Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T01:49:19.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New megapodagrionid damselflies (Odonata: Zygoptera) from the Paleogene of Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Julián F. Petrulevičius ,
Torsten Wappler ,
Sonja Wedmann ,
Jes Rust  and
Andre Nel
Julián F. Petrulevičius
Affiliation:
Departamento Científico Paleozoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque, s/n. 1900 La Plata, and CONICET, Argentina,
Torsten Wappler
Affiliation:
Steinmann Institute, University of Bonn, Nussallee 8, D-53115 Bonn, Germany, ,
Sonja Wedmann
Affiliation:
Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Forschungsstation Grube Messel, Marktstr. 35, D-64409 Messel, Germany,
Jes Rust
Affiliation:
Steinmann Institute, University of Bonn, Nussallee 8, D-53115 Bonn, Germany, ,
Andre Nel
Affiliation:
CNRS UMR 5202, CP 50, Entomologie, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, F-75005 Paris, France,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three fossil taxa of megapodagrionid damselflies are described and figured from the Paleogene localities in Europe on the basis of isolated wings. Eckfeldia superstes (Wappler, 2003) gen. nov. is described from the laminated mudstones of middle Eocene age from Eckfeld Maar, Germany. Furagrion jutlandicus (Henriksen, 1922) gen. nov. is recorded from the laminated claystones of lowermost Eocene age from the Ølst and Fur-Formation, Denmark, and an undetermined megapodagrionid damselfly is recognized from middle Eocene strata. Taphonomy and color preservation in the fossils are briefly considered. Characters used for phylogenetic analyses in extant and fossil Megapodagrionidae are discussed. The biogeographic and paleoecological implications of the new European fossils are briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 6 , November 2008 , pp. 1173 - 1181
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechly, G. 1996. Morphologische Untersuchungen am Flügelgeäder der rezenten Libellen und deren Stammgruppenvertretern (Insecta; Pterygota; Odonata), unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Phylogenetischen Systematik und des Grundplanes der *Odonata. Petalura, Special Volume, 2:1–402.Google Scholar
Bechly, G. 1998. New fossil dragonflies from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation of North-East Brazil (Insecta: Odonata). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), 264:1–66.Google Scholar
Bechly, G. 2005. Phylogenetic Systematics of Zygoptera/Euzygoptera. http://www.bernstein.naturkundemuseum-bw.de/odonata/zygopt2.htm#coenagrionomorphaGoogle Scholar
Belyshev, B. F. and Haritonov, A. Yu. 1983. Dragonfly biogeography of the southern hemisphere. Publishing House, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 152 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Bonde, N. 1997. A distinctive fish fauna in the basal ash-series of the Fur/Ølst Formation (U. Paleocene, Denmark). Aarhus Geoscience, 6:33–48.Google Scholar
Bruch, A. A. and Zhilin, S. G. 2007. Early Miocene climate of Central Eurasia—Evidence from Aquitanian floras of Kazakhstan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.11.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, P. P. 1913. The fossil Odonate Phenacolestes, with a discussion of the venation of the legion Podagrion Selys. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 65:225–272.Google Scholar
Carle, F. L. and Wighton, D. C. 1990. Odonata. p. 51–68. In Grimaldi, D. A. (ed.), Insects from the Santana Formation, Lower Cretaceous, of Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 195, 191 p.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1992. Superclass Hexapoda, p. 1–655. In Moore, R. C. and Kaesler, R. L. (eds.), Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Pt. R, Arthropoda 4. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Chambers, L. M., Pringle, M., Fitton, G., Larsen, L. M., Pedersen, A. K., and Parrish, R. 2003. Recalibration of the Paleocene-Eocene boundary (P-E) using high precision U-Pb and Ar-Ar isotopic dating. Abstract, EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly Nice.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1907. Fossil dragonflies from Florissant, Colorado. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 23:133–139.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1908. A dragonfly puzzle and its solution. Entomological News, 19:455–459.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1920. Eocene insects from the Rocky Mountains. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 57:233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. L. 1981. A synopsis of the extant genera of the Odonata. Societas Internationalis Odonatologica, Rapid Communications, 3:1–59.Google Scholar
Davies, A. L. and Tobin, P. 1984. The dragonflies of the world: A systematic list of the extant species of Odonata. Vol. 1. Zygoptera, Anisozygoptera. Societas Internationalis Odonatologica, Rapid Communications (Suppl), 3:1–127.Google Scholar
De Marmels, J. 2001. Revision of Megapodagrion Selys, 1886 (Insecta, Odonata: Megapodagrionidae). Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Zürich, 230 p.Google Scholar
De Marmels, J. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Priscagrion Zhou and Wilson, 2001, with a description of Teinopodagrion croizati spec. nov. from Ecuador (Zygoptera: Megapodagrionidae). Odonatologica, 31(4):389–394.Google Scholar
