No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Lower Mississippian trilobites from southern New Mexico
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Abstract
Twenty-three species of trilobites are recognized in the lower Mississippian Caballero and Lake Valley Formations of southern New Mexico. Species exhibit a segregation into shelf and off-shelf faunas, and can be subdivided into three distinct stratigraphic faunas. Species found in the Caballero Formation are similar to those found in the Chouteau Formation of Missouri. A second fauna, comprising species found in the Alamogordo, Nunn, and Tierra Blanca Members of the Lake Valley Formation, is correlated with the Fern Glen and Burlington Formations of Missouri. The third fauna found in the Arcente and Dona Ana Members of the Lake Valley Formation is correlated with the Warsaw and Salem Formations of the United States midcontinent region.
Named species from the Kinderhookian Caballero Formation include: Dixiphopyge armata (Vogdes, 1891), Comptonaspis swallowi (Shumard, 1855), Brachymetopus indianwellsensis new species, Ameropiltonia perplexa new species, Griffithidella caballeroensis new species, and Kollarcephalus granatai new genus and new species. Named species from the Lake Valley Formation include: Pudoproetus fernglenensis (Weller, 1909), Breviphillipsia semiteretis Hessler, 1963, Griffithidella doris (Hall 1860), Phillibole planucauda (Brezinski, 1998), Piltonia carlakertisae new species, Australosutura llanoensis Brezinski, 1998, Thigriffides triangulatus new species, Thigriffides? alamogordoensis new species, Namuropyge newmexicoensis new species, Nunnaspis stitti new genus and new species, Hesslerides arcentensis new genus and new species, as well as an unnamed species of Proetides Hessler, 1962, Namuropyge Brezinski, 1988, and Thigriffides Hessler, 1965.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Adrain, J. M., and Chatterton, B. D. E.
1994. The Aulacopleurid trilobite Otarion, with new species from the Silurian of northwestern Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 68:305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amos, A. J., Campbell, K. S. W., and Goldring, R.
1960.
Australosutura gen. nov. (Trilobita) from the Carboniferous of Australia and Argentina. Palaeontology, 3:227–236.Google Scholar
Angelin, N. P.
1854. Palaeontologia Scandinavica I: Crustacea Formationis Transitionalis. Fascicule, 2:21–92.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. K.
1958. The Mississippian of west-central New Mexico. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Memoir
5, 32 p.Google Scholar
Branson, E. B., and Andrews, D.
1938. Subclass Trilobita, p. 113–122. In
Branson, E. B. (ed.), Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, Part I. University of Missouri Studies
13.Google Scholar
Brezinski, D. K.
1986. Trilobite associations from the Chouteau Formation (Kinderhookian) of central Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 60:870–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezinski, D. K.
1988a. Revision and redescription of some Lower Mississippian trilobites from the Chouteau Formation (Kinderhookian) of central Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 62:103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezinski, D. K.
1988b. Trilobites of the Gilmore City Limestone (Mississippian) of Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 62:241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezinski, D. K.
1988c. Appalachian Carboniferous trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 62:934–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezinski, D. K.
1997. A note on the trilobite genus Dixiphopyge
. Annals of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 66:83–87.Google Scholar
Brezinski, D. K.
1998. Lower Mississippian trilobites from starved basin deposits of the south-central United States. Journal of Paleontology, 72:718–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezinski, D. K.
1999. The rise and fall of late Paleozoic trilobites of the United States. Journal of Paleontology, 73:164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezinski, D. K.
2000. New lower Mississippian trilobites from the Chouteau Group of Missouri: Annals of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 69:135–144.Google Scholar
Cisne, J. L.
1967. Two new trilobites of the genus Paladin
. Journal of Paleontology, 41:1267–1273.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K.
1969. Carboniferous trilobites: Utah species and evolution in North America. Journal of Paleontology, 43:41–68.Google Scholar
Collinson, C., Rexroad, C. B., and Thompson, T. L.
1971. Conodont zonation of the North American Mississippian, p. 353–394. In
Sweet, W. C. and Bergstrom, S. M. (eds.), Symposium on Conodont Biostratigraphy. Geological Society of America Special Paper 127.Google Scholar
De Keyser, T. L.
1978. The early Mississippian of the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico—an ecofacies model for carbonate shelf margin deposition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis, 304 p.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H.
1926. The macrofauna of the limestone of Boone age, p. 24–43, In
Roundy, P. V., Girty, G. H., and Goldman, M. I., Mississippian Formations of San Saba County, Texas. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 146.Google Scholar
Goldring, R.
1955. The Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous trilobites of the Pilton Beds in North Devon. Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 36:27–48.Google Scholar
Goldring, R.
