Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:35:02.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new occurrence of Granatocrinus granulatus (Roemer) from the Fort Payne Chert of Alabama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Johnny A. Waters
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, West Georgia College, Carrollton 30118
Gorden L. Bell Jr.
Affiliation:
Red Mountain Museum, Birmingham, Alabama 35205

Extract

The Mississippian was a time of widespread diversification of pelmatozoan echinoderms in the United States. The crinoids and blastoids were diverse and abundant in a variety of geologic settings. Most of the Osagean occurrences of blastoids are associated with platform carbonates such as the Burlington Limestone. These blastoids lived in association with a crinoid community dominated by camerate crinoids. Blastoids also lived in coeval Osagean deltaic environments such as the Borden Delta but were less diverse and abundant.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of Paleontology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W. I. 1978. Community organization, paleontology, and sedimentology of the Lower Mississippian Borden delta platform (Edwardsville Formation, southern Indiana). Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, 433 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Kammer, T. W. and Lane, N. G. 1979. Fossil communities of the Borden (Mississippian) delta in Indiana and northern Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology, 53(5):11821196.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 45, 783 p.Google Scholar
Cline, L. M. 1937. Blastoids of the Osage Group, Mississippian: Part II. The genus Cryptoblastus. Journal of Paleontology, 11(8):634649.Google Scholar
Conkin, J. E. 1957. Stratigraphy of the New Providence Formation (Mississippian) in Jefferson and Bullitt counties, Kentucky, and the fauna of the Coral Ridge Member. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 38(168):109157.Google Scholar
Fay, R. O. 1961. Blastoid Studies. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, Article 3, 147 p.Google Scholar
Gutschick, R. C. and Sandberg, C. A. 1983. Mississippian continental margins of the conterminous United States, p. 7996. In Stanley, D. J. and Moore, B. T. (eds.), The Shelfbreak: Critical Interface on Continental Margins. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammer, T. W. 1982. Fossil communities of the prodeltaic New Providence Shale Member of the Borden Formation (Mississippian), north-central Kentucky and southern Indiana. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, 301 p.Google Scholar
Lineback, J. A. 1966. Deep-water sediments adjacent to the Borden Siltstone (Mississippian) in Illinois. Illinois Geological Survey Circular 401, 48 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1865. Descriptions of new Crinoidea, etc, from the Carboniferous rocks of Illinois and some of the adjoining states. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences. Proceedings for 1865:155166.Google Scholar
Roemer, F. 1851. Monographie der fossilen Crinoiden-familie der Blastoideen, und der Gattung Pentatrematites im Besondern. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Jahrgang 17, 1(3):323397.Google Scholar
Ruppel, S. D. 1979. Conodonts from the Lower Mississippian Fort Payne Chert and Tuscumbia formations in northern Alabama. Journal of Paleontology, 53(1):5570.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. A. 1972. Mississippian stratigraphy of Alabama. Geological Survey of Alabama Monograph 12, 121 p.Google Scholar