Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:51:57.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle and Late Miocene Cricetidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) from Denizli Basin (Southwestern Turkey) and a New Species of Megacricetodon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Hüseyin Erten ,
Sevket Sen  and
Muhittin Görmüş
Hüseyin Erten
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Egineering, Pamukkale University, 20017 Kınıklı-Denizli, Turkey,
Sevket Sen
Affiliation:
UMR 5143 du CNRS: Paléobiodiversité et Paléoenvironnements, Département d'Histoire de la Tere, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 8 rue Buffon, 75005, Paris France
Muhittin Görmüş
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Engineering, Ankara University 06100 Beşevler, Ankara, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The occurrences of Cricetidae and the description of a new species, Megacricetodon yenicekentensis new species from the Denizli terrestrial Neogene Basin are considered herein. The Miocene sediments of the area mainly include terrestrial siliciclastic sediments and have a significant mammal fauna. Fieldwork was carried out in the six localities in the basin and the following rodents were identified: Cricetodon candirensis, Cricetulodon hartenbergeri, Megacricetodon minor and Megacricetodon yenicekentensis n. sp. This is the first study of rodent faunas from the Denizli Basin, which is still poorly documented. This study contributes to a better understanding of the stratigraphic and geological features of the Denizli Basin, which is one of the grabens formed within the Neotectonic period of Western Anatolia and has a significant role in explaining the tectonic evolution of the region. Its sedimentary units are, in stratigraphic order, the Kızılburun, Sazak, Kolankaya and Ulubey formations. Based on the systematics and biochronological implications of cricetids and the bulk faunas from six localities, the time range of these formations is discussed, and an age between the early middle Miocene (MN 6) and late Miocene (MN 10) is proposed for this stratigraphic succession. In addition, the dating of the Ulubey Formation, which is observed both in the Denizli and Uşak-Selendi basins, provides new data about the time of connection between these two basins.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 504 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alçiçek, H., Varol, B., and Özkul, M. 2007. Sedimentary facies, depositional environments and palaeogeographic evolution of the Neogene Denizli Basin, SW Anatolia, Turkey, Sedimentary Geology, 202:596–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alçiçek, H. 2010. Stratigraphic correlation of the Neogene basins in southwestern Anatolia: regional palaeogeographical, palaeoclimatic and tectonic implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 291:297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez, M. A. and García, E. 1986. New Gliridae and Cricetidae from the middle and upper Miocene of the Duero Basin, Spain. Stvdia Geologica Salmanticensia, 22:145–189.Google Scholar
Álvarez Sierra, M. A., García Paredes, I., van den Hoek Ostende, L., van der Meulen, A. J., Peláez-Campomanes, P., and Sevilla, P. 2006. The middle Aragonian (middle Miocene) micromammals from La Retama (Intermediate Depression, Tagus Basin) Province of Cuenca, Spain. Estudios Geológicos, 62:401–428.Google Scholar
Argyropulo, A. I. 1938. On the fauna of Tertiary Cricetinae of the USSR. Doklady Akademia NAUK SSSR, Moskva, 20:226–233.Google Scholar
Baudelot, S. 1972. Etude des chiroptères, insectivores et rongeurs du Miocène de Sansan (Gers). Thesis University Toulouse, 496:1–364.Google Scholar
