Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T05:21:17.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parasitic polychaetes in the Early Cretaceous Hydrocarbon seep-restricted brachiopod Peregrinella Multicarinata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Steffen Kiel
Steffen Kiel*
Affiliation:
Institut für Geowissenschaften, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Ludewig-Meyn-Str. 10, 24118 Kiel, Germany, and Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Natural History Museum, Box 37012, Washington DC 20013-7012, USA,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hydrothermal vents and methane seeps sustain unique ecosystems with a highly adapted fauna that largely thrives on chemotrophic endosymbionts. This large biomass attracts not only predators but also parasitic taxa like the recently reported oophagous bivalve Acesta bullisis Vokes, 1963 that lives permanently attached to a vestimentiferan tube worm (Järnegren et al., 2005). Here I report large brachiopods of the Early Cretaceous seep-restricted genus Peregrinella Oehlert, in Fischer, 1887 that were infested by polychaete tubes inside their shells during their lifetime.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 6 , November 2008 , pp. 1215 - 1217
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, J. P., Greene, G., Orange, D. L., Baxter, C. H., Robinson, B. H., Kochevar, R. E., Nybakken, J. W., Reed, D. L., and McHugh, C. M. 1996. Biologic and geologic characteristics of cold seeps in Monterey Bay, California. Deep-sea Research I, 43:1739–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beesley, P. L., Ross, G. J. B., and Glasby, C. J. 2000. Polychaetes and Allies: The southern synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Volume 4. Part A. *CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 478 p.Google Scholar
Biernat, G. 1957. On Peregrinella multicarinata (Lamarck)(Brachiopoda). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 2:19–52.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. A. 2006. Hydrocarbon seep and hydrothermal vent paleoenvironments and paleontology: Past developments and future research directions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 232:362–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K. A. and Bottjer, D. J. 1995a. Brachiopods and chemosymbiotic bivalves in Phanerozoic hydrothermal vent and cold seep environments. Geology, 23:321–324.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K. A. and Bottjer, D. J. 1995b. Peregrinella: An Early Cretaceous cold-seep-restricted brachiopod. Paleobiology, 24:461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1891. On some new or interesting west American shells obtained from the dredgings of the U.S. Fish Commission steamer Albatross in 1888, and from other sources. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, 14:173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspard, D. 1999. Distribution of Lower Cretaceous brachiopods in Europe (Berriasian to Aptian). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 170:311–326.Google Scholar
Järnegren, J., Tobias, C. R., Macko, S. A., and Young, C. M. 2005. Egg predation fuels unique species association at deep-sea hydrocarbon seeps. Biological Bulletin, 209:87–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenk, V. C. and Wilson, B. R. 1985. A new mussel (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) from hydrothermal vents in the Galapagos Rift Zone. Malacologia, 26:253–271.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V., Hoare, R. D., and Sparks, D. K. 1980. Epizoans of the Middle Devonian brachiopod Paraspirifer bownockeri: Their relationships to one another and to their host. Journal of Paleontology, 54:1141–1154.Google Scholar
Kiel, S. and Peckmann, J. 2008. Paleoecology and evolutionary significance of an Early Cretaceous Peregrinella-dominated hydrocarbon-seep deposit on the Crimean peninsula. Palaios, 23:751–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1819. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres … 3 éd. Verdière, Detervielle & chez l'auteur, Paris.Google Scholar
Oehlert, D. P. 1887. Brachiopodes, p. 1189–1334. In Fischer, P. H. (ed.), Manuel de Conchyliologie. F. Savy, Paris.Google Scholar
Peckmann, J., Campbell, K. A., Walliser, O. H., and Reitner, J. 2007. A Late Devonian hydrocarbon-seep deposit dominated by dimerelloid brachiopods, Morocco. Palaios, 22:114–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posenato, R. and Morsilli, M. 1999. New species of Peregrinella (Brachiopoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of the Gargano Promontory (southern Italy). Cretaceous Research, 20:641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandy, M. R. 1995. A review of some Palaeozoic and Mesozoic brachiopods as members of cold seep chemosynthetic communities: “Unusual” palaeoecology and anomalous palaeobiogeographic pattern explained. Földtani Közlöny, 125:241–258.Google Scholar
Sarycheva, T. G. E. 1960. Treatise of Paleontology. Handbook for paleontologists and geologists of the USSR in 15 volumes. Bryozoans, Brachiopods. Addendum (Appendix): Phoronids. Nauka, Moscow, 343 p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
Smirnova, T. N. 1972. Rannemelovye brahiopody Kryma i Severnogo Kavkaza [Early Cretaceous brachiopods of the Crimea and Northern Caucasus]. Nauka, Moscow, 143 p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
Sun, D. 1986. Discovery of Early Cretaceous Peregrinella (Brachiopoda) in Xizang (Tibet) and its significance. Palaeontologia Cathayana, 2:211–227.Google Scholar
Taddei Ruggiero, E., Buono, G., and Raia, P. 2006. Bioerosion on brachiopod shells of a thanatocoenosis of Alboràn Sea (Spain). Ichnos, 13:175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Hove, H. A. and Zibrowius, H. 1986. Laminatubus alvini gen. et sp. n. and Protis hydrothermica sp.n. (Polychaeta, Serpulidae) from the bathyal hydrothermal vent communities in the eastern Pacific. Zoologica Scripta, 15:21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toula, F. 1911. Über Rhynchonella (Peregrinella Öhlert) multicarinata Lamk. sp. (1819) = Terebratula peregrina L. v. Buch (1833) von Zajzon bei Kronstadt. Abhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen geologischen Reichsanstalt, 20:27–35.Google Scholar
Vinn, O. 2005. The tube ultrastructure of serpulids (Annelida, Polychaeta) Pentaditrupa subtorquata, Cretaceous and Nogrobs cf. vertebralis, Jurassic from Germany. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Geology, 54:260–265.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1963. Studies on tertiary and recent giant Limidae. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 2:75–92.Google Scholar
Weedon, M. J. 1994. Tube microstructure of Recent and Jurassic serpulid polychaetes and the question of the Palaeozoic ‘spirorbids.’ Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 39:1–15.Google Scholar
Zezina, O. N. 2000. What kind of brachiopods can live in the regions of underwater volcanic activity? The Millennium Brachiopod congress, 10–14 July 2000, Abstracts, London.Google Scholar
Zumwalt, G. S. and Delaca, T. E. 1980. Utilization of brachiopod feeding currents by epizoic Foraminifera. Journal of Paleontology, 54:477–484.Google Scholar