1958. Lower Tournaisian trilobites in the Carboniferous limestone facies of the south-west province of Great Britain and of Belgium. Palaeontology, 1:231–244.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., and Hahn, R.
1969. Trilobitae carbonici et permici I, p. 1–160. In
Westphal, F. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus 1. Animalia. s'Gravenhage, Ysel Press, The Netherlands, 120.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., and Hahn, R.
1970. Trilobitae carbonici et permici II, p. 161–335. In
Westphal, F. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus 1. Animalia. s'-Gravenhage, Ysel Press, The Netherlands, 120.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., and Hahn, R.
1972. Trilobitae carbonici et permici III, p. 336–531. In
Westphal, F. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus 1. Animalia. s'-Gravenhage, Ysel Press, The Netherlands, 120.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., and Hahn, R.
1990. Uber Eocyphinium (Metaphillipsia) (Trilobitae; Karbon). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 70:133–145.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., and Hahn, R.
1996. Die Trilobiten-Taxa des Karbons und Perms. 2. Brachymetopidae. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 195, 242 p.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., Hahn, R., and Brauckmann, C.
1980. Über Namuropyge (Trilobita; Unter-Karbon). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 60:353–371.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., Hahn, R., and Brauckmann, C.
1983. Die trilobiten des belgischen Kohlenkalkes (Ünter-Karbon). Geologica and Palaeontologica
17:109–135.Google Scholar
Hall, J.
1860. Notes and observations upon the fossils of the Goniatite Limestone in the Marcellus Shale of the Hamilton Group, in the eastern and central parts of the State of New York, and those of the Goniatite beds of Rockford, Indiana; with some analogous forms from the Hamilton Group proper. New York State Cabinet Natural History Annual Report, 13:95–112.Google Scholar
Herrick, C. L.
1887. A sketch of the geological history of Licking County, Appendicies I and II, Carboniferous trilobites. Denison University Scientific Laboratories Bulletin, 2:51–70.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R.
1962a. The lower Mississippian genus Proetides (Tril.). Journal of Paleontology, 36:811–816.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R.
1962b. Secondary segmentation in the thorax if trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 36:1305–1312.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R.
1963. Lower Mississippian trilobites of the family Proetidae in the United States, Part 1. Journal of Paleontology, 37:543–563.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R.
1965. Lower Mississippian trilobites of the family Proetidae in the United States, Part 2. Journal of Paleontology, 39:248–265.Google Scholar
Kues, B. S.
1986. Paleontology of the Caballero and the Lake Valley Formations (Lower Mississippian) west the Rio Grande, south-central New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook to the 37th Field Conference, p. 203–214.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R.
1974. Mississippian of southeastern New Mexico and west Texas-a wedge-on-wedge relation. Bulletin of American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 58:269–282.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R.
1982. The distribution of facies in North America as exemplified in the Sacramento Mountains of New Mexico, p. 96–114. In
Bolton, K., Lane, H. R., and LeMone, D. V. (eds.), Symposium on the paleoenvironmental setting and distribution of Waulsortian facies. El Paso Geological Society and the University of Texas at El Paso.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., and De Keyser, T. L.
1980. Paleogeography of the late early Misssissippian (Tournaisian 3) in the central and southwestern United States, p. 149–162. In
Fouch, T. D. and Magathan, E. P. (eds.), Paleozoic paleogeography of the west-central United States. West-central United States Paleogeography Symposium 1, Rocky Mountain Section of the Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Lane, H. R., and Ormiston, A.
1982. Waulsortian facies, Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico: Guide for an international field Seminar, p. 115–174. In
Bolton, K., Lane, H. R., and LeMone, P. D. (eds.), Symposium on the paleoenvironmental setting and distribution of Waulsortian facies. El Paso Geological Society and the University of Texas at El Paso.Google Scholar
Levi-Setti, R.
1975. Trilobites. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 213 p.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., and Bowsher, A. L.
1941. Mississippian formations of the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 25:2107–2160.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., and Bowsher, A. L.
1949. Mississippian formations of southwestern New Mexico. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 60:1–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, F.
1847. On the fossil botany and zoology of the rocks associated with coal of Australia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 20:229–300.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H.
1865. Contributions to the palaeontology of Illinois and other western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 17:245–273.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H.
1870. Description of new species and genera of fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, p. 22–56.Google Scholar
Oehert, D. P.
1886
;
Étude sur quelques trilobites du groupe de Proetidae. Bulletin society Étude scientific, Angers
15:121–143.Google Scholar
Owens, R. M.
