Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:18:57.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late Mississippian Productoid Brachiopods Inflatia, Keokukia, and Adairia, Ozark Region of Oklahoma and Arkansas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Mackenzie Gordon Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey (deceased) Washington, D.C. 20560 and
Thomas W. Henry
Affiliation:
Denver, Colorado 80225
Janis D. Treworgy
Affiliation:
Illinois Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois 61820

Abstract

Specimens of the Late Mississippian productoid genera Inflatia and Keokukia from northeastern Oklahoma and northwestern Arkansas, collected from the Boone and “Moorefield” Formations, Hindsville Limestone, and Fayetteville Shale, display morphologic similarities and differences that delineate species and determine their biostratigraphic ranges. Generic assignments are based primarily on internal characters. Systematic descriptions include seven species of Inflatia Muir-Wood and Cooper: Productus inflatus McChesney (the type species), P. cherokeensis Drake, P. clydensis Girty (figured herein for the first time and for which a lectotype is designated), four new species of Inflatia (I. cooperi, I. gracilis, I. pusilla, and I.? succincta), and one species of Keokukia (the type species for the genus, K. sulcata Carter). Also proposed and described is a new genus, Adairia, with its type species Productus (Marginifera) adairensis Drake. All these species of Inflatia, Keokukia, and Adairia have biostratigraphically restricted ranges within the Meramecian and Chesterian sequence in the Ozark region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1993, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A. T. Jr., and Lester, J. G. 1954. Contributions to the paleontology of northwest Georgia. Georgia Geological Survey Bulletin 62, 166 p.Google Scholar
Arnold, C. A., and Sadlick, Walter. 1962. A Mississippian flora from northeastern Utah and its faunal and stratigraphic relations. University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology Contributions, 17(11): 241263.Google Scholar
Boutwell, J. M. 1912. Geology and ore deposits of the Park City district, Utah, with contributions Woolsey, H. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 77, 231 p.Google Scholar
Branson, C. C. 1962. Type specimens of two Oklahoma Mississippian brachiopods. Oklahoma Geology Notes, 22(9):240244.Google Scholar
Butts, Charles. 1917. Descriptions and correlation of the Mississippian formations of western Kentucky. Kentucky Geological Survey, Mississippian Formations of Western Kentucky, 119 p.Google Scholar
Butts, Charles. 1926. Geology of Alabama—the Paleozoic rocks. Alabama Geological Survey Special Report 14:41230.Google Scholar
Butts, Charles. 1940 [1941]. Geology of the Appalachian Valley in Virginia—Pt. 1, Geologic text and illustrations (1940); Pt. 2, Fossil plates and descriptions (1941). Virginia Geological Survey Bulletin 52, Pt. 1, 568 p.; Pt. 2, 271 p.Google Scholar
Carter, J. L. 1990. New brachiopods (Brachiopoda: Articulata) from the late Osagean of the upper Mississippi Valley. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 59:219247.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1944. Phylum Brachiopoda, p. 277365. In Shimer, H. W. and Schrock, R. R. (eds.), Index Fossils of North America. John Wiley & Co., New York.Google Scholar
Croneis, C. G. 1930. Geology of the Arkansas Paleozoic area, with special reference to oil and gas possibilities. Arkansas Geological Survey Bulletin 3, 457 p.Google Scholar
Derby, O. A. 1874. On the Carboniferous Brachiopoda of Itaitúba, Rio Tapajos, Prov. of Pará. Bulletin of the Cornell University (Science), 1(2), 81 p.Google Scholar
Drake, N. F. 1897 [1898]. A geological reconnaissance of the coal fields of the Indian Territory. American Philosophical Society Proceedings, 36(156):326419. [Published in Dec. 1897; also issued with title page and note in 1898 by Leland Stanford, Jr., University, as Contributions to Biology from the Hopkins Seaside Laboratory, Palo Alto, California, p. 326–419.] Google Scholar
Duméril, A. M. C. 1806. Zoologie analytique ou methode naturelle de classification des animaux. Allais, Paris, 344 p.Google Scholar
Easton, W. H. 1943. The fauna of the Pitkin formation of Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology, 17:125154.Google Scholar
Easton, W. H. 1962. Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 348, 126 p.Google Scholar