Bowditch, T. E. 1821.An Analysis of the Natural Classifications of Mammalia for the Use of Students and Travelers. J. Smith, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Bozkurt, E. 2003. Origin of NE-trending basins in western Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 16:61–81.Google Scholar
Daams, R. 1981. The dental pattern of the dormice Dryomys, Myomimus, Microdyromys and Peridyromys . Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin, Special Publication 3, p. 1–115.Google Scholar
Daams, R. and Freudenthal, M. 1988. Megacricetodon (Cricetidae) from the Aragonian and lower Vallesian of the Calatayud Teruel Basin, p. 39–132. In Freudenthal, M. (ed.), Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of the Neogene Micromammalian Faunas from the Calatayud−Teruel Basin (Spain). Scripta Geologica, Special Issue 1.Google Scholar
de Bruijn, H., Daams, R., Daxner-Höck, G., Fahlbuch, V., Ginsburg, L., Mein, P., and Morales, J. 1992 . Report of the RCMNS working group on fossil mammals, Reisensburg 1990. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 26:65–118.Google Scholar
de Bruijn, H., Fahlbusch, V., Saraç, G., and Ünay, E. 1993. Early Miocene rodent faunas from the Eastern Mediterranean area. Part III. The genera Deperetomys and Cricetodon with a dicussion of the evolutionary history of the Cricetodontini. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen B, 96:151–216.Google Scholar
de Bruijn, H., Saraç, G., van den Hoek Ostende, L. W., and Roussiakis, S. 1999. The status of the genus Parapodemus Schaub, 1938: new data bearing on an old controversy. Deinsea, 7:95–112.Google Scholar
de Bruijn, H., van den Hoek Ostende, L., Kristkoiz-Boon, E., Rummel, M., Theocharopoulos, C., and Ünay, E. 2003. Rodents, lagomorphs and insectivores from the middle Miocene hominoid locality of Çandir 2 (Turkey), p. 51–87. In Güleç, E., Begun, D. R., and Geraads, D. (eds.), Geology and Vertebrate Paleontology of the middle Miocene Hominoid Locality of Çandir. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 240.Google Scholar
Ercan, E., Dinçel, A., Metin, S., Türkecan, A., and Günay, A. 1978. Uşak yöresindeki Neojen havzalarının jeolojisi (Geology of the Neogene basins in Uşak region). Bulletin of the Geological Society of Turkey, 21:97–106.Google Scholar
Erten, H., Sen, S., and Özkul, M. 2005, Pleistocene mammals from travertine deposits of the Denizli Basin (SW Turkey). Annales de Paléontologie, 91:267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahlbusch, V. 1964. Die Cricetiden (Mamm.) der Oberen Süßwasser-Molasse Bayerns. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften; mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. Abhandlungen, neue Folge, 118:1–136.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, M. 1963. Entwicklungsstufen der miozänen Cricetodontinae (Mam. Rod.), Mittelspaniens und ihre Stratigraphische Bedeutung. Beaufortia, 10:51–157.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, M. 1967. On the mammalian fauna of the Hipparion Beds in the Calatayud-Teruel Basin (Prov. Zaragoza, Spain). Part II: Democricetodon and Rotundomys (Rodentia). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, B, 70:298–315.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, M. 1968. On the mammalian fauna of the Hipparion beds in the Calatayud−Teruel Basin. Part IV: The genus Megacricetodon (Rodentia). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, B, 71:57–72.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, M., Mein, P., and Martín Suárez, E. 1998. Revision of late Miocene and Pliocene Cricetinae from Spain and France. Treballs del Museu de Geologia de Barcelona, 7:11–93.Google Scholar
Hartenberger, J. L. 1965. Les Cricetidae (Rodentia) de Can Llobateres (Néogène d'Espagne). Bulletin de la Societe géologique de France, 7:487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartenberger, J. L. 1966. Les Rongeurs du Vallesien (Miocene superieur) de Can Llobateres (Sabadell, Espagne): Gliridae et Eomyidae. Bulletin de la Societe géologique de France, 8:596–604.Google Scholar