1986. The Carboniferous trilobites of Britain, Part 1. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society
570, 23 p.Google Scholar
Owens, R. M., and Hahn, G.
1993. Biogeography of Carboniferous and Permian trilobites. Geologica and Palaeontologica, 27:165–180.Google Scholar
Osmolska, H.
1970. Revision of non-cyrtosymbolinid trilobites from the Tourniasian-Namurian of Eurasia. Palaeontologica Polonica
23, 65 p.Google Scholar
Portlock, J. E.
1843. Report on the geology of the county of Londonderry, and parts of Tyrone and Fernanagh. XXI, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, 784 p.Google Scholar
Prantl, F., and PŘibyl, A.
1950. A revision of the Bohemian representatives of the family Otarionidae R. & E. Richter (Trilobitae). Czechoslovakia Statni Geologic Ustov Sbornik, 17:1–83.Google Scholar
Pray, L. C.
1961. Geology of the Sacramento Mountains escarpment, Otero County, New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Bulletin
35, 144 p.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C.
1942. Some new Carboniferous trilobites. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 9:649–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, M.
1966. Mississippian trilobites from northwestern Georgia. Journal of Paleontology, 40:1381–1384.Google Scholar
Richter, R., and Richter, E.
1937. Kulm-Trilobiten von Aprath und Herborn. Senckenbergian, 19:108–115.Google Scholar
Richter, R., and Richter, E.
1939. Ueber Namuropyge n.g. und die Basilutions der Trilobiten-Glatze. Bulletin du Musée royal d'Histoire naturelle de Belgique, 15:1–29.Google Scholar
Rowley, R. R.
1908. Geolology of Pike County, Missouri. Missouri Geological Survey, Bulletin
8, 122 p.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W.
1864. A monograph of British trilobites. Part 1. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, London, 17:1–83.Google Scholar
Shimer, H. W., and Shrock, R. R.
1944. Index fossils of North America. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 837 pp.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F., 1855. Description of a geological section on the Mississippi River from St. Louis to Commerce. Geological Survey of Missouri 1st and 2nd Annual Report, Part 2, p. 185–208.Google Scholar
Snider, L. C.
1915. Paleontology of the Chester Group in Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin
24:67–122.Google Scholar
Tilsley, J. W.
1977. Trilobites (Proetacea) from Visean reef limestones at Treak Cliff, Castleton, Derbyshire. Mercian Geologist, 6:155–170.Google Scholar
Tilsley, J. W.
1988. New data on Carboniferous (Dinantian) trilobites from the Peak District, Derbyshire, England. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society. 47:163–176.Google Scholar
Vogdes, A. W.
1887. The genera and species of North American trilobites. Annals of New York Academy of Science, 4:69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogdes, A. W.
1888. Description of two new species of Carboniferous trilobites. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 7:247–251.Google Scholar
Vogdes, A. W.
1891. On some new Sedalia trilobites. St. Louis Academy of Science Transactions, 5:615–618.Google Scholar
Vogdes, A. W.
1896. Notes on Palaeozoic Crustacea, No. 5, Carboniferous trilobites from Missouri. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science, 2:197–198.Google Scholar
Walter, O. T.
1924. Trilobites of Iowa and some related Paleozoic forms. Iowa Geological Survey Annual Report, 31:173–400.Google Scholar
Weller, S.
1898. Bibliographic index of North American Carboniferous invertebrates. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin
153, 653 pp.Google Scholar
Weller, S.
1909. Kinderhookian faunal studies; V. The fauna of the Fern Glen formation. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 20:265–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, J. M.
1936. Carboniferous trilobite genera. Journal of Paleontology, 10:704–714.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B.
1997. Morphology of the exoskeleton, p. 1–85. In
Whittington, H. B., Chatterton, B. D. E., Speyer, S. E., Fortey, R. A., Owens, R. M., Chang, W. T., Dean, W. T., Jell, P. A., Laurie, J. R., Palmer, A. R., Repina, L. N., Rushton, A. W. A., Shergold, J. H., Clarkson, E. N. K., Wilmont, N. V., and Kelly, S. R. A. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Trilobita, Part O, Revised. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A.
1979. A new species of the trilobite Brachymetopus from the Cuyahoga Formation (Lower Mississippian) of northeastern Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 53:221–223.Google Scholar
Winchell, A.
1863. Description of new species of fossils from the Marshall Group of Michigan, and its supposed equivalent, in other states; with notes on some fossils of the same age previously described. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 17:109–133.Google Scholar
Winchell, A.
1865. Description of new species of fossils from the Marshall Group of Michigan, and its supposed equivalent, in other states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, p. 109–133.Google Scholar