Fredericks [Frederiks], George. 1933. Palaeontological notes, 4; On some upper Paleozoic brachiopods of Eurasia. Tcentralnogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskii Geologo-Razvedochnii Institut (TSNIGRI), Trudy (Leningrad), 2:2433. (In Russian with English resumé.)Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1903. The Carboniferous formations and faunas of Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 16, 546 p.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1904. On the Carboniferous fossils [in the Bisbee quadrangle, Arizona], p. 4654. In Ransome, E. L. (ed.), The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Bisbee Quadrangle, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 21.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1910. New genera and species of Carboniferous fossils from the Fayetteville shale of Arkansas. New York Academy of Science Annals, 20:189238.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1915. The fauna of the Batesville sandstone of northern Arkansas. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 593, 170 p.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1928. The fauna of the middle Boone near Batesville, Arkansas, p. 73103. In Mendenhall, W. C. (ed.), Shorter Contributions to General Geology. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 154.Google Scholar
Glick, E. E., Frezon, S. E., and Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1965. Witts Springs Formation of Morrow age in the Snowball quadrangle, north-central Arkansas. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1194-D, 16 p.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1964 [1965]. Carboniferous cephalopods of Arkansas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 460, 322 p.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1969. Revision of some of Girty's invertebrate fossils from the Fayetteville Shale (Mississippian) of Arkansas and Oklahoma—introduction. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 606:17.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1971. Carlinia, a Late Mississippian genus of Productidae from the western United States. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 3:257265.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1975. Brachiopoda of the Amsden Formation (Mississippian and Pennsylvanian) of Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 848-D, 86 p.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mackenzie Jr., and Henry, T. W. 1990. Marginovatia, a Mid-Carboniferous genus of linoproductid brachiopods. Journal of Paleontology, 64:532551.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mackenzie Jr., Henry, T. W., and Mamet, B. L. 1983. A sedimentologically continuous section across the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian boundary, Granite Mountain, U.S.A. Resumenes X Congreso Internacional de Estratigrafia y Geología del Carbonífero, Madrid, España, p. 361. [Also published in International Union of Geological Sciences Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, 4:17.] Google Scholar
Gordon, Mackenzie Jr., Henry, T. W., and Sutherland, P. K. 1982. Brachiopod zones delimiting the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian boundary in the United States, p. 6976. In International Union of Geological Sciences, Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, Symposium Proceedings: A Mid-Carboniferous Boundary. Leeds, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Gordon, Mackenzie Jr., and Kinney, D. M. 1944. Geologic map and structure sections of the Batesville district, Independence County, Arkansas, 1944. U.S. Geological Survey Oil and Gas Investigations Preliminary Map No. 12, text.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W., and Shimer, H. W. 1909. North American Index Fossils; Invertebrates. A. G. Seiler, New York, volume 1, 853 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1840. Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum, 42nd ed. Woodfall & Sons, London, 370 p.Google Scholar
Henry, T. W., and Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1985. Chesterian davidsoniacean and orthotetacean brachiopods, Ozark region of Arkansas and Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 49:3259.Google Scholar
Henry, T. W., and Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1992a. Middle and upper Chesterian brachiopod biostratigraphy, eastern Appalachians, Virginia and West Virginia, p. 121. In Sutherland, P. K. and Manger, W. L. (eds.), Recent Advances in Carboniferous Biostratigraphy—A Symposium. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 94.Google Scholar
Henry, T. W., and Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1992b. Upper Mississippian and Lower Pennsylvanian brachiopod biostratigraphy of the Chainman Shale and lower part of Ely Limestone, eastern Great Basin. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 24(6):292.Google Scholar
Hernon, R. M. 1935. The Paradise formation and its fauna. Journal of Paleontology, 9:653696.Google Scholar
