Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:37:00.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resolution, sampling, higher taxa and assumptions in stratocladistic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Colin D. Sumrall  and
Christopher A. Brochu
Colin D. Sumrall
Affiliation:
Cincinnati Museum Center, Geier Collections and Research Center, 1301 Western Ave. Cincinnati, Ohio 45203-1130, Department of Geoscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242,
Christopher A. Brochu
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment and Reply
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 189 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 37996.

References

Adrain, J. M., and Westrop, S. R. 2001. Stratigraphy, phylogeny, and species sampling in time and space, p. 291–322. In Adrain, J. M., Edgecombe, G. D., and Lieberman, B. S. (eds.), Fossils, Phylogeny, and Form: An Analytical Approach. Kluwer Academic, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allmon, W. D. 1992. Genera in paleontology: definition and significance. Historical Biology, 6:149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, J. D. 1994. Metataxon concepts and assessing possible ancestry using phylogenetic systematics. Systematic Biology, 43:24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, M. J., Wills, M. A., and Hitchin, R. 2000. Quality of the fossil record through time. Nature, 403:534–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Bryant, H. N., and Russell, A. P. 1998. Supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis: implicit assumptions of monophyly and a comparison of methods. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 64:101–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenbender, B. E. 1995. Morphological, crystallographic, and stratigraphic data in cladistic analyses of blastoid phylogeny. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 29(9):201–257.Google Scholar
Bodenbender, B. E., and Fisher, D. C. 2001. Stratocladistic analysis of blastoid phylogeny. Journal of Paleontology, 75(2):351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E., Moffatt, H. A., and Taylor, W. L. 1997. Echinoderm taphonomy, taphofacies and lagerstätten, p. 147–190. In Waters, J. A. and Maples, C. G. (eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms. Paleontological Society Papers, Volume 3.Google Scholar
Brochu, C. A., and Norell, M. A. 2001. Time and trees: quantitative assessment of temporal congruence in the bird origins debate, p. 511–535. In Gauthier, J. A. and Gall, L. F. (eds.), New Perspectives on the Origin and Evolution of Birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven.Google Scholar
Cantino, P. D., Bryant, H. N., de Quieroz, K., Donoghue, M. J., Eriksson, T., Hillis, D. M., and Lee, M. S. Y. 1999. Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Systematic Biology, 48:790–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clyde, W. C., and Fisher, D. C. 1997. Comparing the fit of stratigraphic and morphologic data in phylogenetic analysis. Paleobiology, 23:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1979. Cladism and common sense, p. 165–198. In Cracraft, J. and Eldredge, N. (eds.), Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D. C. 1994. Stratocladistics: morphological and temporal patterns and their relation to phylogenetic process, p. 133–171. In Grande, L. and Rieppel, O., (eds.) Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature—From Systematic Patterns to Evolutionary Theories. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2001. Inferring temporal patterns of preservation, origination, and extinction from taxonomic survivorship analysis. Paleobiology, 27:602–630.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, M., and Sepkoski, J. J. 1999. Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature, 398:415–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, D. L., Fisher, D. C., and Leighton, L. R. 2001. Reconstructing phylogeny with and without temporal data. Science, 284:1816–1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. G. 2001. Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy: A How-To Manual for Molecular Biologists. Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Massachusetts, 179 p.Google Scholar
Hillis, D. M., and Bull, J. J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology, 44:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, S. M., and Patzkowsky, M. E. 2002. Stratigraphic variation in the timing of first and last occurrences. Palaios, 17:134–146.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jell, P. A., and Jell, J. S. 1999. Crinoids, a blastoid and a cyclocystoid from the Upper Devonian reef complex of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 43:201–236.Google Scholar
Kearney, M. 2002. Fragmentary taxa, missing data, and ambiguity: mistaken assumptions and conclusions. Systematic Biology, 51:369–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, N. G., Waters, J. A., and Maples, C. G. 1997. Echinoderm faunas of the Hongguleleng Formation, Late Devonian (Famennian), Xingjiang-Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. Paleontological Society Memoir, 47:1–43.Google Scholar
Maddison, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology, 40:315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. 2000. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Nixon, K. C., and Carpenter, J. M. 1996. On consensus, collapsibility, and clade concordance. Cladistics, 12:305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norell, M. A. 1992. Taxic origin and temporal diversity: the effect of phylogeny, p. 89–118. In Novacek, M. J. and Wheeler, Q. D. (eds.), Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1982. The adequacy of the fossil record, p. 75–117. In Joysey, K. A. and Friday, A. E. (eds.), Problems of Phylogeny Reconstruction. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1985. The adequacy of the fossil record revisited, p. 1–16. In Cope, J. W. C. and Skelton, P. W. (eds.), Evolutionary Case Histories from the Fossil Record. Palaeontological Society, London.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E., and Foote, M. 2002. Determinants of extinction in the fossil record. Nature, 416:420–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeder, T. W., and Montanucci, R. R. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of the horned lizards (Phynosomatidae: Phrynosoma): evidence from mitochondrial DNA and morphology. Copeia, 2001:309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. B. 2000. Stratigraphy in phylogeny reconstruction. Journal of Paleontology, 74:763–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. B., Gale, A. S., and Monks, N. E. A. 2001. Sea-level change and rock record bias in the Cretaceous: a problem for extinction and biodiversity studies. Paleobiology, 27:241–253.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C. D., Brochu, C. A., and Merck, J. W. 2001. Global lability, regional resolution, and majority-rule consensus bias. Paleobiology, 27:254–261.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent?, p. 314–340. In Miyamoto, M. M. and Cracraft, J. (eds.), Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP∗. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (∗ and Other Methods), version 4.0b7. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 2001. Time and the comparative method. Paleobiology, 27:179–180.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, J. A., Maples, C. G., Lane, N. G., Marcus, S. M., Liao, Z.-T., Liu, L.-J., and Hou, H.-F. In press. Blastoids and crinoids from the Late Devonian (Famennian) of North West China. Journal of Paleontology.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. J. 1998. The accuracy of methods for coding and sampling higher-level taxa for phylogenetic analysis: a simulation study. Systematic Biology, 47:397–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiley, E. O. 1979. Ancestors, species, and cladograms—remarks on the symposium, p. 211–226. In Cracraft, J. and Eldredge, N. (eds.), Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M. 1994. Common cladistic information and its consensus representation: reduced Adams and reduced cladistic consensus trees and profiles. Systematic Biology, 43:343–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar