Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:36:16.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redescription, phylogenetic position, and stratigraphic significance of the dicynodont genus Odontocyclops (Synapsida: Anomodontia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Kenneth D. Angielczyk
Kenneth D. Angielczyk*
Affiliation:
Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley 94720-4780,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dicynodont anomodont Odontocyclops whaitsi, from the Late Permian Madumabisa Mudstone of Zambia, is redescribed and its phylogenetic relationships are considered. The genus is characterized by a two autapomorphies, elongate nasal bosses and a concave dorsal surface of the snout; it also possesses wide exposure of the parietals on the intertemporal skull roof, the presence of a postcaniniform crest, the absence of a labial fossa, and the presence of a dorsal process on the anterior ramus of the epipterygoid footplate. In addition, newly recognized specimens collected in South Africa extend the known geographic range of the genus and allow description of the humerus and scapula for the first time. Cladistic analysis of a data set including Odontocyclops and 18 other well-known South African dicynodont genera does not support the hypothesis that Odontocyclops is a close relative of Dicynodon or of Triassic dicynodonts such as Kannemeyeria. Instead, a close relationship with Oudenodon and Rhachiocephalus is proposed. The presence of Odontocyclops in South Africa and Zambia makes it potentially valuable for more precise biostratigraphic correlation between the sediments of the Karoo Basin and the Luangwa Valley.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 76 , Issue 6 , November 2002 , pp. 1047 - 1059
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angielczyk, K. D. 2001. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis and stratigraphic congruence of the dicynodont anomodonts (Synapsida: Therapsida). Palaeontologia Africana, 37:53–79.Google Scholar
Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42:795–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boonstra, L. D. 1938. A report on some Karroo reptiles from the Luangwa Valley, Northern Rhodesia. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 94:371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, R. 1905. On the use of the term Anomodontia. Albany Museum Records, 1:266–269.Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1913. On some new genera and species of dicynodont reptiles, with notes on a few others. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 32:441–457.Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1915. Catalogue of types and figured specimens of fossil vertebrates in the American Museum of Natural History, Pt. II, Permian, Triassic, and Jurassic reptiles of South Africa. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 25:105–164.Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1932. The Mammal-like Reptiles of South Africa and the Origin of Mammals. Whitherby, London, 376 p.Google Scholar
Camp, C. L., and Welles, S. P. 1956. Triassic dicynodont reptiles, Pt. I, The North American genus Placerias. Memoirs of the University of California, 13:255–304.Google Scholar
Cluver, M. A. 1974. The cranial morphology of the Lower Triassic dicynodont Myosaurus gracilis. Annals of the South African Museum, 66:35–54.Google Scholar
Cluver, M. A. 1978. The skeleton of the mammal-like reptile Cistecephalus with evidence for a fossorial mode of life. Annals of the South African Museum, 76:213–246.Google Scholar
Cluver, M. A., and King, G. M. 1983. A reassessment of the relationships of Permian Dicynodontia (Reptilia, Therapsida) and a new classification of dicynodonts. Annals of the South African Museum, 91:195–273.Google Scholar
Cox, C. B. 1959. On the anatomy of a new dicynodont genus with evidence of the position of the tympanum. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 132:321–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. B. 1965. New Triassic dicynodonts from South America, their origins and relationships. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 248:457–514.Google Scholar
Cox, C. B. 1972. A new digging dicynodont from the Upper Permian of Tanzania, p. 173–190. In Joysey, K. A. and Kemp, T. S. (eds.), Studies in Vertebrate Evolution. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Defauw, S. L. 1986. The appendicular skeleton of African dicynodonts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, 284 p.Google Scholar
Dixey, F. 1937. The geology of part of the upper Luangwa Valley, NorthEastern Rhodesia. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 93:52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drysdall, A. R., and Kitching, J. W. 1962. The Karoo succession of the Upper Luangwa Valley, Northern Rhodesia. Transactions and Proceedings of the Geological Society of South Africa, 65:75–90.Google Scholar
Drysdall, A. R., and Kitching, J. W. 1963. A re-examination of the Karroo succession and fossil localities of part of the Upper Luangwa Valley. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Northern Rhodesia, 1:1–62.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39:783–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancox, P. J. 2000. The continental Triassic of South Africa. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie, Teil I, 1998:1285–1324.Google Scholar
Haughton, S. H., and Brink, A. S. 1954. A bibliographic list of the Reptilia from the Karoo beds of Africa. Palaeontologia Africana, 2:1–187.Google Scholar