Huffman, G. G., et al. 1958. Geology of the flanks of the Ozark uplift, northeastern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin 77, 281 p.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1869. An Introduction to the Classification of Animals. John Churchill & Sons, London, 147 p.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, Roman. 1914. Les brachipodes du carbonifère supérieur de Bolivie. Annales de Paleontologie, 9, 100 p. (In French.) Google Scholar
Lazarev, S. S. 1990. Evolutsia i sistema produktid [Evolution and systematics of the productids]. Akademia Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleontologicheskii Institut, 242:170 [40 pls.]. (In Russian; English translation by Mrs. Josephine W. Cooper.) Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L. 1975. Carboniferous foraminifera and algae of the Amsden Formation (Mississippian and Pennsylvanian) of Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 848-B, 18 p.Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L. 1976. An atlas of microfacies in Carboniferous carbonates of the Canadian Cordillera. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 255, 131 p.Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L., and Skipp, Betty. 1970a [1971]. Lower Carboniferous calcareous foraminifera—preliminary zonation and stratigraphic implications for the Mississippian of North America. Sixième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère, Compte Rendu, 3:11291146.Google Scholar
Mamet, B. L., and Skipp, Betty. 1970b. Preliminary foraminiferal correlations of early Carboniferous strata in the North American Cordillera. Colloque sur la Stratigraphie du Carbonifère; les Congrès et Colloques de l'université de Liège, 55:327348.Google Scholar
Mather, K. F. 1915. The fauna of the Morrow Group of Arkansas and Oklahoma. Bulletin Denison University [Ohio] Scientific Laboratories, 18:59284.Google Scholar
McCaleb, J. A., Quinn, J. H., and Furnish, W. M. 1964. The ammonoid family Girtyoceratidae in the southern Midcontinent. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 67:541.Google Scholar
McChesney, J. H. 1859 [1861?]. Descriptions of new species of fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the Western States. Chicago Academy of Science Transactions, 1, 76 p., p. 77–87 [latter pages, same title, dated 1861].Google Scholar
McChesney, J. H. 1865. Plates illustrating in part the new species of fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the Western States, and two new species noticed March, 1860, published April, 1865. Chicago Academy of Science Transactions. (Title page and Pls. 1–11, with explanations.) Google Scholar
McChesney, J. H. 1868. Descriptions of fossils from the Paleozoic rocks of the Western States. Chicago Academy of Science Transactions, 1(1):157.Google Scholar
McKnight, E. T., and Fischer, R. P. 1970. Geology and ore deposits of the Picher field, Oklahoma and Kansas. U.S. Geological Survey Processional Paper 588, 165 p.Google Scholar
Mendes, J. C. 1959. Chonetacea e Productacea Carboníferos da Amazônia. Bulletim Universidade de Sâo Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras, Geologia, 286(17), 83 p. (In Portuguese, English summary.) Google Scholar
Miller, A. M. 1919. The geology of Kentucky. Kentucky Department of Geology and Forestry, Series 5, Bulletin 2, 392 p.Google Scholar
Miller, L., and Kahn, J. S. 1962. Statistical Analysis in the Geological Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 483 p.Google Scholar
Miloradovich, B. V. 1945. [Some data on the morphology of the shells of Productidae]. Bulletin de L'Académie des Sciences de Union des Republiques Soviétiques Socialistes (Biologique), 4:485500. (In Russian; English summary.) Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. (ed.). 1965. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda 1 and 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 927 p.Google Scholar
Morse, W. C. 1930. Paleozoic rocks [of Mississippi]. Mississippi Geological Survey Bulletin 23, 212 p.Google Scholar
Morse, W. C. 1936. Tishomingo State Park, geologic history. Mississippi Geological Survey Bulletin, 32:736.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M. 1930. The classification of the British Carboniferous brachiopod subfamily Productinae. Annals of the Magazine of Natural History, Series 10, 5(25):100108.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M. 1965. Productidina, p. H439H510. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda, volume 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., and Cooper, G. A. 1960. Morphology, classification and life habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Geological Society of America Memoir 81, 447 p.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., and Williams, Alwyn. 1965. Strophomenida, p. H361H521. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise of Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, Brachiopoda, Volume 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Nelson, S. J. 1961. Mississippian faunas of western Canada. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 2, 39 p.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1934. Über Klitamboniten. Tarartu Universitatis (Dorpatensis), Acta and Commentationes, Series A, 26(3):1239. (In German.) Google Scholar