Eskov, K. Y. 2002. Geographical history of insects, p. 427–435. In Rasnitsyn, A. and Quicke, D. L. J. (eds.), History of insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1793. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, adjectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Hafniae, 3:1–487,1–349.Google Scholar
Fleck, G. and Nel, A. 2003. Revision of the Mesozoic family Aeschnidiidae (Odonata: Anisoptera). Zoologica, 153:1–180.Google Scholar
Förster, F. 1910. Beiträge zu den Gattungen und Arten der Libellen. Wiener entomologische Zeitung, 29:51–56.Google Scholar
Franzen, J. L. 1992. Europe in the Eocene: Messel in time and space, p. 13–15. In Schaal, S., and Ziegler, W. (eds.), Messel. An insight into the history of life and the Earth. Claredon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Franzen, J. L. 2005. The implications of the numerical dating of the Messel fossil deposit (Eocene, Germany) for mammalian biochronology. Annales de Paléontologie, 91:329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, F. C. 1957. A reclassification of the order Odonata, based on some new interpretations of the venation of the dragonfly wing. Handbook of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, 12:1–133.Google Scholar
Hagen, H. A. 1861. Synopsis of the Neuroptera of North America with a list of South American species. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 348 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, F.-J. 2002. Steine erzählen Geschichte(n): Ursachen für die Entstehung des Messel-Sees gefunden. Natur und Museum, 132:1–4.Google Scholar
Heilmann-Clausen, C. 1996. Paleogenet over kalken. Aarhus Geokompendier, 1:69–114.Google Scholar
Henriksen, K. L. 1922. Eocene insects from Denmark. Denmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse, 37(2):5–34.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. H. 1925. New genera of Megapodagrionidae, with notes on the subfamily. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 67:291–311.Google Scholar
Kukalová-Peck, J. 1991. Fossil history and the evolution of hexapod structures, p. 141–179. In Nauman, I. D. (ed.), The insects of Australia. A textbook for students and research workers, 1 [Second edition]. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Lutz, H. 1990. Systematische und palökologische Untersuchungen an den Insekten aus dem Mittel-Eozän der Grube Messel bei Darmstadt. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 124:1–165.Google Scholar
Lutz, H. 1993. Zur Taphonomie der aquatischen und terrestrischen Fauna des “Eckfelder Maares” (Mittel-Eozän; Deutschland): Ergebnisse aus den Grabungen 1990–1992. Mainzer Naturwisschenschaftliches Archiv, 31:85–113.Google Scholar
Lutz, H. 1997. Taphozönosen terrestrischer Insekten in aquatischen Sedimenten—ein Beitrag zur Rekonstruktion des Paläoenvironments. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 203:173–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, H., Frankenhäuser, H., and Neuffer, F. O. 1998. Fossilfundstätte Eckfelder Maar—Archiv eines mitteleozänen Lebensraumes in der Eifel. Landessammlung für Naturkunde, Mainz, 51 p.Google Scholar
Martínez-Delclòs, X., Briggs, D. E. G., and Peñalver, E. 2004. Taphonomy of insects in carbonates and amber. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 203:19–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martynov, A. V. 1929. Fossil insects from Tertiary deposits in Ashutas, Saisan District. Trudy geologicheskogo muzeya, akademii nauk SSSR, 5: 73–216. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Mertz, D. F., Harms, F.-J., Gabriel, G., and Felder, M. 2004. Arbeitstreffen in der Forschungsstation Grube Messel mit neuen Ergebnissen aus der Messel-Forschung. Natur und Museum, 134:289–290.Google Scholar
Mertz, D. F. and Renne, P. R. 2005. A numerical age for the Messel fossil deposit (UNESCO World Heritage Site) derived from 40Ar/39Ar dating on a basaltic rock fragment. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 255:67–75.Google Scholar
Mertz, D. F., Swisher, C. C., Franzen, J. L., Neuffer, F. O., and Lutz, H. 2000. Numerical dating of the Eckfeld Maar fossil site, Eifel, Germany: A calibration mark for the Eocene time scale. Naturwissenschaften, 87:270–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosbrugger, V., Utescher, T., and Dilcher, D. L. 2005. Cenozoic continental climatic evolution of Central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102:14964–14969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munz, P. A. 1919. A venational study of the Suborder Zygoptera (Odonata) with keys for the identification of genera. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society, 3:2–78.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Arillo, A., and Martínez-Delclòs, X. 1996. New fossil Odonata (Insecta) from the Upper Miocene of France and Spain. (Anisoptera and Zygoptera). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 199:167–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nel, A. and Paicheler, J.-C. 1994. Les Lestoidea (Odonata, Zygoptera) fossiles: Un inventaire critique. Annales de Paléontologie, 80(1):1–59.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Martínez-Declòs, X., Paicheler, J.-C., and Henrotay, M. 1993. Les ‘Anisozygoptera’ fossils. Phylogénie et classification (Odonata). Martinia, Numéro Hors Série, 3:1–311.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Martínez-Delclòs, X., Papier, F., and Oudard, J. 1997. New Tertiary fossil Odonata from France. (Sieblosiidae, Lestidae, Coenagrioniidae, Megapodagrionidae, Libellulidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 44(2):231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nel, A. and Jarzembowski, A. E. 1999. Fossil damselflies and dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) from the Late Upper Eocene of southern England. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 110:193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novelo-Gutierrez, R. 1995. The larva of Amphipteryx and a reclassification of Amphipterygidae sensu lato based upon the larvae (Zygoptera). Odonatologica, 24(1):73–87.Google Scholar