Keyser, A. W. 1975. A re-evaluation of the cranial morphology and systematics of some tuskless Anomodontia. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of South Africa, 67:1–110.Google Scholar
Keyser, A. W. 1979. A new dicynodont genus and its bearing on the origin of the Gondwana Triassic Dicynodontia, p. 184–198. In Laskar, B. and Raja Rao, C. S. (eds.). Proceedings and Papers of the 4th IUGS Gondwana Symposium. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, Delhi.Google Scholar
Keyser, A. W., and Cruickshank, A. R. I. 1979. The origins and classification of Triassic Dicynodonts. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 82:81–108.Google Scholar
Keyser, A. W., and Smith, R. M. H. 1977–1978. Vertebrate biozonation of the Beaufort Group, with special reference to the Western Karoo Basin. Annals of the Geological Survey of South Africa, 12:1–35.Google Scholar
King, G. M. 1981a. The postcranial skeleton of Robertia broomiana, an early dicynodont (Reptilia, Therapsida) from the South African Karoo. Annals of the South African Museum, 84:203–231.Google Scholar
King, G. M. 1981b. The functional anatomy of a Permian dicynodont. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 291:244–322.Google Scholar
King, G. M. 1985. The postcranial skeleton of Kingoria nowacki (von Huene) (Therapsida: Dicynodontia). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84:263–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G. M. 1988. Anomodontia. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie. Teil 17C, Fischer, Stuttgart, 174 p.Google Scholar
King, G. M. 1990. The Dicynodonts: A Study in Palaeobiology. Chapman and Hall, New York, 233 p.Google Scholar
Kitching, J. W. 1963. The fossil localities and mammal-like reptiles of the Upper Luangwa Valley, Northern Rhodesia. South African Journal of Science, 59:259–264.Google Scholar
Kitching, J. W. 1977. The distribution of the Karoo vertebrate fauna. Memoirs of the Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, 1, 131 p.Google Scholar
Maddison, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology, 40:315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modesto, S., Rubidge, B. S., and Welman, J. 1999. The most basal anomodont therapsid and the primacy of Gondwana in the evolution of the anomodonts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 266:331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modesto, S., and Rybczynski, N. 2000. The amniote faunas of the Russian Permian: implications for Late Permian terrestrial vertebrate biogeography, p. 17–34. In Benton, M. J., Kurochkin, E. N., Shishkin, M. A., and Unwin, D. M. (eds.), The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1903. The reptilian subclasses Diapsida and Synapsida and the early history of the Diaptosauria. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, 1:449–507.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1859. On the orders of fossil and recent Reptilia and their distribution in time. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science for 1859, p. 153–166.Google Scholar
Rubidge, B. S. (ed.). 1995. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee for Stratigraphy Biostratigraphic Series No. 1. Council for Geoscience, Pretoria, 46 p.Google Scholar
Rybczynski, N. 2000. Cranial anatomy and phylogenetic position of Suminia getmanovi, a basal anomodont (Amniota: Therapsida) from the Late Permian of Eastern Europe. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 130:329–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S.A.C.S. (South African Committee For Stratigraphy). 1980. Stratigraphy of South Africa, Pt. 1, Lithostratigraphy of the Republic of South Africa, South West Africa/Namibia, and the Republics of Bophuthatswana, Transkei, and Venda. Handbook of the Geological Survey of South Africa, 8, 690 p.Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. H., and Keyser, A. W. 1995. Biostratigraphy of the Cistecephalus Assemblage Zone, p. 23–28. In Rubidge, B. S. (ed.), Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee for Stratigraphy Biostratigraphic Series No. 1. Council for Geoscience, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Strong, E. E., and Lipscomb, D. 2000. Character coding and inapplicable data. Cladistics, 15:363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 2000. PAUP∗. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (∗and Other Methods). Version 4.0b4a. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Tollman, S. M., Grine, F. E., and Hahn, B. D. 1980. Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism in Aulacephalodon (Reptilia, Anomodontia). Annals of the South African Museum, 81:159–186.Google Scholar
Van Hoepen, E. C. N. 1934. Oor die indeling van die Dicynodontidae na van nuwe vorme. Paleontologiese Navorsing van die Nasionale Museum, 2:67–101.Google Scholar
Wagner, P. J. 2000. Exhaustion of morphologic character states among fossil taxa. Evolution, 54:365–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, S. L. 2000. Eubiostratigraphic units, quasibiostratigraphic units, and “assemblage zones.” Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20:761–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1914a. The zones of the Beaufort Beds of the Karroo System in South Africa. Geological Magazine, Decade, 6(l):203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1914b. On the nomenclature of the South African pareiasaurians. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 14:98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar