Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:09:23.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micropaleontology across the Precambrian—Cambrian boundary in Spitsbergen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Andrew H. Knoll  and
Keene Swett
Andrew H. Knoll
Affiliation:
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Keene Swett
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paleobiological studies of early metazoan evolution are critically dependent on the accurate stratigraphic subdivision and correlation of uppermost Proterozoic and Lower Cambrian sequences. Planktonic microfossils evolved rapidly during this period and are widely distributed and abundant in Vendian and Lower Cambrian rocks; therefore, they provide what is potentially one of the best means of correlating successions of this age. In Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, tillite-bearing detrital rocks of the uppermost Proterozoic Polarisbreen Group are overlain without apparent unconformity by the Tokammane Formation, a tripartite lithologic sequence consisting of quartzarenites (Blårevbreen Member) overlain by dark shales with subordinate sandstone (Topiggane Member) and dolomites (Ditlovtoppen Member). Salterella, hyoliths, and other invertebrate remains occur in the upper part of the Tokammane succession; trace fossils are found in the Tokammane quartzarenites and shales, as well as in the uppermost few meters of the Polarisbreen sequence. Planktonic microfossils occur throughout the succession. They indicate that the Polarisbreen Group is Vendian in age and that a hiatus corresponding in time to the latest Vendian and (perhaps) earliest Cambrian coincides with the Polarisbreen/Tokammane boundary. Lower Topiggane shale samples contain acritarchs comparable to those found in the sub-Holmia Lontova Beds of Eastern Europe. Upper Topiggane samples contain diverse acritarch assemblages that indicate a late Holmia or Protolenus age, suggesting the presence of a second hiatus within the Tokammane Formation. Planktonic microfossils allow biostratigraphic correlation with other sequences both within (East Greenland) and between (East European Platform) paleocontinents. Like those from other areas, diversity trends exhibited by late Proterozoic and Early Cambrian acritarchs from Spitsbergen indicate a major Vendian episode of extinction followed by Early Cambrian rediversification of planktonic microfossils.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 61 , Issue 5 , September 1987 , pp. 898 - 926
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpert, S. 1977. Trace fossils and the basal Cambrian boundary, p. 1–8. In Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J. C. (eds.), Trace Fossils 2. Geological Journal Special Issue 9, Seel House Press, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Banks, N. L. 1970. Trace fossils from the late Precambrian and Lower Cambrian of Finnmark, Norway, p. 19–34. In Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J. C. (eds.), Trace Fossils. Geological Journal Special Issue 3, Seel House Press, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1982. Sea-level changes, facies changes and the late Precambrian-Early Cambrian evolutionary explosion. Precambrian Research, 17:105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito, I. M. 1967. Silurian and Devonian Acritarcha from Maranhão Basin, Brazil. Micropaleontology, 13:473–482.Google Scholar
Chauvel, J. J., and Mansuy, C. 1981. Micro-paléontologie du Protérozoique du massif Armoricain (France). Precambrian Research, 15:25–42.Google Scholar
Chauvel, J. J., and Mansuy, C., and Schopf, J. W. 1978. Late Precambrian microfossils from Brioverian cherts and limestones of Brittany and Normandy, France. Nature, 275:640–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimes, T. P., et al. 1977. ?Late Precambrian-Lower Cambrian trace fossils from Spain, p. 91–138. In Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J. C. (eds.), Trace Fossils 2. Geological Journal Special Issue 9, Seel House Press, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Crimes, T. P., et al., and Germs, G. J. B. 1982. Trace fossils from the Nama Group (Precambrian-Cambrian) of Southwest Africa (Namibia). Journal of Paleontology, 56:890–907.Google Scholar
Daily, B. 1972. The base of the Cambrian and the first Cambrian faunas. Centre for Precambrian Research Special Paper 1:13–42.Google Scholar
Damassa, S. P., and Knoll, A. H. 1986. Micropaleontology of the late Proterozoic Arcoona Quartzite Member of the Tent Hill Formation, Stuart Shelf, South Australia. Alcheringa, 10:417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species, 1st ed. J. Murray, London, 490 p.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G. 1937. Microfossiles des silex Crétacés. Deuxième partie. Flagellés incertae sedis Hystrichosphaeridés sarcodinés. Organisme Divers. Annales de Paléontologie, 26:51–103.Google Scholar
