Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:46:02.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Silurian Odontopleurinae (Trilobita) from the Cape Phillips Formation, Arctic Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Jonathan M. Adrain  and
Lars Ramsköld
Jonathan M. Adrain
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom
Lars Ramsköld
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Museum, University of Uppsala, Norbyvägen 22, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Odontopleurids are a diverse component of rich silicified trilobite faunas recovered from the Wenlock and Ludlow of the Cape Phillips Formation, central Canadian Arctic. Odontopleurinae and Acidaspidinae are common, but Ceratocephalinae and Koneprusiinae are also represented. This work treats all of the Odontopleurinae, with the exception of the genus Acanthalomina Prantl and Přibyl, 1949.

New species of Kettneraspis Prantl and Přibyl, 1949, include the upper Sheinwoodian K. wrightae, the lower Homerian K. lindoei, and the Gorstian K. caldwelli. Rare specimens assigned to Odontopleura Emmrich, 1839, and Radiaspis Richter and Richter, 1917, occur in the Sheinwoodian of the central Arctic.

Edgecombeaspis (type species E. johansonae new species) is proposed for an odontopleurine clade endemic to Laurentia, and in the Silurian restricted to northern Laurentia. Cladistic analysis yields a hypothesis of ingroup structure that is in general calibrated with stratigraphic sequence. An exception is a group of Telychian species from the Mackenzie Mountains, whose stratigraphic sequence was used to support a previous hypothesis of an ancestral-descendant lineage. The cladistic result indicates that the stratigraphic pattern is the inverse of the phylogenetic pattern: the stratigraphically lowest species in the proposed lineage is the most derived, and the highest is most primitive. In addition to the type, new species of Edgecombeaspis include the mid-Sheinwoodian E. jahansi and the lower Homerian E. soehni. Edgecombeaspis apparently became extinct in the Homerian.

The species Kettneraspis lenzi (Chatterton and Perry, 1983) and Radiaspis cf. R. norfordi (Chatterton and Perry, 1983) occur in the central Arctic, and further strengthen previous correlations with strata in the central Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , March 1997 , pp. 237 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrain, J. M. 1994. The lichid trilobite Borealarges n. gen., with species from the Silurian of arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 68:1081–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1990. Odontopleura (Trilobita, Silurian), and a method of constrained congruency analysis. Journal of Paleontology, 64:600–614.Google Scholar
Adrain, J. M., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1994. The aulacopleurid trilobite Otarion, with new species from northwestern Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 68:305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1995. The otarionine trilobites Harpidella and Maurotarion, with species from northwestern Canada, the United States, and Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 69:307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M., and Edgecombe, G. D. 1995. Balizoma and the new genera Aegrotocatellus and Perirehaedulus: encrinurid trilobites from the Douro Formation (Silurian, Ludlow) of the central Canadian Arctic. Journal of Paleontology, 69:736–752.Google Scholar
Adrain, J. M., and Edgecombe, G. D. In press. Silurian encrinurine trilobites from the central Canadian Arctic. Palaeontographica Canadiana.Google Scholar
Adrain, J. M., and MacDonald, E. W. 1996. Phacopid trilobites from the Silurian of Arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 70:1091–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrain, J. M., and Ramsköld, L. 1996. The lichid trilobite Radiolichas in the Silurian of Arctic Canada and Gotland, Sweden. Geological Magazine, 133:147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1846. Notice préliminaire sur le systéme Silurien et les trilobites de Bohême. Leipzig, 97 p.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1872. Systême Silurien du centre de la Bohême. lére partie. Recherches paléontologiques, supplément au vol. 1. Prague and Paris, 647 p.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1967. Silurian odontopleurid trilobites from Sweden, Estonia, and Latvia. Palaeontology, 10:214–244.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1968. A revision of the Odontopleuridae (Trilobita) from the Palaeozoic of Bohemia. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. I. Mat.-Naturv. Klasse. Ny Serie, No. 25, 73 p.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten. Georg Reimer, Berlin, 147 p.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., and Perry, D. G. 1979. Acanthalomina Prantl and Přibyl, a valid subgenus of the trilobite genus Diacanthaspis . Journal of Paleontology, 53:1327–1342.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., and Perry, D. G. 1983. Silicified Silurian odontopleurid trilobites from the Mackenzie Mountains. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 1:1–127.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Johnson, B. D., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1979. Silicified Lower Devonian trilobites from New South Wales. Palaeontology, 22:799–837.Google Scholar
Dalman, J. W. 1828. Nya svenska palaeader. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 1828:134–138.Google Scholar
Edgecombe, G. D., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1987. Heterochrony in the Silurian radiation of encrinurine trilobites. Lethaia, 20:337–351.Google Scholar
Emmrich, H. F. 1839. De trilobitis. Dissertatio petrefactologica quam consensu et auctoritate amplissimi philosophorum ordinis, etc., Berlin, 56 p.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, A. 1843. Systematische übersicht der Trilobiten und Beschreibung einiger neue Arten derselben. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie, und Petrefaktenkunde, for 1843:537–567.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C. 1990. Ludlow and Pridoli (Upper Silurian) graptolite biostratigraphy of the central Arctic Islands: a preliminary report. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 27:1074–1083.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C., and Melchin, M. J. 1990. Wenlock graptolite biostratigraphy of the Cape Phillips Formation, Canadian Arctic Islands. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 27:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, A. C., and Melchin, M. J. 1991. Wenlock (Silurian) graptolites, Cape Phillips Formation, Canadian Arctic Islands. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. G., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1977. Silurian (Wenlockian) trilobites from Baillie-Hamilton Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14:285–317.Google Scholar
Prantl, F., and Přibyl, A. 1949. A study of the superfamily Odontopleuracea nov. superfam. (trilobites). Rozpravy Ustredního ústavu Geologického, 12:1–221.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L. 1984. Silurian odontopleurid trilobites from Gotland. Palaeontology, 27:239–264.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L. 1991a. The perforated trilobite Laethoprusia gen. nov., and the phylogeny of Koneprusia and Isoprusia (Odontopleuridae, Koneprusiinae). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:125–141.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L. 1991b. Pattern and process in the evolution of the Odontopleuridae (Trilobita). The Selenopeltinae and Ceratocephalinae. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:143–181.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1991. Revision and subdivision of the polyphyletic ‘Leonaspis’ (Trilobita). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:333–371.Google Scholar
Richter, R., and Richter, E. 1917. Über die Einteilung der Familie Acidaspidae und über einige ihrer devonische Vertreter. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, for 1917:462–472.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. A monograph of the British trilobites from the Cambrian, Silurian and Devonian formations. Palaeontographical Society Monographs, 80 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1993. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony Version 3.1.1. Program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survery, Champaign.Google Scholar
Steinman, G. 1912. In Steinmann, G., and Hoek, H., Das Silur und Cambrium des Hochlandes von Bolivia und ihre Fauna. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Beil 34:176–252.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1956a. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites: the Odontopleuridae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 114:155–288.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1956b. Type and other species of Odontopleuridae. Journal of Paleontology, 30:504–520.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1967. Silicified Silurian trilobites from Maine. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 135:447–483.Google Scholar