Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:33:22.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Candinia (Sacoglossa: Juliidae), a new fossil genus of bivalved gastropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Jacques Le Renard
Affiliation:
Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Laboratoire de Malacologie, 55 rue de Buffon, 75005 Paris, France
Bruno Sabelli
Affiliation:
Museo di Zoologia del Dipartimento di Biologia Evoluzionistica e Sperimentale dell'Università di Bologna, via S. Giacomo 9, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Marco Taviani
Affiliation:
Istituto per la Geologia Marina del C.N.R., via Zamboni 65, 40127 Bologna, Italy

Abstract

The record of the fossil representatives of the family Juliidae is updated. The new genus Candinia is proposed, in the subfamily Juliinae, for two fossil species somewhat intermediate between Julia and Berthelinia. The new species Candinia pliocaenica is recorded from the lower Pliocene shallow marine deposits near Siena (Tuscany, Italy). This is the first record of Sacoglossa in the Mediterranean Basin. Based on the very specialized life habits of the Juliidae, it is suggested that subtropical Caulerpa algal prairies inhabited the Mediterranean during the early Pliocene, likely becoming extinct in this basin because of the mid-Pliocene climatic deterioration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1967. Costa Geologica d'Italia, Foglio 113, Castelfiorentino. 2nd ed. Servizio Geologica d'ltalia, Firenze.Google Scholar
Baluk, W., and Jakubowski, G. 1968. Berthelinia krachi n. sp., a new bivalved gastropod from the Miocene of Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 13(2):291302.Google Scholar
Beets, C. 1949. Additional observations on the genus Julia Gould. Geologie en Mijnbouw, 11e Jaargang, No. 1:2224.Google Scholar
Bergh, R. 1878. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Aeolidiaden. Part V. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, Jahrgang 1877, 32. Sep.:136.Google Scholar
Bergh, R. 1885. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Aeolidiaden. Part VIII. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, Jahrgang 1885, 35. Sep.:160.Google Scholar
Boettger, C. R. 1963. Gastropoden mit zwei Schalenklappen. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 56:403439.Google Scholar
Bogi, C., Coppini, M., and Margelli, A., 1984. Contributo alla conoscenza della malacofauna dell'Alto Tirreno. La Conchiglia, 14(186/187):37.Google Scholar
Burn, R. 1966. The Opisthobranchs of a caulerpan microfauna from Fiji. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 37:4565.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1886. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Eocène des environs de Paris. ler fascicule. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, 21:1174.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1887. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Eocène des environs de Paris. 2ème fascicule. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, 22:1218.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1905. Mollusques éocéniques de la Loire-inférieure. Tome 3, fasc. I. Bulletin de la Société de Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France, 2ème série, 4 (3-4), 1904 (publ. 1905): 147-213 (sep. p. 167).Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1906. Mollusques éocéniques de la Loire-inférieure. Tome 3, fasc. II. Bulletin de la Société de Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France, 2ème série, 5, 1905 (publ. 1906):135-189 (sep. p. 69123).Google Scholar
Cossmann, M., and Peyrot, A. 1914. Conchologie Néogénique de l'Aquitaine. Tome II: Pélécypodes, fin et supplément. In 4o, Bordeaux (Saugnac), 1496.Google Scholar
Crosse, H. 1875. Description du nouveau genre Berthelinia . Journal de Conchyliologie, Paris, 3ème série, t. XV:79.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1798. Tableau élémentaire de l'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux. Paris (Baudouin), an 6 [= 1798 sec. Deshayes, 1832 (Encyclopédie Méthodique, “1830”:165)]:377383.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1898. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida, with especial reference to the silex-beds of Tampa, and the Pliocene beds of the Caloosahatchie River, including in many cases a complete revision of the generic groups treated of and their American Tertiary species. Part IV. 1. Prionodesmacea: Nucula to Julia. Transactions of the Wagner Free Institution of Sciences, Philadelphia, 3, (4):571-947.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1861. Description des Animaux sans vertèbres découverts dans le bassin de Paris, pour servir de supplément à la description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris, comprenant une revue de toutes les espèces actuellement connues. Tome Deuxième, Texte: Mollusques Acéphalés Monomyaires et Brachiopodes, Mollusques céphalés. Première partie. Paris (Baillière), 1861–1863:1968.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P., 1863. Catalogue des Mollusques de l'Ile de la Réunion (Bourbon). Paris (Dentu):1144, pls. XXVIII-XLI (= 1-14).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, G., and Dautzenberg, Ph. 1901. Nouvelle liste des Pélécypodes et des Brachiopodes Fossiles du Miocène moyen du Nord-Ouest de la France. Journal de Conchyliologie, XLIX:229280.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1886. Manuel de Conchyliologie et de Paléontologie con-chyliologique, ou Histoire naturelle des Mollusques vivants et fossiles. Paris (Savy), 1880-1887, p. 11369.Google Scholar
Ganapati, P. N., and Sarma, A. L. N. 1974. Bivalved Gastropods of the Indian Seas. Proceedings of the Indian Natural Sciences Academy, B, 38, (3/4), 1972 (publ. 1974):240-250.Google Scholar
Gonor, J. J. 1961. Observations on the biology of Lobiger serradifalci, a shelled sacoglossan opisthobranch from the Mediterranean. Vie et Milieu, 12:381403.Google Scholar
Gould, A. A. 1862. Descriptions of new genera and species of shells. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 8:280284.Google Scholar