Dorning, K. J. 1981. Silurian acritarch distribution in the Ludlovian shelf sea of South Wales and the Welsh Borderland, p. 31–36. In Neale, R. and Brasier, M. (eds.), Microfossils from Recent and Fossil Shelf Seas. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Downie, C. 1963. ‘Hystrichospheres’ (Acritarchs) and spores of the Wenlock Shales (Silurian) of Wenlock, England. Palaeontology, 6:625–652.Google Scholar
Downie, C. 1974. Acritarchs from near the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology, 18:57–60.Google Scholar
Downie, C. 1982. Lower Cambrian acritarchs from Scotland, Norway, Greenland, and Canada. Transactions, Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 72:257–285.Google Scholar
Downie, C., and Sarjeant, W. A. S. 1963. On the interpretation and status of some hystrichosphere genera. Palaeontology, 6:83–96.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1958. Microplankton aus dem nord deutschen Apt nebst einigen Bemerkungen über fossile Dinoflagellaten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 106:383–422.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1959. Neotypen baltischer Silur-Hystrichospháren und neue Arten. Paleontographica, Abteilung A, 112:193–211.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1969. Zur Systematile einiger paläozoischer Hystrichosphären (Acritarcha) des baltischen Gebietes. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 133:245–266.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A. 1972. Kritische Bemerkung zur Gattung Pterospermopsis (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paláontologie, 10:596–601.Google Scholar
Fairchild, I. J., and Hambrey, M. J. 1984. The Vendian succession of northeastern Spitsbergen: petrogenesis of a dolomite-tillite association. Precambrian Research, 26:111–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedonkin, M. A. 1977. Precambrian-Cambrian ichnocoenoses of the east European platform, p. 183–194. In Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J. C. (eds.), Trace Fossils 2. Geological Journal Special Issue 9, Seel House Press, London.Google Scholar
Fombella, M. A. 1977. Acritarcos de edad Cámbrico medio inferior de la provincia de León, España. Revista Española Micropaleontologia, 9:115–124.Google Scholar
Fombella, M. A. 1978. Acritarcos de la Formación Oville, edad Cámbrico Medio-Tremadociense, Provincia de León, España. Palinologia Revista Institute de Palinologico, León, Numero Extra 1:245–261.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Bruton, D. L. 1973. Cambrian-Ordovician rocks adjacent to Hinlopenstretet, North Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 84:2227–2242.Google Scholar
Fridrichsone, A. I. 1971. The acritarch Baltisphaeridium and hystrichospheres(?) from the Cambrian beds of Latvia (in Russian). Paleont. Strat. Prebaltiki I Bielorussii, 3:5–22.Google Scholar
Gardiner, P. R. R., and Vanguestaine, M. 1971. Cambrian and Ordovician microfossils from south-east Ireland and their implications. Geological Survey Ireland, Bulletin 1:163–210.Google Scholar
Germs, G., Knoll, A. H., and Vidal, G. 1986. Latest Proterozoic microfossils from the Nama Group, South West Africa. Precambrian Research, 32:45–62.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1984. The Dawn of Animal Life: A Biohistorical Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 244 p.Google Scholar
Gobbett, D. G., and Wilson, C. B. 1960. The Oslobreen Series, Upper Hecla Hoek of Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Geological Magazine, 97:441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A. 1958. A Cambro-Ordovician fauna from the Hecla Hoek succession of Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Geological Magazine, 95:71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrey, M. J. 1982. Late Precambrian diamicites of northeastern Svalbard. Geological Magazine, 119:527–551.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B. 1959. The Caledonian sequence in Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 114:307–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B., and Wilson, C. B. 1956. The Hecla Hoek succession in Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Geological Magazine, 93:265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S. R. 1979. Acritarchs as paleoenvironmental indicators in middle and upper Ordovician rocks from Kentucky, Ohio, and New York. Journal of Paleontology, 53:1197–1212.Google Scholar
Jankauskas, T. V. 1975. Novye akritarkhi nizhnego kembria Pribaltiki. Paleontol. ogicheskii Zhurnal, 1:94–104.Google Scholar
Jankauskas, T. V. 1976. New acritarchs from the Lower Cambrian of the Baltic Region, p. 187–192. In Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Lower and Middle Cambrian of U.S.S.R. Akademia Nauk SSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Trudy, Publ. 296 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Jankauskas, T. V., and Posti, E. 1973. Micropalaeontological characteristics of the stratotype sections of the Estonian Lower Cambrian. Izvestia Akademii Nauk Estonskoi SSR Kimia Geologia, 22(2):143–148 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Jankauskas, T. V., and Posti, E., 1976. Novye vidy akritarkh kembria Pribaltiki. Izvestia Akademii Nauk Estonskoi SSR Kimia Geologia, 25(2):145–151.Google Scholar