Rich, Mark. 1980. Carboniferous calcareous Foraminifera from northeastern Alabama, south-central Tennessee, and northwestern Georgia. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 18, 62 p.Google Scholar
Sadlick, Walter. 1962. Systematic descriptions: the fauna, p. 255257. In Arnold, C. A. and Sadlick, Walter (eds.), A Mississippian Flora from Northeastern Utah and its Faunal and Stratigraphic Relations. University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology Contributions, 17(11):255–257.Google Scholar
Sando, W. J., Mamet, B. L., and Dutro, J. T. Jr. 1969. Carboniferous megafaunal and microfaunal zonation in the northern Cordillera of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 613-A, 29 p.Google Scholar
Sarycheva [Sarytcheva], T. G. 1949. [Morphology, ecology, and evolution of the Carboniferous productids of the Moscow Basin (Genera Dictyoclostus, Pugilis, and Antiquatonia)]. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleontologicheskii Institut, Moscow, 18, 304 p. (In Russian with English summary.) Google Scholar
Sarycheva [Sarytcheva], T. G. 1977. Nadsymyecvo Productacea Pozdelapaleozoiskikh produktids Sibrir i Arktiki [Superfamily Productacea; late Paleozoic Productidae of the Siberian and Arctic]. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleontologicheskii Institut, Moscow, 161:65126. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Sarycheva [Sarytcheva], T. G., and Sokolskaya, A. N. 1952. Opredelitel Paleozoiskikh brakhiopod Podmoskovony Kotliviny [Index of Paleozoic Brachiopoda of the Moscow Basin]. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskii Institut, Trudy, 38:1307. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Saunders, W. G., Manger, W. L., and Gordon, Mackenzie Jr. 1977. Upper Mississippian and Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian ammonoid biostratigraphy of northern Arkansas, p. 117137. In Sutherland, P. K. and Manger, W. L. (eds.), Upper Chesterian–Morrowan Stratigraphy and the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian Boundary in Northeastern Oklahoma and Northwestern Arkansas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 18.Google Scholar
Snider, L. C. 1915. The paleontology of the Chester group in Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 24:67122.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. S., and Rohlf, F. J. 1969. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W. H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco, 776 p.Google Scholar
Sowerby, James. 1821 [1821–1822]. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, volume 4. B. Meredith, London, 113 p.Google Scholar
Stehli, F. G. 1954. Lower Leonardian Brachiopoda of the Sierra Diablo. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 105:263358.Google Scholar
Sutherland, P. K., and Harlow, F. H. 1973. Pennsylvanian brachiopods and biostratigraphy in southern Sangre de Cristo Mountains, New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Memoir 27, 173 p.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. H. 1938. Taxonomy of Mississippian Productidae. Journal of Paleontology, 12:537569.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1917. The formations of the Chester series in western Kentucky and their correlates elsewhere. In Mississippian Formations of Western Kentucky, Part 2. Kentucky Geological Survey, Series 5, 272 p.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. H. 1884 [1882–1885]. Salt Range fossils; Pts. 1–5. Productus Limestone fossils [nos. 3–5, Brachiopoda]. Palaeontologica Indica, Memoir Series 13, 1(1–5):329–770, pls. 25–86 [no. 1, p. 329–390, pls. 25–28, 1882; no. 2, p. 391–435, pls. 29–49, 1883; no. 3, p. 547–610, pls. 50–57, 1884; no. 4, p. 611–728, pls. 58–81, 1884; no. 5, p. 729–770, pls. 82–86, 1885].Google Scholar
Weller, J. M. 1931. Mississippian fauna. Kentucky Geological Survey, Series 6, 36:249290.Google Scholar
Weller, Stuart. 1914. The Mississippian Brachiopoda of the Mississippi Valley basin. Illinois Geological Survey Monograph 1, 508 p.Google Scholar
Williams, Alwyn, et al. 1965. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda 1 and 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 927 p.Google Scholar