Hofmeijer, G. K. and de Bruijn, H. 1988. The mammals from the lower Miocene of Aliveri (Island of Evia Greece). Part 8: The Cricetidae, Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, B, 91:185–204.Google Scholar
Illiger, C. 1811.Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium additis terminis zoographicis utriusque classis. C. Salfeld, Berlin, 301 p.Google Scholar
Kalin, D. and Engesser, B. 2001. Die jungmiozäne Säugetierfauna vom Nebelbergweg bei Nunningen (Kanton Solothurn, Schweiz). Schweizerische Paläontologische Abhandlungen, 121:1–61.Google Scholar
Kaya, T., Tuna, V., and Geraads, D. 2001. A new late Orleanian/early Astaracian mammalian fauna from Kultak (Milas-Muğla), southwestern Turkey. Geobios, 34:673–680.Google Scholar
Kaymakçı, N. 2006. Kinematic development and paleostress analysis of the Denizli Basin (Western Turkish): implications of spatial varition of relative paleostress magnitudes and orientations. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 27:207–222.Google Scholar
Kordos, L. 1986 . Upper Miocene hamsters (Cricetidae, Mammalia) of Haznos and Szentendre. Magyar Allami Földtani Intézet Jelentése Az, 1984:523–553.Google Scholar
Lartet, E. 1851.Notice sur la colline de Sansan. Portes, Auch, p. 1–47.Google Scholar
Mein, P. 1958. Les Mammifères de la Faunne Sidèrolithique de Viedux-Collonges. Nouvelles Archives du Museum d'histoire naturelles Lyon V, p. 1–35.Google Scholar
Mein, P. and Freudenthal, M. 1971. Les Cricetidae (Mammalia, Rodentia) du Neogéne Moyen de Vieux-Collonges. Part. 1: Le genre Cricetodon LARTET, 1851. Scripta Geology, 5:1–51.Google Scholar
Mein, P. 1990. Updating of MN Zones, p. 73–90. In Lindsay, E. H., Fahlbusch, V., and Mein, P. (eds.), European Neogene Mammal Chronology. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebert, K. 1958. Denizli Pliyosen teressübatı ve bunların Batı Anadolu tatlı su Neojen stratigrafisi için ehemmiyeti. MTA Dergisi, 51:7–20.Google Scholar
Peláez-Campomanes, P. and Daams, R. 2002. Middle Miocene rodents from Paşalar, Anatolia, Turkey. Acta Paleontolonica Polonica, 47:125–132.Google Scholar
Pickford, M., Gabunia, L., Mein, P., Morales, J., and Azanza, B. 2000. The middle Miocene mammalian site of Belometchetskaya, North Caucasus: an important biostratigraphic link between Europe and China. Geobios, 33:257–267.Google Scholar
Rochebrune, A. T. 1883. Faune de la Sénégambie. Mammifères. Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux 37:49–203.Google Scholar
Rummel, M. 1998. Die Cricetiden aus de Mittel- und Obermiozän der Türkei. Documenta naturae, 123:1–300.Google Scholar
Rummel, M. 1999. Tribe Cricetodontini, p. 359–364. In Rössner, G. E. and Heissig, K. (eds.), The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe. Verlag, Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München.Google Scholar
Saraç, G. 2003. Türkiye omurgalı fosil yatakları. MTA Rapor no: 10609, Ankara, 218.Google Scholar
Sarica-Filoreau, N. 2002. Faunes de rongeurs néogènes et quaternaires des grabens d'Anatolie occidentale. Systématique, biochronologie et implications tectoniques. Ph.D. thesis, Muséum Nationald'Histoire Naturelle Paris, p. 1–345.Google Scholar
Schaub, S. 1925. Die hamsterartigen Nagetiere des Tertiärs und ihre lebenden Verwandten. Abhandlungen der Schweizerischen Paläontologischen Gesellschaft, 45:1–114.Google Scholar
Sen, S. 1991. Stratigraphie, faunes de mammifères et magnétostratigraphie du Néogène de Sinap Tepe, Province d'Ankara, Turquie. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire naturelle, 12 (3/4):243–277.Google Scholar
