil. Paläontologie von Timor, XIII Lieferung, 22:1–275.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Tomus I (tenth edition). Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1953. Divisions and faunas of the Hokonui system (Triassic and Jurassic). New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin, 21:1–141.Google Scholar
McRoberts, C. A. and Newell, N. D. 2005. Marine Myalinidae (Bivalvia: Pterioida) from the Permian of West Texas. American Museum Novitates, Number 3469, 15 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1877. The American Paleozoic fossils; a catalogue of the genera and species. Published by the author, Cincinnati, 334 p.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 1845. Description of fossils, p. 270–291. In de Strzelecki, P. E. (ed.), Physical Description of New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land. Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Nevesskaya, L. A., Scarlato, O. A., Starobogatov, Ya. I., and Eberzin, A. G. 1971. New ideas on bivalve systematics. Paleontological Journal, 5:141–155[translated from Novyye predstavleniya o systeme dvustvorchatykh molluskov. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1971(2):3-20].Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1942. Late Paleozoic Pelecypods: Mytilacea. Kansas Geological Survey Publications, 10, Part 2:1–115.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. American Museum Novitates, Number 2206, 25 p.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1969a. Superfamily Ambonychiacea S. A. Miller, 1877, p. N285. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6. Bivalvia 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1969b. Order Modiomorphoida, p. N393. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6. Bivalvia 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1969c. Family Actinodontophoridae Newell, new family, p. N468–N470. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6. Bivalvia 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. and Boyd, D. W. 1987. Iteration of ligament structures in pteriomorphian Bivalves. American Museum Novitates, Number 2875, 11 p.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. and Boyd, D. W. 1995. Pectinoid bivalves of the Permian-Triassic crisis. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 227: 1–95.Google Scholar
Newton, C. R. 1987. Systematic Paleontology, p. 13–78. In Newton, C. R., Whalen, M. T., Thompson, J. B., Prins, N., and Delalla, D. (eds.), Systematics and Paleoecology of Norian (late Triassic) Bivalves from a Tropical Island Arc: Wallowa Terrane, Oregon. Paleontological Society Memoir, 22, supplement to Journal of Paleontology, 61(4).Google Scholar
Poel, L. van de. 1959. Faune malacologique du Hervien. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 35:1–26.Google Scholar
Posenato, R. 2002. Bivalves and other macrobenthic fauna from the Ladinian “Muschelkalk” of Punta del Lavatoio (Algher, SW Sardinia). Rendiconti della Societa' Paleontologica Italiana, 1:185–196.Google Scholar
Rafinesque-Schmaltz, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature ou tableau de lUnivers dt des corps organisés. Palermo, 224 pp.Google Scholar
Reis, O. M. 1926. Die Fauna des Wettersteinkalks. III: Gastropoden, Bivalven, Brachiopoden etc. Geognostische Jahreshefte (München), 39:87–188.Google Scholar
Renz, C. 1904. Nachtrag zu den Muschelkalk-Zweischalern, p. 20–21. In Frech, F. (ed.), Neue Zweischaler und Brachiopoden aus der Bakonyer Trias. Resultate der wissenschaftlichen Erforschung des Balatonsees, Anhang: Palaeontologie der Umgebung des Balatonsees I, Band 1.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. von. 1820. Die Petrefactenkunde auf ihrem jetzigem Standpunkte durch die Beschreibung seiner Sammlung versteinerter und fossiler Überreste des Thier- und Pflanzenreichs der Vorwelt erläutert. Erste Abtheilung. Das Thierreich. Beckersche Buchhandlung, Gotha, xii + 437 p., 15 pls.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1936. Fossilien der spanischen Trias. Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 22:1–140.Google Scholar
Schnetzer, R. 1934. Die Muschelkalkfauna des Öfenbachgrabens bei Saalfelden. Palaeontographica, 81:1–160.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1818-1821. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of those Remains of Testaceous Animals or Shells, which have been Preserved at Various Times and Depths in the Earth. Vol. 3. Arding & Meredith, London, 186 p.Google Scholar
Stiller, F. and Chen, J. 2006. New Mysidiellidae (Bivalvia) from the Anisian (Middle Triassic) of Qingyan, south-west China. Palaeontology, 49: 213–227.Google Scholar
Tommasi, A. 1911. I Fossili della Lumachella Triasica de Ghegne in Valsecca presso Roncobello, Pt. I, Algae, Anthozoa, Brachiopoda, Lamellibranchiata. Palaeontographica Italica, Memorie di Paleontología, 17:1–36.Google Scholar
Urlichs, M. 1977. Zur Altersstellung der Pachycardientuffe und der Unteren Cassianer Schichten in den Dolomiten. Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie, 17:15–25.Google Scholar
Waagen, L. 1906. Über die Lamellibranchiaten der Frommbachtuffe nebst Bemerkungen über deren verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen. Verhandlungen der k. k. geologischen Reichsanstalt, 16:385–395.Google Scholar
Waagen, L. 1907. Die Lamellibranchiaten der Pachycardientuffe der Seiser Alm nebst vergleichend paläontologischen und phylogenetischen Studien. Abhandlungen der k. k. geologischen Reichsanstalt, 18:21–180.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1990. The evolution of ligament systems in the Bivalvia, p. 49–71. In Morton, B. (ed.), The Bivalvia. Proceedings of a Memorial Symposium in Honour of Sir Charles Maurice Yonge (1899-1986), Edinburgh, 1986. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 1998. Origin of the Molluscan class Bivalvia and a phylogeny of major groups, p. 1–45. In Johnston, P. A. and Haggart, J. W. (eds.), Bivalves: An Eon of Evolution. University of Calgary Press, Calgary.Google Scholar
Waller, T. R. 2005. Systematic Paleontology, p. 7–50. In Waller, T. R. and Stanley, G. D., Middle Triassic Pteriomorphian Bivalvia (Mollusca) from the New Pass Range, west-central Nevada: Systematics, Biostratigraphy, Paleoecology, and Paleobiogeography. Paleontological Society Memoir, 61, supplement to Journal of Paleontology, 80(X).Google Scholar
Shixuan, Wen, Lan, Xiu, Chen, Jinhua, Zang, Zuoming, Chen, Chuzhen, and Gu, Zhiwei. 1976. Fossil Lamellibranchia from the Mount Qomolangma region, p. 1–152, pls. 1-40. In Chinese Academy of Science (eds.), The Xizang Scientific Expedition, Scientific Reports on the Expedition to the Qomolangma Region (1966-1968), Palaeontology (Fascicule III), Beijing (Science Press). [In Chinese]Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1840. Observations on the genus Derbe of Fabricius. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 1:82–85.Google Scholar
Winkler, G. 1859. Die Schichten mit Avicula contorta inner- und außerhalb der Alpen. Palm, München, 51p.Google Scholar
Winkler, G. 1861. Der Oberkeuper nach Studien in den bayerischen Alpen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 13:459–521.Google Scholar
Zapfe, H. 1963. Beiträge zur Paläontologie der nordalpinen Riffe. Zur Kenntnis der Fauna des oberrhätischen Riffkalkes von Adnet, Salzburg (exkl. Riffbildner). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, 66:207–259.Google Scholar
Zapfe, H. 1967. Beiträge zur Paläontologie nordalpiner Riffe. Die Fauna der Zlambach-Mergel der Fischwiese bei Aussee, Steiermark. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, 71:413–480.Google Scholar
Zeller, F. 1908. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Lettenkohle und des Keupers in Schwaben. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Beilage-Band, 25:1–134.Google Scholar