Kirjanov, V. V. 1974. New acritarchs from the Volynian Cambrian. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 2:117–129 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kjellstrom, G. 1971. Ordovician microplankton (baltisphaerids) from the Grotlingbo Borehole No. 1, Gotland, Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Undersoekning, Series C, 65:1–75.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H. 1982. Microfossil based biostratigraphy of the Precambrian Hecla Hoek sequence of Nordaustlandet, Svalbard. Geological Magazine, 119:269–279.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H. 1983. Microbiotas of the late Precambrian Hunnberg Formation, Nordaustlandet, Svalbard. Journal of Paleontology, 58:131–162.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H., Blick, N., and Awramik, S. M. 1981. Stratigraphic and ecological implications of late Precambrian microfossils from Utah. American Journal of Science, 281:247–263.Google Scholar
Knoll, A. H., and Swett, K. 1985. Micropalaeontology of the late Proterozoic Veteranen Group, Spitsbergen. Palaeontology, 28:451–473.Google Scholar
Korkutis, V. 1981. Late Precambrian and Early Cambrian in the East European Platform. Precambrian Research, 15:75–94.Google Scholar
Lauritzen, Ø., and Yochelson, E. L. 1982. Salterella rugosa (Early Cambrian: Agmata) on Nordaustlandet and Spitsbergen, Svalbard. Polar Research, 1:5–10.Google Scholar
Lindgren, S. 1981. Remarks on the taxonomy, botanical affinities, and distribution of leiospheres. Stockholm Contributions in Geology, 38(1):1–20.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, H. A., and Margulis, L. 1980. Evolutionary prerequisites for early Phanerozoic calcareous skeletons. BioSystems, 12:27–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansuy, C., and Vidal, G. 1983. Late Proterozoic Brioverian microfossils from France: taxonomic affinity and implications of plankton productivity. Nature, 302:606–607.Google Scholar
Missarzhevskii, V. V. 1969. Description of hyolithids, gastropods, hyolithelminths, camenides and forms of an obscure taxonomic position, p. 127–204. In Raaben, M. E. (ed.), The Tommotian Stage and the Cambrian Lower Boundary Problem. Nauka, Moscow (translated from Russian).Google Scholar
Moczydlowska, M. 1980. Acritarcha z osadów kambria wiercenia Okuniew IG1. Kwartalnik Geologiczny, 24(3):461–487.Google Scholar
Moczydlowska, M. 1981. Lower and Middle Cambrian acritarchs from northeastern Poland. Precambrian Research, 15:63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moczydlowska, M., and Vidal, G. 1987. Acritarch-based alternative zonation of the Lower Cambrian around the southern border of the Fennoscandian Shield and the Lublin Slope of the East European Platform in Poland. Geologiska Foreningens i Stockholm Forhandlinger (in press).Google Scholar
Moorman, M. 1974. Microbiota of the late Proterozoic Hector Formation, southwestern Alberta, Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 48:524–539.Google Scholar
Muir, M. D., and Sarjeant, W. A. S. 1971. An annotated bibliography of the Tasmanaceae and of related living forms (Algae: Prasinophyceae), p. 51–117. In Jardiné, S. (ed.), C.I.M.P. Microfossiles organiques du Paléozoic, 3, Les Acritarches. Editions du Centre national de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar
Naumova, S. N. 1960. Spore-pollen assemblages in the Riphean and Lower Cambrian deposits of USSR. Geologists. Topic 21st International Geological Congress. Reports of Soviet Scientist, 8:109–117 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Newton, E. T. 1875. On “Tasmanite” and Australian “White Coal.” Geological Magazine, Series 2, 2:337–342.Google Scholar
Pyatiletov, V. G. 1980. The Yudomian assemblage of microfossils of South Yakutia. Geologia i Geofizika, 21(7):8–20.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu., 1979. Volborthella, p. 111–113. In Urbanek, A. and Rozanov, A. Y. (eds.), Upper Precambrian and Cambrian Palaeontology of the East-European Platform. Wydaw-nictwa Geologiczne, Warszawa.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B. 1982. The Cambrian explosion: animals or fossils? Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 29:395–411.Google Scholar
Schepeleva, E. D., and Timofeev, B. V. 1963. Micropaleophytology of the Pachelma Series and its stratigraphic equivalents. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSR, 153(5):1158–1159 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Schopf, J. W. 1968. Microflora of the Bitter Springs Formation, late Precambrian, central Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 42:651–688.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. 1979. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria. Paleobiology, 5:222–251.Google Scholar
Smith, D. G. 1971. Lower Cambrian palynomorphs from Howth, Co. Dublin. Geological Journal, 12:159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1976. Fossil data and the Precambrian-Cambrian evolutionary transition. American Journal of Science, 276:56–76.Google Scholar