Sen, S., Seyitoğlu, G., Karadenizli, L., Kazancı, N., Varol, B., and Araz, H. 1998. Mammalian biochronology of Neogene deposits and its correlation with the lithostratigraphy in the Çankırı-Çorum Basin, central Anatolia, Turkey. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 91:307–320.Google Scholar
Sen, S. 2003. Muridae and Gerbillidae (Rodentia), p. 125–140. In Fortelius, M., Kappelman, J., Sen, S., and Bernor, R. L. (eds.), Geology and Paleontology of the Miocene Sinap Formation, Turkey. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sickenberg, O. 1975. Eine Säugetierfauna des Tieferen Bihariums aus dem Becken von Megalopolis (Peloponnes, Griechenland). Annales géologiques des Pays helléniques, 27:25–73.Google Scholar
Şimşek, Ş. 1984. Denizli-Kızıldere-Tekkehamam-Tosunlar-Buldan- Yenice alanının jeolojisi ve jeotermal enerji olanakları. Mineral Res. Expl. Direct. Turkey (MTA), Scientific Report, No: 7846, p. 85. Ankara, Turkey. (In Turkish) Google Scholar
Seyitoğlu, G., Alçiçek, M. C., Işik, V., Alçiçek, H., Mayda, S., Varol, B., Yılmaz, I. and Esat, K. 2009. The stratigraphical position of Kemiklitepe fossil locality (Eşme, Uşak) revised: implications for the late Cenozoic sedimentary basin development and extensional tectonics in western Turkey. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palaeontologie, 251:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, S. 1990. Denizli-Uşak Arasının Jeolojisi ve Linyit Olanakları. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA), Ankara, Scientific Report No: 9985, 92 p., (unpublished).Google Scholar
Taner, G. 1974 a. Denizli bölgesi Neojen'inin paleontolojik ve stratigrafik etüdü. Bulletin of the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA), 82:89–126.Google Scholar
Taner, G. 1974 b. Denizli bölgesi Neojen'inin paleontolojik ve stratigrafik etüdü. Bulletin of the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA), 83:145–177.Google Scholar
Taner, G. 1975. Denizli bölgesi Neojen'inin paleontolojik ve stratigrafik etüdü. Bulletin of the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA), 85:45–66.Google Scholar
Tobien, H. 1978. New species of Cricetodontini (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the Miocene of Turkey. Mainzer Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, 6:209–219.Google Scholar
Topachevskiy, V. A. and Scorik, A. F. 1992. Neogene and Pleistocene primitive Cricetidae of the south of Eastern Europe. Naukova dumka, Kiev, 242 p. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Ünay, E. 1981. Middle and upper Miocene Rodents from the Bayraktepe section (Çanakkale, Turkey). Koninklijke Nederlands Akademie Wetenschappen Amsterdam, B, 84:217–238.Google Scholar
Ünay, E. 1990. Turkomys pasalarensis Tobien, its range of variation in the type locality at Paşalar, Turkey. Journal of Human Evolution, 19:437–443.Google Scholar
Ünay, E., de. Bruijn, H., and Saraç, G. 2003. A preliminary zonation of the continental Neogene of Anatolia based on rodents. Deinsea, 10:539–547.Google Scholar
Wessels, W., Ünay, E., and Tobien, H. 1987. Correlation on some Miocene faunas from Northern Africa, Turkey and Pakistan by means of Myocricetodontidae. Koninklijke Nederlands Akademie Wetenschappen Amsterdam, B, 90:65–82.Google Scholar
Wessels, W. 1996. Myocricetodontinae from the Miocene of Pakistan. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlands Akademie Wetenschappen Amsterdam, B, 99:253–312.Google Scholar
Westaway, R., Guillou, H., Yurtmen, S., Demir, T., Scaillet, S., and Rowbotham, G. 2005. Constraints on the timing and regional conditions at the start of the present phase of crustal extension in western Turkey, from observations in and around the Denizli region. Geodinamica Acta, 18 (3–4):209–238.Google Scholar
Wüst, E. J. 1901. Untersuchungen ülber das Pliozan und das altaste Pleistozan Thtiringens. Abhandlungen der naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Halle, 23:17–352.Google Scholar