Parker, A. R. and McKenzie, D. R. 2003. The cause of 50 million-year-old colour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B (Suppl.), 270:151–153.Google ScholarPubMed
Pfretzschner, H. U. 1998. Ein weiteres Exemplar von Lethe? corbieri Nel, 1993 (Lepidoptera, Satyridae) aus dem Unter-Uligozän von Céreste (Süd-Frankreich). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 72:56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piton, L. 1940. Paléontologie du gisement éocène de Menat (Puy-de-Dôme), flore et faune. Mémoire de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle d'Auvergne, 1:1–303.Google Scholar
Rácenis, J. 1959. Notas taxonomicas sobre la familia Megapodagrionidae (Odonata: Zygoptera) con la sinopsis de las especies venezolanas. Acta Biologica Venezolana, 2(30):335–367.Google Scholar
Rehn, A. C. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of higher-level relationships of Odonata. Systematic Entomology, 28(2):181–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, E. F. 1976. A new collection of insects from the Upper Triassic of South Africa. Annals of the Natal Museum, 22:791–820.Google Scholar
Riek, E. F. and Kukalová-Peck, J. 1984. A new interpretation of dragonfly wing venation based upon early Carboniferous fossils from Argentina (Insecta: Odonatoidea) and basic characters states in pterygote wings. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62:1150–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ris, F. 1917. Eine neue Agrioniden-Gattung der “Légion Podagrion” (Odonata) aus China. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 60:185–191.Google Scholar
Rust, J. 1999. Biologie der Insekten aus dem ältesten Tertiär Nordeuropas. Unpublished Habilitation thesis, Biologische Fakultät der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 482 p.Google Scholar
Schmitz, B., Peucker-Ehrenbrinck, B., Heilmann-Clausen, C., Åberg, G., Asaro, F., and Lee, C.-T. A. 2004. Basaltic explosive volcanism, but no impact, at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary: High resolution chemical and isotopic records from Egypt, Spain and Denmark. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 225:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schorr, M., Lindeboom, M., and Paulson, D. 2007. World Odonata list. http://www.ups.edu/x6140.xml, March 2007.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1890. The Tertiary insects of North America. Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories, 13:1–734.Google Scholar
Selys, L. E. 1854. Monographie des Caloptérygines. Memoires de la Societe royale scientifique de Liege, 9:1–291.Google Scholar
Selys, L. E. 1862. Synopsis des Agrionines. Troisième légion: Podagrion. Bulletins de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 14(6):5–44.Google Scholar
Selys, L. E. 1886. Révision du Synopsis des Agrionines. Première partie comprenant les légions Pseudostigma, Podagrion, Platycnemis et Protoneura. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 38:1–233.Google Scholar
Steinmann, H. 1997. World catalogue of Odonata, Anisoptera (second edition). W. Gruyter, Berlin, 636p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theischinger, G. 1998. Supra-specific diversity in Australian “Argiolestes” (Odonata: Zygoptera: Megapodagrionidae). Stapfia, 55:613–621.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. and Fraser, F. C. 1938–1940. A reclassification of the order Odonata, based on some new interpretations of the venation of the dragonfly wing. Australian Zoologist, 9:125–169,195–221,359–390.Google Scholar
Wappler, T. 2003. Systematik, Phylogenie, Taphonomie und Paläoökologie der Insekten aus dem Mittle-Eozän des Eckfelder Maares, Vulkaneifel. Clausthaler Geowissenschaften, 2:1–241.Google Scholar
Wappler, T. and Engel, M. S. 2003. The Middle Eocene bee faunas of the Eckfeld Maar and Messel, Germany (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of Paleontology, 77:908–921.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wappler, T., Smith, V. S., and Dalgleish, R. C. 2004. Scratching an ancient itch: an Eocene bird louse fossil. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B (Suppl.), 271:255–258.Google ScholarPubMed
Wedmann, S., Bradler, S., and Rust, J. 2007. The first fossil leaf insect: 47 million years of specialized cryptic morphology and behaviour. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104:565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wighton, D. C. and Wilson, M. V. H. 1986. The Gomphaeschninae (Odonata: Aeshnidae): New fossil genus, reconstructed phylogeny, and geographical history. Systematic Entomology, 11:505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E., and Billups, K. 2001. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science, 292:686–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, W.-B. and Wilson, K. D. P. 2001. Priscagrion kiautai gen. nov., spec. nov. and P. pinheyi spec. nov., new damselflies from Southwestern China (Zygoptera: Megapodagrionidae). Odonatologica, 30(1):117–121.Google Scholar
Zink, K. and Püttmann, W. 1994. Biomarker-Analytik an ausgewählten Proben aus der Fossilfundstätte Eckfeld. Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv, Beiheft, 16:103–124.Google Scholar