Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:06:49.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconstruction of a cyathiform Eugonophyllum, Upper Pennsylvanian, Palo Pinto County, Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Andrew M. Torres
Andrew M. Torres*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Species of Eugonophyllum (Codiaceae, Chlorophyta) have traditionally been characterized as phylloid or leaf-like. But a reconstruction of well preserved specimens of Eugonophyllum, probably E. johnsonii Konishi and Wray, from Upper Pennsylvanian limestone formations of Palo Pinto County, Texas, indicates it was cyathiform or cup-shaped. Reconstruction was based on the forms of membranes as seen in sections and on partial excavation of thalli. This Eugonophyllum shared with congeneric species of Eugonophyllum the characteristic two-layered cortex (outer and inner), and with other codiaceans the same general membrane structure consisting of bilateral cortices with palisades of utricles now filled with micrite, and a medulla of tubular coenocytes, an area now mostly filled with mosaic sparry calcite. A cyathiform thallus would have inner and outer cortices but no differences were found in the structure of the inner and outer cortical utricular casts. The thalli were apparently anchored with elongated, cylindrical holdfasts. Internal spherical structures, presumably developed from differentiated utricles, may have been zygotes or young embryos from an oogamous fertilization. These were apparently released to the environment through the membrane.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , May 1997 , pp. 493 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baars, D. L. 1968. Nature of calcification in codiacean algae. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 52:518.Google Scholar
Baars, D. L., and Torres, A. M. 1991. Late Paleozoic phylloid algae-a pragmatic review. Palaios, 6:513–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bold, H. C., and Wynne, A. J. 1985. Introduction to the Algae, (second edition). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 720 p.Google Scholar
Brown, L. F., and Wermund, E. G. 1979. Calcareous (bank) facies of Missourian (Canyon) age, North Central Texas. Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas, Austin, 26 p.Google Scholar
Cross, T. A., and Klosterman, M. J. 1981. Autecology and development of a stromatolitic-bound phylloid algal bioherm, Laborcita Formation (Lower Permian), Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico, USA, p. 45–59. In Monty, C. (ed.), Phanerozoic Stromatolites. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, R., and Kanumai, M. 1954. Geology of the Mino Mountain Land and southern part of Hida Plateau, with the description of the algal remains found in those districts. Scientific Reports of Saitama University, Series B 1, 3:177–208.Google Scholar
Hillis-Colinvaux, L. 1980. Ecology and taxonomy of Halimeda: primary producers of coral reefs. Advances in Marine Biology, 17:1–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. H. 1946. Lime-secreting algae from the Pennsylvanian and Permian of Kansas. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 57:1087–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, B. L., Moore, C. H. Jr., and Dickson, J. A. D. 1993. Well preserved, aragonitic phylloid algae (Eugonophyllum, Udoteaceae) from the Pennsylvanian Holder Formation, Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico. Palaios, 8:111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khvorova, I. V. 1946. On a new genus of algae from the Middle Carboniferous deposits of the Moscow Basin. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS, 23:737–739.Google Scholar
Konishi, K., and Wray, J. L. 1961. Eugonophyllum, a new Pennsylvanian and Permian algal genus. Journal of Paleontology, 35:659–666.Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L., Roux, A. and Nassichuk, W. W. 1987. Algues Carbonifères et Permiennes de l'Arctique Canadien. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 342, p. 1–99.Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L., Roux, A. and Nassichuk, W. W. 1991. Carboniferous calcareous algae, p. 371–451. In Riding, R. (ed.), Calcareous Algae and Stromatolites. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Mu, X. 1991. Fossil Udoteaceae and Gymnocodiaceae, p. 146–166. In Riding, R. (ed.), Calcareous Algae and Stromatolites. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Pray, L.C., and Wray, J. L. 1963. Porous algal facies (Pennsylvanian) Honaker Trail, San Juan Canyon, Utah, p. 204–234. In Bass, R. O. (ed.), Shelf Carbonates of the Paradox Basin. Four Corners Geological Society Symposium, Fourth Field Conference.Google Scholar
Torres, A. M. 1995. Ivanovia tebagaensis was a cyathiform Permian codiacean membranous alga with dimorphic cortices. Journal of Paleontology, 69:381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, A. M., and Baars, D. L. 1992a. Using the term utricle. Journal of Paleontology, 66:688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, A. M., and Baars, D. L. 1992b. Anchicodium Johnson: branched or phylloid? Journal of Paleontology, 66:675–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, A. M., West, R. R. and Sawin, R. S. 1992. Calcipatera cottonwoodensis, a new membranous Late Paleozoic calcareous alga. Journal of Paleontology, 66:678–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wermund, E. G. 1975. Upper Pennsylvanian limestone banks, North Central Texas. Geological Circular 75-3, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas, Austin, 34 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, K. M., Colinvaux, L. H. and Watabe, N. 1969. Electron microscope study of calcification in the alga Halimeda (order Siphonales). Phycologia, 8:27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, J. L. 1977. Calcareous Algae. Elsevier, New York, 185 p.Google Scholar