Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:09:31.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new family of trepostome bryozoans from the Ordovician Simpson Group of Oklahoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Marcus M. Key Jr.
Marcus M. Key Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new family, Bimuroporidae, is proposed for a clade of Ordovician trepostome bryozoans. The family is united by several characteristics, including a zooidal ontogenetic progression from mesozooid to autozooid and an integrate wall structure. Discriminant and cladistic analyses of colonies from the Ordovician Simpson Group outcropping in the Arbuckle Mountains and Criner Hills of south-central Oklahoma permit the recognition of eight species belonging to this family. Four species assigned to the new genus Bimuropora are described: B. dubia (Loeblich), B. pollaphragmata n. sp., B. conferta (Coryell), and B. winchelli (Ulrich), as well as four species assigned to the genus Champlainopora Ross: C. chazyensis (Ross), C. ramusculus n. sp., C. pachymura (Loeblich), and C. arbucklensis n. sp.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 5 , September 1990 , pp. 700 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astrova, G. G. 1965. Morphology, evolutionary history, and systematics of Ordovician and Silurian bryozoans. Trudy Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskiy Institut, Vol. 106, 432 p.Google Scholar
Astrova, G. G. 1978. Historical development, systematics, and phylogeny of Bryozoa. Trudy Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskiy Institut, Vol. 169, 240 p.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1911. The early Paleozoic Bryozoa of the Baltic provinces. U.S. National Museum, Bulletin U.S. National Museum, Bulletin, 382 p.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S. 1960. Trepostomatous Bryozoa of the Hamilton Group of New York State. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 87 p.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Cook, P. L. 1970. Intracolony variation and the genus concept in Bryozoa. Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, p. 294–320.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., and McKinney, F. K. 1985. Soft part characters in stenolaemate taxonomy, p. 35–44. In Nielsen, C. and Larwood, G. P. (eds.), Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Bork, K. B., and Perry, T. G. 1967. Bryozoa (Ectoprocta) of Champlainian age (Middle Ordovician) from northwestern Illinois and adjacent parts of Iowa and Wisconsin. Part I. Amplexopora, Monotrypella, Hallopora, and Batostoma. Journal o. Paleontology, 41:1365–1392.Google Scholar
Brown, G. D. Jr. 1965. Trepostomatous Bryozoa from the Logana and Jessamine Limestones (Middle Ordovician) of the Kentucky Bluegrass region. Journal of Paleontology, 39:974–1006.Google Scholar
Conti, S., and Serpagli, E. 1987. Functional morphology of the caplike apparatus in autozooids of a Palaeozoic trepostome bryozoan. Lethaia, 20:1–20.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1956. Chazyan and related brachiopods. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 127:1–1245.Google Scholar
Coryell, H. N. 1921. Bryozoan faunas of the Stones River Group of central Tennessee. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Sciences, 1919:261–340.Google Scholar
Decker, C. E., and Merritt, C. A. 1931. The stratigraphy and physical characteristics of the Simpson Group. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 55, 112 p.Google Scholar
Farmer, G. T. Jr. 1974. The oldest well-preserved bryozoan fauna in the world? Oklahoma Geology Notes, 34:99–101.Google Scholar
Farmer, G. T. Jr. 1975. New bifoliate tubular bryozoan genera from the Simpson Group (Middle Ordovician), Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 67:123–138.Google Scholar
Fritz, M. A. 1957. Bryozoa (mainly Trepostomata) from the Ottawa Formation (Middle Ordovician) of the Ottawa-St. Lawrence Lowland. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 42:1–75.Google Scholar
Hendy, M. D., and Penny, D. 1982. Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary trees. Mathematical Biosciences, 59:277–290.Google Scholar
Kanygin, A. V., Obut, A. M., Volkova, K. N., and Yaroshinskaya, A. M. 1984. Phylum Bryozoa, p. 19–31. In Moskalenko, T. (ed.), Ordovician of the Siberian Platform. Paleontological Atlas. U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Siberian Division, Trudy of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Vol. 590.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr. 1942. Bryozoa from the Ordovician Bromide Formation, Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 16:413–436.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1971. Trepostomatous Ectoprocta (Bryozoa) from the Lower Chickamauga Group (Middle Ordovician), Wills Valley, Alabama. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 60:195–337.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1977. Autozooecial budding patterns in dendroid Paleozoic bryozoans. Journal of Paleontology, 51:303–329.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K., and Boardman, R. S. 1985. Zooidal biometry of Stenolaemata, p. 193–203. In Nielsen, C. and Larwood, G. P. (eds.), Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Merida, J. E., and Boardman, R. S. 1967. The use of Paleozoic Bryozoa from well cuttings. Journal of Paleontology, 41:763–765.Google Scholar
Perry, T. G. 1962. Sprechts Ferry (Middle Ordovician) bryozoan fauna from Illinois, Wisconsin, and Iowa. Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 326, 36 p.Google Scholar
Ropot, B. F., and Pushkin, B. I. 1987. Ordovician of White Russia. Minsk, Nauka i Tekhnika, 234 p.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. P. 1963. Chazyan (Ordovician) leptotrypellid and atactotoechid bryozoa. Palaeontology, 5:727–739.Google Scholar
Ross, J. P. 1964. Morphology and phylogeny of early Ectoprocta (Bryozoa). Geological Society of America Bulletin, 75:927–948.Google Scholar
Ross, J. P. 1967. Champlainian Ectoprocta (Bryozoa), New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 41:632–648.Google Scholar
Ross, J. P. 1969. Champlainian (Ordovician) Ectoprocta (Bryozoa), New York State, Part II. Journal of Paleontology, 43:257–284.Google Scholar
Ross, J. P. 1970. Distribution, paleoecology and correlation of Champlainian Ectoprocta (Bryozoa), New York State, Part III. Journal of Paleontology, 44:346–382.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr. 1976. Ordovician sedimentation in the western United States, p. 73–105. In Bassett, M. G. (ed.), The Ordovician System. University of Wales Press, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr., et al. 1982. The Ordovician System in the United States. International Union of Geological Societies, Publication 12, 73 p.Google Scholar
Schafer, P. 1985. Significance of soft part morphology in the classification of recent tubuliporid cyclostomes, p. 273–284. In Nielsen, C. and Larwood, G. P. (eds.), Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1982. Echinoderm faunas from the Bromide Formation (Middle Ordovician) of Oklahoma. University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions, Monograph 1, University of Kansas Paleontological Institute, Lawrence, 369 p.Google Scholar
SPSS, Inc. 1988. SPSS/PC+, Version 2.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1985. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 2.4. David L. Swofford, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 1986. CONTREE: Consensus Tree Program, Version 1/3/86. David L. Swofford, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1882. American Paleozoic Bryozoa. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 5:121–175.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1886. Report on the Lower Silurian Bryozoa with preliminary descriptions of some of the new species. Geological and Natural History Survey of Minnesota, Annual report, 14:58–103.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1893. The Bryozoa of the Lower Silurian in Minnesota. Geological and Natural History Survey of Minnesota, Final report, 3:96–332.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. E. 1921. The range of certain Lower Ordovician faunas of the Ottawa Valley with descriptions of some new species. Canada Geological Survey Bulletin, 33:19–57.Google Scholar
Winston, J. E. 1981. Feeding behavior of modern bryozoans, p. 1–21. In Broadhead, T. W. (ed.), Lophophorates, Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennessee, Department of Geological Sciences, Studies in Geology, No. 5.Google Scholar