von Ihering, H., 1876. Versuch eines naturlichen Systemes der Mollusken. Jahrbucher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft, 3:97148.Google Scholar
International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature. 1885. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Third Edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature in association with British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
Janssen, R. 1979. Berthelinia und Julia aus dem Oligozän von SW-Frankreich (Gastropoda: Sacoglossa). Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 110(1/3):7579.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. R. 1978. Feeding biology of some Florida sacoglossans. American Zoologist, 18:665.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. R. 1980. A review of Sacoglossan diets, with comparative notes on radular and buccal anatomy. Malacological Review, 13:5577.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. R. 1992. Review of the usage of the synonyms Sacoglossa Ihering, 1876 and Ascoglossa Bergh, 1876. Proceedings of the Tenth International Malacological Congress, Tubingen, 1989, 2:541.Google Scholar
Kawaguti, S., and Baba, K. 1959. A preliminary note on a two-valved Sacoglossan Gastropod, Tamanovalva limax n. sp., from Tamano, Japan. Biological Journal of Okayama University, 5 (3-4): 177-184.Google Scholar
Kay, A. E. 1964. A new species of Berthelinia and its associated Sacoglossans in the Hawaiian Islands. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 36:191197.Google Scholar
Kay, A. E. 1968. A review of the bivalved gastropods and a discussion of evolution within the Sacoglossa. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 22:109134.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M., and Smith, A. 1961. West American species of the bivalved gastropod genus Berthelinia . Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 30(2):4766.Google Scholar
Le Renard, J. 1980. Nouvelles espèces de Gastéropodes de l'Auversien à “faciès charrié” de Baron (Oise). Bulletin d'Information des Géologues du Bassin de Paris, 17(2):1725, text-figs. 7-12.Google Scholar
Le Renard, J. 1983. Mise en évidence d'algueraies à Caulerpa par les Juliidae (Gastéropodes à 2 valves: Sacoglossa) dans l'Eocène du bassin de Paris. Geobios, 16(1):3951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Renard, J. 1989. Le genre Namnetia Cossmann, 1905: Attribution aux Juliidae (Opisthobranchia, Gastropoda). Définition des espèces et implications paléoécologiques pour l'Eocène de la région de Nantes (Loire-Atlantique). Géologie de la France, (1-2):2130.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae, Editio Duodecima.Google Scholar
Ludbrook, N. H., and Steel, T. M. 1961. A late Tertiary bivalve gastropod from South Australia. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 34, 1960 (publ. 1961):228-230.Google Scholar
Macnae, W. 1954. On four sacoglossan molluscs new to South Africa. Annals of the Natal Museum, 13:5154.Google Scholar
Melleville, . 1843. Mémoire sur les sables tertiaires inférieurs du bassin de Paris, avec la description de 78 espèces de coquilles fossiles tertiaires inédites de ce terrain. Annales des Sciences Géologiques, tome II: separatum p. 188.Google Scholar
Mienis, H. K. 1973. Notes. A Bivalved Gastropod from Eilat. Argamon, Israel Journal of Malacology, 4(1):18.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H. 1846. Note sur la classification naturelle des Mollusques Gastéropodes. Extrait des procès-verbaux des séances de la Société Philomatique de Paris:116.Google Scholar
Montefameglio, L., Pavia, G., and Rosa, D. A. 1980. Associazioni a molluschi del Tabianiano del Basso Monferrato (Alba, Italia NW). Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana, 18(2):173199.Google Scholar
Pavia, G. 1976. I Molluschi del Pliocene inferiore di Monteu Roero (Alba, Italia NW). Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana, 14(2):99175.Google Scholar
Pavia, G. 1980. Molluschi del Tabianiano del Basso Monferrato (Alba, Italia NW). Bollettino della Societa Geologica Italiana, 19(2):205226.Google Scholar
Poorman, H., and Poorman, F. L. 1977. Four opisthobranchs living on marine algae from West Mexico. The Nautilus, 91(2):6266.Google Scholar
Raffi, S., and Marasti, C. 1982. The Mediterranean bioprovince from the Pliocene to the Recent: observations and hypotheses based on the evolution of the taxonomic diversity of molluscs, p. 151177. In Montanaro Gallitelli, E. (ed.), Palaeontology, Essential of Historical Geology, S.T.E.M. Mucchi, Modena.Google Scholar
Raffi, S., Rio, D., Sprovieri, R., Valleri, G., Monegatti, P., Raffi, I., and Barrier, P. 1989. New stratigraphic data on the Piacenzian stratotype. Bollettino della Societa Geologica Italiana, 108:183196.Google Scholar
Raincourt, de. 1877. Description d'espèces nouvelles du bassin de Paris. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 3ème série, V:329333.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A. 1885. Report on the scientific results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. Zoology-Vol. XIII. Longmans, Murray, Macmillan, Simpkin, Marshall, Trübner, Stanford, Potter, Kegan Paul, Trench, London, 341 p.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1871. The Pelecypoda, with a review of all known genera of this class, fossil and recent. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, 3 (Cretaceous Fauna of Southern India).Google Scholar
Taviani, M. 1979. I molluschi marini raccolti dalla spedizione “L. Mares-G.R.S.T.S.” alle isole Galapagos. 1. Gastropoda e Bivalvia. In: Galapagos, studi e ricerche. Spedizione “L. Mares-G.R.S.T.S.”, ed. G.R.S.T.S., Firenze, 61 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E. 1977. Jamaican opisthobranch molluscs. I. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 43:93140.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1925. Contribution to the Geology and Palaeontology of West Indies. Miocene Mollusks from Bowden, Jamaica. Pelecypods and Scaphopods. Publications of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 366:1222.Google Scholar