Staplin, F. L., Jansonius, J., and Pocock, S. A. J. 1965. Evaluation of some acritarchous hystrichosphere genera. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 123:167–201.Google Scholar
Swett, K. 1981. Cambro-Ordovician strata in Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, and their paleotectonic significance. Geological Magazine, 118:225–250.Google Scholar
Tappan, H. 1980. The Paleobiology of Plant Protists. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1,028 p.Google Scholar
Timofeev, B. V. 1959. Ancient flora of the Baltic area and its stratigraphic significance. Trudy Institute for All-Union Scientific Investigation of Prospects for Petroleum No. 129, 320 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Timofeev, B. V. 1966. Mikropaleontologicheskie issledovania drevnikh svit. Nauka, Moscow and Lenningrad.Google Scholar
Timofeev, B. V. 1969. Proterozoic Sphaeromorphida. Academy of Sciences USSR Institute for Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Nauka, Leningrad. 146 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Tynni, R. 1978. Lower Cambrian fossils and acritarchs in the sedimentary rocks of Söderfjarden, Western Finland. Geological Survey of Finland Bulletin, 297:41–81.Google Scholar
Vanguestaine, M. 1974. Espèces zonales d'Acritarches du Cambro-Trémadocien de Belgique et de l'Ardenne française. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology, 18:63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanguestaine, M. 1978. Critères palynostratigraphiques conduisant à la reconnaissance d'un pli couché revinien dans le sondage de Grand-Halleux. Annates de la Sociétè Géologique de Belgique, 100:249–276.Google Scholar
Vidal, G. 1974. Late Precambrian microfossils from the basal sandstone unit of the Visingsö Beds, south Sweden. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 8:1–14.Google Scholar
Vidal, G. 1976. Late Precambrian microfossils from the Visingsö Beds in southern Sweden. Fossils and Strata, 9:1–56.Google Scholar
Vidal, G. 1979. Acritarchs from the upper Proterozoic and Lower Cambrian of East Greenland. Gr⊘nlands Geologiske Unders⊘gelse Bulletin 134, 55 p.Google Scholar
Vidal, G. 1981a. Lower Cambrian acritarch stratigraphy in Scandinavia. Geologiska Föreningen i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 103:183–192.Google Scholar
Vidal, G. 1981b. Micropalaeontology and biostratigraphy of the upper Proterozoic and Lower Cambrian sequence in East Finnmark, northern Norway. Norges geologiske Unders⊘kelse, Bulletin 59, 53 p.Google Scholar
Vidal, G., and Knoll, A. H. 1982. Radiations and extinctions of plankton in the late Proterozoic and Early Cambrian. Nature, 297:57–60.Google Scholar
Vidal, G., and Knoll, A. H., and Knoll, A. H. 1983. Proterozoic plankton. Geological Society of America Memoir, 163:265–277.Google Scholar
Volkova, N. A. 1964. Fitoplankton drevneishikh otlozhenii Severo-Zapadnogo Podmoskovya i ego znachenie dla stratigrafii. Isvestia Akademii Nauk SSSR, Izv. AN SSSR, Geologia, 4:74–84.Google Scholar
Volkova, N. A. 1968. Acritarchs of the Precambrian and Lower Cambrian deposits of Estonia, p. 8–36. In Volkova, N. A. et al. (eds.), Problematics of Riphean and Cambrian layers of the Russian Platform, Urals, and Kazkhstan. Transactions Academy of Sciences USSR 188, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Volkova, N. A. 1969. Acritarchs of the north-west Russian Platform, p. 224–236. In Rozanov, A. Yu. et al. (eds.), Tommotian Stage and the Cambrian Lower Boundary Problem. Transactions Academy of Sciences USSR 206, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Volkova, N. A. 1971. Lower Cambrian “hystrichosphaerids.” Geological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, Journal of Palynology, 7:26–29.Google Scholar
Volkova, N. A., et al. 1979. Upper Precambrian and Cambrian Paleontology of East European Platform Geological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. Moscow, Nauka, 210 p. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Waterbury, J. B., and Stanier, R. Y. 1978. Patterns of growth and development in pleurocapsalean cyanobacteria. Microbiological Reviews, 42:2–44.Google Scholar
Wazyńsky, J. 1967. Preliminary microfloristic examinations of the Sinian and Cambrian deposits from the Biolowicza area. Kwartalnik Geologiczny, 11:10–20 (in Polish).Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1931. Diplocraterion, Monocraterion, and Scolithus from the Lower Cambrian of Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Under-soeking, 25:1–25.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. B., and Harland, W. B. 1964. The Polarisbreen Series and other evidences of late Pre-Cambrian ice ages in Spitsbergen. Geological Magazine, 101:198–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1977. Agmata, a proposed extinct phylum of Early Cambrian age. Journal of Paleontology, 51:437–454.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1981. A survey of Salterella (Phylum Agmata). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 81– 743:244–248.Google Scholar